Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum Brasiliensis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.1080/00103624.2020.1862165 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1862165 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210587 |
Resumo: | The dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) has significant economic importance in Brazil and is one of the most important sources of income, especially for small producers. This study aimed to evaluate the response of dry bean to different nitrogen (N) sources, using a completely randomized design, with five replicates. Treatments comprised five N sources [ammonium sulfate [(NH4)(2)SO4], calcium nitrate [Ca(NO3)(2)], potassium nitrate (KNO3), ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3), and urea] applied at 300 mg kg(-1) N plus three additional treatments (inoculation with Rhizobium tropici, inoculation with R. tropici plus Azospirillum brasiliensis, and the control without N and inoculation). The yield components [grain yield (GY), shoot dry weight yield (SDWY), number of pods per pot (NPP), number of grains per pot (NGPt), pod weight (PW), and number of grains per pod (NGP)], and physiological components [water use efficiency (WUE), photosynthetic rate (A), and stomatal conductance (g(s))] were evaluated. Inoculation with R. tropici and R. tropici plus A. brasiliensis did not induce significant effects on yield components when compared to those of the control. (NH4)(2)SO4 did not change the performance of most quantified yield components, whereas NH4NO3 showed increases in GY, SDWY, NPP, NGP, and PW as well as in WUE. KNO3 and Ca(NO3)(2) resulted in increased performance of GY, SDWY, NPP, A, and g(s) compared to that in the control treatment and the isolated inoculant and its combination with A. brasiliensis. The amide source via urea showed the greatest increase in GY, with 56.5% more than that in the control. |
id |
UNSP_88abe333fc1065392a30eae42410278a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/210587 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum BrasiliensisPhaseolus vulgarisnitrogen fertilizersRhizobium tropiciAzospirillum brasiliensisgrain yieldThe dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) has significant economic importance in Brazil and is one of the most important sources of income, especially for small producers. This study aimed to evaluate the response of dry bean to different nitrogen (N) sources, using a completely randomized design, with five replicates. Treatments comprised five N sources [ammonium sulfate [(NH4)(2)SO4], calcium nitrate [Ca(NO3)(2)], potassium nitrate (KNO3), ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3), and urea] applied at 300 mg kg(-1) N plus three additional treatments (inoculation with Rhizobium tropici, inoculation with R. tropici plus Azospirillum brasiliensis, and the control without N and inoculation). The yield components [grain yield (GY), shoot dry weight yield (SDWY), number of pods per pot (NPP), number of grains per pot (NGPt), pod weight (PW), and number of grains per pod (NGP)], and physiological components [water use efficiency (WUE), photosynthetic rate (A), and stomatal conductance (g(s))] were evaluated. Inoculation with R. tropici and R. tropici plus A. brasiliensis did not induce significant effects on yield components when compared to those of the control. (NH4)(2)SO4 did not change the performance of most quantified yield components, whereas NH4NO3 showed increases in GY, SDWY, NPP, NGP, and PW as well as in WUE. KNO3 and Ca(NO3)(2) resulted in increased performance of GY, SDWY, NPP, A, and g(s) compared to that in the control treatment and the isolated inoculant and its combination with A. brasiliensis. The amide source via urea showed the greatest increase in GY, with 56.5% more than that in the control.Londrina State Univ UEL, Dept Crop Sci, Londrina, Parana, BrazilEmbrapa Soja, Dept Mineral Plant Nutr, Rodovia Carlos Joao Str S-N, Londrina, Parana, BrazilUniv Pitagoras Unopar, Dept Microbiol, Arapongas, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Forage, Aracatuba, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Forage, Aracatuba, BrazilTaylor & Francis IncUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Univ Pitagoras UnoparUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Vieira, Nilson DarlanMoreira, AdonisMoraes, Larissa A. C.Cerezini, PaulaSoares Filho, Cecilio Viega [UNESP]Cardoso, Bruna Miguel2021-06-25T22:38:51Z2021-06-25T22:38:51Z2020-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article686-694http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1862165Communications In Soil Science And Plant Analysis. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Inc, v. 52, n. 7, p. 686-694, 2021.0010-3624http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21058710.1080/00103624.2020.1862165WOS:000599577700001Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCommunications In Soil Science And Plant Analysisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-04T19:15:25Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/210587Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-04T19:15:25Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum Brasiliensis |
title |
Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum Brasiliensis |
spellingShingle |
Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum Brasiliensis Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum Brasiliensis Vieira, Nilson Darlan Phaseolus vulgaris nitrogen fertilizers Rhizobium tropici Azospirillum brasiliensis grain yield Vieira, Nilson Darlan Phaseolus vulgaris nitrogen fertilizers Rhizobium tropici Azospirillum brasiliensis grain yield |
title_short |
Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum Brasiliensis |
title_full |
Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum Brasiliensis |
title_fullStr |
Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum Brasiliensis Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum Brasiliensis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum Brasiliensis Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum Brasiliensis |
title_sort |
Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum Brasiliensis |
author |
Vieira, Nilson Darlan |
author_facet |
Vieira, Nilson Darlan Vieira, Nilson Darlan Moreira, Adonis Moraes, Larissa A. C. Cerezini, Paula Soares Filho, Cecilio Viega [UNESP] Cardoso, Bruna Miguel Moreira, Adonis Moraes, Larissa A. C. Cerezini, Paula Soares Filho, Cecilio Viega [UNESP] Cardoso, Bruna Miguel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Moreira, Adonis Moraes, Larissa A. C. Cerezini, Paula Soares Filho, Cecilio Viega [UNESP] Cardoso, Bruna Miguel |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) Univ Pitagoras Unopar Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vieira, Nilson Darlan Moreira, Adonis Moraes, Larissa A. C. Cerezini, Paula Soares Filho, Cecilio Viega [UNESP] Cardoso, Bruna Miguel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Phaseolus vulgaris nitrogen fertilizers Rhizobium tropici Azospirillum brasiliensis grain yield |
topic |
Phaseolus vulgaris nitrogen fertilizers Rhizobium tropici Azospirillum brasiliensis grain yield |
description |
The dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) has significant economic importance in Brazil and is one of the most important sources of income, especially for small producers. This study aimed to evaluate the response of dry bean to different nitrogen (N) sources, using a completely randomized design, with five replicates. Treatments comprised five N sources [ammonium sulfate [(NH4)(2)SO4], calcium nitrate [Ca(NO3)(2)], potassium nitrate (KNO3), ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3), and urea] applied at 300 mg kg(-1) N plus three additional treatments (inoculation with Rhizobium tropici, inoculation with R. tropici plus Azospirillum brasiliensis, and the control without N and inoculation). The yield components [grain yield (GY), shoot dry weight yield (SDWY), number of pods per pot (NPP), number of grains per pot (NGPt), pod weight (PW), and number of grains per pod (NGP)], and physiological components [water use efficiency (WUE), photosynthetic rate (A), and stomatal conductance (g(s))] were evaluated. Inoculation with R. tropici and R. tropici plus A. brasiliensis did not induce significant effects on yield components when compared to those of the control. (NH4)(2)SO4 did not change the performance of most quantified yield components, whereas NH4NO3 showed increases in GY, SDWY, NPP, NGP, and PW as well as in WUE. KNO3 and Ca(NO3)(2) resulted in increased performance of GY, SDWY, NPP, A, and g(s) compared to that in the control treatment and the isolated inoculant and its combination with A. brasiliensis. The amide source via urea showed the greatest increase in GY, with 56.5% more than that in the control. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-18 2021-06-25T22:38:51Z 2021-06-25T22:38:51Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1862165 Communications In Soil Science And Plant Analysis. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Inc, v. 52, n. 7, p. 686-694, 2021. 0010-3624 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210587 10.1080/00103624.2020.1862165 WOS:000599577700001 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1862165 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210587 |
identifier_str_mv |
Communications In Soil Science And Plant Analysis. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Inc, v. 52, n. 7, p. 686-694, 2021. 0010-3624 10.1080/00103624.2020.1862165 WOS:000599577700001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Communications In Soil Science And Plant Analysis |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
686-694 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1822183589852217344 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1080/00103624.2020.1862165 |