Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reis, Bárbara A. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Fais, Laiza MG. [UNESP], Ribeiro, Ana L.R. [UNESP], Vaz, Luis G. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04762
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199305
Resumo: Objectives: Development of a new generation of stable β alloy, free of aluminum or vanadium and with better biological and mechanical compatibility and evaluate the surface properties of Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta after anodization in hydrofluoric acid, followed by deposition of different electrolyte concentrations of magnesium particles by micro arc-oxidation treatment. Methods: Disks were anodized in hydrofluoric acid. After this first anodization, the specimens received the deposition of magnesium using different concentration (8.5% and 12.5%) and times (30s and 60s). The surface morphology was assessed using scanning electron microscopy, and the chemical composition was assessed using energy dispersive x ray spectroscopy. The surface free energy was measured from the contact angle, and the mean roughness was measured using a digital profilometer. Results: Anodization in hydrofluoric acid provided the formation of nanotubes in both alloys, and the best concentration of magnesium considered was 8.5%, as it was the condition where the magnesium was incorporated without covering the morphology of the nanotubes. X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy showed magnesium incorporation in all conditions. The average roughness was increased in the Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta alloy. Conclusions: It was concluded that anodizing could be used to deposit magnesium on the surfaces of Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta nanotubes, with better results obtained in samples with magnesium concentration in 8.5% and the process favored the roughness in the Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta group.
id UNSP_899ae4cfa5c70f2fda54cfffc7a389ba
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199305
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizingAlloysDental implantsDentistryMagnesiumMaterials scienceMetallurgical engineeringNanotechnologyNanotubesTitaniumObjectives: Development of a new generation of stable β alloy, free of aluminum or vanadium and with better biological and mechanical compatibility and evaluate the surface properties of Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta after anodization in hydrofluoric acid, followed by deposition of different electrolyte concentrations of magnesium particles by micro arc-oxidation treatment. Methods: Disks were anodized in hydrofluoric acid. After this first anodization, the specimens received the deposition of magnesium using different concentration (8.5% and 12.5%) and times (30s and 60s). The surface morphology was assessed using scanning electron microscopy, and the chemical composition was assessed using energy dispersive x ray spectroscopy. The surface free energy was measured from the contact angle, and the mean roughness was measured using a digital profilometer. Results: Anodization in hydrofluoric acid provided the formation of nanotubes in both alloys, and the best concentration of magnesium considered was 8.5%, as it was the condition where the magnesium was incorporated without covering the morphology of the nanotubes. X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy showed magnesium incorporation in all conditions. The average roughness was increased in the Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta alloy. Conclusions: It was concluded that anodizing could be used to deposit magnesium on the surfaces of Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta nanotubes, with better results obtained in samples with magnesium concentration in 8.5% and the process favored the roughness in the Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta group.Materials Science; Nanotechnology; Metallurgical Engineering; Dentistry; Alloys; Titanium; Nanotubes; Magnesium; Dental Implants.Department of Diagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry, São PauloDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of DentistryDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry, São PauloDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of DentistryUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Reis, Bárbara A. [UNESP]Fais, Laiza MG. [UNESP]Ribeiro, Ana L.R. [UNESP]Vaz, Luis G. [UNESP]2020-12-12T01:36:14Z2020-12-12T01:36:14Z2020-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04762Heliyon, v. 6, n. 8, 2020.2405-8440http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19930510.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e047622-s2.0-85089907274Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengHeliyoninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T07:00:44Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199305Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T07:00:44Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
title Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
spellingShingle Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
Reis, Bárbara A. [UNESP]
Alloys
Dental implants
Dentistry
Magnesium
Materials science
Metallurgical engineering
Nanotechnology
Nanotubes
Titanium
title_short Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
title_full Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
title_fullStr Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
title_sort Comparison of Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–6Al–4V hydrofluoric acid/magnesium-doped surfaces obtained by anodizing
author Reis, Bárbara A. [UNESP]
author_facet Reis, Bárbara A. [UNESP]
Fais, Laiza MG. [UNESP]
Ribeiro, Ana L.R. [UNESP]
Vaz, Luis G. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Fais, Laiza MG. [UNESP]
Ribeiro, Ana L.R. [UNESP]
Vaz, Luis G. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reis, Bárbara A. [UNESP]
Fais, Laiza MG. [UNESP]
Ribeiro, Ana L.R. [UNESP]
Vaz, Luis G. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alloys
Dental implants
Dentistry
Magnesium
Materials science
Metallurgical engineering
Nanotechnology
Nanotubes
Titanium
topic Alloys
Dental implants
Dentistry
Magnesium
Materials science
Metallurgical engineering
Nanotechnology
Nanotubes
Titanium
description Objectives: Development of a new generation of stable β alloy, free of aluminum or vanadium and with better biological and mechanical compatibility and evaluate the surface properties of Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta after anodization in hydrofluoric acid, followed by deposition of different electrolyte concentrations of magnesium particles by micro arc-oxidation treatment. Methods: Disks were anodized in hydrofluoric acid. After this first anodization, the specimens received the deposition of magnesium using different concentration (8.5% and 12.5%) and times (30s and 60s). The surface morphology was assessed using scanning electron microscopy, and the chemical composition was assessed using energy dispersive x ray spectroscopy. The surface free energy was measured from the contact angle, and the mean roughness was measured using a digital profilometer. Results: Anodization in hydrofluoric acid provided the formation of nanotubes in both alloys, and the best concentration of magnesium considered was 8.5%, as it was the condition where the magnesium was incorporated without covering the morphology of the nanotubes. X-ray dispersive energy spectroscopy showed magnesium incorporation in all conditions. The average roughness was increased in the Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta alloy. Conclusions: It was concluded that anodizing could be used to deposit magnesium on the surfaces of Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta nanotubes, with better results obtained in samples with magnesium concentration in 8.5% and the process favored the roughness in the Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta group.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T01:36:14Z
2020-12-12T01:36:14Z
2020-08-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04762
Heliyon, v. 6, n. 8, 2020.
2405-8440
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199305
10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04762
2-s2.0-85089907274
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04762
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199305
identifier_str_mv Heliyon, v. 6, n. 8, 2020.
2405-8440
10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04762
2-s2.0-85089907274
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Heliyon
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803650308646109184