Is international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.1590/1807-01912017231261 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912017231261 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169781 |
Resumo: | Over the last 40 years, investigations have shown the discipline of International Relations to reproduce the American influence on its methods, paradigms, and institutional dynamics. This article explores the case for the Latin American community, based on the survey data from the Teaching, Research, and International Politics project (TRIP) 2014 developed by the Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations of the College of William and Mary, Virginia (USA). TRIP evaluated International Relations communities in 32 countries around the world. The article aims to answer two main questions: (i) is American influence still dominant over epistemological, methodological, paradigmatic, and institutional representative terms in Latin American International Relations communities, as has been considered in the past? (ii) Is there in the region any contestation to this supposed influence? Primarily, the present article shows an affirmative answer for the first issue. Therefore, and most importantly, the data analysis shows upcoming local pressures rooted in American influence, especially on its epistemic and paradigmatic terms. The data strengthens the miscegenation tendency on its epistemological and paradigmatic aspects, which underlines a lack of consensus over the structure of American dominance over the discipline of International Relations in Latin America, especially if one observes the most numerous and structured group in the region: The Brazilian International Relations community. |
id |
UNSP_89cc83d3eccc6dc24f0830263731216a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169781 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Is international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America?American influenceInternational relationsLatin AmericaTRIPOver the last 40 years, investigations have shown the discipline of International Relations to reproduce the American influence on its methods, paradigms, and institutional dynamics. This article explores the case for the Latin American community, based on the survey data from the Teaching, Research, and International Politics project (TRIP) 2014 developed by the Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations of the College of William and Mary, Virginia (USA). TRIP evaluated International Relations communities in 32 countries around the world. The article aims to answer two main questions: (i) is American influence still dominant over epistemological, methodological, paradigmatic, and institutional representative terms in Latin American International Relations communities, as has been considered in the past? (ii) Is there in the region any contestation to this supposed influence? Primarily, the present article shows an affirmative answer for the first issue. Therefore, and most importantly, the data analysis shows upcoming local pressures rooted in American influence, especially on its epistemic and paradigmatic terms. The data strengthens the miscegenation tendency on its epistemological and paradigmatic aspects, which underlines a lack of consensus over the structure of American dominance over the discipline of International Relations in Latin America, especially if one observes the most numerous and structured group in the region: The Brazilian International Relations community.Department DCP-USP Institute of International Relations IRI-USP Director of the Center for Research in International Relations NUPRI-USP University of São PauloCenter for Research in International Relations NUPRI-USP Researcher at the Institute of International Economics Studies IEEI-UNESP Anhembi Morumbi University-UAM University Center FECAPCenter for Research in International Relations NUPRI-USP Researcher at the Institute of International Economics Studies IEEI-UNESP Anhembi Morumbi University-UAM University Center FECAPUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Duarte Villa, Rafael A.de Souza Pimenta, Marilia Carolina B. [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:47:34Z2018-12-11T16:47:34Z2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article261-288application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912017231261Opiniao Publica, v. 23, n. 1, p. 261-288, 2017.1807-01910104-6276http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16978110.1590/1807-01912017231261S0104-627620170001002612-s2.0-85019967442S0104-62762017000100261.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengOpiniao Publica0,573info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-23T07:12:05Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169781Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:47:36.312359Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America? |
title |
Is international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America? |
spellingShingle |
Is international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America? Is international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America? Duarte Villa, Rafael A. American influence International relations Latin America TRIP Duarte Villa, Rafael A. American influence International relations Latin America TRIP |
title_short |
Is international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America? |
title_full |
Is international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America? |
title_fullStr |
Is international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America? Is international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America? Is international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America? |
title_sort |
Is international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America? |
author |
Duarte Villa, Rafael A. |
author_facet |
Duarte Villa, Rafael A. Duarte Villa, Rafael A. de Souza Pimenta, Marilia Carolina B. [UNESP] de Souza Pimenta, Marilia Carolina B. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Souza Pimenta, Marilia Carolina B. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Duarte Villa, Rafael A. de Souza Pimenta, Marilia Carolina B. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
American influence International relations Latin America TRIP |
topic |
American influence International relations Latin America TRIP |
description |
Over the last 40 years, investigations have shown the discipline of International Relations to reproduce the American influence on its methods, paradigms, and institutional dynamics. This article explores the case for the Latin American community, based on the survey data from the Teaching, Research, and International Politics project (TRIP) 2014 developed by the Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations of the College of William and Mary, Virginia (USA). TRIP evaluated International Relations communities in 32 countries around the world. The article aims to answer two main questions: (i) is American influence still dominant over epistemological, methodological, paradigmatic, and institutional representative terms in Latin American International Relations communities, as has been considered in the past? (ii) Is there in the region any contestation to this supposed influence? Primarily, the present article shows an affirmative answer for the first issue. Therefore, and most importantly, the data analysis shows upcoming local pressures rooted in American influence, especially on its epistemic and paradigmatic terms. The data strengthens the miscegenation tendency on its epistemological and paradigmatic aspects, which underlines a lack of consensus over the structure of American dominance over the discipline of International Relations in Latin America, especially if one observes the most numerous and structured group in the region: The Brazilian International Relations community. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-01 2018-12-11T16:47:34Z 2018-12-11T16:47:34Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912017231261 Opiniao Publica, v. 23, n. 1, p. 261-288, 2017. 1807-0191 0104-6276 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169781 10.1590/1807-01912017231261 S0104-62762017000100261 2-s2.0-85019967442 S0104-62762017000100261.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912017231261 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169781 |
identifier_str_mv |
Opiniao Publica, v. 23, n. 1, p. 261-288, 2017. 1807-0191 0104-6276 10.1590/1807-01912017231261 S0104-62762017000100261 2-s2.0-85019967442 S0104-62762017000100261.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Opiniao Publica 0,573 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
261-288 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822228624950951936 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-01912017231261 |