Comparable efficacy of adapalene 0.3% gel and tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for cutaneous photoaging
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3320 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164591 |
Resumo: | Background: Adapalene has been previously evaluated as a treatment for actinic keratosis (AK) and solar lentigines and shown to improve signs of photoaging. Objectives: To evaluate whether adapalene 0.3% gel is non-inferior to tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for photoaged skin. Materials & Methods: An investigator-blinded, parallel-group comparison study was conducted in Brazil. Subjects were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive, once daily, adapalene 0.3% gel or tretinoin 0.05% cream. Subjects were evaluated at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24, based on clinical signs of cutaneous photoaging, histopathological and digital morphometric findings, as well as safety and tolerability. Results: A comparison of clinical efficacy showed that both treatments did not differ significantly regarding clinical evaluation of the following criteria: global cutaneous photoaging, periorbital wrinkles, ephelides/melanosis, forehead wrinkles, and AK. Conclusion: Adapalene 0.3% gel showed non-inferior efficacy to tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for photoaged skin, with a similar safety profile. Adapalene 0.3% gel may therefore be considered a safe and effective option for the treatment of mild or moderate photoaging. |
id |
UNSP_8a56863a71b128ae8ebbfe502ee29b7b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/164591 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparable efficacy of adapalene 0.3% gel and tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for cutaneous photoagingadapalenemelanosisphotoagingretinoidtretinoinwrinklesBackground: Adapalene has been previously evaluated as a treatment for actinic keratosis (AK) and solar lentigines and shown to improve signs of photoaging. Objectives: To evaluate whether adapalene 0.3% gel is non-inferior to tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for photoaged skin. Materials & Methods: An investigator-blinded, parallel-group comparison study was conducted in Brazil. Subjects were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive, once daily, adapalene 0.3% gel or tretinoin 0.05% cream. Subjects were evaluated at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24, based on clinical signs of cutaneous photoaging, histopathological and digital morphometric findings, as well as safety and tolerability. Results: A comparison of clinical efficacy showed that both treatments did not differ significantly regarding clinical evaluation of the following criteria: global cutaneous photoaging, periorbital wrinkles, ephelides/melanosis, forehead wrinkles, and AK. Conclusion: Adapalene 0.3% gel showed non-inferior efficacy to tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for photoaged skin, with a similar safety profile. Adapalene 0.3% gel may therefore be considered a safe and effective option for the treatment of mild or moderate photoaging.GaldermaUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Dermatol, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Translat Med Postgrad Program, Sao Paulo, BrazilDona Libania Dermatol Ctr, Dept Hlth, Fortaleza, Ceara, BrazilUniv Fed Parana, Curitiba, Parana, BrazilMed Sci Coll, Dept Dermatol, Belo Horizonte, MG, BrazilMed Residency Santa Casa, Santa Casa, MG, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, FMB, Dept Dermatol, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, FMB, Dept Dermatol, Sao Paulo, BrazilJohn Libbey Eurotext LtdUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Dona Libania Dermatol CtrUniv Fed ParanaMed Sci CollMed Residency Santa CasaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Bagatin, EdileiaGoncalves, Heitor de SaSato, MauricioCosta Almeida, Luiz MauricioMiot, Helio Amante [UNESP]2018-11-26T17:55:13Z2018-11-26T17:55:13Z2018-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article343-350application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3320European Journal Of Dermatology. Montrouge: John Libbey Eurotext Ltd, v. 28, n. 3, p. 343-350, 2018.1167-1122http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16459110.1684/ejd.2018.3320WOS:000443277100007WOS000443277100007.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean Journal Of Dermatology0,777info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-14T18:45:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/164591Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-14T18:45:33Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparable efficacy of adapalene 0.3% gel and tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for cutaneous photoaging |
title |
Comparable efficacy of adapalene 0.3% gel and tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for cutaneous photoaging |
spellingShingle |
Comparable efficacy of adapalene 0.3% gel and tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for cutaneous photoaging Bagatin, Edileia adapalene melanosis photoaging retinoid tretinoin wrinkles |
title_short |
Comparable efficacy of adapalene 0.3% gel and tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for cutaneous photoaging |
title_full |
Comparable efficacy of adapalene 0.3% gel and tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for cutaneous photoaging |
title_fullStr |
Comparable efficacy of adapalene 0.3% gel and tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for cutaneous photoaging |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparable efficacy of adapalene 0.3% gel and tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for cutaneous photoaging |
title_sort |
Comparable efficacy of adapalene 0.3% gel and tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for cutaneous photoaging |
author |
Bagatin, Edileia |
author_facet |
Bagatin, Edileia Goncalves, Heitor de Sa Sato, Mauricio Costa Almeida, Luiz Mauricio Miot, Helio Amante [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Goncalves, Heitor de Sa Sato, Mauricio Costa Almeida, Luiz Mauricio Miot, Helio Amante [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Dona Libania Dermatol Ctr Univ Fed Parana Med Sci Coll Med Residency Santa Casa Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bagatin, Edileia Goncalves, Heitor de Sa Sato, Mauricio Costa Almeida, Luiz Mauricio Miot, Helio Amante [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
adapalene melanosis photoaging retinoid tretinoin wrinkles |
topic |
adapalene melanosis photoaging retinoid tretinoin wrinkles |
description |
Background: Adapalene has been previously evaluated as a treatment for actinic keratosis (AK) and solar lentigines and shown to improve signs of photoaging. Objectives: To evaluate whether adapalene 0.3% gel is non-inferior to tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for photoaged skin. Materials & Methods: An investigator-blinded, parallel-group comparison study was conducted in Brazil. Subjects were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive, once daily, adapalene 0.3% gel or tretinoin 0.05% cream. Subjects were evaluated at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24, based on clinical signs of cutaneous photoaging, histopathological and digital morphometric findings, as well as safety and tolerability. Results: A comparison of clinical efficacy showed that both treatments did not differ significantly regarding clinical evaluation of the following criteria: global cutaneous photoaging, periorbital wrinkles, ephelides/melanosis, forehead wrinkles, and AK. Conclusion: Adapalene 0.3% gel showed non-inferior efficacy to tretinoin 0.05% cream as treatment for photoaged skin, with a similar safety profile. Adapalene 0.3% gel may therefore be considered a safe and effective option for the treatment of mild or moderate photoaging. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-26T17:55:13Z 2018-11-26T17:55:13Z 2018-05-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3320 European Journal Of Dermatology. Montrouge: John Libbey Eurotext Ltd, v. 28, n. 3, p. 343-350, 2018. 1167-1122 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164591 10.1684/ejd.2018.3320 WOS:000443277100007 WOS000443277100007.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3320 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164591 |
identifier_str_mv |
European Journal Of Dermatology. Montrouge: John Libbey Eurotext Ltd, v. 28, n. 3, p. 343-350, 2018. 1167-1122 10.1684/ejd.2018.3320 WOS:000443277100007 WOS000443277100007.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
European Journal Of Dermatology 0,777 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
343-350 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Libbey Eurotext Ltd |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Libbey Eurotext Ltd |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128123384889344 |