In vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andreotti, Agda Marobo [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: De Sousa, Cecília Alves [UNESP], Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP], da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas [UNESP], Duque, Cristiane [UNESP], Moreno, Amália, Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_50_18
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176404
Resumo: Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of surface roughness in biofilm formation of four microorganisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Candida albicans) on acrylic resin surface of ocular prostheses. Materials and Methods: Acrylic resin samples were divided into six groups according to polishing: Group 1200S (1200 grit + silica solution); Group 1200; Group 800; Group 400; Group 120 and Group unpolished. Surface roughness was measured using a profilometer and surface images obtained with atomic force microscopy. Microbial growth was evaluated after 4, 24, and 48 hours of incubation by counting colony-forming units. Statistical Analysis Used: For roughness, it was performed 1-way ANOVA and parametric Tukey test α5% (P ≤ 0.05). For CFU data found, it was applied Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: Group 120 and 400 presented the highest roughness values. For S. epidermidis and S. aureus, Group 1200S presented the lowest values of microbial growth. For E. faecalis at 4 hour, microbial growth was not observed. C. albicans did not adhere to the acrylic resin. Except for Group 1200S, different surface roughnesses did not statistically interfere with microbial adhesion and growth on acrylic surfaces of ocular prostheses. Conclusions: The roughness did not interfere with the microbial adhesion of the microorganisms evaluated. The use of silica decreases significantly microbial growth.
id UNSP_8ada73b450de4912da066b77b25b9adf
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/176404
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling In vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesisAcrylic resinBiofilmMicrobial adhesionOcular prosthesisObjective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of surface roughness in biofilm formation of four microorganisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Candida albicans) on acrylic resin surface of ocular prostheses. Materials and Methods: Acrylic resin samples were divided into six groups according to polishing: Group 1200S (1200 grit + silica solution); Group 1200; Group 800; Group 400; Group 120 and Group unpolished. Surface roughness was measured using a profilometer and surface images obtained with atomic force microscopy. Microbial growth was evaluated after 4, 24, and 48 hours of incubation by counting colony-forming units. Statistical Analysis Used: For roughness, it was performed 1-way ANOVA and parametric Tukey test α5% (P ≤ 0.05). For CFU data found, it was applied Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: Group 120 and 400 presented the highest roughness values. For S. epidermidis and S. aureus, Group 1200S presented the lowest values of microbial growth. For E. faecalis at 4 hour, microbial growth was not observed. C. albicans did not adhere to the acrylic resin. Except for Group 1200S, different surface roughnesses did not statistically interfere with microbial adhesion and growth on acrylic surfaces of ocular prostheses. Conclusions: The roughness did not interfere with the microbial adhesion of the microorganisms evaluated. The use of silica decreases significantly microbial growth.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Bucal Oncology Center Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Department of Pediatric Dentistry Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Department of Oral Surgery and Pathology School of Dentistry Federal University of Minas GeraisDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Bucal Oncology Center Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Department of Pediatric Dentistry Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)Andreotti, Agda Marobo [UNESP]De Sousa, Cecília Alves [UNESP]Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas [UNESP]Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]Moreno, AmáliaDos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:20:40Z2018-12-11T17:20:40Z2018-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article176-183application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_50_18European Journal of Dentistry, v. 12, n. 2, p. 176-183, 2018.1305-74641305-7456http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17640410.4103/ejd.ejd_50_182-s2.0-850480912152-s2.0-85048091215.pdf971988381487258256518745094936170000-0002-2575-279XScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean Journal of Dentistry0,7490,749info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T17:57:01Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/176404Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T17:57:01Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesis
title In vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesis
spellingShingle In vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesis
Andreotti, Agda Marobo [UNESP]
Acrylic resin
Biofilm
Microbial adhesion
Ocular prosthesis
title_short In vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesis
title_full In vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesis
title_fullStr In vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed In vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesis
title_sort In vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesis
author Andreotti, Agda Marobo [UNESP]
author_facet Andreotti, Agda Marobo [UNESP]
De Sousa, Cecília Alves [UNESP]
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas [UNESP]
Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]
Moreno, Amália
Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 De Sousa, Cecília Alves [UNESP]
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas [UNESP]
Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]
Moreno, Amália
Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andreotti, Agda Marobo [UNESP]
De Sousa, Cecília Alves [UNESP]
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas [UNESP]
Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]
Moreno, Amália
Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acrylic resin
Biofilm
Microbial adhesion
Ocular prosthesis
topic Acrylic resin
Biofilm
Microbial adhesion
Ocular prosthesis
description Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of surface roughness in biofilm formation of four microorganisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Candida albicans) on acrylic resin surface of ocular prostheses. Materials and Methods: Acrylic resin samples were divided into six groups according to polishing: Group 1200S (1200 grit + silica solution); Group 1200; Group 800; Group 400; Group 120 and Group unpolished. Surface roughness was measured using a profilometer and surface images obtained with atomic force microscopy. Microbial growth was evaluated after 4, 24, and 48 hours of incubation by counting colony-forming units. Statistical Analysis Used: For roughness, it was performed 1-way ANOVA and parametric Tukey test α5% (P ≤ 0.05). For CFU data found, it was applied Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: Group 120 and 400 presented the highest roughness values. For S. epidermidis and S. aureus, Group 1200S presented the lowest values of microbial growth. For E. faecalis at 4 hour, microbial growth was not observed. C. albicans did not adhere to the acrylic resin. Except for Group 1200S, different surface roughnesses did not statistically interfere with microbial adhesion and growth on acrylic surfaces of ocular prostheses. Conclusions: The roughness did not interfere with the microbial adhesion of the microorganisms evaluated. The use of silica decreases significantly microbial growth.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T17:20:40Z
2018-12-11T17:20:40Z
2018-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_50_18
European Journal of Dentistry, v. 12, n. 2, p. 176-183, 2018.
1305-7464
1305-7456
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176404
10.4103/ejd.ejd_50_18
2-s2.0-85048091215
2-s2.0-85048091215.pdf
9719883814872582
5651874509493617
0000-0002-2575-279X
url http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_50_18
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/176404
identifier_str_mv European Journal of Dentistry, v. 12, n. 2, p. 176-183, 2018.
1305-7464
1305-7456
10.4103/ejd.ejd_50_18
2-s2.0-85048091215
2-s2.0-85048091215.pdf
9719883814872582
5651874509493617
0000-0002-2575-279X
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv European Journal of Dentistry
0,749
0,749
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 176-183
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546493223632896