Revisiting classical methods to identify collapsible soils
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220552 |
Resumo: | The paper revisits and updates two expedite methods used to identify the occurrence of collapsible soils. The methods were proposed by Gibbs (1961) and de Mello (1973) and have in common the assumption that collapsible soils are usually low density soils characterized through the relative compaction at natural condition, ratio between in situ dry-density and maximum dry density from Standard Proctor compaction test. The method by Gibbs (1961) considers in addition the soils moisture deviation, the difference between in situ moisture content and optimum moisture content. Data from different origin soils of all over the world were used and analyzed and equations were proposed to separate collapsible and non-collapsible soils. The updated procedures, as the original ones, were intended for use during preliminary investigation to identify potentially collapsible soil and to serve as a basis for planning more precise methods of investigation. |
id |
UNSP_8b064297f8dfacc929491a7606b930c8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220552 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Revisiting classical methods to identify collapsible soilsCollapsible soilsIdentificationUnsaturated soilThe paper revisits and updates two expedite methods used to identify the occurrence of collapsible soils. The methods were proposed by Gibbs (1961) and de Mello (1973) and have in common the assumption that collapsible soils are usually low density soils characterized through the relative compaction at natural condition, ratio between in situ dry-density and maximum dry density from Standard Proctor compaction test. The method by Gibbs (1961) considers in addition the soils moisture deviation, the difference between in situ moisture content and optimum moisture content. Data from different origin soils of all over the world were used and analyzed and equations were proposed to separate collapsible and non-collapsible soils. The updated procedures, as the original ones, were intended for use during preliminary investigation to identify potentially collapsible soil and to serve as a basis for planning more precise methods of investigation.Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos Universidade de São PauloFaculdade de Engenharia de Bauru Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita FilhoFaculdade de Engenharia de Bauru Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita FilhoUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Vilar, O. M.Rodrigues, R. A. [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:02:32Z2022-04-28T19:02:32Z2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article265-278Soils and Rocks, v. 38, n. 3, p. 265-278, 2015.1980-9743http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2205522-s2.0-84957004566Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSoils and Rocksinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:02:32Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220552Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:28:02.111539Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Revisiting classical methods to identify collapsible soils |
title |
Revisiting classical methods to identify collapsible soils |
spellingShingle |
Revisiting classical methods to identify collapsible soils Vilar, O. M. Collapsible soils Identification Unsaturated soil |
title_short |
Revisiting classical methods to identify collapsible soils |
title_full |
Revisiting classical methods to identify collapsible soils |
title_fullStr |
Revisiting classical methods to identify collapsible soils |
title_full_unstemmed |
Revisiting classical methods to identify collapsible soils |
title_sort |
Revisiting classical methods to identify collapsible soils |
author |
Vilar, O. M. |
author_facet |
Vilar, O. M. Rodrigues, R. A. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodrigues, R. A. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vilar, O. M. Rodrigues, R. A. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Collapsible soils Identification Unsaturated soil |
topic |
Collapsible soils Identification Unsaturated soil |
description |
The paper revisits and updates two expedite methods used to identify the occurrence of collapsible soils. The methods were proposed by Gibbs (1961) and de Mello (1973) and have in common the assumption that collapsible soils are usually low density soils characterized through the relative compaction at natural condition, ratio between in situ dry-density and maximum dry density from Standard Proctor compaction test. The method by Gibbs (1961) considers in addition the soils moisture deviation, the difference between in situ moisture content and optimum moisture content. Data from different origin soils of all over the world were used and analyzed and equations were proposed to separate collapsible and non-collapsible soils. The updated procedures, as the original ones, were intended for use during preliminary investigation to identify potentially collapsible soil and to serve as a basis for planning more precise methods of investigation. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01 2022-04-28T19:02:32Z 2022-04-28T19:02:32Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Soils and Rocks, v. 38, n. 3, p. 265-278, 2015. 1980-9743 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220552 2-s2.0-84957004566 |
identifier_str_mv |
Soils and Rocks, v. 38, n. 3, p. 265-278, 2015. 1980-9743 2-s2.0-84957004566 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220552 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Soils and Rocks |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
265-278 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128815326560256 |