Influence of growing-phase supplementation strategies on intake and performance of different beef cattle genotypes in finishing phase on pasture or feedlot

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Torrecilhas, Juliana A. [UNESP], Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP], Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP], Vito, Elias San, Lima, Ana R.C. [UNESP], Sanchez, João M.D. [UNESP], Reis, Ricardo A. [UNESP], Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104653
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233353
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of previous supplementation strategies (mineral and corn-based supplementation in the growing-phase) on intake and performance of different beef cattle group genotypes in the finishing phase on pasture or feedlot. Two experiments for the finishing phase were conducted simultaneously. For Exp.1, 60 bulls were finished on tropical grass with supplementation. They were distributed in a randomized block design in a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement (three genotypes (Nellore, Senepol x Nellore (½Senepol), Angus x Nellore (½Angus)) and two growing-phase supplementation strategies (mineral and corn-based supplementation)). They were allocated to 12 paddocks with 1.8 ha of Urochloa brizantha ‘Xaraes’ per paddock (5 animals/paddock). The animals were supplemented (corn-based supplement at the rate of 20 g/kg body weight [BW]) for 125 days. For Exp.2 60 bulls were finished in individual pens. They were of three genotypes (Nellore, ½Senepol, ½Angus) from two growing-phase supplementation strategies (mineral and corn-based supplementation) and distributed in a randomized block design allocated to individual pens. In Exp.1 (finish on tropical grass), the genotypes,½ Angus and Nellore bulls showed the greatest initial (end of growing phase treatments) and final body weights (BW), final carcass weight (HCW) and hot carcass yield (HCY) than ½ Senepol bulls. Bulls with corn-based supplementation in the growing phase had greater initial (end of growing phase) and final BW and lower feed efficiency (FE) than animal supplementation with mineral in the growing phase. ½Senepol showed higher total dry matter (DM, percentage of BW) and forage DM intake than Nellore in the finishing phase. For supplement DM intake, higher values were found for the ½ Angus bulls compare ½Senepol. Nellore bulls showed greater DM and OM digestibility than ½ Senepol but no different to ½ Angus. For experiment 2 (finish in feedlot), ½ Angus and ½ Senepol bulls had higher ADG than Nellore bulls. ½ Angus and Nellore bulls presented the greatest HCW while Nellore bulls had the highest HCY. Daily carcass gain (DCG) in the finishing phase was higher in animals that received only mineral supplementation during the growth phase. ½ Angus and ½ Senepol showed higher FE than Nellore bulls. Nellore bulls had lower DMI of forage and supplement than ½ Angus and ½ Senepol. ½ Angus and Nellore bulls had greater BW at the end of the finishing phase than ½ Senepol.The feedlot-finishing system promotes better finishing performance in ½ Angus and ½ Senepol, thus crossing Nellore with a Bos taurus breed may be a strategy to improve finishing performance and carcass characteristics. Corn-based supplement during the growing phase may be a strategy to improve body weight on entry to a finishing phase, although it may reduce carcass gain in the finishing phase.
id UNSP_8be959524aebaf729132c8686e00d3d3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233353
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Influence of growing-phase supplementation strategies on intake and performance of different beef cattle genotypes in finishing phase on pasture or feedlotBos indicusBos taurusCarcassCrossbreedingDigestibilityThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of previous supplementation strategies (mineral and corn-based supplementation in the growing-phase) on intake and performance of different beef cattle group genotypes in the finishing phase on pasture or feedlot. Two experiments for the finishing phase were conducted simultaneously. For Exp.1, 60 bulls were finished on tropical grass with supplementation. They were distributed in a randomized block design in a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement (three genotypes (Nellore, Senepol x Nellore (½Senepol), Angus x Nellore (½Angus)) and two growing-phase supplementation strategies (mineral and corn-based supplementation)). They were allocated to 12 paddocks with 1.8 ha of Urochloa brizantha ‘Xaraes’ per paddock (5 animals/paddock). The animals were supplemented (corn-based supplement at the rate of 20 g/kg body weight [BW]) for 125 days. For Exp.2 60 bulls were finished in individual pens. They were of three genotypes (Nellore, ½Senepol, ½Angus) from two growing-phase supplementation strategies (mineral and corn-based supplementation) and distributed in a randomized block design allocated to individual pens. In Exp.1 (finish on tropical grass), the genotypes,½ Angus and Nellore bulls showed the greatest initial (end of growing phase treatments) and final body weights (BW), final carcass weight (HCW) and hot carcass yield (HCY) than ½ Senepol bulls. Bulls with corn-based supplementation in the growing phase had greater initial (end of growing phase) and final BW and lower feed efficiency (FE) than animal supplementation with mineral in the growing phase. ½Senepol showed higher total dry matter (DM, percentage of BW) and forage DM intake than Nellore in the finishing phase. For supplement DM intake, higher values were found for the ½ Angus bulls compare ½Senepol. Nellore bulls showed greater DM and OM digestibility than ½ Senepol but no different to ½ Angus. For experiment 2 (finish in feedlot), ½ Angus and ½ Senepol bulls had higher ADG than Nellore bulls. ½ Angus and Nellore bulls presented the greatest HCW while Nellore bulls had the highest HCY. Daily carcass gain (DCG) in the finishing phase was higher in animals that received only mineral supplementation during the growth phase. ½ Angus and ½ Senepol showed higher FE than Nellore bulls. Nellore bulls had lower DMI of forage and supplement than ½ Angus and ½ Senepol. ½ Angus and Nellore bulls had greater BW at the end of the finishing phase than ½ Senepol.The feedlot-finishing system promotes better finishing performance in ½ Angus and ½ Senepol, thus crossing Nellore with a Bos taurus breed may be a strategy to improve finishing performance and carcass characteristics. Corn-based supplement during the growing phase may be a strategy to improve body weight on entry to a finishing phase, although it may reduce carcass gain in the finishing phase.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Department of Animal Science School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)Centro de Investigación El NUS Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria AGROSAVIAICAA – Instituto de Ciências Agrarias e AmbientaisInstituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia/Ciência AnimalConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoDepartment of Animal Science School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)CAPES: 001FAPESP: 2015/01147-0FAPESP: 2017/02034-0Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)AGROSAVIAICAA – Instituto de Ciências Agrarias e AmbientaisInstituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia/Ciência AnimalConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoSimioni, Tiago A. [UNESP]Torrecilhas, Juliana A. [UNESP]Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP]Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP]Vito, Elias SanLima, Ana R.C. [UNESP]Sanchez, João M.D. [UNESP]Reis, Ricardo A. [UNESP]Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP]2022-05-01T07:58:52Z2022-05-01T07:58:52Z2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104653Livestock Science, v. 251.1871-1413http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23335310.1016/j.livsci.2021.1046532-s2.0-85111913096Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengLivestock Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T18:41:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233353Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:04:38.330156Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of growing-phase supplementation strategies on intake and performance of different beef cattle genotypes in finishing phase on pasture or feedlot
title Influence of growing-phase supplementation strategies on intake and performance of different beef cattle genotypes in finishing phase on pasture or feedlot
spellingShingle Influence of growing-phase supplementation strategies on intake and performance of different beef cattle genotypes in finishing phase on pasture or feedlot
Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP]
Bos indicus
Bos taurus
Carcass
Crossbreeding
Digestibility
title_short Influence of growing-phase supplementation strategies on intake and performance of different beef cattle genotypes in finishing phase on pasture or feedlot
title_full Influence of growing-phase supplementation strategies on intake and performance of different beef cattle genotypes in finishing phase on pasture or feedlot
title_fullStr Influence of growing-phase supplementation strategies on intake and performance of different beef cattle genotypes in finishing phase on pasture or feedlot
title_full_unstemmed Influence of growing-phase supplementation strategies on intake and performance of different beef cattle genotypes in finishing phase on pasture or feedlot
title_sort Influence of growing-phase supplementation strategies on intake and performance of different beef cattle genotypes in finishing phase on pasture or feedlot
author Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP]
author_facet Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP]
Torrecilhas, Juliana A. [UNESP]
Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP]
Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP]
Vito, Elias San
Lima, Ana R.C. [UNESP]
Sanchez, João M.D. [UNESP]
Reis, Ricardo A. [UNESP]
Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Torrecilhas, Juliana A. [UNESP]
Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP]
Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP]
Vito, Elias San
Lima, Ana R.C. [UNESP]
Sanchez, João M.D. [UNESP]
Reis, Ricardo A. [UNESP]
Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
AGROSAVIA
ICAA – Instituto de Ciências Agrarias e Ambientais
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia/Ciência Animal
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Simioni, Tiago A. [UNESP]
Torrecilhas, Juliana A. [UNESP]
Messana, Juliana D. [UNESP]
Granja-Salcedo, Yury T. [UNESP]
Vito, Elias San
Lima, Ana R.C. [UNESP]
Sanchez, João M.D. [UNESP]
Reis, Ricardo A. [UNESP]
Berchielli, Telma T. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bos indicus
Bos taurus
Carcass
Crossbreeding
Digestibility
topic Bos indicus
Bos taurus
Carcass
Crossbreeding
Digestibility
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of previous supplementation strategies (mineral and corn-based supplementation in the growing-phase) on intake and performance of different beef cattle group genotypes in the finishing phase on pasture or feedlot. Two experiments for the finishing phase were conducted simultaneously. For Exp.1, 60 bulls were finished on tropical grass with supplementation. They were distributed in a randomized block design in a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement (three genotypes (Nellore, Senepol x Nellore (½Senepol), Angus x Nellore (½Angus)) and two growing-phase supplementation strategies (mineral and corn-based supplementation)). They were allocated to 12 paddocks with 1.8 ha of Urochloa brizantha ‘Xaraes’ per paddock (5 animals/paddock). The animals were supplemented (corn-based supplement at the rate of 20 g/kg body weight [BW]) for 125 days. For Exp.2 60 bulls were finished in individual pens. They were of three genotypes (Nellore, ½Senepol, ½Angus) from two growing-phase supplementation strategies (mineral and corn-based supplementation) and distributed in a randomized block design allocated to individual pens. In Exp.1 (finish on tropical grass), the genotypes,½ Angus and Nellore bulls showed the greatest initial (end of growing phase treatments) and final body weights (BW), final carcass weight (HCW) and hot carcass yield (HCY) than ½ Senepol bulls. Bulls with corn-based supplementation in the growing phase had greater initial (end of growing phase) and final BW and lower feed efficiency (FE) than animal supplementation with mineral in the growing phase. ½Senepol showed higher total dry matter (DM, percentage of BW) and forage DM intake than Nellore in the finishing phase. For supplement DM intake, higher values were found for the ½ Angus bulls compare ½Senepol. Nellore bulls showed greater DM and OM digestibility than ½ Senepol but no different to ½ Angus. For experiment 2 (finish in feedlot), ½ Angus and ½ Senepol bulls had higher ADG than Nellore bulls. ½ Angus and Nellore bulls presented the greatest HCW while Nellore bulls had the highest HCY. Daily carcass gain (DCG) in the finishing phase was higher in animals that received only mineral supplementation during the growth phase. ½ Angus and ½ Senepol showed higher FE than Nellore bulls. Nellore bulls had lower DMI of forage and supplement than ½ Angus and ½ Senepol. ½ Angus and Nellore bulls had greater BW at the end of the finishing phase than ½ Senepol.The feedlot-finishing system promotes better finishing performance in ½ Angus and ½ Senepol, thus crossing Nellore with a Bos taurus breed may be a strategy to improve finishing performance and carcass characteristics. Corn-based supplement during the growing phase may be a strategy to improve body weight on entry to a finishing phase, although it may reduce carcass gain in the finishing phase.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-01
2022-05-01T07:58:52Z
2022-05-01T07:58:52Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104653
Livestock Science, v. 251.
1871-1413
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233353
10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104653
2-s2.0-85111913096
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104653
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233353
identifier_str_mv Livestock Science, v. 251.
1871-1413
10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104653
2-s2.0-85111913096
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Livestock Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128890775797760