Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periods
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0126436 |
Texto Completo: | http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126436 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/128300 |
Resumo: | Peritoneal dialysis (PD) should be considered a suitable method of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients. This study is the largest cohort providing patient characteristics, clinical practice, patterns and their relationship to outcomes in a developing country. Its objective was to describe the main determinants of patient and technique survival, including trends over time of PD treatment in AKI patients. This was a Brazilian prospective cohort study in which all adult AKI patients on PD were studied from January/2004 to January/2014. For comparison purposes, patients were divided into 2 groups according to the year of treatment: 2004-2008 and 2009-2014. Patient survival and technique failure (TF) were analyzed using the competing risk model of Fine and Gray. A total of 301 patients were included, 51 were transferred to hemodialysis (16.9%) during the study period. The main cause of TF was mechanical complication (47%) followed by peritonitis (41.2%). There was change in TF during the study period: compared to 2004-2008, patients treated at 2009-2014 had relative risk (RR) reduction of 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.96) and three independent risk factors were identified: period of treatment at 2009 and 2014, sepsis and age>65 years. There were 180 deaths (59.8%) during the study. Death was the leading cause of dropout (77.9% of all cases) mainly by sepsis (58.3%), followed cardiovascular disease (36.1%). The overall patient survival was 41% at 30 days. Patient survival improved along study periods: compared to 2004-2008, patients treated at 2009-2014 had a RR reduction of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.98). The independent risk factors for mortality were sepsis, age>70 years, ATN-ISS > 0.65 and positive fluid balance. As conclusion, we observed an improvement in patient survival and TF along the years even after correction for several confounders and using a competing risk approach. |
id |
UNSP_8d8ad75cbfe44033d14e45a61b3d2d72 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/128300 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periodsPeritoneal dialysis (PD) should be considered a suitable method of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients. This study is the largest cohort providing patient characteristics, clinical practice, patterns and their relationship to outcomes in a developing country. Its objective was to describe the main determinants of patient and technique survival, including trends over time of PD treatment in AKI patients. This was a Brazilian prospective cohort study in which all adult AKI patients on PD were studied from January/2004 to January/2014. For comparison purposes, patients were divided into 2 groups according to the year of treatment: 2004-2008 and 2009-2014. Patient survival and technique failure (TF) were analyzed using the competing risk model of Fine and Gray. A total of 301 patients were included, 51 were transferred to hemodialysis (16.9%) during the study period. The main cause of TF was mechanical complication (47%) followed by peritonitis (41.2%). There was change in TF during the study period: compared to 2004-2008, patients treated at 2009-2014 had relative risk (RR) reduction of 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.96) and three independent risk factors were identified: period of treatment at 2009 and 2014, sepsis and age>65 years. There were 180 deaths (59.8%) during the study. Death was the leading cause of dropout (77.9% of all cases) mainly by sepsis (58.3%), followed cardiovascular disease (36.1%). The overall patient survival was 41% at 30 days. Patient survival improved along study periods: compared to 2004-2008, patients treated at 2009-2014 had a RR reduction of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.98). The independent risk factors for mortality were sepsis, age>70 years, ATN-ISS > 0.65 and positive fluid balance. As conclusion, we observed an improvement in patient survival and TF along the years even after correction for several confounders and using a competing risk approach.Univ Sao Paulo State UNESP, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina (FMB), Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo State UNESP, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina (FMB), Botucatu, SP, BrazilPublic Library ScienceUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Ponce, Daniela [UNESP]Buffarah, Marina Berbel [UNESP]Goes, Cassiana [UNESP]Balbi, Andre [UNESP]2015-10-21T13:08:50Z2015-10-21T13:08:50Z2015-05-12info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-13application/pdfhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126436Plos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 10, n. 5, p. 1-13, 2015.1932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12830010.1371/journal.pone.0126436WOS:000354543500059WOS000354543500059.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPlos One2.7661,164info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-14T17:21:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/128300Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-14T17:21:55Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periods |
title |
Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periods |
spellingShingle |
Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periods Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periods Ponce, Daniela [UNESP] Ponce, Daniela [UNESP] |
title_short |
Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periods |
title_full |
Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periods |
title_fullStr |
Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periods Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periods Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periods |
title_sort |
Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periods |
author |
Ponce, Daniela [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Ponce, Daniela [UNESP] Ponce, Daniela [UNESP] Buffarah, Marina Berbel [UNESP] Goes, Cassiana [UNESP] Balbi, Andre [UNESP] Buffarah, Marina Berbel [UNESP] Goes, Cassiana [UNESP] Balbi, Andre [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Buffarah, Marina Berbel [UNESP] Goes, Cassiana [UNESP] Balbi, Andre [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ponce, Daniela [UNESP] Buffarah, Marina Berbel [UNESP] Goes, Cassiana [UNESP] Balbi, Andre [UNESP] |
description |
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) should be considered a suitable method of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients. This study is the largest cohort providing patient characteristics, clinical practice, patterns and their relationship to outcomes in a developing country. Its objective was to describe the main determinants of patient and technique survival, including trends over time of PD treatment in AKI patients. This was a Brazilian prospective cohort study in which all adult AKI patients on PD were studied from January/2004 to January/2014. For comparison purposes, patients were divided into 2 groups according to the year of treatment: 2004-2008 and 2009-2014. Patient survival and technique failure (TF) were analyzed using the competing risk model of Fine and Gray. A total of 301 patients were included, 51 were transferred to hemodialysis (16.9%) during the study period. The main cause of TF was mechanical complication (47%) followed by peritonitis (41.2%). There was change in TF during the study period: compared to 2004-2008, patients treated at 2009-2014 had relative risk (RR) reduction of 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.96) and three independent risk factors were identified: period of treatment at 2009 and 2014, sepsis and age>65 years. There were 180 deaths (59.8%) during the study. Death was the leading cause of dropout (77.9% of all cases) mainly by sepsis (58.3%), followed cardiovascular disease (36.1%). The overall patient survival was 41% at 30 days. Patient survival improved along study periods: compared to 2004-2008, patients treated at 2009-2014 had a RR reduction of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.98). The independent risk factors for mortality were sepsis, age>70 years, ATN-ISS > 0.65 and positive fluid balance. As conclusion, we observed an improvement in patient survival and TF along the years even after correction for several confounders and using a competing risk approach. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-21T13:08:50Z 2015-10-21T13:08:50Z 2015-05-12 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126436 Plos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 10, n. 5, p. 1-13, 2015. 1932-6203 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/128300 10.1371/journal.pone.0126436 WOS:000354543500059 WOS000354543500059.pdf |
url |
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126436 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/128300 |
identifier_str_mv |
Plos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 10, n. 5, p. 1-13, 2015. 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0126436 WOS:000354543500059 WOS000354543500059.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Plos One 2.766 1,164 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1-13 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Library Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Library Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822182455695638528 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1371/journal.pone.0126436 |