Biomechanical effect of inclined implants in fixed prosthesis: strain and stress analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.05418 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158177 |
Resumo: | AbstractIntroductionImplant inclinations can be corrected using mini abutments at different angulations.ObjectiveTo analyze the influence of external hexagon implants in different inclinations (3 levels) on the microstrain distribution generated around three implants.MethodA geometric bone model was created through Rhinoceros CAD software (version 5.0 SR8, Mcneel North America, Seattle, WA, USA). Three implants (4.1 × 13 mm) were modeled and inserted inside the substrate at three different inclinations: 0º, 17º and 30º. Next, all groups received mini conical abutments, fixation screws and a simplified prosthesis. The final geometry was exported in STEP format to analysis software and all materials were considered homogeneous, isotropic and linearly elastic. An axial load (300N) was applied on the center of the prosthesis. An in vitro study was conducted with same conditions and groups for validating the tridimentional model.ResultStress was concentrated on the external area of the implants, in contact with the cortical bone and external hexagon. For the bone simulator, the strain increased in the peri-implant region according to the increase in the implant’s inclination. The difference between groups was significant (p = 0.000). The 30º group presented higher stress and strain concentration.ConclusionThe microstrain and stress increase around implants directly proportional to the increase of the installation angle. |
id |
UNSP_8de55bdc7c6332866c7e6d8f29df8a80 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/158177 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Biomechanical effect of inclined implants in fixed prosthesis: strain and stress analysisEfeito biomecânico de implantes inclinados em prótese fixa: analise das tensões e deformaçõesFinite element analysesdental implantfixed prosthesisAnálises de elementos finitosimplante dentárioprótese fixaAbstractIntroductionImplant inclinations can be corrected using mini abutments at different angulations.ObjectiveTo analyze the influence of external hexagon implants in different inclinations (3 levels) on the microstrain distribution generated around three implants.MethodA geometric bone model was created through Rhinoceros CAD software (version 5.0 SR8, Mcneel North America, Seattle, WA, USA). Three implants (4.1 × 13 mm) were modeled and inserted inside the substrate at three different inclinations: 0º, 17º and 30º. Next, all groups received mini conical abutments, fixation screws and a simplified prosthesis. The final geometry was exported in STEP format to analysis software and all materials were considered homogeneous, isotropic and linearly elastic. An axial load (300N) was applied on the center of the prosthesis. An in vitro study was conducted with same conditions and groups for validating the tridimentional model.ResultStress was concentrated on the external area of the implants, in contact with the cortical bone and external hexagon. For the bone simulator, the strain increased in the peri-implant region according to the increase in the implant’s inclination. The difference between groups was significant (p = 0.000). The 30º group presented higher stress and strain concentration.ConclusionThe microstrain and stress increase around implants directly proportional to the increase of the installation angle.ResumoIntroduçãoA inclinação dos implantes pode ser corrigida através de mini-pilares de diferentes angulações.ObjetivoAnalisar a influência de implantes com hexágono externo em diferentes inclinações (3 níveis) na distribuição de microdeformações geradas em torno de três implantes.MétodoUm modelo geométrico de osso foi criado através do software CAD Rhinoceros (versão 5.0 SR8, Mcneel North America, Seattle, WA, EUA). Três implantes (4,1 × 13 mm) foram modelados e inseridos no interior do substrato em três diferentes inclinações: 0º, 17º e 30º. Em seguida, todos os grupos receberam mini-pilares cônicos, parafusos de fixação e prótese simplificada. A geometria final foi exportada em formato STEP para software de análise e todos os materiais foram considerados homogêneos, isotrópicos e linearmente elásticos. Uma carga axial (300N) foi aplicada no centro da prótese. Um estudo in vitro foi conduzido com as mesmas condições e grupos para validar o modelo tridimensional.ResultadoA concentração de tensão ocorreu na área externa dos implantes, em contato com o osso cortical e o hexágono externo. Para o simulador ósseo, a deformação aumentou na região peri-implantar de acordo com o aumento da inclinação do implante. A diferença entre os grupos foi significativa (p = 0.000). O grupo de 30º apresentou maior concentração de tensão e deformação.ConclusãoO aumento da microdeformação e das tensões ao redor dos implantes aumenta diretamente proporcional ao aumento do ângulo de instalação.Faculdade de PindamonhangabaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia Departamento de Materiais Odontológicos e PróteseUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia Departamento de Materiais Odontológicos e PróteseUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita FilhoFaculdade de PindamonhangabaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Rodrigues, Vinícius AnéasTribst, João Paulo MendesSantis, Leandro RuivoBorges, Alexandre Luiz SoutoNishioka, Renato Sussumu2018-11-12T17:28:42Z2018-11-12T17:28:42Z2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article237-243application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.05418Revista de Odontologia da UNESP. Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, v. 47, n. 4, p. 237-243, 2018.1807-2577http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15817710.1590/1807-2577.05418S1807-25772018000400237S1807-25772018000400237.pdf00566608422843970000-0002-1458-601XSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista de Odontologia da UNESPinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-11-18T13:35:14Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/158177Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-11-18T13:35:14Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biomechanical effect of inclined implants in fixed prosthesis: strain and stress analysis Efeito biomecânico de implantes inclinados em prótese fixa: analise das tensões e deformações |
title |
Biomechanical effect of inclined implants in fixed prosthesis: strain and stress analysis |
spellingShingle |
Biomechanical effect of inclined implants in fixed prosthesis: strain and stress analysis Rodrigues, Vinícius Anéas Finite element analyses dental implant fixed prosthesis Análises de elementos finitos implante dentário prótese fixa |
title_short |
Biomechanical effect of inclined implants in fixed prosthesis: strain and stress analysis |
title_full |
Biomechanical effect of inclined implants in fixed prosthesis: strain and stress analysis |
title_fullStr |
Biomechanical effect of inclined implants in fixed prosthesis: strain and stress analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biomechanical effect of inclined implants in fixed prosthesis: strain and stress analysis |
title_sort |
Biomechanical effect of inclined implants in fixed prosthesis: strain and stress analysis |
author |
Rodrigues, Vinícius Anéas |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Vinícius Anéas Tribst, João Paulo Mendes Santis, Leandro Ruivo Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto Nishioka, Renato Sussumu |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes Santis, Leandro Ruivo Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto Nishioka, Renato Sussumu |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Pindamonhangaba Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Vinícius Anéas Tribst, João Paulo Mendes Santis, Leandro Ruivo Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto Nishioka, Renato Sussumu |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Finite element analyses dental implant fixed prosthesis Análises de elementos finitos implante dentário prótese fixa |
topic |
Finite element analyses dental implant fixed prosthesis Análises de elementos finitos implante dentário prótese fixa |
description |
AbstractIntroductionImplant inclinations can be corrected using mini abutments at different angulations.ObjectiveTo analyze the influence of external hexagon implants in different inclinations (3 levels) on the microstrain distribution generated around three implants.MethodA geometric bone model was created through Rhinoceros CAD software (version 5.0 SR8, Mcneel North America, Seattle, WA, USA). Three implants (4.1 × 13 mm) were modeled and inserted inside the substrate at three different inclinations: 0º, 17º and 30º. Next, all groups received mini conical abutments, fixation screws and a simplified prosthesis. The final geometry was exported in STEP format to analysis software and all materials were considered homogeneous, isotropic and linearly elastic. An axial load (300N) was applied on the center of the prosthesis. An in vitro study was conducted with same conditions and groups for validating the tridimentional model.ResultStress was concentrated on the external area of the implants, in contact with the cortical bone and external hexagon. For the bone simulator, the strain increased in the peri-implant region according to the increase in the implant’s inclination. The difference between groups was significant (p = 0.000). The 30º group presented higher stress and strain concentration.ConclusionThe microstrain and stress increase around implants directly proportional to the increase of the installation angle. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-12T17:28:42Z 2018-11-12T17:28:42Z 2018-08-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.05418 Revista de Odontologia da UNESP. Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, v. 47, n. 4, p. 237-243, 2018. 1807-2577 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158177 10.1590/1807-2577.05418 S1807-25772018000400237 S1807-25772018000400237.pdf 0056660842284397 0000-0002-1458-601X |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.05418 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158177 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP. Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, v. 47, n. 4, p. 237-243, 2018. 1807-2577 10.1590/1807-2577.05418 S1807-25772018000400237 S1807-25772018000400237.pdf 0056660842284397 0000-0002-1458-601X |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
237-243 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1826304012155092992 |