Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.21526 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175597 |
Resumo: | The performances of an anaerobic/aerobic baffled reactor (AABR) and a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HFCW) have been investigated. In this study, both systems were operated in parallel using the same source of domestic low-strength wastewater (0.06–0.61 kg COD m3 d–1). The inlet concentrations, expressed as chemical oxygen demand (COD), ranged from 105 to 381 mg COD L–1. The outlet concentrations ranged from 12 to 147 mg COD L–1 in the AABR and from 7 to 88 mg COD L–1 in the HFCW. The AABR and HFCW achieved 78% ± 9% and 82% ± 9% COD average removal rates, respectively. To compare the results, a statistical test (significance level of 0.05) was used and showed no significant difference between the systems in terms of organic matter and total suspended solids (TSS) removal. In addition, this study addressed energy costs and treatment capacity per area for both wastewater treatment systems that were studied independently with capacities for 20 habitants, and showed lower energy consumptions per month when compared with a domestic electric shower generally used by a sample Brazilian family consisting of four members. |
id |
UNSP_90623f99a40572d6ec155ccf7c4da2ce |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/175597 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewaterAerobic chamberAnaerobic baffled reactorEnergy costHorizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlandsSanitary wastewaterThe performances of an anaerobic/aerobic baffled reactor (AABR) and a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HFCW) have been investigated. In this study, both systems were operated in parallel using the same source of domestic low-strength wastewater (0.06–0.61 kg COD m3 d–1). The inlet concentrations, expressed as chemical oxygen demand (COD), ranged from 105 to 381 mg COD L–1. The outlet concentrations ranged from 12 to 147 mg COD L–1 in the AABR and from 7 to 88 mg COD L–1 in the HFCW. The AABR and HFCW achieved 78% ± 9% and 82% ± 9% COD average removal rates, respectively. To compare the results, a statistical test (significance level of 0.05) was used and showed no significant difference between the systems in terms of organic matter and total suspended solids (TSS) removal. In addition, this study addressed energy costs and treatment capacity per area for both wastewater treatment systems that were studied independently with capacities for 20 habitants, and showed lower energy consumptions per month when compared with a domestic electric shower generally used by a sample Brazilian family consisting of four members.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The College of Engineering Bauru UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Av. Eng. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01Department of Biochemistry and Chemical Technology Institute of Chemistry UNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus Araraquara, Rua Prof. Francisco Degni, 55Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The College of Engineering Bauru UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Av. Eng. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01Department of Biochemistry and Chemical Technology Institute of Chemistry UNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus Araraquara, Rua Prof. Francisco Degni, 55FAPESP: 2010/12445-9FAPESP: 2011/10816-2Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)da Silva, Julliana Alves [UNESP]Sarti, Arnaldo [UNESP]da Silva, Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:16:38Z2018-12-11T17:16:38Z2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article93-100application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.21526Desalination and Water Treatment, v. 91, p. 93-100.1944-39861944-3994http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17559710.5004/dwt.2017.215262-s2.0-850370316652-s2.0-85037031665.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDesalination and Water Treatment0,3980,398info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-28T12:56:41Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/175597Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:48:48.501368Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater |
title |
Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater |
spellingShingle |
Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater da Silva, Julliana Alves [UNESP] Aerobic chamber Anaerobic baffled reactor Energy cost Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands Sanitary wastewater |
title_short |
Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater |
title_full |
Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater |
title_fullStr |
Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater |
title_sort |
Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater |
author |
da Silva, Julliana Alves [UNESP] |
author_facet |
da Silva, Julliana Alves [UNESP] Sarti, Arnaldo [UNESP] da Silva, Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sarti, Arnaldo [UNESP] da Silva, Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Silva, Julliana Alves [UNESP] Sarti, Arnaldo [UNESP] da Silva, Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aerobic chamber Anaerobic baffled reactor Energy cost Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands Sanitary wastewater |
topic |
Aerobic chamber Anaerobic baffled reactor Energy cost Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands Sanitary wastewater |
description |
The performances of an anaerobic/aerobic baffled reactor (AABR) and a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HFCW) have been investigated. In this study, both systems were operated in parallel using the same source of domestic low-strength wastewater (0.06–0.61 kg COD m3 d–1). The inlet concentrations, expressed as chemical oxygen demand (COD), ranged from 105 to 381 mg COD L–1. The outlet concentrations ranged from 12 to 147 mg COD L–1 in the AABR and from 7 to 88 mg COD L–1 in the HFCW. The AABR and HFCW achieved 78% ± 9% and 82% ± 9% COD average removal rates, respectively. To compare the results, a statistical test (significance level of 0.05) was used and showed no significant difference between the systems in terms of organic matter and total suspended solids (TSS) removal. In addition, this study addressed energy costs and treatment capacity per area for both wastewater treatment systems that were studied independently with capacities for 20 habitants, and showed lower energy consumptions per month when compared with a domestic electric shower generally used by a sample Brazilian family consisting of four members. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-01 2018-12-11T17:16:38Z 2018-12-11T17:16:38Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.21526 Desalination and Water Treatment, v. 91, p. 93-100. 1944-3986 1944-3994 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175597 10.5004/dwt.2017.21526 2-s2.0-85037031665 2-s2.0-85037031665.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.21526 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175597 |
identifier_str_mv |
Desalination and Water Treatment, v. 91, p. 93-100. 1944-3986 1944-3994 10.5004/dwt.2017.21526 2-s2.0-85037031665 2-s2.0-85037031665.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Desalination and Water Treatment 0,398 0,398 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
93-100 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129121590444032 |