Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Silva, Julliana Alves [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Sarti, Arnaldo [UNESP], da Silva, Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.21526
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175597
Resumo: The performances of an anaerobic/aerobic baffled reactor (AABR) and a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HFCW) have been investigated. In this study, both systems were operated in parallel using the same source of domestic low-strength wastewater (0.06–0.61 kg COD m3 d–1). The inlet concentrations, expressed as chemical oxygen demand (COD), ranged from 105 to 381 mg COD L–1. The outlet concentrations ranged from 12 to 147 mg COD L–1 in the AABR and from 7 to 88 mg COD L–1 in the HFCW. The AABR and HFCW achieved 78% ± 9% and 82% ± 9% COD average removal rates, respectively. To compare the results, a statistical test (significance level of 0.05) was used and showed no significant difference between the systems in terms of organic matter and total suspended solids (TSS) removal. In addition, this study addressed energy costs and treatment capacity per area for both wastewater treatment systems that were studied independently with capacities for 20 habitants, and showed lower energy consumptions per month when compared with a domestic electric shower generally used by a sample Brazilian family consisting of four members.
id UNSP_90623f99a40572d6ec155ccf7c4da2ce
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/175597
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewaterAerobic chamberAnaerobic baffled reactorEnergy costHorizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlandsSanitary wastewaterThe performances of an anaerobic/aerobic baffled reactor (AABR) and a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HFCW) have been investigated. In this study, both systems were operated in parallel using the same source of domestic low-strength wastewater (0.06–0.61 kg COD m3 d–1). The inlet concentrations, expressed as chemical oxygen demand (COD), ranged from 105 to 381 mg COD L–1. The outlet concentrations ranged from 12 to 147 mg COD L–1 in the AABR and from 7 to 88 mg COD L–1 in the HFCW. The AABR and HFCW achieved 78% ± 9% and 82% ± 9% COD average removal rates, respectively. To compare the results, a statistical test (significance level of 0.05) was used and showed no significant difference between the systems in terms of organic matter and total suspended solids (TSS) removal. In addition, this study addressed energy costs and treatment capacity per area for both wastewater treatment systems that were studied independently with capacities for 20 habitants, and showed lower energy consumptions per month when compared with a domestic electric shower generally used by a sample Brazilian family consisting of four members.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The College of Engineering Bauru UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Av. Eng. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01Department of Biochemistry and Chemical Technology Institute of Chemistry UNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus Araraquara, Rua Prof. Francisco Degni, 55Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The College of Engineering Bauru UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Av. Eng. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01Department of Biochemistry and Chemical Technology Institute of Chemistry UNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus Araraquara, Rua Prof. Francisco Degni, 55FAPESP: 2010/12445-9FAPESP: 2011/10816-2Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)da Silva, Julliana Alves [UNESP]Sarti, Arnaldo [UNESP]da Silva, Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:16:38Z2018-12-11T17:16:38Z2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article93-100application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.21526Desalination and Water Treatment, v. 91, p. 93-100.1944-39861944-3994http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17559710.5004/dwt.2017.215262-s2.0-850370316652-s2.0-85037031665.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDesalination and Water Treatment0,3980,398info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-28T12:56:41Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/175597Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:48:48.501368Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater
title Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater
spellingShingle Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater
da Silva, Julliana Alves [UNESP]
Aerobic chamber
Anaerobic baffled reactor
Energy cost
Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands
Sanitary wastewater
title_short Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater
title_full Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater
title_fullStr Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater
title_full_unstemmed Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater
title_sort Performances of two pilot decentralized wastewater treatment plants used to treat low-strength wastewater
author da Silva, Julliana Alves [UNESP]
author_facet da Silva, Julliana Alves [UNESP]
Sarti, Arnaldo [UNESP]
da Silva, Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Sarti, Arnaldo [UNESP]
da Silva, Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Silva, Julliana Alves [UNESP]
Sarti, Arnaldo [UNESP]
da Silva, Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aerobic chamber
Anaerobic baffled reactor
Energy cost
Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands
Sanitary wastewater
topic Aerobic chamber
Anaerobic baffled reactor
Energy cost
Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands
Sanitary wastewater
description The performances of an anaerobic/aerobic baffled reactor (AABR) and a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HFCW) have been investigated. In this study, both systems were operated in parallel using the same source of domestic low-strength wastewater (0.06–0.61 kg COD m3 d–1). The inlet concentrations, expressed as chemical oxygen demand (COD), ranged from 105 to 381 mg COD L–1. The outlet concentrations ranged from 12 to 147 mg COD L–1 in the AABR and from 7 to 88 mg COD L–1 in the HFCW. The AABR and HFCW achieved 78% ± 9% and 82% ± 9% COD average removal rates, respectively. To compare the results, a statistical test (significance level of 0.05) was used and showed no significant difference between the systems in terms of organic matter and total suspended solids (TSS) removal. In addition, this study addressed energy costs and treatment capacity per area for both wastewater treatment systems that were studied independently with capacities for 20 habitants, and showed lower energy consumptions per month when compared with a domestic electric shower generally used by a sample Brazilian family consisting of four members.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-01
2018-12-11T17:16:38Z
2018-12-11T17:16:38Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.21526
Desalination and Water Treatment, v. 91, p. 93-100.
1944-3986
1944-3994
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175597
10.5004/dwt.2017.21526
2-s2.0-85037031665
2-s2.0-85037031665.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.21526
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175597
identifier_str_mv Desalination and Water Treatment, v. 91, p. 93-100.
1944-3986
1944-3994
10.5004/dwt.2017.21526
2-s2.0-85037031665
2-s2.0-85037031665.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Desalination and Water Treatment
0,398
0,398
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 93-100
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129121590444032