Direct seeding reduces costs, but it is not promising for restoring tropical seasonal forests

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Diego Cerveira de [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Engel, Vera Lex [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.019
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179631
Resumo: Direct seeding is a potential technique to restore forests; however, further studies are needed before its application on a large scale. We carried out a field experiment in a deforested area in southern Brazil to test the technical and economic feasibility of a direct seeding system with high tree species diversity to restore the tropical seasonal forest. We also compared species performances and tested the effects of seed size and successional group on tree seedling emergence and development. The trial was established at two different sowing times using 31 tree species. For two years after sowing we evaluated seedling emergence, establishment, survival and early growth of tree species, weed competition and costs for plantation establishment and early maintenance. Most species had low seedling emergence and establishment, but high survival rates, implying that low seedling emergence is the main barrier to community assembly that must be overcome. The most successful species had larger seeds, belonged to non-pioneer categories and had slower growth rates. Final costs after two years were lower than has been reported in the literature for most restoration planting using seedlings both in Brazil and elsewhere; however, seedling density was low. Although direct seeding may be a feasible alternative to decrease planting costs, the poor species performances and low seedling density may reduce its applicability. Thus, we recommend direct seeding only in association with the planting of pioneer species seedlings.
id UNSP_91841c433c38c64a75cbe59edeb5af1d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/179631
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Direct seeding reduces costs, but it is not promising for restoring tropical seasonal forestsCostsDirect seedingEcological restorationSeed sizesSuccessional groupsTropical seasonal forestsDirect seeding is a potential technique to restore forests; however, further studies are needed before its application on a large scale. We carried out a field experiment in a deforested area in southern Brazil to test the technical and economic feasibility of a direct seeding system with high tree species diversity to restore the tropical seasonal forest. We also compared species performances and tested the effects of seed size and successional group on tree seedling emergence and development. The trial was established at two different sowing times using 31 tree species. For two years after sowing we evaluated seedling emergence, establishment, survival and early growth of tree species, weed competition and costs for plantation establishment and early maintenance. Most species had low seedling emergence and establishment, but high survival rates, implying that low seedling emergence is the main barrier to community assembly that must be overcome. The most successful species had larger seeds, belonged to non-pioneer categories and had slower growth rates. Final costs after two years were lower than has been reported in the literature for most restoration planting using seedlings both in Brazil and elsewhere; however, seedling density was low. Although direct seeding may be a feasible alternative to decrease planting costs, the poor species performances and low seedling density may reduce its applicability. Thus, we recommend direct seeding only in association with the planting of pioneer species seedlings.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Agriculture (FCA), Campus of BotucatuSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Agriculture (FCA), Campus of BotucatuUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Souza, Diego Cerveira de [UNESP]Engel, Vera Lex [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:36:07Z2018-12-11T17:36:07Z2018-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article35-44application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.019Ecological Engineering, v. 116, p. 35-44.0925-8574http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17963110.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.0192-s2.0-850428715392-s2.0-85042871539.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEcological Engineering1,042info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T13:10:45Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/179631Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:46:36.181701Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Direct seeding reduces costs, but it is not promising for restoring tropical seasonal forests
title Direct seeding reduces costs, but it is not promising for restoring tropical seasonal forests
spellingShingle Direct seeding reduces costs, but it is not promising for restoring tropical seasonal forests
Souza, Diego Cerveira de [UNESP]
Costs
Direct seeding
Ecological restoration
Seed sizes
Successional groups
Tropical seasonal forests
title_short Direct seeding reduces costs, but it is not promising for restoring tropical seasonal forests
title_full Direct seeding reduces costs, but it is not promising for restoring tropical seasonal forests
title_fullStr Direct seeding reduces costs, but it is not promising for restoring tropical seasonal forests
title_full_unstemmed Direct seeding reduces costs, but it is not promising for restoring tropical seasonal forests
title_sort Direct seeding reduces costs, but it is not promising for restoring tropical seasonal forests
author Souza, Diego Cerveira de [UNESP]
author_facet Souza, Diego Cerveira de [UNESP]
Engel, Vera Lex [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Engel, Vera Lex [UNESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Diego Cerveira de [UNESP]
Engel, Vera Lex [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Costs
Direct seeding
Ecological restoration
Seed sizes
Successional groups
Tropical seasonal forests
topic Costs
Direct seeding
Ecological restoration
Seed sizes
Successional groups
Tropical seasonal forests
description Direct seeding is a potential technique to restore forests; however, further studies are needed before its application on a large scale. We carried out a field experiment in a deforested area in southern Brazil to test the technical and economic feasibility of a direct seeding system with high tree species diversity to restore the tropical seasonal forest. We also compared species performances and tested the effects of seed size and successional group on tree seedling emergence and development. The trial was established at two different sowing times using 31 tree species. For two years after sowing we evaluated seedling emergence, establishment, survival and early growth of tree species, weed competition and costs for plantation establishment and early maintenance. Most species had low seedling emergence and establishment, but high survival rates, implying that low seedling emergence is the main barrier to community assembly that must be overcome. The most successful species had larger seeds, belonged to non-pioneer categories and had slower growth rates. Final costs after two years were lower than has been reported in the literature for most restoration planting using seedlings both in Brazil and elsewhere; however, seedling density was low. Although direct seeding may be a feasible alternative to decrease planting costs, the poor species performances and low seedling density may reduce its applicability. Thus, we recommend direct seeding only in association with the planting of pioneer species seedlings.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T17:36:07Z
2018-12-11T17:36:07Z
2018-06-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.019
Ecological Engineering, v. 116, p. 35-44.
0925-8574
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179631
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.019
2-s2.0-85042871539
2-s2.0-85042871539.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.019
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179631
identifier_str_mv Ecological Engineering, v. 116, p. 35-44.
0925-8574
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.019
2-s2.0-85042871539
2-s2.0-85042871539.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Ecological Engineering
1,042
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 35-44
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128415774015488