The Effects of Concurrent Training Combining Both Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training or Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Metabolic Syndrome

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Da Silva, Marco Antônio R.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Baptista, Liliana C., Neves, Rafael S., De França, Elias, Loureiro, Helena, Lira, Fabio Santos [UNESP], Caperuto, Erico C., Veríssimo, Manuel T., Martins, Raul A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00572
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199038
Resumo: To date, there are several knowledge gaps on how to properly prescribe concurrent training to achieve the best dose-response, especially regarding the optimal intensity or volume of the aerobic component. Thus, the objective of this study is to analyze the effects of different aerobic exercise modes and intensities [i.e. aerobic high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous aerobic training (MICT) combined with a resistance training (RT) program] on metabolic outcomes in participants with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Thirty-nine men and women (67.0 ± 6.7 years) volunteered to a 12-weeks exercise intervention (3 week–1, 50 min/session) and were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (a) RT plus MICT (RT+MICT) (2 males; 11 females); (b) RT plus HIIT (RT+HIIT) (4 males; 9 females); and (c) control group (CON) – without formal exercise (4 males; 9 females). Intensity was established between 60 and 70% of maximum heart rate (HRmax) in RT+MICT and ranged from 55–65% to 80–90% HRmax in the RT+HIIT group. Dependent outcomes included morphological, metabolic and hemodynamic variables. Both training groups improved waist circumference (RT+MICT: P = 0.019; RT+HIIT: P = 0.003), but not body weight, fat mass or fat-free mass (P ≥ 0.114). RT+HIIT group improved fasting glucose (P = 0.014), low density lipoprotein [LDL (P = 0.022)], insulin (P = 0.034) and homeostatic model assessment (P = 0.028). RT+MICT group reduced triglycerides (P = 0.053). Both exercise interventions did not change high sensitivity C-reactive protein, glycated hemoglobin, high density lipoprotein and total cholesterol, systolic, diastolic or mean arterial blood pressure (P ≥ 0.05). The CON group reduced the LDL (P = 0.031). This trial suggests that short-term exercise mode and intensity may differently impact the metabolic profile of individuals with MetS. Further, our data suggests that both concurrent trainings promote important cardiometabolic gains, particularly in the RT+HIIT. Nonetheless, due to the small-to-moderate effect size and the short-term intervention length, our data suggests that the intervention length also has an important modulating role in these benefits in older adults with MetS. Therefore, more research is needed to confirm our results using longer exercise interventions and larger groups.
id UNSP_918471ecaacac0d6a0a69825539ac8f6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199038
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling The Effects of Concurrent Training Combining Both Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training or Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Metabolic Syndromeage groupsendurance traininghigh-intensity interval trainingmetabolic syndromeresistance trainingTo date, there are several knowledge gaps on how to properly prescribe concurrent training to achieve the best dose-response, especially regarding the optimal intensity or volume of the aerobic component. Thus, the objective of this study is to analyze the effects of different aerobic exercise modes and intensities [i.e. aerobic high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous aerobic training (MICT) combined with a resistance training (RT) program] on metabolic outcomes in participants with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Thirty-nine men and women (67.0 ± 6.7 years) volunteered to a 12-weeks exercise intervention (3 week–1, 50 min/session) and were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (a) RT plus MICT (RT+MICT) (2 males; 11 females); (b) RT plus HIIT (RT+HIIT) (4 males; 9 females); and (c) control group (CON) – without formal exercise (4 males; 9 females). Intensity was established between 60 and 70% of maximum heart rate (HRmax) in RT+MICT and ranged from 55–65% to 80–90% HRmax in the RT+HIIT group. Dependent outcomes included morphological, metabolic and hemodynamic variables. Both training groups improved waist circumference (RT+MICT: P = 0.019; RT+HIIT: P = 0.003), but not body weight, fat mass or fat-free mass (P ≥ 0.114). RT+HIIT group improved fasting glucose (P = 0.014), low density lipoprotein [LDL (P = 0.022)], insulin (P = 0.034) and homeostatic model assessment (P = 0.028). RT+MICT group reduced triglycerides (P = 0.053). Both exercise interventions did not change high sensitivity C-reactive protein, glycated hemoglobin, high density lipoprotein and total cholesterol, systolic, diastolic or mean arterial blood pressure (P ≥ 0.05). The CON group reduced the LDL (P = 0.031). This trial suggests that short-term exercise mode and intensity may differently impact the metabolic profile of individuals with MetS. Further, our data suggests that both concurrent trainings promote important cardiometabolic gains, particularly in the RT+HIIT. Nonetheless, due to the small-to-moderate effect size and the short-term intervention length, our data suggests that the intervention length also has an important modulating role in these benefits in older adults with MetS. Therefore, more research is needed to confirm our results using longer exercise interventions and larger groups.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education University of CoimbraDepartment of Physical Education Universidade da AmazôniaDepartment of Medicine The University of Alabama at BirminghamHuman Movement Laboratory São Judas Tadeu UniversitySchool of Health Technologies Polytechnic Institute of CoimbraExercise and Immunometabolism Research Group Department of Physical Education Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Exercise and Immunometabolism Research Group Department of Physical Education Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of CoimbraUniversidade da AmazôniaThe University of Alabama at BirminghamSão Judas Tadeu UniversityPolytechnic Institute of CoimbraUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Da Silva, Marco Antônio R.Baptista, Liliana C.Neves, Rafael S.De França, EliasLoureiro, HelenaLira, Fabio Santos [UNESP]Caperuto, Erico C.Veríssimo, Manuel T.Martins, Raul A.2020-12-12T01:29:04Z2020-12-12T01:29:04Z2020-06-11info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00572Frontiers in Physiology, v. 11.1664-042Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/19903810.3389/fphys.2020.005722-s2.0-85087013047Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFrontiers in Physiologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T01:35:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199038Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:35:38.664699Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Effects of Concurrent Training Combining Both Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training or Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Metabolic Syndrome
title The Effects of Concurrent Training Combining Both Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training or Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Metabolic Syndrome
spellingShingle The Effects of Concurrent Training Combining Both Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training or Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Metabolic Syndrome
Da Silva, Marco Antônio R.
age groups
endurance training
high-intensity interval training
metabolic syndrome
resistance training
title_short The Effects of Concurrent Training Combining Both Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training or Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Metabolic Syndrome
title_full The Effects of Concurrent Training Combining Both Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training or Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Metabolic Syndrome
title_fullStr The Effects of Concurrent Training Combining Both Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training or Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Metabolic Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Concurrent Training Combining Both Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training or Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Metabolic Syndrome
title_sort The Effects of Concurrent Training Combining Both Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training or Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Metabolic Syndrome
author Da Silva, Marco Antônio R.
author_facet Da Silva, Marco Antônio R.
Baptista, Liliana C.
Neves, Rafael S.
De França, Elias
Loureiro, Helena
Lira, Fabio Santos [UNESP]
Caperuto, Erico C.
Veríssimo, Manuel T.
Martins, Raul A.
author_role author
author2 Baptista, Liliana C.
Neves, Rafael S.
De França, Elias
Loureiro, Helena
Lira, Fabio Santos [UNESP]
Caperuto, Erico C.
Veríssimo, Manuel T.
Martins, Raul A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv University of Coimbra
Universidade da Amazônia
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
São Judas Tadeu University
Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Da Silva, Marco Antônio R.
Baptista, Liliana C.
Neves, Rafael S.
De França, Elias
Loureiro, Helena
Lira, Fabio Santos [UNESP]
Caperuto, Erico C.
Veríssimo, Manuel T.
Martins, Raul A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv age groups
endurance training
high-intensity interval training
metabolic syndrome
resistance training
topic age groups
endurance training
high-intensity interval training
metabolic syndrome
resistance training
description To date, there are several knowledge gaps on how to properly prescribe concurrent training to achieve the best dose-response, especially regarding the optimal intensity or volume of the aerobic component. Thus, the objective of this study is to analyze the effects of different aerobic exercise modes and intensities [i.e. aerobic high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous aerobic training (MICT) combined with a resistance training (RT) program] on metabolic outcomes in participants with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Thirty-nine men and women (67.0 ± 6.7 years) volunteered to a 12-weeks exercise intervention (3 week–1, 50 min/session) and were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (a) RT plus MICT (RT+MICT) (2 males; 11 females); (b) RT plus HIIT (RT+HIIT) (4 males; 9 females); and (c) control group (CON) – without formal exercise (4 males; 9 females). Intensity was established between 60 and 70% of maximum heart rate (HRmax) in RT+MICT and ranged from 55–65% to 80–90% HRmax in the RT+HIIT group. Dependent outcomes included morphological, metabolic and hemodynamic variables. Both training groups improved waist circumference (RT+MICT: P = 0.019; RT+HIIT: P = 0.003), but not body weight, fat mass or fat-free mass (P ≥ 0.114). RT+HIIT group improved fasting glucose (P = 0.014), low density lipoprotein [LDL (P = 0.022)], insulin (P = 0.034) and homeostatic model assessment (P = 0.028). RT+MICT group reduced triglycerides (P = 0.053). Both exercise interventions did not change high sensitivity C-reactive protein, glycated hemoglobin, high density lipoprotein and total cholesterol, systolic, diastolic or mean arterial blood pressure (P ≥ 0.05). The CON group reduced the LDL (P = 0.031). This trial suggests that short-term exercise mode and intensity may differently impact the metabolic profile of individuals with MetS. Further, our data suggests that both concurrent trainings promote important cardiometabolic gains, particularly in the RT+HIIT. Nonetheless, due to the small-to-moderate effect size and the short-term intervention length, our data suggests that the intervention length also has an important modulating role in these benefits in older adults with MetS. Therefore, more research is needed to confirm our results using longer exercise interventions and larger groups.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T01:29:04Z
2020-12-12T01:29:04Z
2020-06-11
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00572
Frontiers in Physiology, v. 11.
1664-042X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199038
10.3389/fphys.2020.00572
2-s2.0-85087013047
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00572
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199038
identifier_str_mv Frontiers in Physiology, v. 11.
1664-042X
10.3389/fphys.2020.00572
2-s2.0-85087013047
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers in Physiology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129093521113088