Assessment of the interface between implant and abutments of five systems by Scanning Electronic Microscopy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219889 |
Resumo: | Aim: The objective of this study was to assess, by Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM), the interface between the platforms of five implant systems and the conic abutments (I) gold ucla type (II) and multi-unit type (III). Materials and methods: The implant systems used and their respective abutments studied were: AS Technology Titanium Fix (I, II, III), Conexão (I, II, III), Neodent (I, II, III), Sterngold Implamed (I, II) and 3i Implant Innovation (I, II). The abutments were screwed to the implants with a 20 Ncm torque. For each sample, 6 points were selected for measurement, 3 on the right and 3 three on the left side: the most external point, the middle point and the most internal point at the interface formed between the implant platform and the abutment. Results: On the outer point there was a variation in measurement from 0 to 11.173 μm, on the middle point there was variation from 0 to 8.314 μm and in the internal point there was a variation from 0 to 15.267 μm. The smallest gaps for abutments I, II and III were obtained with Neodent (0.733 μm), Sterngold Implamed (0.513 μm) and Conexão (0.503 μm), respectively. The Neodent system showed statistically significant differences with the other systems analyzed in the right internal point (p<0.05), while on the left ones differences were not significant only with the the Conexão system (p=0.168); the latter showed statistically significant differences with the other systems except for the 3i system (p=0.311). Conclusion: It is concluded that the Neodent system differed from the other ones in the right and left internal points (p<0.05) except for the Conexão system (p=0.168), which also differed from the other ones, and the 3i system (p=0.311). Maladjustment values obtained are similar to those reported in the literature. |
id |
UNSP_919f445fe1227827f5d861127bfed07c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219889 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Assessment of the interface between implant and abutments of five systems by Scanning Electronic MicroscopyAbutmentGapImplantPeri-implantAim: The objective of this study was to assess, by Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM), the interface between the platforms of five implant systems and the conic abutments (I) gold ucla type (II) and multi-unit type (III). Materials and methods: The implant systems used and their respective abutments studied were: AS Technology Titanium Fix (I, II, III), Conexão (I, II, III), Neodent (I, II, III), Sterngold Implamed (I, II) and 3i Implant Innovation (I, II). The abutments were screwed to the implants with a 20 Ncm torque. For each sample, 6 points were selected for measurement, 3 on the right and 3 three on the left side: the most external point, the middle point and the most internal point at the interface formed between the implant platform and the abutment. Results: On the outer point there was a variation in measurement from 0 to 11.173 μm, on the middle point there was variation from 0 to 8.314 μm and in the internal point there was a variation from 0 to 15.267 μm. The smallest gaps for abutments I, II and III were obtained with Neodent (0.733 μm), Sterngold Implamed (0.513 μm) and Conexão (0.503 μm), respectively. The Neodent system showed statistically significant differences with the other systems analyzed in the right internal point (p<0.05), while on the left ones differences were not significant only with the the Conexão system (p=0.168); the latter showed statistically significant differences with the other systems except for the 3i system (p=0.311). Conclusion: It is concluded that the Neodent system differed from the other ones in the right and left internal points (p<0.05) except for the Conexão system (p=0.168), which also differed from the other ones, and the 3i system (p=0.311). Maladjustment values obtained are similar to those reported in the literature.São Paulo University State Dental School of Araçatuba UNESP, São PauloOral and Maxillofacial SurgeryDepartment of Morphology, Dentistry and Physiology Dental School of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo, USPBiomaterials Group Unesp-AraraquaraSão Paulo University State Dental School of Araçatuba UNESP, São PauloBiomaterials Group Unesp-AraraquaraUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Fujiwara, Carlos Alberto [UNESP]Filho, Osvaldo MagroOliveira, Nilson T. C. [UNESP]Queiroz, Thallita PereiraAbla, Marcelo Sabagg [UNESP]Pardini, Luiz Carlos2022-04-28T18:58:12Z2022-04-28T18:58:12Z2009-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article60-66Journal of Osseointegration, v. 1, n. 2, p. 60-66, 2009.2036-413X2036-4121http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2198892-s2.0-84873932577Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Osseointegrationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T18:58:12Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219889Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:50:07.049512Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment of the interface between implant and abutments of five systems by Scanning Electronic Microscopy |
title |
Assessment of the interface between implant and abutments of five systems by Scanning Electronic Microscopy |
spellingShingle |
Assessment of the interface between implant and abutments of five systems by Scanning Electronic Microscopy Fujiwara, Carlos Alberto [UNESP] Abutment Gap Implant Peri-implant |
title_short |
Assessment of the interface between implant and abutments of five systems by Scanning Electronic Microscopy |
title_full |
Assessment of the interface between implant and abutments of five systems by Scanning Electronic Microscopy |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of the interface between implant and abutments of five systems by Scanning Electronic Microscopy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of the interface between implant and abutments of five systems by Scanning Electronic Microscopy |
title_sort |
Assessment of the interface between implant and abutments of five systems by Scanning Electronic Microscopy |
author |
Fujiwara, Carlos Alberto [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Fujiwara, Carlos Alberto [UNESP] Filho, Osvaldo Magro Oliveira, Nilson T. C. [UNESP] Queiroz, Thallita Pereira Abla, Marcelo Sabagg [UNESP] Pardini, Luiz Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Filho, Osvaldo Magro Oliveira, Nilson T. C. [UNESP] Queiroz, Thallita Pereira Abla, Marcelo Sabagg [UNESP] Pardini, Luiz Carlos |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fujiwara, Carlos Alberto [UNESP] Filho, Osvaldo Magro Oliveira, Nilson T. C. [UNESP] Queiroz, Thallita Pereira Abla, Marcelo Sabagg [UNESP] Pardini, Luiz Carlos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Abutment Gap Implant Peri-implant |
topic |
Abutment Gap Implant Peri-implant |
description |
Aim: The objective of this study was to assess, by Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM), the interface between the platforms of five implant systems and the conic abutments (I) gold ucla type (II) and multi-unit type (III). Materials and methods: The implant systems used and their respective abutments studied were: AS Technology Titanium Fix (I, II, III), Conexão (I, II, III), Neodent (I, II, III), Sterngold Implamed (I, II) and 3i Implant Innovation (I, II). The abutments were screwed to the implants with a 20 Ncm torque. For each sample, 6 points were selected for measurement, 3 on the right and 3 three on the left side: the most external point, the middle point and the most internal point at the interface formed between the implant platform and the abutment. Results: On the outer point there was a variation in measurement from 0 to 11.173 μm, on the middle point there was variation from 0 to 8.314 μm and in the internal point there was a variation from 0 to 15.267 μm. The smallest gaps for abutments I, II and III were obtained with Neodent (0.733 μm), Sterngold Implamed (0.513 μm) and Conexão (0.503 μm), respectively. The Neodent system showed statistically significant differences with the other systems analyzed in the right internal point (p<0.05), while on the left ones differences were not significant only with the the Conexão system (p=0.168); the latter showed statistically significant differences with the other systems except for the 3i system (p=0.311). Conclusion: It is concluded that the Neodent system differed from the other ones in the right and left internal points (p<0.05) except for the Conexão system (p=0.168), which also differed from the other ones, and the 3i system (p=0.311). Maladjustment values obtained are similar to those reported in the literature. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-08-01 2022-04-28T18:58:12Z 2022-04-28T18:58:12Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Osseointegration, v. 1, n. 2, p. 60-66, 2009. 2036-413X 2036-4121 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219889 2-s2.0-84873932577 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Osseointegration, v. 1, n. 2, p. 60-66, 2009. 2036-413X 2036-4121 2-s2.0-84873932577 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219889 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Osseointegration |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
60-66 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129364389265408 |