Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233563 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990 Rhipicephalus sanguineus. In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in R. sanguineus, which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing Leishmania spp. in R. sanguineus, thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB. |
id |
UNSP_940571edf8eedfca8ff5ced18a383ff4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233563 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniquesDiagnosticELISALeishmaniaRT-PCRSmearsTicksThe aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990 Rhipicephalus sanguineus. In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in R. sanguineus, which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing Leishmania spp. in R. sanguineus, thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB.Institute of Agricultural Sciences Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys (UFVJM) Avenida Universitária, MGSchool of Veterinary Medicine São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloSchool of Medical Sciences São Paulo Brazil and Laboratory of Image Data Science Institute of Computing University of CampinasSchool of Veterinary Medicine São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloUniversidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Santos-Doni, Thaís RabeloViol, Milena Araúz [UNESP]Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix [UNESP]Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda [UNESP]Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki [UNESP]da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP]Gomes, Jancarlo FerreiraBresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP]2022-05-01T09:30:45Z2022-05-01T09:30:45Z2022-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article109-120http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-yVeterinary Research Communications, v. 46, n. 1, p. 109-120, 2022.1573-74460165-7380http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23356310.1007/s11259-021-09834-y2-s2.0-85115370494Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengVeterinary Research Communicationsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-04T19:15:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233563Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-04T19:15:52Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques |
title |
Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques |
spellingShingle |
Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo Diagnostic ELISA Leishmania RT-PCR Smears Ticks |
title_short |
Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques |
title_full |
Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques |
title_fullStr |
Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques |
title_full_unstemmed |
Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques |
title_sort |
Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques |
author |
Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo |
author_facet |
Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo Viol, Milena Araúz [UNESP] Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix [UNESP] Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda [UNESP] Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki [UNESP] da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP] Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Viol, Milena Araúz [UNESP] Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix [UNESP] Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda [UNESP] Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki [UNESP] da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP] Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo Viol, Milena Araúz [UNESP] Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix [UNESP] Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda [UNESP] Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki [UNESP] da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP] Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Diagnostic ELISA Leishmania RT-PCR Smears Ticks |
topic |
Diagnostic ELISA Leishmania RT-PCR Smears Ticks |
description |
The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990 Rhipicephalus sanguineus. In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in R. sanguineus, which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing Leishmania spp. in R. sanguineus, thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-01T09:30:45Z 2022-05-01T09:30:45Z 2022-02-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y Veterinary Research Communications, v. 46, n. 1, p. 109-120, 2022. 1573-7446 0165-7380 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233563 10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y 2-s2.0-85115370494 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233563 |
identifier_str_mv |
Veterinary Research Communications, v. 46, n. 1, p. 109-120, 2022. 1573-7446 0165-7380 10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y 2-s2.0-85115370494 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Veterinary Research Communications |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
109-120 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1810021403912568832 |