Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Viol, Milena Araúz [UNESP], Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix [UNESP], Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda [UNESP], Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki [UNESP], da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP], Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira, Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233563
Resumo: The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990 Rhipicephalus sanguineus. In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in R. sanguineus, which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing Leishmania spp. in R. sanguineus, thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB.
id UNSP_940571edf8eedfca8ff5ced18a383ff4
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233563
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniquesDiagnosticELISALeishmaniaRT-PCRSmearsTicksThe aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990 Rhipicephalus sanguineus. In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in R. sanguineus, which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing Leishmania spp. in R. sanguineus, thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB.Institute of Agricultural Sciences Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys (UFVJM) Avenida Universitária, MGSchool of Veterinary Medicine São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloSchool of Medical Sciences São Paulo Brazil and Laboratory of Image Data Science Institute of Computing University of CampinasSchool of Veterinary Medicine São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloUniversidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Santos-Doni, Thaís RabeloViol, Milena Araúz [UNESP]Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix [UNESP]Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda [UNESP]Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki [UNESP]da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP]Gomes, Jancarlo FerreiraBresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP]2022-05-01T09:30:45Z2022-05-01T09:30:45Z2022-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article109-120http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-yVeterinary Research Communications, v. 46, n. 1, p. 109-120, 2022.1573-74460165-7380http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23356310.1007/s11259-021-09834-y2-s2.0-85115370494Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengVeterinary Research Communicationsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-04T19:15:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233563Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-04T19:15:52Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques
title Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques
spellingShingle Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques
Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo
Diagnostic
ELISA
Leishmania
RT-PCR
Smears
Ticks
title_short Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques
title_full Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques
title_fullStr Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques
title_full_unstemmed Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques
title_sort Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques
author Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo
author_facet Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo
Viol, Milena Araúz [UNESP]
Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix [UNESP]
Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda [UNESP]
Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki [UNESP]
da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP]
Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira
Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Viol, Milena Araúz [UNESP]
Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix [UNESP]
Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda [UNESP]
Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki [UNESP]
da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP]
Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira
Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo
Viol, Milena Araúz [UNESP]
Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix [UNESP]
Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda [UNESP]
Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki [UNESP]
da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP]
Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira
Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diagnostic
ELISA
Leishmania
RT-PCR
Smears
Ticks
topic Diagnostic
ELISA
Leishmania
RT-PCR
Smears
Ticks
description The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990 Rhipicephalus sanguineus. In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in R. sanguineus, which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing Leishmania spp. in R. sanguineus, thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-01T09:30:45Z
2022-05-01T09:30:45Z
2022-02-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y
Veterinary Research Communications, v. 46, n. 1, p. 109-120, 2022.
1573-7446
0165-7380
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233563
10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y
2-s2.0-85115370494
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233563
identifier_str_mv Veterinary Research Communications, v. 46, n. 1, p. 109-120, 2022.
1573-7446
0165-7380
10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y
2-s2.0-85115370494
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Veterinary Research Communications
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 109-120
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1810021403912568832