Preanesthetic assessment data do not influence the time for tracheal intubation with Airtraq (TM) video laryngoscope in obese patients
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2012.07.004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/130693 |
Resumo: | Purpose this study investigated the influence of anatomical predictors on difficult laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation in obese patients by comparing Macintosh and Airtraq™ laryngoscopes. Methods from 132 bariatric surgery patients (body mass index ≥ 35 kg m−1), cervical perimeter, sternomental distance, interincisor distance, and Mallampati score were recorded. The patients were randomized into two groups according to whether a Macintosh (n = 64) or an Airtraq™ (n = 68) laryngoscope was used for tracheal intubation. Time required for intubation was the first outcome. Cormack–Lehane score, number of intubation attempts, the Macintosh blade used, any need for external tracheal compression or the use of gum elastic bougie were recorded. Intubation failure and strategies adopted were also registered. Results intubation failed in two patients in the Macintosh laryngoscope group, and these patients were included as worst cases scenario. The intubation times were 36.9 + 22.8 s and 13.7 + 3.1 s for the Macintosh and Airtraq™ laryngoscope groups (p < 0.01), respectively. Cormack–Lehane scores were also lower for the Airtraq™ group. One patient in the Macintosh group with intubation failure was quickly intubated with the Airtraq™. Cervical circumference (p < 0.01) and interincisor distance (p < 0.05) influenced the time required for intubation in the Macintosh group but not in the Airtraq™ group. Conclusion in obese patients despite increased neck circumference and limited mouth opening, the Airtraq™ laryngoscope affords faster tracheal intubation than the Macintosh laryngoscope, and it may serve as an alternative when conventional laryngoscopy fails. |
id |
UNSP_94be921b917804dca57fd510f409807b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/130693 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Preanesthetic assessment data do not influence the time for tracheal intubation with Airtraq (TM) video laryngoscope in obese patientsDatos de evaluación preanestésica no influyen en el tiempo de intubación traqueal con el videolaringoscopio Airtraq(r) en pacientes obesosDados da avaliação pré-anestésica não influenciam o tempo de intubação com o videolaringoscópio Airtraq(r) em pacientes obesosObesityIntubationLaryngoscopyAirtraq(tm)ObesidadeIntubaçãoLaringoscopiaAirtraq(r)Purpose this study investigated the influence of anatomical predictors on difficult laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation in obese patients by comparing Macintosh and Airtraq™ laryngoscopes. Methods from 132 bariatric surgery patients (body mass index ≥ 35 kg m−1), cervical perimeter, sternomental distance, interincisor distance, and Mallampati score were recorded. The patients were randomized into two groups according to whether a Macintosh (n = 64) or an Airtraq™ (n = 68) laryngoscope was used for tracheal intubation. Time required for intubation was the first outcome. Cormack–Lehane score, number of intubation attempts, the Macintosh blade used, any need for external tracheal compression or the use of gum elastic bougie were recorded. Intubation failure and strategies adopted were also registered. Results intubation failed in two patients in the Macintosh laryngoscope group, and these patients were included as worst cases scenario. The intubation times were 36.9 + 22.8 s and 13.7 + 3.1 s for the Macintosh and Airtraq™ laryngoscope groups (p < 0.01), respectively. Cormack–Lehane scores were also lower for the Airtraq™ group. One patient in the Macintosh group with intubation failure was quickly intubated with the Airtraq™. Cervical circumference (p < 0.01) and interincisor distance (p < 0.05) influenced the time required for intubation in the Macintosh group but not in the Airtraq™ group. Conclusion in obese patients despite increased neck circumference and limited mouth opening, the Airtraq™ laryngoscope affords faster tracheal intubation than the Macintosh laryngoscope, and it may serve as an alternative when conventional laryngoscopy fails.Objetivo esse estudo investigou a influência de preditores anatômicos para laringoscopia e intubação orotraqueal difícil em pacientes obesos mediante a comparação dos laringoscópios Macintosh e Airtraq®. Métodos em 132 pacientes de cirurgia bariátrica foram registrados: perímetro cervical, distância esternomentoniana, distância inter‐incisivos e escore de Mallampati. Os pacientes foram randomizados em dois grupos, de acordo com o laringoscópio usado para a intubação traqueal: Macintosh (n = 64) ou Airtraq® (n = 68). O tempo até a intubação foi o primeiro desfecho. Também foram registrados: escore de Cormack‐Lehane, número de tentativas de intubação, lamina Macintosh usada, necessidade de compressão traqueal externa, ou uso de um bougie elástico de borracha. Também foram anotados o insucesso na intubação e as estratégias adotadas. Resultados houve insucesso na intubação em dois pacientes no grupo com laringoscópio de Macintosh; esses pacientes foram incluídos como o pior cenário de caso. Os tempos para intubação foram 36,9 ± 22,8 seg e 13,7 ± 3,1 seg para os grupos Macintosh e Airtraq® (p < 0,01), respectivamente. Os escores de Cormack‐Lehane também foram mais baixos para o grupo Airtraq®. Um paciente no grupo Macintosh com insucesso na intubação foi rapidamente intubado com o laringoscópio Airtraq®. A circunferência cervical (p < 0,01) e a distância inter‐incisivos (p < 0,05) influenciaram o tempo até a intubação no grupo Macintosh, mas não no grupo Airtraq®. Conclusão em pacientes obesos, apesar da maior circunferência cervical e da limitada abertura da boca, o laringoscópio Airtraq® possibilita uma intubação traqueal mais rápida versus laringoscópio Macintosh, podendo funcionar como alternativa, nos casos de insucesso com a laringoscopia convencional.Objetivo el objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la influencia de los predictores anatómicos en la laringoscopia e intubación orotraqueal difíciles en pacientes obesos comparando el laringoscopio Macintosh y el videolaringoscopio Airtraq®. Métodos en 132 pacientes sometidos a cirugía bariátrica (índice de masa corporal ≥ 35 kg/m2), se registraron los valores de perímetro cervical, distancia mentoesternal, distancia interincisivos y puntuación de Mallampati. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados en 2 grupos de acuerdo con el uso de los laringoscopios Macintosh (n = 64) o Airtraq® (n = 68) para intubación traqueal. El resultado primario fue el tiempo necesario para la intubación. Se registraron la puntuación de Cormack-Lehane, el número de intentos de intubación, el uso de lámina Macintosh y cualquier necesidad de compresión traqueal externa o la utilización de introductor del tubo traqueal. Las estrategias de intubación adoptadas y los fallos de las intubaciones también fueron recogidos en el informe. Resultados en el grupo Macintosh, 2 pacientes presentaron fallo en la intubación y fueron incluidos como los peores casos de intubación. Los tiempos de intubación fueron 36,9 ± 22,8 s y 13,7 ± 3,1 s para los grupos Macintosh y Airtraq® (p < 0,01), respectivamente. Las puntuaciones de Cormack-Lehane también fueron menores para el grupo Airtraq®. Un paciente del grupo Macintosh con fallo de intubación fue rápidamente intubado con el Airtraq®. La circunferencia cervical (p < 0,01) y la distancia interincisivos (p < 0,05) influyeron en el tiempo necesario para la intubación en el grupo Macintosh, pero no en el grupo Airtraq®. Conclusión en los pacientes obesos, a pesar del aumento de la circunferencia del cuello y de la abertura limitada de la boca, el laringoscopio Airtraq® ofrece una intubación traqueal más rápida que el laringoscopio Macintosh, pudiendo servir como una alternativa cuando la laringoscopia convencional falle.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Hospital do Coração de Balneário Camboriu Department of AnesthesioloyUnesp Falcudade de Mediciana de Botucatu Department of AnesthesioloyUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Med Botucatu, Dept Anesthesiol, Sao Paulo, SC, BrazilSociedade Brasileira de AnestesiologiaHosp Coracao Balneario CamboriuUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Ranieri Júnior, DanteZinelli, Fabio RiefelNeubauer, Adecir GeraldoSchneider, Andre P.Nascimento Junior, Paulo do [UNESP]2015-02-02T12:39:33Z2015-02-02T12:39:33Z2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article190-194application/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2012.07.004Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia, v. 64, n. 3, p. 190-194, 2014.0034-7094http://hdl.handle.net/11449/13069310.1016/j.bjane.2012.07.004S0034-70942014000300190WOS:000339139300009S0034-70942014000300190.pdf87453589896806000000-0002-2323-9159SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologia0.8500,320info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-14T13:20:26Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/130693Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-14T13:20:26Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Preanesthetic assessment data do not influence the time for tracheal intubation with Airtraq (TM) video laryngoscope in obese patients Datos de evaluación preanestésica no influyen en el tiempo de intubación traqueal con el videolaringoscopio Airtraq(r) en pacientes obesos Dados da avaliação pré-anestésica não influenciam o tempo de intubação com o videolaringoscópio Airtraq(r) em pacientes obesos |
title |
Preanesthetic assessment data do not influence the time for tracheal intubation with Airtraq (TM) video laryngoscope in obese patients |
spellingShingle |
Preanesthetic assessment data do not influence the time for tracheal intubation with Airtraq (TM) video laryngoscope in obese patients Ranieri Júnior, Dante Obesity Intubation Laryngoscopy Airtraq(tm) Obesidade Intubação Laringoscopia Airtraq(r) |
title_short |
Preanesthetic assessment data do not influence the time for tracheal intubation with Airtraq (TM) video laryngoscope in obese patients |
title_full |
Preanesthetic assessment data do not influence the time for tracheal intubation with Airtraq (TM) video laryngoscope in obese patients |
title_fullStr |
Preanesthetic assessment data do not influence the time for tracheal intubation with Airtraq (TM) video laryngoscope in obese patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Preanesthetic assessment data do not influence the time for tracheal intubation with Airtraq (TM) video laryngoscope in obese patients |
title_sort |
Preanesthetic assessment data do not influence the time for tracheal intubation with Airtraq (TM) video laryngoscope in obese patients |
author |
Ranieri Júnior, Dante |
author_facet |
Ranieri Júnior, Dante Zinelli, Fabio Riefel Neubauer, Adecir Geraldo Schneider, Andre P. Nascimento Junior, Paulo do [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zinelli, Fabio Riefel Neubauer, Adecir Geraldo Schneider, Andre P. Nascimento Junior, Paulo do [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Hosp Coracao Balneario Camboriu Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ranieri Júnior, Dante Zinelli, Fabio Riefel Neubauer, Adecir Geraldo Schneider, Andre P. Nascimento Junior, Paulo do [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Obesity Intubation Laryngoscopy Airtraq(tm) Obesidade Intubação Laringoscopia Airtraq(r) |
topic |
Obesity Intubation Laryngoscopy Airtraq(tm) Obesidade Intubação Laringoscopia Airtraq(r) |
description |
Purpose this study investigated the influence of anatomical predictors on difficult laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation in obese patients by comparing Macintosh and Airtraq™ laryngoscopes. Methods from 132 bariatric surgery patients (body mass index ≥ 35 kg m−1), cervical perimeter, sternomental distance, interincisor distance, and Mallampati score were recorded. The patients were randomized into two groups according to whether a Macintosh (n = 64) or an Airtraq™ (n = 68) laryngoscope was used for tracheal intubation. Time required for intubation was the first outcome. Cormack–Lehane score, number of intubation attempts, the Macintosh blade used, any need for external tracheal compression or the use of gum elastic bougie were recorded. Intubation failure and strategies adopted were also registered. Results intubation failed in two patients in the Macintosh laryngoscope group, and these patients were included as worst cases scenario. The intubation times were 36.9 + 22.8 s and 13.7 + 3.1 s for the Macintosh and Airtraq™ laryngoscope groups (p < 0.01), respectively. Cormack–Lehane scores were also lower for the Airtraq™ group. One patient in the Macintosh group with intubation failure was quickly intubated with the Airtraq™. Cervical circumference (p < 0.01) and interincisor distance (p < 0.05) influenced the time required for intubation in the Macintosh group but not in the Airtraq™ group. Conclusion in obese patients despite increased neck circumference and limited mouth opening, the Airtraq™ laryngoscope affords faster tracheal intubation than the Macintosh laryngoscope, and it may serve as an alternative when conventional laryngoscopy fails. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-06-01 2015-02-02T12:39:33Z 2015-02-02T12:39:33Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2012.07.004 Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia, v. 64, n. 3, p. 190-194, 2014. 0034-7094 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/130693 10.1016/j.bjane.2012.07.004 S0034-70942014000300190 WOS:000339139300009 S0034-70942014000300190.pdf 8745358989680600 0000-0002-2323-9159 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2012.07.004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/130693 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia, v. 64, n. 3, p. 190-194, 2014. 0034-7094 10.1016/j.bjane.2012.07.004 S0034-70942014000300190 WOS:000339139300009 S0034-70942014000300190.pdf 8745358989680600 0000-0002-2323-9159 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia 0.850 0,320 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
190-194 application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128147599654912 |