Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa Silva, Edgard Henrique [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Soares, Renato S. [UNESP], Diniz, Guilherme M. [UNESP], Franco, Carolina A. [UNESP], Marin, Marcus V. [UNESP], Candido, Willame S. [UNESP], Braz, Leila T. [UNESP], Soares, Pedro Luiz M. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.004
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189888
Resumo: The root-knot nematodes (RKN) challenge okra production (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) worldwide and there are no reports of genetic resistance within the genus Abelmoschus. As an alternative, the compatibility for grafting of RKN-resistant malvaceous species with okra was assessed. Cotton (Gossypium spp.) genotypes are incompatible for grafting with okra. The kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.), the false roselle (Hibiscus acetosella Welw. ex Hiern.) and the roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) are compatible. However, the rootstock must be sown five days after the scion to promote better grafting compatibility. The performance of grafted okra onto kenaf and false roselle was assessed in two experiments: RKN-free field in the open, and in the presence or not of Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in protected environment. The effect of grafting along time was addressed in the open field experiment. In RKN-free conditions, no differences were observed between rootstocks and self-grafted and non-grafted control. In the presence of M. incognita race 3, the resistant rootstocks provided superior plant development and production due low nematode reproduction. Therefore, grafting okra onto resistant rootstocks is a potential prophylactic measure to manage RKN.
id UNSP_97252518f8165a50849a1acce19626e6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/189888
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidatesAbelmoschus esculentus L. MoenchGenetic resistanceGrafting compatibilityIntergeneric graftingMeloidogyne spp.The root-knot nematodes (RKN) challenge okra production (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) worldwide and there are no reports of genetic resistance within the genus Abelmoschus. As an alternative, the compatibility for grafting of RKN-resistant malvaceous species with okra was assessed. Cotton (Gossypium spp.) genotypes are incompatible for grafting with okra. The kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.), the false roselle (Hibiscus acetosella Welw. ex Hiern.) and the roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) are compatible. However, the rootstock must be sown five days after the scion to promote better grafting compatibility. The performance of grafted okra onto kenaf and false roselle was assessed in two experiments: RKN-free field in the open, and in the presence or not of Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in protected environment. The effect of grafting along time was addressed in the open field experiment. In RKN-free conditions, no differences were observed between rootstocks and self-grafted and non-grafted control. In the presence of M. incognita race 3, the resistant rootstocks provided superior plant development and production due low nematode reproduction. Therefore, grafting okra onto resistant rootstocks is a potential prophylactic measure to manage RKN.São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Agricultural and Veterinarian SciencesSão Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Agricultural and Veterinarian SciencesUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Costa Silva, Edgard Henrique [UNESP]Soares, Renato S. [UNESP]Diniz, Guilherme M. [UNESP]Franco, Carolina A. [UNESP]Marin, Marcus V. [UNESP]Candido, Willame S. [UNESP]Braz, Leila T. [UNESP]Soares, Pedro Luiz M. [UNESP]2019-10-06T16:55:29Z2019-10-06T16:55:29Z2019-02-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article354-359http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.004Scientia Horticulturae, v. 246, p. 354-359.0304-4238http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18988810.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.0042-s2.0-85056659463Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengScientia Horticulturaeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T21:09:56Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/189888Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-22T21:09:56Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates
title Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates
spellingShingle Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates
Costa Silva, Edgard Henrique [UNESP]
Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench
Genetic resistance
Grafting compatibility
Intergeneric grafting
Meloidogyne spp.
title_short Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates
title_full Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates
title_fullStr Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates
title_full_unstemmed Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates
title_sort Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates
author Costa Silva, Edgard Henrique [UNESP]
author_facet Costa Silva, Edgard Henrique [UNESP]
Soares, Renato S. [UNESP]
Diniz, Guilherme M. [UNESP]
Franco, Carolina A. [UNESP]
Marin, Marcus V. [UNESP]
Candido, Willame S. [UNESP]
Braz, Leila T. [UNESP]
Soares, Pedro Luiz M. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Soares, Renato S. [UNESP]
Diniz, Guilherme M. [UNESP]
Franco, Carolina A. [UNESP]
Marin, Marcus V. [UNESP]
Candido, Willame S. [UNESP]
Braz, Leila T. [UNESP]
Soares, Pedro Luiz M. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa Silva, Edgard Henrique [UNESP]
Soares, Renato S. [UNESP]
Diniz, Guilherme M. [UNESP]
Franco, Carolina A. [UNESP]
Marin, Marcus V. [UNESP]
Candido, Willame S. [UNESP]
Braz, Leila T. [UNESP]
Soares, Pedro Luiz M. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench
Genetic resistance
Grafting compatibility
Intergeneric grafting
Meloidogyne spp.
topic Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench
Genetic resistance
Grafting compatibility
Intergeneric grafting
Meloidogyne spp.
description The root-knot nematodes (RKN) challenge okra production (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) worldwide and there are no reports of genetic resistance within the genus Abelmoschus. As an alternative, the compatibility for grafting of RKN-resistant malvaceous species with okra was assessed. Cotton (Gossypium spp.) genotypes are incompatible for grafting with okra. The kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.), the false roselle (Hibiscus acetosella Welw. ex Hiern.) and the roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) are compatible. However, the rootstock must be sown five days after the scion to promote better grafting compatibility. The performance of grafted okra onto kenaf and false roselle was assessed in two experiments: RKN-free field in the open, and in the presence or not of Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in protected environment. The effect of grafting along time was addressed in the open field experiment. In RKN-free conditions, no differences were observed between rootstocks and self-grafted and non-grafted control. In the presence of M. incognita race 3, the resistant rootstocks provided superior plant development and production due low nematode reproduction. Therefore, grafting okra onto resistant rootstocks is a potential prophylactic measure to manage RKN.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-06T16:55:29Z
2019-10-06T16:55:29Z
2019-02-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.004
Scientia Horticulturae, v. 246, p. 354-359.
0304-4238
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189888
10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.004
2-s2.0-85056659463
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.004
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189888
identifier_str_mv Scientia Horticulturae, v. 246, p. 354-359.
0304-4238
10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.004
2-s2.0-85056659463
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Horticulturae
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 354-359
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964733587062784