Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189888 |
Resumo: | The root-knot nematodes (RKN) challenge okra production (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) worldwide and there are no reports of genetic resistance within the genus Abelmoschus. As an alternative, the compatibility for grafting of RKN-resistant malvaceous species with okra was assessed. Cotton (Gossypium spp.) genotypes are incompatible for grafting with okra. The kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.), the false roselle (Hibiscus acetosella Welw. ex Hiern.) and the roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) are compatible. However, the rootstock must be sown five days after the scion to promote better grafting compatibility. The performance of grafted okra onto kenaf and false roselle was assessed in two experiments: RKN-free field in the open, and in the presence or not of Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in protected environment. The effect of grafting along time was addressed in the open field experiment. In RKN-free conditions, no differences were observed between rootstocks and self-grafted and non-grafted control. In the presence of M. incognita race 3, the resistant rootstocks provided superior plant development and production due low nematode reproduction. Therefore, grafting okra onto resistant rootstocks is a potential prophylactic measure to manage RKN. |
id |
UNSP_97252518f8165a50849a1acce19626e6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/189888 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidatesAbelmoschus esculentus L. MoenchGenetic resistanceGrafting compatibilityIntergeneric graftingMeloidogyne spp.The root-knot nematodes (RKN) challenge okra production (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) worldwide and there are no reports of genetic resistance within the genus Abelmoschus. As an alternative, the compatibility for grafting of RKN-resistant malvaceous species with okra was assessed. Cotton (Gossypium spp.) genotypes are incompatible for grafting with okra. The kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.), the false roselle (Hibiscus acetosella Welw. ex Hiern.) and the roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) are compatible. However, the rootstock must be sown five days after the scion to promote better grafting compatibility. The performance of grafted okra onto kenaf and false roselle was assessed in two experiments: RKN-free field in the open, and in the presence or not of Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in protected environment. The effect of grafting along time was addressed in the open field experiment. In RKN-free conditions, no differences were observed between rootstocks and self-grafted and non-grafted control. In the presence of M. incognita race 3, the resistant rootstocks provided superior plant development and production due low nematode reproduction. Therefore, grafting okra onto resistant rootstocks is a potential prophylactic measure to manage RKN.São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Agricultural and Veterinarian SciencesSão Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Agricultural and Veterinarian SciencesUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Costa Silva, Edgard Henrique [UNESP]Soares, Renato S. [UNESP]Diniz, Guilherme M. [UNESP]Franco, Carolina A. [UNESP]Marin, Marcus V. [UNESP]Candido, Willame S. [UNESP]Braz, Leila T. [UNESP]Soares, Pedro Luiz M. [UNESP]2019-10-06T16:55:29Z2019-10-06T16:55:29Z2019-02-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article354-359http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.004Scientia Horticulturae, v. 246, p. 354-359.0304-4238http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18988810.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.0042-s2.0-85056659463Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengScientia Horticulturaeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T13:55:36Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/189888Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:16:05.089491Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates |
title |
Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates |
spellingShingle |
Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates Costa Silva, Edgard Henrique [UNESP] Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench Genetic resistance Grafting compatibility Intergeneric grafting Meloidogyne spp. |
title_short |
Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates |
title_full |
Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates |
title_fullStr |
Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates |
title_sort |
Grafting as a management tool to control Meloidogyne incognita in okra: Identifying rootstocks candidates |
author |
Costa Silva, Edgard Henrique [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Costa Silva, Edgard Henrique [UNESP] Soares, Renato S. [UNESP] Diniz, Guilherme M. [UNESP] Franco, Carolina A. [UNESP] Marin, Marcus V. [UNESP] Candido, Willame S. [UNESP] Braz, Leila T. [UNESP] Soares, Pedro Luiz M. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Soares, Renato S. [UNESP] Diniz, Guilherme M. [UNESP] Franco, Carolina A. [UNESP] Marin, Marcus V. [UNESP] Candido, Willame S. [UNESP] Braz, Leila T. [UNESP] Soares, Pedro Luiz M. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa Silva, Edgard Henrique [UNESP] Soares, Renato S. [UNESP] Diniz, Guilherme M. [UNESP] Franco, Carolina A. [UNESP] Marin, Marcus V. [UNESP] Candido, Willame S. [UNESP] Braz, Leila T. [UNESP] Soares, Pedro Luiz M. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench Genetic resistance Grafting compatibility Intergeneric grafting Meloidogyne spp. |
topic |
Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench Genetic resistance Grafting compatibility Intergeneric grafting Meloidogyne spp. |
description |
The root-knot nematodes (RKN) challenge okra production (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) worldwide and there are no reports of genetic resistance within the genus Abelmoschus. As an alternative, the compatibility for grafting of RKN-resistant malvaceous species with okra was assessed. Cotton (Gossypium spp.) genotypes are incompatible for grafting with okra. The kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.), the false roselle (Hibiscus acetosella Welw. ex Hiern.) and the roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) are compatible. However, the rootstock must be sown five days after the scion to promote better grafting compatibility. The performance of grafted okra onto kenaf and false roselle was assessed in two experiments: RKN-free field in the open, and in the presence or not of Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in protected environment. The effect of grafting along time was addressed in the open field experiment. In RKN-free conditions, no differences were observed between rootstocks and self-grafted and non-grafted control. In the presence of M. incognita race 3, the resistant rootstocks provided superior plant development and production due low nematode reproduction. Therefore, grafting okra onto resistant rootstocks is a potential prophylactic measure to manage RKN. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-06T16:55:29Z 2019-10-06T16:55:29Z 2019-02-27 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.004 Scientia Horticulturae, v. 246, p. 354-359. 0304-4238 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189888 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.004 2-s2.0-85056659463 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189888 |
identifier_str_mv |
Scientia Horticulturae, v. 246, p. 354-359. 0304-4238 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.004 2-s2.0-85056659463 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Horticulturae |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
354-359 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128626953027584 |