Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey141 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164495 |
Resumo: | Bacterial communication has become an increasingly studied topic aiming at the discovery of new products to aid the treatment of diseases for which conventional options do not work. The production of safe foods, free of pathogens, has been receiving increasing attention due to market demands for food products of high quality and free of residues. This study assessed the communication between Lactobacillus spp. during the in vitro inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg (SH) and the impact an autoinducer produced by a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum has on communication in the normal microbiota and inhibiting SH in newborn chicks. For this purpose, the isolates of Lactobacillus spp. were isolated cloacal swabs of broilers and identified through biochemical and molecular assays and were obtained from broiler farms. They later had their inhibitory potential against SH stimulated after contact with the autoinducer. For assessing bacterial communication (quorum sensing) during the inhibition of SH by Lactobacillus spp., a spot on the lawn assay was conducted. For the in vivo, 75 one-day-old chicks were divided in 5 experimental groups: control with no treatment; treatment with a Lactobacillus spp. pool on the first day; treatment with autoinducer on the second day; treatment with Lactobacillus spp. on the first day; and autoinducer on the second day and treatment without autoinducer. The autoinducer was assessed through an SH count in the ceca of the birds. The autoinducer produced by the strain of L. plantarum proved to be efficient for communicating with the other Lactobacillus spp. isolates as previous contact with SH induced the production of an autoinducer capable of increasing inhibition of SH both in vitro (in average 132.73%) and in vivo, acting similarly to the Lactobacillus spp. pool (probiotic) by decreasing the SH count in the ceca (64%-24 h, 42%-96 h, and 46%-168 h). |
id |
UNSP_97c276e13010ac2f18002bc2d878ef6c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/164495 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of conceptautoinducerchickenmicrobiotaquorum sensingprobioticBacterial communication has become an increasingly studied topic aiming at the discovery of new products to aid the treatment of diseases for which conventional options do not work. The production of safe foods, free of pathogens, has been receiving increasing attention due to market demands for food products of high quality and free of residues. This study assessed the communication between Lactobacillus spp. during the in vitro inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg (SH) and the impact an autoinducer produced by a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum has on communication in the normal microbiota and inhibiting SH in newborn chicks. For this purpose, the isolates of Lactobacillus spp. were isolated cloacal swabs of broilers and identified through biochemical and molecular assays and were obtained from broiler farms. They later had their inhibitory potential against SH stimulated after contact with the autoinducer. For assessing bacterial communication (quorum sensing) during the inhibition of SH by Lactobacillus spp., a spot on the lawn assay was conducted. For the in vivo, 75 one-day-old chicks were divided in 5 experimental groups: control with no treatment; treatment with a Lactobacillus spp. pool on the first day; treatment with autoinducer on the second day; treatment with Lactobacillus spp. on the first day; and autoinducer on the second day and treatment without autoinducer. The autoinducer was assessed through an SH count in the ceca of the birds. The autoinducer produced by the strain of L. plantarum proved to be efficient for communicating with the other Lactobacillus spp. isolates as previous contact with SH induced the production of an autoinducer capable of increasing inhibition of SH both in vitro (in average 132.73%) and in vivo, acting similarly to the Lactobacillus spp. pool (probiotic) by decreasing the SH count in the ceca (64%-24 h, 42%-96 h, and 46%-168 h).Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)FMVZ UNESP Botucatu, Vet Clin Dept, BR-18618681 Sao Paulo, BrazilFMVZ UNESP Botucatu, Vet Clin Dept, BR-18618681 Sao Paulo, BrazilFAPESP: 2017/17712-4Oxford Univ PressUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Okamoto, Adrian Sakai [UNESP]Andreatti Filho, Raphael Lucio [UNESP]Milbradt, Elisane Lenita [UNESP]Izidoro Moraes, Ana Carolina [UNESP]Bastos Vellano, Igor Henrique [UNESP]Chalfun Guimaraes-Okamoto, Priscylla Tatiana [UNESP]2018-11-26T17:54:47Z2018-11-26T17:54:47Z2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2708-2712http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey141Poultry Science. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 97, n. 8, p. 2708-2712, 2018.0032-5791http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16449510.3382/ps/pey141WOS:00044095450001047039833802243730000-0002-0355-9841Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPoultry Science1,112info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T14:54:20Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/164495Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:28:17.989707Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept |
title |
Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept |
spellingShingle |
Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept Okamoto, Adrian Sakai [UNESP] autoinducer chicken microbiota quorum sensing probiotic |
title_short |
Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept |
title_full |
Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept |
title_fullStr |
Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept |
title_sort |
Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept |
author |
Okamoto, Adrian Sakai [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Okamoto, Adrian Sakai [UNESP] Andreatti Filho, Raphael Lucio [UNESP] Milbradt, Elisane Lenita [UNESP] Izidoro Moraes, Ana Carolina [UNESP] Bastos Vellano, Igor Henrique [UNESP] Chalfun Guimaraes-Okamoto, Priscylla Tatiana [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Andreatti Filho, Raphael Lucio [UNESP] Milbradt, Elisane Lenita [UNESP] Izidoro Moraes, Ana Carolina [UNESP] Bastos Vellano, Igor Henrique [UNESP] Chalfun Guimaraes-Okamoto, Priscylla Tatiana [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Okamoto, Adrian Sakai [UNESP] Andreatti Filho, Raphael Lucio [UNESP] Milbradt, Elisane Lenita [UNESP] Izidoro Moraes, Ana Carolina [UNESP] Bastos Vellano, Igor Henrique [UNESP] Chalfun Guimaraes-Okamoto, Priscylla Tatiana [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
autoinducer chicken microbiota quorum sensing probiotic |
topic |
autoinducer chicken microbiota quorum sensing probiotic |
description |
Bacterial communication has become an increasingly studied topic aiming at the discovery of new products to aid the treatment of diseases for which conventional options do not work. The production of safe foods, free of pathogens, has been receiving increasing attention due to market demands for food products of high quality and free of residues. This study assessed the communication between Lactobacillus spp. during the in vitro inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg (SH) and the impact an autoinducer produced by a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum has on communication in the normal microbiota and inhibiting SH in newborn chicks. For this purpose, the isolates of Lactobacillus spp. were isolated cloacal swabs of broilers and identified through biochemical and molecular assays and were obtained from broiler farms. They later had their inhibitory potential against SH stimulated after contact with the autoinducer. For assessing bacterial communication (quorum sensing) during the inhibition of SH by Lactobacillus spp., a spot on the lawn assay was conducted. For the in vivo, 75 one-day-old chicks were divided in 5 experimental groups: control with no treatment; treatment with a Lactobacillus spp. pool on the first day; treatment with autoinducer on the second day; treatment with Lactobacillus spp. on the first day; and autoinducer on the second day and treatment without autoinducer. The autoinducer was assessed through an SH count in the ceca of the birds. The autoinducer produced by the strain of L. plantarum proved to be efficient for communicating with the other Lactobacillus spp. isolates as previous contact with SH induced the production of an autoinducer capable of increasing inhibition of SH both in vitro (in average 132.73%) and in vivo, acting similarly to the Lactobacillus spp. pool (probiotic) by decreasing the SH count in the ceca (64%-24 h, 42%-96 h, and 46%-168 h). |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-26T17:54:47Z 2018-11-26T17:54:47Z 2018-08-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey141 Poultry Science. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 97, n. 8, p. 2708-2712, 2018. 0032-5791 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164495 10.3382/ps/pey141 WOS:000440954500010 4703983380224373 0000-0002-0355-9841 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey141 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164495 |
identifier_str_mv |
Poultry Science. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 97, n. 8, p. 2708-2712, 2018. 0032-5791 10.3382/ps/pey141 WOS:000440954500010 4703983380224373 0000-0002-0355-9841 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Poultry Science 1,112 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
2708-2712 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford Univ Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford Univ Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129206625763328 |