Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Okamoto, Adrian Sakai [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Andreatti Filho, Raphael Lucio [UNESP], Milbradt, Elisane Lenita [UNESP], Izidoro Moraes, Ana Carolina [UNESP], Bastos Vellano, Igor Henrique [UNESP], Chalfun Guimaraes-Okamoto, Priscylla Tatiana [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey141
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164495
Resumo: Bacterial communication has become an increasingly studied topic aiming at the discovery of new products to aid the treatment of diseases for which conventional options do not work. The production of safe foods, free of pathogens, has been receiving increasing attention due to market demands for food products of high quality and free of residues. This study assessed the communication between Lactobacillus spp. during the in vitro inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg (SH) and the impact an autoinducer produced by a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum has on communication in the normal microbiota and inhibiting SH in newborn chicks. For this purpose, the isolates of Lactobacillus spp. were isolated cloacal swabs of broilers and identified through biochemical and molecular assays and were obtained from broiler farms. They later had their inhibitory potential against SH stimulated after contact with the autoinducer. For assessing bacterial communication (quorum sensing) during the inhibition of SH by Lactobacillus spp., a spot on the lawn assay was conducted. For the in vivo, 75 one-day-old chicks were divided in 5 experimental groups: control with no treatment; treatment with a Lactobacillus spp. pool on the first day; treatment with autoinducer on the second day; treatment with Lactobacillus spp. on the first day; and autoinducer on the second day and treatment without autoinducer. The autoinducer was assessed through an SH count in the ceca of the birds. The autoinducer produced by the strain of L. plantarum proved to be efficient for communicating with the other Lactobacillus spp. isolates as previous contact with SH induced the production of an autoinducer capable of increasing inhibition of SH both in vitro (in average 132.73%) and in vivo, acting similarly to the Lactobacillus spp. pool (probiotic) by decreasing the SH count in the ceca (64%-24 h, 42%-96 h, and 46%-168 h).
id UNSP_97c276e13010ac2f18002bc2d878ef6c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/164495
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of conceptautoinducerchickenmicrobiotaquorum sensingprobioticBacterial communication has become an increasingly studied topic aiming at the discovery of new products to aid the treatment of diseases for which conventional options do not work. The production of safe foods, free of pathogens, has been receiving increasing attention due to market demands for food products of high quality and free of residues. This study assessed the communication between Lactobacillus spp. during the in vitro inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg (SH) and the impact an autoinducer produced by a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum has on communication in the normal microbiota and inhibiting SH in newborn chicks. For this purpose, the isolates of Lactobacillus spp. were isolated cloacal swabs of broilers and identified through biochemical and molecular assays and were obtained from broiler farms. They later had their inhibitory potential against SH stimulated after contact with the autoinducer. For assessing bacterial communication (quorum sensing) during the inhibition of SH by Lactobacillus spp., a spot on the lawn assay was conducted. For the in vivo, 75 one-day-old chicks were divided in 5 experimental groups: control with no treatment; treatment with a Lactobacillus spp. pool on the first day; treatment with autoinducer on the second day; treatment with Lactobacillus spp. on the first day; and autoinducer on the second day and treatment without autoinducer. The autoinducer was assessed through an SH count in the ceca of the birds. The autoinducer produced by the strain of L. plantarum proved to be efficient for communicating with the other Lactobacillus spp. isolates as previous contact with SH induced the production of an autoinducer capable of increasing inhibition of SH both in vitro (in average 132.73%) and in vivo, acting similarly to the Lactobacillus spp. pool (probiotic) by decreasing the SH count in the ceca (64%-24 h, 42%-96 h, and 46%-168 h).Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)FMVZ UNESP Botucatu, Vet Clin Dept, BR-18618681 Sao Paulo, BrazilFMVZ UNESP Botucatu, Vet Clin Dept, BR-18618681 Sao Paulo, BrazilFAPESP: 2017/17712-4Oxford Univ PressUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Okamoto, Adrian Sakai [UNESP]Andreatti Filho, Raphael Lucio [UNESP]Milbradt, Elisane Lenita [UNESP]Izidoro Moraes, Ana Carolina [UNESP]Bastos Vellano, Igor Henrique [UNESP]Chalfun Guimaraes-Okamoto, Priscylla Tatiana [UNESP]2018-11-26T17:54:47Z2018-11-26T17:54:47Z2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2708-2712http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey141Poultry Science. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 97, n. 8, p. 2708-2712, 2018.0032-5791http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16449510.3382/ps/pey141WOS:00044095450001047039833802243730000-0002-0355-9841Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPoultry Science1,112info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T14:54:20Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/164495Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:28:17.989707Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept
title Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept
spellingShingle Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept
Okamoto, Adrian Sakai [UNESP]
autoinducer
chicken
microbiota
quorum sensing
probiotic
title_short Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept
title_full Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept
title_fullStr Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept
title_sort Bacterial communication between Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry in the inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg-proof of concept
author Okamoto, Adrian Sakai [UNESP]
author_facet Okamoto, Adrian Sakai [UNESP]
Andreatti Filho, Raphael Lucio [UNESP]
Milbradt, Elisane Lenita [UNESP]
Izidoro Moraes, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
Bastos Vellano, Igor Henrique [UNESP]
Chalfun Guimaraes-Okamoto, Priscylla Tatiana [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Andreatti Filho, Raphael Lucio [UNESP]
Milbradt, Elisane Lenita [UNESP]
Izidoro Moraes, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
Bastos Vellano, Igor Henrique [UNESP]
Chalfun Guimaraes-Okamoto, Priscylla Tatiana [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Okamoto, Adrian Sakai [UNESP]
Andreatti Filho, Raphael Lucio [UNESP]
Milbradt, Elisane Lenita [UNESP]
Izidoro Moraes, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
Bastos Vellano, Igor Henrique [UNESP]
Chalfun Guimaraes-Okamoto, Priscylla Tatiana [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv autoinducer
chicken
microbiota
quorum sensing
probiotic
topic autoinducer
chicken
microbiota
quorum sensing
probiotic
description Bacterial communication has become an increasingly studied topic aiming at the discovery of new products to aid the treatment of diseases for which conventional options do not work. The production of safe foods, free of pathogens, has been receiving increasing attention due to market demands for food products of high quality and free of residues. This study assessed the communication between Lactobacillus spp. during the in vitro inhibition of Salmonella Heidelberg (SH) and the impact an autoinducer produced by a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum has on communication in the normal microbiota and inhibiting SH in newborn chicks. For this purpose, the isolates of Lactobacillus spp. were isolated cloacal swabs of broilers and identified through biochemical and molecular assays and were obtained from broiler farms. They later had their inhibitory potential against SH stimulated after contact with the autoinducer. For assessing bacterial communication (quorum sensing) during the inhibition of SH by Lactobacillus spp., a spot on the lawn assay was conducted. For the in vivo, 75 one-day-old chicks were divided in 5 experimental groups: control with no treatment; treatment with a Lactobacillus spp. pool on the first day; treatment with autoinducer on the second day; treatment with Lactobacillus spp. on the first day; and autoinducer on the second day and treatment without autoinducer. The autoinducer was assessed through an SH count in the ceca of the birds. The autoinducer produced by the strain of L. plantarum proved to be efficient for communicating with the other Lactobacillus spp. isolates as previous contact with SH induced the production of an autoinducer capable of increasing inhibition of SH both in vitro (in average 132.73%) and in vivo, acting similarly to the Lactobacillus spp. pool (probiotic) by decreasing the SH count in the ceca (64%-24 h, 42%-96 h, and 46%-168 h).
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-26T17:54:47Z
2018-11-26T17:54:47Z
2018-08-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey141
Poultry Science. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 97, n. 8, p. 2708-2712, 2018.
0032-5791
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164495
10.3382/ps/pey141
WOS:000440954500010
4703983380224373
0000-0002-0355-9841
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey141
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164495
identifier_str_mv Poultry Science. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 97, n. 8, p. 2708-2712, 2018.
0032-5791
10.3382/ps/pey141
WOS:000440954500010
4703983380224373
0000-0002-0355-9841
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Poultry Science
1,112
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 2708-2712
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Univ Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Univ Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129206625763328