Bond strength of self-etching adhesives applied to different substrates

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kubo, Cinthia S. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Piccioni, Mayra A. R. V. [UNESP], Tonetto, Mateus R., Bandeca, Matheus C., Kuga, Milton C., Saad, José R. C. [UNESP], de Andrade, Marcelo F. [UNESP], de Campos, Edson A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1465
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220972
Resumo: Aim: To evaluate the microshear bond strength and adhesive interface using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of self-etching adhesive systems on normal and artificially hypermineralized dentin substrates. Materials and methods: A total of 65 (n = 65) bovine incisors were divided into two groups according to dentin type: Normal (n = 28) and artificially hypermineralized (n = 29). Composite resin cylinders were placed on these surfaces and cured (3M™ ESPE™ Filtek™ Z350 XT). Each group was divided into four subgroups (n = 7) according to the self-etching adhesive systems used (Clearfil SE Bond, AdheSE®, Adper™ Easy One, and OptiBond™ All-In-One™), and microshear bond tests were performed. In addition, one specimen from each group was prepared for an evaluation of the adhesive interface under a microscope (×2000 magnification). The differences between the groups were determined using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Results: For normal dentin, the microshear bond strength values in MPa were as follows: Clearfil = 15.65; AdheSE = 14.71; Easy One = 21.92; and OptiBond = 28.43. For hypermineralized dentin, the values were as follows: Clearfil = 20.96; AdheSE = 17.23; and OptiBond = 23.29. There were no significant differences between any of the adhesives used (p > 0.05). When adhesion, dentin, and interaction were treated as factors and analyzed, a significant difference was found only in the case of the adhesive (p = 0.0002). Conclusion: Self-etching adhesive systems with higher degrees of acidity do not necessarily exhibit greater microshear bond strength in hypermineralized teeth. Clinical significance: It is important to obtain bond strength values to analyze the possible clinical performance of the adhesive systems. Furthermore, information on their interactions with different types of dentin substrates proved complementary and useful in the study performed herein.
id UNSP_98b6ab2ad27ebb1a3c8febc27d7f96fe
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220972
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Bond strength of self-etching adhesives applied to different substratesAdhesionBond strengthDental adhesivesDentinScanning electron microscopyAim: To evaluate the microshear bond strength and adhesive interface using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of self-etching adhesive systems on normal and artificially hypermineralized dentin substrates. Materials and methods: A total of 65 (n = 65) bovine incisors were divided into two groups according to dentin type: Normal (n = 28) and artificially hypermineralized (n = 29). Composite resin cylinders were placed on these surfaces and cured (3M™ ESPE™ Filtek™ Z350 XT). Each group was divided into four subgroups (n = 7) according to the self-etching adhesive systems used (Clearfil SE Bond, AdheSE®, Adper™ Easy One, and OptiBond™ All-In-One™), and microshear bond tests were performed. In addition, one specimen from each group was prepared for an evaluation of the adhesive interface under a microscope (×2000 magnification). The differences between the groups were determined using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Results: For normal dentin, the microshear bond strength values in MPa were as follows: Clearfil = 15.65; AdheSE = 14.71; Easy One = 21.92; and OptiBond = 28.43. For hypermineralized dentin, the values were as follows: Clearfil = 20.96; AdheSE = 17.23; and OptiBond = 23.29. There were no significant differences between any of the adhesives used (p > 0.05). When adhesion, dentin, and interaction were treated as factors and analyzed, a significant difference was found only in the case of the adhesive (p = 0.0002). Conclusion: Self-etching adhesive systems with higher degrees of acidity do not necessarily exhibit greater microshear bond strength in hypermineralized teeth. Clinical significance: It is important to obtain bond strength values to analyze the possible clinical performance of the adhesive systems. Furthermore, information on their interactions with different types of dentin substrates proved complementary and useful in the study performed herein.Department of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Universidade Estadual PaulistaDepartment of Dentistry University of CuiabáDepartment of Dentistry CEUMA UniversityDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Universidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of CuiabáCEUMA UniversityKubo, Cinthia S. [UNESP]Piccioni, Mayra A. R. V. [UNESP]Tonetto, Mateus R.Bandeca, Matheus C.Kuga, Milton C.Saad, José R. C. [UNESP]de Andrade, Marcelo F. [UNESP]de Campos, Edson A. [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:07:08Z2022-04-28T19:07:08Z2017-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article358-363http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1465World Journal of Dentistry, v. 8, n. 5, p. 358-363, 2017.0976-60140976-6006http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22097210.5005/jp-journals-10015-14652-s2.0-85035241094Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengWorld Journal of Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:07:09Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220972Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:18:55.116022Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bond strength of self-etching adhesives applied to different substrates
title Bond strength of self-etching adhesives applied to different substrates
spellingShingle Bond strength of self-etching adhesives applied to different substrates
Kubo, Cinthia S. [UNESP]
Adhesion
Bond strength
Dental adhesives
Dentin
Scanning electron microscopy
title_short Bond strength of self-etching adhesives applied to different substrates
title_full Bond strength of self-etching adhesives applied to different substrates
title_fullStr Bond strength of self-etching adhesives applied to different substrates
title_full_unstemmed Bond strength of self-etching adhesives applied to different substrates
title_sort Bond strength of self-etching adhesives applied to different substrates
author Kubo, Cinthia S. [UNESP]
author_facet Kubo, Cinthia S. [UNESP]
Piccioni, Mayra A. R. V. [UNESP]
Tonetto, Mateus R.
Bandeca, Matheus C.
Kuga, Milton C.
Saad, José R. C. [UNESP]
de Andrade, Marcelo F. [UNESP]
de Campos, Edson A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Piccioni, Mayra A. R. V. [UNESP]
Tonetto, Mateus R.
Bandeca, Matheus C.
Kuga, Milton C.
Saad, José R. C. [UNESP]
de Andrade, Marcelo F. [UNESP]
de Campos, Edson A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
University of Cuiabá
CEUMA University
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kubo, Cinthia S. [UNESP]
Piccioni, Mayra A. R. V. [UNESP]
Tonetto, Mateus R.
Bandeca, Matheus C.
Kuga, Milton C.
Saad, José R. C. [UNESP]
de Andrade, Marcelo F. [UNESP]
de Campos, Edson A. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adhesion
Bond strength
Dental adhesives
Dentin
Scanning electron microscopy
topic Adhesion
Bond strength
Dental adhesives
Dentin
Scanning electron microscopy
description Aim: To evaluate the microshear bond strength and adhesive interface using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of self-etching adhesive systems on normal and artificially hypermineralized dentin substrates. Materials and methods: A total of 65 (n = 65) bovine incisors were divided into two groups according to dentin type: Normal (n = 28) and artificially hypermineralized (n = 29). Composite resin cylinders were placed on these surfaces and cured (3M™ ESPE™ Filtek™ Z350 XT). Each group was divided into four subgroups (n = 7) according to the self-etching adhesive systems used (Clearfil SE Bond, AdheSE®, Adper™ Easy One, and OptiBond™ All-In-One™), and microshear bond tests were performed. In addition, one specimen from each group was prepared for an evaluation of the adhesive interface under a microscope (×2000 magnification). The differences between the groups were determined using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Results: For normal dentin, the microshear bond strength values in MPa were as follows: Clearfil = 15.65; AdheSE = 14.71; Easy One = 21.92; and OptiBond = 28.43. For hypermineralized dentin, the values were as follows: Clearfil = 20.96; AdheSE = 17.23; and OptiBond = 23.29. There were no significant differences between any of the adhesives used (p > 0.05). When adhesion, dentin, and interaction were treated as factors and analyzed, a significant difference was found only in the case of the adhesive (p = 0.0002). Conclusion: Self-etching adhesive systems with higher degrees of acidity do not necessarily exhibit greater microshear bond strength in hypermineralized teeth. Clinical significance: It is important to obtain bond strength values to analyze the possible clinical performance of the adhesive systems. Furthermore, information on their interactions with different types of dentin substrates proved complementary and useful in the study performed herein.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-01
2022-04-28T19:07:08Z
2022-04-28T19:07:08Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1465
World Journal of Dentistry, v. 8, n. 5, p. 358-363, 2017.
0976-6014
0976-6006
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220972
10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1465
2-s2.0-85035241094
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1465
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220972
identifier_str_mv World Journal of Dentistry, v. 8, n. 5, p. 358-363, 2017.
0976-6014
0976-6006
10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1465
2-s2.0-85035241094
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv World Journal of Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 358-363
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129187426336768