Dynamic models for in vitro biofilm formation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Dovigo, L. N. [UNESP], Sanitá, P. V. [UNESP], Machado, A. L. [UNESP], Giampaolo, E. T. [UNESP], Vergani, C. E. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Capítulo de livro
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227129
Resumo: Since biofilms are resistant both to host defense mechanisms and to antimicrobialagents, they represent an ongoing source of infection.Investigations of natural biofilmsare restricted because of problems with access and sampling, in addition to complicationsdue to ethical aspects.In vitro biofilm models are important tools in experimental medicalscience to better understand the development and behavior of such microbialcommunities.Laboratory models that intend to mimic natural biofilms may be morecontrollable than in vivo protocols and therefore more useful to explain and predict theirbehavior.In vitro systems range from static mono-cultures to the development of diversemixed cultures growing under dynamic conditions.Given that in vivo conditions arealmost exclusively dynamic, studies evaluating biofilm formation under static conditionsmight be somewhat misleading.One of the most used dynamic models to study biofilmmode of growth is the flow cell system, which consists of a transparent chamber of fixeddepth through which the growth medium passes.In conjunction with a microscope andcamera, this method can be used to observe the early events of biofilm formation(microbial adhesion) and the interactions between microorganisms and substrata in realtime.Chemostats can also be used to study the dynamic growth of microorganismpopulations on experimental substrates submerged within the chemostat.One of the mostimportant features of chemostats is that microorganisms can be grown at a constantrate.Moreover, during biofilm formation, culture parameters such temperature and pHremain constant.Analogous to the operation of the chemostat, there is another category ofreactors in which biofilms are formed on thin filter membranes in a physiological steadystate.These systems permitanalyses of the growth rate dependence and cell-cyclespecificity of antibacterial agents by collecting the eluate passed thought the filter, whichcontains a cohort of freshly divided cells.Finally, there are constant depth reactors in which surface growth is periodically removed to maintain a constant geometry ofbiofilms.In these reactors, microorganisms can be grown in a physiological steady statewith all culture parameters constant.The system can generate large numbers of biofilmswith comparable and reproducible data from experiment to experiment and has been usedextensively to investigate factors that may influence the growth of microorganismcommunities.Considering the information presented above, this chapter will explore therange of technologies and dynamic systems available for in vitro biofilm formation, development, and maturation. © 2011 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
id UNSP_9c6a305ac7da08e8461f9554394494d3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/227129
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Dynamic models for in vitro biofilm formationSince biofilms are resistant both to host defense mechanisms and to antimicrobialagents, they represent an ongoing source of infection.Investigations of natural biofilmsare restricted because of problems with access and sampling, in addition to complicationsdue to ethical aspects.In vitro biofilm models are important tools in experimental medicalscience to better understand the development and behavior of such microbialcommunities.Laboratory models that intend to mimic natural biofilms may be morecontrollable than in vivo protocols and therefore more useful to explain and predict theirbehavior.In vitro systems range from static mono-cultures to the development of diversemixed cultures growing under dynamic conditions.Given that in vivo conditions arealmost exclusively dynamic, studies evaluating biofilm formation under static conditionsmight be somewhat misleading.One of the most used dynamic models to study biofilmmode of growth is the flow cell system, which consists of a transparent chamber of fixeddepth through which the growth medium passes.In conjunction with a microscope andcamera, this method can be used to observe the early events of biofilm formation(microbial adhesion) and the interactions between microorganisms and substrata in realtime.Chemostats can also be used to study the dynamic growth of microorganismpopulations on experimental substrates submerged within the chemostat.One of the mostimportant features of chemostats is that microorganisms can be grown at a constantrate.Moreover, during biofilm formation, culture parameters such temperature and pHremain constant.Analogous to the operation of the chemostat, there is another category ofreactors in which biofilms are formed on thin filter membranes in a physiological steadystate.These systems permitanalyses of the growth rate dependence and cell-cyclespecificity of antibacterial agents by collecting the eluate passed thought the filter, whichcontains a cohort of freshly divided cells.Finally, there are constant depth reactors in which surface growth is periodically removed to maintain a constant geometry ofbiofilms.In these reactors, microorganisms can be grown in a physiological steady statewith all culture parameters constant.The system can generate large numbers of biofilmswith comparable and reproducible data from experiment to experiment and has been usedextensively to investigate factors that may influence the growth of microorganismcommunities.Considering the information presented above, this chapter will explore therange of technologies and dynamic systems available for in vitro biofilm formation, development, and maturation. © 2011 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Araraquara Dental School UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São PauloAraraquara Dental School UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São PauloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP]Dovigo, L. N. [UNESP]Sanitá, P. V. [UNESP]Machado, A. L. [UNESP]Giampaolo, E. T. [UNESP]Vergani, C. E. [UNESP]2022-04-29T06:48:22Z2022-04-29T06:48:22Z2011-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart125-162Biofilms: Formation, Development and Properties, p. 125-162.http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2271292-s2.0-84873924569Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBiofilms: Formation, Development and Propertiesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T14:57:35Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/227129Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T14:57:35Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dynamic models for in vitro biofilm formation
title Dynamic models for in vitro biofilm formation
spellingShingle Dynamic models for in vitro biofilm formation
Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP]
title_short Dynamic models for in vitro biofilm formation
title_full Dynamic models for in vitro biofilm formation
title_fullStr Dynamic models for in vitro biofilm formation
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic models for in vitro biofilm formation
title_sort Dynamic models for in vitro biofilm formation
author Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP]
author_facet Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP]
Dovigo, L. N. [UNESP]
Sanitá, P. V. [UNESP]
Machado, A. L. [UNESP]
Giampaolo, E. T. [UNESP]
Vergani, C. E. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Dovigo, L. N. [UNESP]
Sanitá, P. V. [UNESP]
Machado, A. L. [UNESP]
Giampaolo, E. T. [UNESP]
Vergani, C. E. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pavarina, A. C. [UNESP]
Dovigo, L. N. [UNESP]
Sanitá, P. V. [UNESP]
Machado, A. L. [UNESP]
Giampaolo, E. T. [UNESP]
Vergani, C. E. [UNESP]
description Since biofilms are resistant both to host defense mechanisms and to antimicrobialagents, they represent an ongoing source of infection.Investigations of natural biofilmsare restricted because of problems with access and sampling, in addition to complicationsdue to ethical aspects.In vitro biofilm models are important tools in experimental medicalscience to better understand the development and behavior of such microbialcommunities.Laboratory models that intend to mimic natural biofilms may be morecontrollable than in vivo protocols and therefore more useful to explain and predict theirbehavior.In vitro systems range from static mono-cultures to the development of diversemixed cultures growing under dynamic conditions.Given that in vivo conditions arealmost exclusively dynamic, studies evaluating biofilm formation under static conditionsmight be somewhat misleading.One of the most used dynamic models to study biofilmmode of growth is the flow cell system, which consists of a transparent chamber of fixeddepth through which the growth medium passes.In conjunction with a microscope andcamera, this method can be used to observe the early events of biofilm formation(microbial adhesion) and the interactions between microorganisms and substrata in realtime.Chemostats can also be used to study the dynamic growth of microorganismpopulations on experimental substrates submerged within the chemostat.One of the mostimportant features of chemostats is that microorganisms can be grown at a constantrate.Moreover, during biofilm formation, culture parameters such temperature and pHremain constant.Analogous to the operation of the chemostat, there is another category ofreactors in which biofilms are formed on thin filter membranes in a physiological steadystate.These systems permitanalyses of the growth rate dependence and cell-cyclespecificity of antibacterial agents by collecting the eluate passed thought the filter, whichcontains a cohort of freshly divided cells.Finally, there are constant depth reactors in which surface growth is periodically removed to maintain a constant geometry ofbiofilms.In these reactors, microorganisms can be grown in a physiological steady statewith all culture parameters constant.The system can generate large numbers of biofilmswith comparable and reproducible data from experiment to experiment and has been usedextensively to investigate factors that may influence the growth of microorganismcommunities.Considering the information presented above, this chapter will explore therange of technologies and dynamic systems available for in vitro biofilm formation, development, and maturation. © 2011 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-01
2022-04-29T06:48:22Z
2022-04-29T06:48:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
format bookPart
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Biofilms: Formation, Development and Properties, p. 125-162.
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227129
2-s2.0-84873924569
identifier_str_mv Biofilms: Formation, Development and Properties, p. 125-162.
2-s2.0-84873924569
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227129
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Biofilms: Formation, Development and Properties
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 125-162
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546404376739840