Interference relationships between weeds and sugarcane in the ‘plene’ system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mossin, C. B. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Hijano, N. [UNESP], Nepomuceno, M. P. [UNESP], Carvalho, L. B. [UNESP], Alves, P. L.C.A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100116
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198115
Resumo: Sugarcane is one of the most important crops planted in Brazil in that the presence of weeds in the fields has promoted significant yield reduction. The objective of this work was to evaluate the differential growth response of two sugarcane varieties cropped in the ‘Plene’ system as a function of the coexistence with different weed species. Treatments consisted of the coexistence of Bidens pilosa plus Ipomoea quamoclit, Ipomoea hederifolia, Amaranthus viridis, Urochloa plantaginea, Panicum maximum, and Digitaria horizontalis with two sugarcane varieties (RB92579 and SP80-1842) cropped in the ‘Plene’ system, in addition to a control without weeds. The design was completely randomized with three replicates. Dry matter accumulation of weeds was dependent of the weed species and the sugarcane variety whose coexistence was kept. The behavior of development in terms of plant height, number of green leaves, leaf area, and dry mass of stems, roots and leaves was dependent on the sugarcane variety and on the weed species whose coexistence was kept. The weed U. plantaginea showed the greatest potential to interfere with the growth of both sugarcane varieties planted in the ‘Plene’ system. Panicum maximum and D. horizontalis are also potential competitors, while B. pilosa, I. quamoclit, I. hederifolia, and A. viridis are less competitive. The sugarcane variety RB92579 is less susceptible to weed interference than SP80-1842 when planted in the ‘Plene’ system.
id UNSP_9f888490adbb299595741e62459561ca
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198115
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Interference relationships between weeds and sugarcane in the ‘plene’ systemRelações de Interferência de Plantas Daninhas com Cana-de-Açúcar no Sistema ‘Plene’Guinea grassJamaican crabgrassMarmalade grassMorning glorySaccharum officinarumSlender amaranthSugarcane is one of the most important crops planted in Brazil in that the presence of weeds in the fields has promoted significant yield reduction. The objective of this work was to evaluate the differential growth response of two sugarcane varieties cropped in the ‘Plene’ system as a function of the coexistence with different weed species. Treatments consisted of the coexistence of Bidens pilosa plus Ipomoea quamoclit, Ipomoea hederifolia, Amaranthus viridis, Urochloa plantaginea, Panicum maximum, and Digitaria horizontalis with two sugarcane varieties (RB92579 and SP80-1842) cropped in the ‘Plene’ system, in addition to a control without weeds. The design was completely randomized with three replicates. Dry matter accumulation of weeds was dependent of the weed species and the sugarcane variety whose coexistence was kept. The behavior of development in terms of plant height, number of green leaves, leaf area, and dry mass of stems, roots and leaves was dependent on the sugarcane variety and on the weed species whose coexistence was kept. The weed U. plantaginea showed the greatest potential to interfere with the growth of both sugarcane varieties planted in the ‘Plene’ system. Panicum maximum and D. horizontalis are also potential competitors, while B. pilosa, I. quamoclit, I. hederifolia, and A. viridis are less competitive. The sugarcane variety RB92579 is less susceptible to weed interference than SP80-1842 when planted in the ‘Plene’ system.Laboratório de Plantas Daninhas (LAPDA) Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” FCAV/UNESPLaboratório de Plantas Daninhas (LAPDA) Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” FCAV/UNESPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Mossin, C. B. [UNESP]Hijano, N. [UNESP]Nepomuceno, M. P. [UNESP]Carvalho, L. B. [UNESP]Alves, P. L.C.A. [UNESP]2020-12-12T00:59:37Z2020-12-12T00:59:37Z2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100116Planta Daninha, v. 37.0100-8358http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19811510.1590/s0100-83582019370100116S0100-835820190001001882-s2.0-85074777680S0100-83582019000100188.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPlanta Daninhainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-11T06:12:12Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198115Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:23:05.726670Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Interference relationships between weeds and sugarcane in the ‘plene’ system
Relações de Interferência de Plantas Daninhas com Cana-de-Açúcar no Sistema ‘Plene’
title Interference relationships between weeds and sugarcane in the ‘plene’ system
spellingShingle Interference relationships between weeds and sugarcane in the ‘plene’ system
Mossin, C. B. [UNESP]
Guinea grass
Jamaican crabgrass
Marmalade grass
Morning glory
Saccharum officinarum
Slender amaranth
title_short Interference relationships between weeds and sugarcane in the ‘plene’ system
title_full Interference relationships between weeds and sugarcane in the ‘plene’ system
title_fullStr Interference relationships between weeds and sugarcane in the ‘plene’ system
title_full_unstemmed Interference relationships between weeds and sugarcane in the ‘plene’ system
title_sort Interference relationships between weeds and sugarcane in the ‘plene’ system
author Mossin, C. B. [UNESP]
author_facet Mossin, C. B. [UNESP]
Hijano, N. [UNESP]
Nepomuceno, M. P. [UNESP]
Carvalho, L. B. [UNESP]
Alves, P. L.C.A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Hijano, N. [UNESP]
Nepomuceno, M. P. [UNESP]
Carvalho, L. B. [UNESP]
Alves, P. L.C.A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mossin, C. B. [UNESP]
Hijano, N. [UNESP]
Nepomuceno, M. P. [UNESP]
Carvalho, L. B. [UNESP]
Alves, P. L.C.A. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Guinea grass
Jamaican crabgrass
Marmalade grass
Morning glory
Saccharum officinarum
Slender amaranth
topic Guinea grass
Jamaican crabgrass
Marmalade grass
Morning glory
Saccharum officinarum
Slender amaranth
description Sugarcane is one of the most important crops planted in Brazil in that the presence of weeds in the fields has promoted significant yield reduction. The objective of this work was to evaluate the differential growth response of two sugarcane varieties cropped in the ‘Plene’ system as a function of the coexistence with different weed species. Treatments consisted of the coexistence of Bidens pilosa plus Ipomoea quamoclit, Ipomoea hederifolia, Amaranthus viridis, Urochloa plantaginea, Panicum maximum, and Digitaria horizontalis with two sugarcane varieties (RB92579 and SP80-1842) cropped in the ‘Plene’ system, in addition to a control without weeds. The design was completely randomized with three replicates. Dry matter accumulation of weeds was dependent of the weed species and the sugarcane variety whose coexistence was kept. The behavior of development in terms of plant height, number of green leaves, leaf area, and dry mass of stems, roots and leaves was dependent on the sugarcane variety and on the weed species whose coexistence was kept. The weed U. plantaginea showed the greatest potential to interfere with the growth of both sugarcane varieties planted in the ‘Plene’ system. Panicum maximum and D. horizontalis are also potential competitors, while B. pilosa, I. quamoclit, I. hederifolia, and A. viridis are less competitive. The sugarcane variety RB92579 is less susceptible to weed interference than SP80-1842 when planted in the ‘Plene’ system.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
2020-12-12T00:59:37Z
2020-12-12T00:59:37Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100116
Planta Daninha, v. 37.
0100-8358
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198115
10.1590/s0100-83582019370100116
S0100-83582019000100188
2-s2.0-85074777680
S0100-83582019000100188.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100116
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198115
identifier_str_mv Planta Daninha, v. 37.
0100-8358
10.1590/s0100-83582019370100116
S0100-83582019000100188
2-s2.0-85074777680
S0100-83582019000100188.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128802848505856