Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garcia, Gian Franco Napa
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Lodi, Paulo César [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00518-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201753
Resumo: Geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures are commonly used in seismic design in regions. The performance of GRES under seismic conditions can be found to range from very good to catastrophic. This paper presents the implementation of a test to evaluate the influence of pre-cycling on the post-cycling resistance of a soil–geogrid system. Tests were performed on a PVE uniaxial geogrid with a tensile strength of 400 kN/m and a clean sand with 89% compaction and friction angle of 37.5°. The system was subjected to cyclic pullout tests at 40 and 80% of the monotonic strength. After the pre-cycling, a posterior monotonic pullout test was performed to evaluate the influence of the previous cycling on the final post-cycling strength. A test protocol was established to apply 50, 100, 500 and 5000 cycles with 40% and 80% pullout resistance amplitudes. At the 40% amplitude, the system exhibited stable increasing behavior in terms of resistance and cyclic displacement. Failure was not reached during the pre-cycling stage at 40% amplitude. At the 80% amplitude, the system failed at 250 cycles, and cyclic displacement was found to be erratic for all pre-cycling cases. The results suggest a general tendency of the pre-cycling to increase the post-cycling resistance. However, a combination of high cyclic amplitude with large number of cycles may lead to failure. Exposure to seismic events could be considered in the design of GRES though a rationally chosen reduction factor is applied.
id UNSP_a0328353bba7a740fcb9a918d0ee7e1b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201753
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of GeogridsGeogridGeosyntheticsPost-cycling strengthPre-cyclingPulloutGeosynthetic-reinforced soil structures are commonly used in seismic design in regions. The performance of GRES under seismic conditions can be found to range from very good to catastrophic. This paper presents the implementation of a test to evaluate the influence of pre-cycling on the post-cycling resistance of a soil–geogrid system. Tests were performed on a PVE uniaxial geogrid with a tensile strength of 400 kN/m and a clean sand with 89% compaction and friction angle of 37.5°. The system was subjected to cyclic pullout tests at 40 and 80% of the monotonic strength. After the pre-cycling, a posterior monotonic pullout test was performed to evaluate the influence of the previous cycling on the final post-cycling strength. A test protocol was established to apply 50, 100, 500 and 5000 cycles with 40% and 80% pullout resistance amplitudes. At the 40% amplitude, the system exhibited stable increasing behavior in terms of resistance and cyclic displacement. Failure was not reached during the pre-cycling stage at 40% amplitude. At the 80% amplitude, the system failed at 250 cycles, and cyclic displacement was found to be erratic for all pre-cycling cases. The results suggest a general tendency of the pre-cycling to increase the post-cycling resistance. However, a combination of high cyclic amplitude with large number of cycles may lead to failure. Exposure to seismic events could be considered in the design of GRES though a rationally chosen reduction factor is applied.Department of Geotechnical Engineering School of Engineering of Sao Carlos University of Sao Paulo, Av. Trabalhador Sãocarlense, 400, PO BOX 359Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering UNESP – São Paulo State University, Av. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01, PO BOX 473Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering UNESP – São Paulo State University, Av. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01, PO BOX 473Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Garcia, Gian Franco NapaLodi, Paulo César [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:40:53Z2020-12-12T02:40:53Z2020-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article827-834http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00518-3International Journal of Civil Engineering, v. 18, n. 7, p. 827-834, 2020.2383-38741735-0522http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20175310.1007/s40999-020-00518-32-s2.0-8508468440211208446044459620000-0001-8857-1710Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Civil Engineeringinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-28T12:56:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201753Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:51:08.551708Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids
title Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids
spellingShingle Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids
Garcia, Gian Franco Napa
Geogrid
Geosynthetics
Post-cycling strength
Pre-cycling
Pullout
title_short Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids
title_full Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids
title_fullStr Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids
title_full_unstemmed Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids
title_sort Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids
author Garcia, Gian Franco Napa
author_facet Garcia, Gian Franco Napa
Lodi, Paulo César [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Lodi, Paulo César [UNESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garcia, Gian Franco Napa
Lodi, Paulo César [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Geogrid
Geosynthetics
Post-cycling strength
Pre-cycling
Pullout
topic Geogrid
Geosynthetics
Post-cycling strength
Pre-cycling
Pullout
description Geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures are commonly used in seismic design in regions. The performance of GRES under seismic conditions can be found to range from very good to catastrophic. This paper presents the implementation of a test to evaluate the influence of pre-cycling on the post-cycling resistance of a soil–geogrid system. Tests were performed on a PVE uniaxial geogrid with a tensile strength of 400 kN/m and a clean sand with 89% compaction and friction angle of 37.5°. The system was subjected to cyclic pullout tests at 40 and 80% of the monotonic strength. After the pre-cycling, a posterior monotonic pullout test was performed to evaluate the influence of the previous cycling on the final post-cycling strength. A test protocol was established to apply 50, 100, 500 and 5000 cycles with 40% and 80% pullout resistance amplitudes. At the 40% amplitude, the system exhibited stable increasing behavior in terms of resistance and cyclic displacement. Failure was not reached during the pre-cycling stage at 40% amplitude. At the 80% amplitude, the system failed at 250 cycles, and cyclic displacement was found to be erratic for all pre-cycling cases. The results suggest a general tendency of the pre-cycling to increase the post-cycling resistance. However, a combination of high cyclic amplitude with large number of cycles may lead to failure. Exposure to seismic events could be considered in the design of GRES though a rationally chosen reduction factor is applied.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T02:40:53Z
2020-12-12T02:40:53Z
2020-07-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00518-3
International Journal of Civil Engineering, v. 18, n. 7, p. 827-834, 2020.
2383-3874
1735-0522
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201753
10.1007/s40999-020-00518-3
2-s2.0-85084684402
1120844604445962
0000-0001-8857-1710
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00518-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201753
identifier_str_mv International Journal of Civil Engineering, v. 18, n. 7, p. 827-834, 2020.
2383-3874
1735-0522
10.1007/s40999-020-00518-3
2-s2.0-85084684402
1120844604445962
0000-0001-8857-1710
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Civil Engineering
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 827-834
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128709056528384