Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00518-3 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201753 |
Resumo: | Geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures are commonly used in seismic design in regions. The performance of GRES under seismic conditions can be found to range from very good to catastrophic. This paper presents the implementation of a test to evaluate the influence of pre-cycling on the post-cycling resistance of a soil–geogrid system. Tests were performed on a PVE uniaxial geogrid with a tensile strength of 400 kN/m and a clean sand with 89% compaction and friction angle of 37.5°. The system was subjected to cyclic pullout tests at 40 and 80% of the monotonic strength. After the pre-cycling, a posterior monotonic pullout test was performed to evaluate the influence of the previous cycling on the final post-cycling strength. A test protocol was established to apply 50, 100, 500 and 5000 cycles with 40% and 80% pullout resistance amplitudes. At the 40% amplitude, the system exhibited stable increasing behavior in terms of resistance and cyclic displacement. Failure was not reached during the pre-cycling stage at 40% amplitude. At the 80% amplitude, the system failed at 250 cycles, and cyclic displacement was found to be erratic for all pre-cycling cases. The results suggest a general tendency of the pre-cycling to increase the post-cycling resistance. However, a combination of high cyclic amplitude with large number of cycles may lead to failure. Exposure to seismic events could be considered in the design of GRES though a rationally chosen reduction factor is applied. |
id |
UNSP_a0328353bba7a740fcb9a918d0ee7e1b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201753 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of GeogridsGeogridGeosyntheticsPost-cycling strengthPre-cyclingPulloutGeosynthetic-reinforced soil structures are commonly used in seismic design in regions. The performance of GRES under seismic conditions can be found to range from very good to catastrophic. This paper presents the implementation of a test to evaluate the influence of pre-cycling on the post-cycling resistance of a soil–geogrid system. Tests were performed on a PVE uniaxial geogrid with a tensile strength of 400 kN/m and a clean sand with 89% compaction and friction angle of 37.5°. The system was subjected to cyclic pullout tests at 40 and 80% of the monotonic strength. After the pre-cycling, a posterior monotonic pullout test was performed to evaluate the influence of the previous cycling on the final post-cycling strength. A test protocol was established to apply 50, 100, 500 and 5000 cycles with 40% and 80% pullout resistance amplitudes. At the 40% amplitude, the system exhibited stable increasing behavior in terms of resistance and cyclic displacement. Failure was not reached during the pre-cycling stage at 40% amplitude. At the 80% amplitude, the system failed at 250 cycles, and cyclic displacement was found to be erratic for all pre-cycling cases. The results suggest a general tendency of the pre-cycling to increase the post-cycling resistance. However, a combination of high cyclic amplitude with large number of cycles may lead to failure. Exposure to seismic events could be considered in the design of GRES though a rationally chosen reduction factor is applied.Department of Geotechnical Engineering School of Engineering of Sao Carlos University of Sao Paulo, Av. Trabalhador Sãocarlense, 400, PO BOX 359Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering UNESP – São Paulo State University, Av. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01, PO BOX 473Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering UNESP – São Paulo State University, Av. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01, PO BOX 473Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Garcia, Gian Franco NapaLodi, Paulo César [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:40:53Z2020-12-12T02:40:53Z2020-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article827-834http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00518-3International Journal of Civil Engineering, v. 18, n. 7, p. 827-834, 2020.2383-38741735-0522http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20175310.1007/s40999-020-00518-32-s2.0-8508468440211208446044459620000-0001-8857-1710Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Civil Engineeringinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-28T12:56:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201753Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:51:08.551708Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids |
title |
Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids |
spellingShingle |
Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids Garcia, Gian Franco Napa Geogrid Geosynthetics Post-cycling strength Pre-cycling Pullout |
title_short |
Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids |
title_full |
Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids |
title_fullStr |
Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids |
title_full_unstemmed |
Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids |
title_sort |
Post-cycling Interface Strength Test of Geogrids |
author |
Garcia, Gian Franco Napa |
author_facet |
Garcia, Gian Franco Napa Lodi, Paulo César [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lodi, Paulo César [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garcia, Gian Franco Napa Lodi, Paulo César [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Geogrid Geosynthetics Post-cycling strength Pre-cycling Pullout |
topic |
Geogrid Geosynthetics Post-cycling strength Pre-cycling Pullout |
description |
Geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures are commonly used in seismic design in regions. The performance of GRES under seismic conditions can be found to range from very good to catastrophic. This paper presents the implementation of a test to evaluate the influence of pre-cycling on the post-cycling resistance of a soil–geogrid system. Tests were performed on a PVE uniaxial geogrid with a tensile strength of 400 kN/m and a clean sand with 89% compaction and friction angle of 37.5°. The system was subjected to cyclic pullout tests at 40 and 80% of the monotonic strength. After the pre-cycling, a posterior monotonic pullout test was performed to evaluate the influence of the previous cycling on the final post-cycling strength. A test protocol was established to apply 50, 100, 500 and 5000 cycles with 40% and 80% pullout resistance amplitudes. At the 40% amplitude, the system exhibited stable increasing behavior in terms of resistance and cyclic displacement. Failure was not reached during the pre-cycling stage at 40% amplitude. At the 80% amplitude, the system failed at 250 cycles, and cyclic displacement was found to be erratic for all pre-cycling cases. The results suggest a general tendency of the pre-cycling to increase the post-cycling resistance. However, a combination of high cyclic amplitude with large number of cycles may lead to failure. Exposure to seismic events could be considered in the design of GRES though a rationally chosen reduction factor is applied. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-12T02:40:53Z 2020-12-12T02:40:53Z 2020-07-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00518-3 International Journal of Civil Engineering, v. 18, n. 7, p. 827-834, 2020. 2383-3874 1735-0522 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201753 10.1007/s40999-020-00518-3 2-s2.0-85084684402 1120844604445962 0000-0001-8857-1710 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00518-3 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201753 |
identifier_str_mv |
International Journal of Civil Engineering, v. 18, n. 7, p. 827-834, 2020. 2383-3874 1735-0522 10.1007/s40999-020-00518-3 2-s2.0-85084684402 1120844604445962 0000-0001-8857-1710 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Civil Engineering |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
827-834 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128709056528384 |