Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220697 |
Resumo: | Objective: To evaluate stainless steel archwire static friction in active and passive self-ligating lingual and conventional brackets with secondorder angulations. Methods: Two conventional lingual brackets for canines (STb light/Ormco; PSWb/Tecnident), and two self-ligating brackets, one active (In-Ovation L/GAC) and the other passive (3D/ Forestadent), were evaluated. A stainless steel archwire was used at 0°, 3° and 5° angulations. Metal ligatures, conventional elastic ligatures, and low friction elastic ligatures were also tested. A universal testing machine applied friction between brackets and wires, simulating sliding mechanics, to produce 2-mm sliding at 3 mm/minute speed. Results: Two-way analysis of variance demonstrated a significant effect of the interaction between brackets and angulations (p < 0.001). Tukey test indicated that the highest frictional resistance values were observed at 5° angulation for In-Ovation L, PSWb bracket with non conventional ligature, and STb bracket with metal ligature. As for 3D, PSWb with conventional or metal ligatures, and STb brackets with non conventional ligature, showed significantly lower static frictional resistance with 0° angulation. At 0° angulation, STb brackets with metal ties, In-Ovation L brackets and 3D brackets had the lowest frictional resistance. Conclusions: As the angulation increased from 0° to 3°, static friction resistance increased. When angulation increased from 3° to 5°, static friction resistance increased or remained the same. Self-ligating 3D and In-Ovation L brackets, as well as conventional STb brackets, seem to be the best option when sliding mechanics is used to perform lingual orthodontic treatment. |
id |
UNSP_a0baf344adfec3c41d3912881205f891 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220697 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro studyFrictionLigationOrthodontic bracketsObjective: To evaluate stainless steel archwire static friction in active and passive self-ligating lingual and conventional brackets with secondorder angulations. Methods: Two conventional lingual brackets for canines (STb light/Ormco; PSWb/Tecnident), and two self-ligating brackets, one active (In-Ovation L/GAC) and the other passive (3D/ Forestadent), were evaluated. A stainless steel archwire was used at 0°, 3° and 5° angulations. Metal ligatures, conventional elastic ligatures, and low friction elastic ligatures were also tested. A universal testing machine applied friction between brackets and wires, simulating sliding mechanics, to produce 2-mm sliding at 3 mm/minute speed. Results: Two-way analysis of variance demonstrated a significant effect of the interaction between brackets and angulations (p < 0.001). Tukey test indicated that the highest frictional resistance values were observed at 5° angulation for In-Ovation L, PSWb bracket with non conventional ligature, and STb bracket with metal ligature. As for 3D, PSWb with conventional or metal ligatures, and STb brackets with non conventional ligature, showed significantly lower static frictional resistance with 0° angulation. At 0° angulation, STb brackets with metal ties, In-Ovation L brackets and 3D brackets had the lowest frictional resistance. Conclusions: As the angulation increased from 0° to 3°, static friction resistance increased. When angulation increased from 3° to 5°, static friction resistance increased or remained the same. Self-ligating 3D and In-Ovation L brackets, as well as conventional STb brackets, seem to be the best option when sliding mechanics is used to perform lingual orthodontic treatment.São Leopoldo Mandic Department of Dental Material and Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry and Research InstituteUniversidade de Araras (UNIARARAS) Department of OrthodonticsUniversidade Estadual Paulista (FOAUNESP) School of Dentistry Department of OrthodonticsUniversidade Estadual Paulista (FOAUNESP) School of Dentistry Department of OrthodonticsSchool of Dentistry and Research InstituteUniversidade de Araras (UNIARARAS)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Pereira, Graziane OlímpioGimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP]Prieto, LucasDo Lago Prieto, Marcos GabrielBasting, Roberta Tarkany2022-04-28T19:04:42Z2022-04-28T19:04:42Z2016-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article34-40http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oarDental Press Journal of Orthodontics, v. 21, n. 4, p. 34-40, 2016.2177-67092176-9451http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22069710.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar2-s2.0-84988583563Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:04:42Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220697Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:26:20.014511Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study |
title |
Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study |
spellingShingle |
Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study Pereira, Graziane Olímpio Friction Ligation Orthodontic brackets |
title_short |
Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study |
title_full |
Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr |
Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study |
title_sort |
Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study |
author |
Pereira, Graziane Olímpio |
author_facet |
Pereira, Graziane Olímpio Gimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP] Prieto, Lucas Do Lago Prieto, Marcos Gabriel Basting, Roberta Tarkany |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP] Prieto, Lucas Do Lago Prieto, Marcos Gabriel Basting, Roberta Tarkany |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
School of Dentistry and Research Institute Universidade de Araras (UNIARARAS) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira, Graziane Olímpio Gimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP] Prieto, Lucas Do Lago Prieto, Marcos Gabriel Basting, Roberta Tarkany |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Friction Ligation Orthodontic brackets |
topic |
Friction Ligation Orthodontic brackets |
description |
Objective: To evaluate stainless steel archwire static friction in active and passive self-ligating lingual and conventional brackets with secondorder angulations. Methods: Two conventional lingual brackets for canines (STb light/Ormco; PSWb/Tecnident), and two self-ligating brackets, one active (In-Ovation L/GAC) and the other passive (3D/ Forestadent), were evaluated. A stainless steel archwire was used at 0°, 3° and 5° angulations. Metal ligatures, conventional elastic ligatures, and low friction elastic ligatures were also tested. A universal testing machine applied friction between brackets and wires, simulating sliding mechanics, to produce 2-mm sliding at 3 mm/minute speed. Results: Two-way analysis of variance demonstrated a significant effect of the interaction between brackets and angulations (p < 0.001). Tukey test indicated that the highest frictional resistance values were observed at 5° angulation for In-Ovation L, PSWb bracket with non conventional ligature, and STb bracket with metal ligature. As for 3D, PSWb with conventional or metal ligatures, and STb brackets with non conventional ligature, showed significantly lower static frictional resistance with 0° angulation. At 0° angulation, STb brackets with metal ties, In-Ovation L brackets and 3D brackets had the lowest frictional resistance. Conclusions: As the angulation increased from 0° to 3°, static friction resistance increased. When angulation increased from 3° to 5°, static friction resistance increased or remained the same. Self-ligating 3D and In-Ovation L brackets, as well as conventional STb brackets, seem to be the best option when sliding mechanics is used to perform lingual orthodontic treatment. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-01 2022-04-28T19:04:42Z 2022-04-28T19:04:42Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, v. 21, n. 4, p. 34-40, 2016. 2177-6709 2176-9451 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220697 10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar 2-s2.0-84988583563 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220697 |
identifier_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, v. 21, n. 4, p. 34-40, 2016. 2177-6709 2176-9451 10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar 2-s2.0-84988583563 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
34-40 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129202213355520 |