Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Graziane Olímpio
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Gimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP], Prieto, Lucas, Do Lago Prieto, Marcos Gabriel, Basting, Roberta Tarkany
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220697
Resumo: Objective: To evaluate stainless steel archwire static friction in active and passive self-ligating lingual and conventional brackets with secondorder angulations. Methods: Two conventional lingual brackets for canines (STb light/Ormco; PSWb/Tecnident), and two self-ligating brackets, one active (In-Ovation L/GAC) and the other passive (3D/ Forestadent), were evaluated. A stainless steel archwire was used at 0°, 3° and 5° angulations. Metal ligatures, conventional elastic ligatures, and low friction elastic ligatures were also tested. A universal testing machine applied friction between brackets and wires, simulating sliding mechanics, to produce 2-mm sliding at 3 mm/minute speed. Results: Two-way analysis of variance demonstrated a significant effect of the interaction between brackets and angulations (p < 0.001). Tukey test indicated that the highest frictional resistance values were observed at 5° angulation for In-Ovation L, PSWb bracket with non conventional ligature, and STb bracket with metal ligature. As for 3D, PSWb with conventional or metal ligatures, and STb brackets with non conventional ligature, showed significantly lower static frictional resistance with 0° angulation. At 0° angulation, STb brackets with metal ties, In-Ovation L brackets and 3D brackets had the lowest frictional resistance. Conclusions: As the angulation increased from 0° to 3°, static friction resistance increased. When angulation increased from 3° to 5°, static friction resistance increased or remained the same. Self-ligating 3D and In-Ovation L brackets, as well as conventional STb brackets, seem to be the best option when sliding mechanics is used to perform lingual orthodontic treatment.
id UNSP_a0baf344adfec3c41d3912881205f891
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220697
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro studyFrictionLigationOrthodontic bracketsObjective: To evaluate stainless steel archwire static friction in active and passive self-ligating lingual and conventional brackets with secondorder angulations. Methods: Two conventional lingual brackets for canines (STb light/Ormco; PSWb/Tecnident), and two self-ligating brackets, one active (In-Ovation L/GAC) and the other passive (3D/ Forestadent), were evaluated. A stainless steel archwire was used at 0°, 3° and 5° angulations. Metal ligatures, conventional elastic ligatures, and low friction elastic ligatures were also tested. A universal testing machine applied friction between brackets and wires, simulating sliding mechanics, to produce 2-mm sliding at 3 mm/minute speed. Results: Two-way analysis of variance demonstrated a significant effect of the interaction between brackets and angulations (p < 0.001). Tukey test indicated that the highest frictional resistance values were observed at 5° angulation for In-Ovation L, PSWb bracket with non conventional ligature, and STb bracket with metal ligature. As for 3D, PSWb with conventional or metal ligatures, and STb brackets with non conventional ligature, showed significantly lower static frictional resistance with 0° angulation. At 0° angulation, STb brackets with metal ties, In-Ovation L brackets and 3D brackets had the lowest frictional resistance. Conclusions: As the angulation increased from 0° to 3°, static friction resistance increased. When angulation increased from 3° to 5°, static friction resistance increased or remained the same. Self-ligating 3D and In-Ovation L brackets, as well as conventional STb brackets, seem to be the best option when sliding mechanics is used to perform lingual orthodontic treatment.São Leopoldo Mandic Department of Dental Material and Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry and Research InstituteUniversidade de Araras (UNIARARAS) Department of OrthodonticsUniversidade Estadual Paulista (FOAUNESP) School of Dentistry Department of OrthodonticsUniversidade Estadual Paulista (FOAUNESP) School of Dentistry Department of OrthodonticsSchool of Dentistry and Research InstituteUniversidade de Araras (UNIARARAS)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Pereira, Graziane OlímpioGimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP]Prieto, LucasDo Lago Prieto, Marcos GabrielBasting, Roberta Tarkany2022-04-28T19:04:42Z2022-04-28T19:04:42Z2016-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article34-40http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oarDental Press Journal of Orthodontics, v. 21, n. 4, p. 34-40, 2016.2177-67092176-9451http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22069710.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar2-s2.0-84988583563Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:04:42Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220697Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:26:20.014511Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study
title Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study
spellingShingle Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study
Pereira, Graziane Olímpio
Friction
Ligation
Orthodontic brackets
title_short Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study
title_full Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study
title_sort Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: An in vitro study
author Pereira, Graziane Olímpio
author_facet Pereira, Graziane Olímpio
Gimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP]
Prieto, Lucas
Do Lago Prieto, Marcos Gabriel
Basting, Roberta Tarkany
author_role author
author2 Gimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP]
Prieto, Lucas
Do Lago Prieto, Marcos Gabriel
Basting, Roberta Tarkany
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv School of Dentistry and Research Institute
Universidade de Araras (UNIARARAS)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Graziane Olímpio
Gimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP]
Prieto, Lucas
Do Lago Prieto, Marcos Gabriel
Basting, Roberta Tarkany
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Friction
Ligation
Orthodontic brackets
topic Friction
Ligation
Orthodontic brackets
description Objective: To evaluate stainless steel archwire static friction in active and passive self-ligating lingual and conventional brackets with secondorder angulations. Methods: Two conventional lingual brackets for canines (STb light/Ormco; PSWb/Tecnident), and two self-ligating brackets, one active (In-Ovation L/GAC) and the other passive (3D/ Forestadent), were evaluated. A stainless steel archwire was used at 0°, 3° and 5° angulations. Metal ligatures, conventional elastic ligatures, and low friction elastic ligatures were also tested. A universal testing machine applied friction between brackets and wires, simulating sliding mechanics, to produce 2-mm sliding at 3 mm/minute speed. Results: Two-way analysis of variance demonstrated a significant effect of the interaction between brackets and angulations (p < 0.001). Tukey test indicated that the highest frictional resistance values were observed at 5° angulation for In-Ovation L, PSWb bracket with non conventional ligature, and STb bracket with metal ligature. As for 3D, PSWb with conventional or metal ligatures, and STb brackets with non conventional ligature, showed significantly lower static frictional resistance with 0° angulation. At 0° angulation, STb brackets with metal ties, In-Ovation L brackets and 3D brackets had the lowest frictional resistance. Conclusions: As the angulation increased from 0° to 3°, static friction resistance increased. When angulation increased from 3° to 5°, static friction resistance increased or remained the same. Self-ligating 3D and In-Ovation L brackets, as well as conventional STb brackets, seem to be the best option when sliding mechanics is used to perform lingual orthodontic treatment.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-01
2022-04-28T19:04:42Z
2022-04-28T19:04:42Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, v. 21, n. 4, p. 34-40, 2016.
2177-6709
2176-9451
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220697
10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar
2-s2.0-84988583563
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220697
identifier_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, v. 21, n. 4, p. 34-40, 2016.
2177-6709
2176-9451
10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar
2-s2.0-84988583563
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 34-40
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129202213355520