Gabapentin versus dexchlorpheniramine as treatment for uremic pruritus: a randomised controlled trial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3356 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188334 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: Uremic pruritus is a common symptom in chronic renal failure patients with undefined pathophysiology. Initial treatment involves topical therapy mainly in the form of moisturizers, however, in many cases, this is not sufficient to relieve itching. Systemic adjuvant therapy is therefore necessary, which commonly includes oral antihistamines, with limited success. Positive effects have been reported for gabapentin. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin vs. dexchlorpheniramine in reducing uremic pruritus. MATERIALS & METHODS: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial for haemodialysis patients with persistent pruritus was performed. Pre-randomisation, cold cream was used for 15 days by 71 participants. Those with pruritus who remained in the study (60 patients) were randomised to receive gabapentin (30 patients; GABA group) or dexchlorpheniramine (30 patients; DEX group) for 21 days. The primary outcome was the decrease in pruritus score and improvement in quality of life. RESULTS: After cold cream use, the participants demonstrated a 37.5% median reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (p<0.01) and a 50% reduction in Quality of Life in Dermatology (DLQI) score (p<0.01). There was an additional reduction of pruritus in both groups (p<0.01), with no difference between the two (p>0.7). The median DLQI was reduced from 2 to 1 in the GABA group and from 2 to 0 in the DEX group. Nineteen patients (32%) reported mild/moderate side effects without differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Uremic pruritus was reduced upon treatment with gabapentin or dexchlorpheniramine with good safety profiles; no difference was observed between the two treatments. |
id |
UNSP_a1cf9528817a0552f8613cfdcb43b14a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/188334 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Gabapentin versus dexchlorpheniramine as treatment for uremic pruritus: a randomised controlled trialcold creamdexchlorpheniraminegabapentinhaemodialysisuremic pruritusBACKGROUND: Uremic pruritus is a common symptom in chronic renal failure patients with undefined pathophysiology. Initial treatment involves topical therapy mainly in the form of moisturizers, however, in many cases, this is not sufficient to relieve itching. Systemic adjuvant therapy is therefore necessary, which commonly includes oral antihistamines, with limited success. Positive effects have been reported for gabapentin. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin vs. dexchlorpheniramine in reducing uremic pruritus. MATERIALS & METHODS: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial for haemodialysis patients with persistent pruritus was performed. Pre-randomisation, cold cream was used for 15 days by 71 participants. Those with pruritus who remained in the study (60 patients) were randomised to receive gabapentin (30 patients; GABA group) or dexchlorpheniramine (30 patients; DEX group) for 21 days. The primary outcome was the decrease in pruritus score and improvement in quality of life. RESULTS: After cold cream use, the participants demonstrated a 37.5% median reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (p<0.01) and a 50% reduction in Quality of Life in Dermatology (DLQI) score (p<0.01). There was an additional reduction of pruritus in both groups (p<0.01), with no difference between the two (p>0.7). The median DLQI was reduced from 2 to 1 in the GABA group and from 2 to 0 in the DEX group. Nineteen patients (32%) reported mild/moderate side effects without differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Uremic pruritus was reduced upon treatment with gabapentin or dexchlorpheniramine with good safety profiles; no difference was observed between the two treatments.Nursing Department Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Dermatology and Radiotherapy Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Medical Clinic Nephrology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Nursing Department Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Dermatology and Radiotherapy Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Medical Clinic Nephrology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Gobo-Oliveira, Mariele [UNESP]Pigari, Vitória G [UNESP]Ogata, Matheus Sp [UNESP]Miot, Hélio A [UNESP]Ponce, Daniela [UNESP]Abbade, Luciana Pf [UNESP]2019-10-06T16:04:46Z2019-10-06T16:04:46Z2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article488-495http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3356European journal of dermatology : EJD, v. 28, n. 4, p. 488-495, 2018.1952-4013http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18833410.1684/ejd.2018.33562-s2.0-85056280353Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean journal of dermatology : EJDinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-15T18:47:46Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/188334Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-15T18:47:46Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Gabapentin versus dexchlorpheniramine as treatment for uremic pruritus: a randomised controlled trial |
title |
Gabapentin versus dexchlorpheniramine as treatment for uremic pruritus: a randomised controlled trial |
spellingShingle |
Gabapentin versus dexchlorpheniramine as treatment for uremic pruritus: a randomised controlled trial Gobo-Oliveira, Mariele [UNESP] cold cream dexchlorpheniramine gabapentin haemodialysis uremic pruritus |
title_short |
Gabapentin versus dexchlorpheniramine as treatment for uremic pruritus: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full |
Gabapentin versus dexchlorpheniramine as treatment for uremic pruritus: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Gabapentin versus dexchlorpheniramine as treatment for uremic pruritus: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gabapentin versus dexchlorpheniramine as treatment for uremic pruritus: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort |
Gabapentin versus dexchlorpheniramine as treatment for uremic pruritus: a randomised controlled trial |
author |
Gobo-Oliveira, Mariele [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Gobo-Oliveira, Mariele [UNESP] Pigari, Vitória G [UNESP] Ogata, Matheus Sp [UNESP] Miot, Hélio A [UNESP] Ponce, Daniela [UNESP] Abbade, Luciana Pf [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pigari, Vitória G [UNESP] Ogata, Matheus Sp [UNESP] Miot, Hélio A [UNESP] Ponce, Daniela [UNESP] Abbade, Luciana Pf [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gobo-Oliveira, Mariele [UNESP] Pigari, Vitória G [UNESP] Ogata, Matheus Sp [UNESP] Miot, Hélio A [UNESP] Ponce, Daniela [UNESP] Abbade, Luciana Pf [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
cold cream dexchlorpheniramine gabapentin haemodialysis uremic pruritus |
topic |
cold cream dexchlorpheniramine gabapentin haemodialysis uremic pruritus |
description |
BACKGROUND: Uremic pruritus is a common symptom in chronic renal failure patients with undefined pathophysiology. Initial treatment involves topical therapy mainly in the form of moisturizers, however, in many cases, this is not sufficient to relieve itching. Systemic adjuvant therapy is therefore necessary, which commonly includes oral antihistamines, with limited success. Positive effects have been reported for gabapentin. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin vs. dexchlorpheniramine in reducing uremic pruritus. MATERIALS & METHODS: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial for haemodialysis patients with persistent pruritus was performed. Pre-randomisation, cold cream was used for 15 days by 71 participants. Those with pruritus who remained in the study (60 patients) were randomised to receive gabapentin (30 patients; GABA group) or dexchlorpheniramine (30 patients; DEX group) for 21 days. The primary outcome was the decrease in pruritus score and improvement in quality of life. RESULTS: After cold cream use, the participants demonstrated a 37.5% median reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (p<0.01) and a 50% reduction in Quality of Life in Dermatology (DLQI) score (p<0.01). There was an additional reduction of pruritus in both groups (p<0.01), with no difference between the two (p>0.7). The median DLQI was reduced from 2 to 1 in the GABA group and from 2 to 0 in the DEX group. Nineteen patients (32%) reported mild/moderate side effects without differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Uremic pruritus was reduced upon treatment with gabapentin or dexchlorpheniramine with good safety profiles; no difference was observed between the two treatments. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-01 2019-10-06T16:04:46Z 2019-10-06T16:04:46Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3356 European journal of dermatology : EJD, v. 28, n. 4, p. 488-495, 2018. 1952-4013 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188334 10.1684/ejd.2018.3356 2-s2.0-85056280353 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3356 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188334 |
identifier_str_mv |
European journal of dermatology : EJD, v. 28, n. 4, p. 488-495, 2018. 1952-4013 10.1684/ejd.2018.3356 2-s2.0-85056280353 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
European journal of dermatology : EJD |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
488-495 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128211566985216 |