Sequential methodology for the selection of sanitary landfill sites: A comparison with a traditional method
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2020.105347 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221442 |
Resumo: | A sequential methodological approach for sanitary landfill sites selection is proposed. Spatial data were processed in a GIS platform using multi-criteria decision analysis (analytic hierarchy process, boolean, fuzzy, and weighted sum). A traditional weighted sum method was compared to the sequential method proposed herein. Using weighted sum, 57.98% of the area results propitious versus 8.98% using the sequential method. Strong variation also occurs in the areas classified as restrictive, which increases from 0.60% to 26.01%. Most significant differences occurred in urban areas neighbouring and areas high slope areas with rocky outcropping substrate (strong restriction to sanitary landfills implantation). Once traditional method results average classes, areas with strong restriction for one attribute can be selected. In sequential method, the overlapping of the environmental, legal and operational attributes results more consistent classification, more conservative socio-environmental evaluation, reducing environmental impacts mitigation needs and decreasing the management risks and general enterprise costs. |
id |
UNSP_a32f10982ebaa6f4e59fbfba3535da99 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221442 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Sequential methodology for the selection of sanitary landfill sites: A comparison with a traditional methodAnalytic hierarchy processEnvironmentGeographic information systemHydrographic basinMethod comparisonMulti-criteria analysisRio Claro hydrographic basinSanitary landfillSequential methodologicalSites selectionWaste managementWeighted sumA sequential methodological approach for sanitary landfill sites selection is proposed. Spatial data were processed in a GIS platform using multi-criteria decision analysis (analytic hierarchy process, boolean, fuzzy, and weighted sum). A traditional weighted sum method was compared to the sequential method proposed herein. Using weighted sum, 57.98% of the area results propitious versus 8.98% using the sequential method. Strong variation also occurs in the areas classified as restrictive, which increases from 0.60% to 26.01%. Most significant differences occurred in urban areas neighbouring and areas high slope areas with rocky outcropping substrate (strong restriction to sanitary landfills implantation). Once traditional method results average classes, areas with strong restriction for one attribute can be selected. In sequential method, the overlapping of the environmental, legal and operational attributes results more consistent classification, more conservative socio-environmental evaluation, reducing environmental impacts mitigation needs and decreasing the management risks and general enterprise costs.Department of Civil Engineering Federal University of São CarlosDepartment of Civil Engineering São Paulo State UniversityFederal University of São CarlosDepartment of Environmental Sciences Federal University of São CarlosDepartment of Civil Engineering São Paulo State UniversityUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Mazzuco, Giulia G.Souza, Natália C.Oliveira, Vinícius G.Gobbo, Caio A.R.Moreira, Emerson R.Lollo, José A. [UNESP]Lorandi, ReinaldoMoschini, Luiz E.2022-04-28T19:28:31Z2022-04-28T19:28:31Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article141-158http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2020.105347International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, v. 25, n. 2, p. 141-158, 2020.1478-98681478-9876http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22144210.1504/IJEWM.2020.1053472-s2.0-85080129146Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Environment and Waste Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:28:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221442Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:28:31Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sequential methodology for the selection of sanitary landfill sites: A comparison with a traditional method |
title |
Sequential methodology for the selection of sanitary landfill sites: A comparison with a traditional method |
spellingShingle |
Sequential methodology for the selection of sanitary landfill sites: A comparison with a traditional method Mazzuco, Giulia G. Analytic hierarchy process Environment Geographic information system Hydrographic basin Method comparison Multi-criteria analysis Rio Claro hydrographic basin Sanitary landfill Sequential methodological Sites selection Waste management Weighted sum |
title_short |
Sequential methodology for the selection of sanitary landfill sites: A comparison with a traditional method |
title_full |
Sequential methodology for the selection of sanitary landfill sites: A comparison with a traditional method |
title_fullStr |
Sequential methodology for the selection of sanitary landfill sites: A comparison with a traditional method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sequential methodology for the selection of sanitary landfill sites: A comparison with a traditional method |
title_sort |
Sequential methodology for the selection of sanitary landfill sites: A comparison with a traditional method |
author |
Mazzuco, Giulia G. |
author_facet |
Mazzuco, Giulia G. Souza, Natália C. Oliveira, Vinícius G. Gobbo, Caio A.R. Moreira, Emerson R. Lollo, José A. [UNESP] Lorandi, Reinaldo Moschini, Luiz E. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Natália C. Oliveira, Vinícius G. Gobbo, Caio A.R. Moreira, Emerson R. Lollo, José A. [UNESP] Lorandi, Reinaldo Moschini, Luiz E. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mazzuco, Giulia G. Souza, Natália C. Oliveira, Vinícius G. Gobbo, Caio A.R. Moreira, Emerson R. Lollo, José A. [UNESP] Lorandi, Reinaldo Moschini, Luiz E. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Analytic hierarchy process Environment Geographic information system Hydrographic basin Method comparison Multi-criteria analysis Rio Claro hydrographic basin Sanitary landfill Sequential methodological Sites selection Waste management Weighted sum |
topic |
Analytic hierarchy process Environment Geographic information system Hydrographic basin Method comparison Multi-criteria analysis Rio Claro hydrographic basin Sanitary landfill Sequential methodological Sites selection Waste management Weighted sum |
description |
A sequential methodological approach for sanitary landfill sites selection is proposed. Spatial data were processed in a GIS platform using multi-criteria decision analysis (analytic hierarchy process, boolean, fuzzy, and weighted sum). A traditional weighted sum method was compared to the sequential method proposed herein. Using weighted sum, 57.98% of the area results propitious versus 8.98% using the sequential method. Strong variation also occurs in the areas classified as restrictive, which increases from 0.60% to 26.01%. Most significant differences occurred in urban areas neighbouring and areas high slope areas with rocky outcropping substrate (strong restriction to sanitary landfills implantation). Once traditional method results average classes, areas with strong restriction for one attribute can be selected. In sequential method, the overlapping of the environmental, legal and operational attributes results more consistent classification, more conservative socio-environmental evaluation, reducing environmental impacts mitigation needs and decreasing the management risks and general enterprise costs. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 2022-04-28T19:28:31Z 2022-04-28T19:28:31Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2020.105347 International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, v. 25, n. 2, p. 141-158, 2020. 1478-9868 1478-9876 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221442 10.1504/IJEWM.2020.105347 2-s2.0-85080129146 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2020.105347 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221442 |
identifier_str_mv |
International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, v. 25, n. 2, p. 141-158, 2020. 1478-9868 1478-9876 10.1504/IJEWM.2020.105347 2-s2.0-85080129146 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Environment and Waste Management |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
141-158 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1803650228901904384 |