Economic viability of nutrient management practices for banana crop

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Furlaneto, Fernanda de Paiva Badiz
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Martins, Adriana Novais, Esperancini, Maura Seiko Tsutsui [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232009
Resumo: Proper fertilizing management, in order to optimize fruit quality and yield, is a relevant stage on the production process to the rural entrepreneur profitability. So, the aim of this study was to analyze the economic feasibility of five nutrient management practices for banana crop, Cavendish cultivars, in the Médio Paranapanema region, São Paulo State, Brazil, in 2009/2010. The effective operational cost (EOC) and total operational cost (TOC) structures and three profitability indicators were used. Significant differences were observed among the management systems, and the system that resulted in major economic advantage to the producer provided an average profit rate 25.6% higher than other treatments, with total net revenue about 29.5% higher than other management types. The unitary cost was lower for the most profitable nutrient management practice, although the yieldwas 9.5% lower than the management system that presented the highest yield levels.
id UNSP_a33d93bcfee91c05416bdf595caf016a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232009
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Economic viability of nutrient management practices for banana cropViabilidade econômica de manejos nutricionais na cultura de bananaBanana cropFertilizationMusa spp.Production costProfitabilityProper fertilizing management, in order to optimize fruit quality and yield, is a relevant stage on the production process to the rural entrepreneur profitability. So, the aim of this study was to analyze the economic feasibility of five nutrient management practices for banana crop, Cavendish cultivars, in the Médio Paranapanema region, São Paulo State, Brazil, in 2009/2010. The effective operational cost (EOC) and total operational cost (TOC) structures and three profitability indicators were used. Significant differences were observed among the management systems, and the system that resulted in major economic advantage to the producer provided an average profit rate 25.6% higher than other treatments, with total net revenue about 29.5% higher than other management types. The unitary cost was lower for the most profitable nutrient management practice, although the yieldwas 9.5% lower than the management system that presented the highest yield levels.Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA) Pólo Centro-Oeste Paulista Unidade de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Marília, SPAgência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA) Pólo Médio Paranapanema, Assis, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista Campus Botucatu Departamento de Gestão e Tecnologia Agroindustrial, Botucatu, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista Campus Botucatu Departamento de Gestão e Tecnologia Agroindustrial, Botucatu, SPUnidade de Pesquisa e DesenvolvimentoPólo Médio ParanapanemaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Furlaneto, Fernanda de Paiva BadizMartins, Adriana NovaisEsperancini, Maura Seiko Tsutsui [UNESP]2022-04-29T08:48:40Z2022-04-29T08:48:40Z2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article205-212Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical, v. 41, n. 2, p. 205-212, 2011.1983-40631517-6398http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2320092-s2.0-79959873672Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengporPesquisa Agropecuaria Tropicalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T13:33:18Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232009Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-04-30T13:33:18Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Economic viability of nutrient management practices for banana crop
Viabilidade econômica de manejos nutricionais na cultura de banana
title Economic viability of nutrient management practices for banana crop
spellingShingle Economic viability of nutrient management practices for banana crop
Furlaneto, Fernanda de Paiva Badiz
Banana crop
Fertilization
Musa spp.
Production cost
Profitability
title_short Economic viability of nutrient management practices for banana crop
title_full Economic viability of nutrient management practices for banana crop
title_fullStr Economic viability of nutrient management practices for banana crop
title_full_unstemmed Economic viability of nutrient management practices for banana crop
title_sort Economic viability of nutrient management practices for banana crop
author Furlaneto, Fernanda de Paiva Badiz
author_facet Furlaneto, Fernanda de Paiva Badiz
Martins, Adriana Novais
Esperancini, Maura Seiko Tsutsui [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Martins, Adriana Novais
Esperancini, Maura Seiko Tsutsui [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Unidade de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento
Pólo Médio Paranapanema
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Furlaneto, Fernanda de Paiva Badiz
Martins, Adriana Novais
Esperancini, Maura Seiko Tsutsui [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Banana crop
Fertilization
Musa spp.
Production cost
Profitability
topic Banana crop
Fertilization
Musa spp.
Production cost
Profitability
description Proper fertilizing management, in order to optimize fruit quality and yield, is a relevant stage on the production process to the rural entrepreneur profitability. So, the aim of this study was to analyze the economic feasibility of five nutrient management practices for banana crop, Cavendish cultivars, in the Médio Paranapanema region, São Paulo State, Brazil, in 2009/2010. The effective operational cost (EOC) and total operational cost (TOC) structures and three profitability indicators were used. Significant differences were observed among the management systems, and the system that resulted in major economic advantage to the producer provided an average profit rate 25.6% higher than other treatments, with total net revenue about 29.5% higher than other management types. The unitary cost was lower for the most profitable nutrient management practice, although the yieldwas 9.5% lower than the management system that presented the highest yield levels.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
2022-04-29T08:48:40Z
2022-04-29T08:48:40Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical, v. 41, n. 2, p. 205-212, 2011.
1983-4063
1517-6398
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232009
2-s2.0-79959873672
identifier_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical, v. 41, n. 2, p. 205-212, 2011.
1983-4063
1517-6398
2-s2.0-79959873672
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 205-212
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964394725048320