Meat with edible coating: Acceptance, purchase intention and neophobia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves Mauricio, Raquel [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos, Juliana [UNESP], Tieko Nassu, Renata
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111002
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223474
Resumo: The acceptance of a new product depends on its sensory quality and consumers’ physiological and psychological aspects. The fear of consuming foods processed by new technologies is an example. This study aimed to investigate the overall acceptance and purchase intention of chitosan-coated beef and lamb meat in blind and informed conditions and to estimate the psychometric properties using the Food Technology Neophobia Scale (FTNS). Beef and lamb meat samples were evaluated for overall acceptance (1 = extremely disliked, 9 = extremely liked) and purchase intention (1 = certainly would not buy, 5 = certainly would buy). A questionnaire containing the Food Technology Neophobia Scale (FTNS) was applied, and sociodemographic data were collected, and 297 consumers participated in this study. For beef, chitosan-coated in the informed condition was the most accepted. In contrast, for lamb meat, the overall acceptance values of control and chitosan treatments in the blind condition were higher than the samples in the informed condition. However, cluster analysis indicated three clusters of consumers with different perceptions for both types of meat. The original FTNS showed factorial invariance, and the abbreviated scale (AFTNS) was used. The final AFTNS model showed good adjustment index (λ = 0.41 – 0.73; χ2 / gl = 3.5; CFI = 0.93; TLI = 0.90; RMSEA = 0.09) and had 8 items. For most consumers in this study, an absence of neophobia was observed (71.1%), indicating that the chitosan-coated meat would potentially be commerced.
id UNSP_a430487a51f8ff06dbd54ff972c2dff6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223474
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Meat with edible coating: Acceptance, purchase intention and neophobiaChitosanConfirmatory factor analysisConsumerLabelSensoryThe acceptance of a new product depends on its sensory quality and consumers’ physiological and psychological aspects. The fear of consuming foods processed by new technologies is an example. This study aimed to investigate the overall acceptance and purchase intention of chitosan-coated beef and lamb meat in blind and informed conditions and to estimate the psychometric properties using the Food Technology Neophobia Scale (FTNS). Beef and lamb meat samples were evaluated for overall acceptance (1 = extremely disliked, 9 = extremely liked) and purchase intention (1 = certainly would not buy, 5 = certainly would buy). A questionnaire containing the Food Technology Neophobia Scale (FTNS) was applied, and sociodemographic data were collected, and 297 consumers participated in this study. For beef, chitosan-coated in the informed condition was the most accepted. In contrast, for lamb meat, the overall acceptance values of control and chitosan treatments in the blind condition were higher than the samples in the informed condition. However, cluster analysis indicated three clusters of consumers with different perceptions for both types of meat. The original FTNS showed factorial invariance, and the abbreviated scale (AFTNS) was used. The final AFTNS model showed good adjustment index (λ = 0.41 – 0.73; χ2 / gl = 3.5; CFI = 0.93; TLI = 0.90; RMSEA = 0.09) and had 8 items. For most consumers in this study, an absence of neophobia was observed (71.1%), indicating that the chitosan-coated meat would potentially be commerced.Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Araraquara - Universidade Estadual Paulista (FCFAr/UNESP), Rodovia Araraquara Jaú, Km 01 – s/n – Campos Ville CEP, SPEmbrapa Pecuária Sudeste. Rodovia Washington Luiz, km 234 - Fazenda Canchim, Caixa Postal 339 – São Carlos, SPFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Araraquara - Universidade Estadual Paulista (FCFAr/UNESP), Rodovia Araraquara Jaú, Km 01 – s/n – Campos Ville CEP, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Alves Mauricio, Raquel [UNESP]Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos, Juliana [UNESP]Tieko Nassu, Renata2022-04-28T19:50:51Z2022-04-28T19:50:51Z2022-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111002Food Research International, v. 154.1873-71450963-9969http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22347410.1016/j.foodres.2022.1110022-s2.0-85124707037Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFood Research Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:50:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223474Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:50:51Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Meat with edible coating: Acceptance, purchase intention and neophobia
title Meat with edible coating: Acceptance, purchase intention and neophobia
spellingShingle Meat with edible coating: Acceptance, purchase intention and neophobia
Alves Mauricio, Raquel [UNESP]
Chitosan
Confirmatory factor analysis
Consumer
Label
Sensory
title_short Meat with edible coating: Acceptance, purchase intention and neophobia
title_full Meat with edible coating: Acceptance, purchase intention and neophobia
title_fullStr Meat with edible coating: Acceptance, purchase intention and neophobia
title_full_unstemmed Meat with edible coating: Acceptance, purchase intention and neophobia
title_sort Meat with edible coating: Acceptance, purchase intention and neophobia
author Alves Mauricio, Raquel [UNESP]
author_facet Alves Mauricio, Raquel [UNESP]
Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos, Juliana [UNESP]
Tieko Nassu, Renata
author_role author
author2 Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos, Juliana [UNESP]
Tieko Nassu, Renata
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves Mauricio, Raquel [UNESP]
Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos, Juliana [UNESP]
Tieko Nassu, Renata
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chitosan
Confirmatory factor analysis
Consumer
Label
Sensory
topic Chitosan
Confirmatory factor analysis
Consumer
Label
Sensory
description The acceptance of a new product depends on its sensory quality and consumers’ physiological and psychological aspects. The fear of consuming foods processed by new technologies is an example. This study aimed to investigate the overall acceptance and purchase intention of chitosan-coated beef and lamb meat in blind and informed conditions and to estimate the psychometric properties using the Food Technology Neophobia Scale (FTNS). Beef and lamb meat samples were evaluated for overall acceptance (1 = extremely disliked, 9 = extremely liked) and purchase intention (1 = certainly would not buy, 5 = certainly would buy). A questionnaire containing the Food Technology Neophobia Scale (FTNS) was applied, and sociodemographic data were collected, and 297 consumers participated in this study. For beef, chitosan-coated in the informed condition was the most accepted. In contrast, for lamb meat, the overall acceptance values of control and chitosan treatments in the blind condition were higher than the samples in the informed condition. However, cluster analysis indicated three clusters of consumers with different perceptions for both types of meat. The original FTNS showed factorial invariance, and the abbreviated scale (AFTNS) was used. The final AFTNS model showed good adjustment index (λ = 0.41 – 0.73; χ2 / gl = 3.5; CFI = 0.93; TLI = 0.90; RMSEA = 0.09) and had 8 items. For most consumers in this study, an absence of neophobia was observed (71.1%), indicating that the chitosan-coated meat would potentially be commerced.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-28T19:50:51Z
2022-04-28T19:50:51Z
2022-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111002
Food Research International, v. 154.
1873-7145
0963-9969
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223474
10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111002
2-s2.0-85124707037
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111002
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223474
identifier_str_mv Food Research International, v. 154.
1873-7145
0963-9969
10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111002
2-s2.0-85124707037
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Food Research International
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964511044632576