Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1816767 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200990 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to compare bond strengths between composite and dentin using different adhesive systems and to assess the influence of the experimental unit during thermocycling. Ninety recently extracted human molars were selected, and the occlusal third of each crown was removed. The teeth were divided into 15 groups (n = 6), according to the type of adhesive (1, 2, or 3 steps), the aging conditions (dry, distilled water storage, or thermocycling), and the experimental unit used during aging (sticks or blocks). On occlusal surfaces, composite blocks were constructed. Specimens from the “blocks” experimental units were aged as blocks and then cut into sticks, while specimens from the “sticks” experimental units were cut before being aged. The microtensile bond strength test was performed and the failure types were classified. Data were statistically analyzed. The type of adhesive was the only variable that significantly influenced the bond strength among tested groups (p =.0024). Lower values were obtained for the specimens cemented with the 3-step adhesive and thermocycled before being cut (p =.0024), while the highest values were obtained for the 2-step adhesive thermocycled as sticks. Dunnett's test showed that the group differing from the dry subgroups (control) was that with the 3-step adhesive thermocycled as blocks. The predominant failure mode was the cohesive failure of the composite resin. It can be concluded that the different adhesive systems applied to dentin demonstrated similar bond strength, except for the 3 and 2-step adhesives after thermocycling. Moreover, the aging protocols and the experimental unit did not influence the µTSB. |
id |
UNSP_a5d6e49e994e390719d2d279d1a691c1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200990 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unitAdhesivesagingdentin-bonding agentstensile strengthThe objective of this study was to compare bond strengths between composite and dentin using different adhesive systems and to assess the influence of the experimental unit during thermocycling. Ninety recently extracted human molars were selected, and the occlusal third of each crown was removed. The teeth were divided into 15 groups (n = 6), according to the type of adhesive (1, 2, or 3 steps), the aging conditions (dry, distilled water storage, or thermocycling), and the experimental unit used during aging (sticks or blocks). On occlusal surfaces, composite blocks were constructed. Specimens from the “blocks” experimental units were aged as blocks and then cut into sticks, while specimens from the “sticks” experimental units were cut before being aged. The microtensile bond strength test was performed and the failure types were classified. Data were statistically analyzed. The type of adhesive was the only variable that significantly influenced the bond strength among tested groups (p =.0024). Lower values were obtained for the specimens cemented with the 3-step adhesive and thermocycled before being cut (p =.0024), while the highest values were obtained for the 2-step adhesive thermocycled as sticks. Dunnett's test showed that the group differing from the dry subgroups (control) was that with the 3-step adhesive thermocycled as blocks. The predominant failure mode was the cohesive failure of the composite resin. It can be concluded that the different adhesive systems applied to dentin demonstrated similar bond strength, except for the 3 and 2-step adhesives after thermocycling. Moreover, the aging protocols and the experimental unit did not influence the µTSB.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology - ICT São José dos Campos Dental School Univ. Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Department of Restorative Dentistry Division of Prosthodontics Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science Dental Materials Unit Center for Dental and Oral Medicine University of ZurichDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology - ICT São José dos Campos Dental School Univ. Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)University of ZurichLima, Julia Magalhães Costa [UNESP]Anami, Lilian Costa [UNESP]Pereira, Sarina Maciel Braga [UNESP]de Melo, Renata Marques [UNESP]Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]de Miranda, Larissa MendonçaSouza, Karina BarbosaÖzcan, MutluSouza, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção2020-12-12T02:21:20Z2020-12-12T02:21:20Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1816767Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.1568-56160169-4243http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20099010.1080/01694243.2020.18167672-s2.0-85090209038Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T15:48:22Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200990Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:14:50.217318Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit |
title |
Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit |
spellingShingle |
Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit Lima, Julia Magalhães Costa [UNESP] Adhesives aging dentin-bonding agents tensile strength |
title_short |
Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit |
title_full |
Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit |
title_fullStr |
Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit |
title_sort |
Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit |
author |
Lima, Julia Magalhães Costa [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Lima, Julia Magalhães Costa [UNESP] Anami, Lilian Costa [UNESP] Pereira, Sarina Maciel Braga [UNESP] de Melo, Renata Marques [UNESP] Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP] de Miranda, Larissa Mendonça Souza, Karina Barbosa Özcan, Mutlu Souza, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Anami, Lilian Costa [UNESP] Pereira, Sarina Maciel Braga [UNESP] de Melo, Renata Marques [UNESP] Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP] de Miranda, Larissa Mendonça Souza, Karina Barbosa Özcan, Mutlu Souza, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) University of Zurich |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Julia Magalhães Costa [UNESP] Anami, Lilian Costa [UNESP] Pereira, Sarina Maciel Braga [UNESP] de Melo, Renata Marques [UNESP] Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP] de Miranda, Larissa Mendonça Souza, Karina Barbosa Özcan, Mutlu Souza, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Adhesives aging dentin-bonding agents tensile strength |
topic |
Adhesives aging dentin-bonding agents tensile strength |
description |
The objective of this study was to compare bond strengths between composite and dentin using different adhesive systems and to assess the influence of the experimental unit during thermocycling. Ninety recently extracted human molars were selected, and the occlusal third of each crown was removed. The teeth were divided into 15 groups (n = 6), according to the type of adhesive (1, 2, or 3 steps), the aging conditions (dry, distilled water storage, or thermocycling), and the experimental unit used during aging (sticks or blocks). On occlusal surfaces, composite blocks were constructed. Specimens from the “blocks” experimental units were aged as blocks and then cut into sticks, while specimens from the “sticks” experimental units were cut before being aged. The microtensile bond strength test was performed and the failure types were classified. Data were statistically analyzed. The type of adhesive was the only variable that significantly influenced the bond strength among tested groups (p =.0024). Lower values were obtained for the specimens cemented with the 3-step adhesive and thermocycled before being cut (p =.0024), while the highest values were obtained for the 2-step adhesive thermocycled as sticks. Dunnett's test showed that the group differing from the dry subgroups (control) was that with the 3-step adhesive thermocycled as blocks. The predominant failure mode was the cohesive failure of the composite resin. It can be concluded that the different adhesive systems applied to dentin demonstrated similar bond strength, except for the 3 and 2-step adhesives after thermocycling. Moreover, the aging protocols and the experimental unit did not influence the µTSB. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-12T02:21:20Z 2020-12-12T02:21:20Z 2020-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1816767 Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 1568-5616 0169-4243 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200990 10.1080/01694243.2020.1816767 2-s2.0-85090209038 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1816767 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200990 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 1568-5616 0169-4243 10.1080/01694243.2020.1816767 2-s2.0-85090209038 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128779604721664 |