Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Julia Magalhães Costa [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Anami, Lilian Costa [UNESP], Pereira, Sarina Maciel Braga [UNESP], de Melo, Renata Marques [UNESP], Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP], de Miranda, Larissa Mendonça, Souza, Karina Barbosa, Özcan, Mutlu, Souza, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1816767
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200990
Resumo: The objective of this study was to compare bond strengths between composite and dentin using different adhesive systems and to assess the influence of the experimental unit during thermocycling. Ninety recently extracted human molars were selected, and the occlusal third of each crown was removed. The teeth were divided into 15 groups (n = 6), according to the type of adhesive (1, 2, or 3 steps), the aging conditions (dry, distilled water storage, or thermocycling), and the experimental unit used during aging (sticks or blocks). On occlusal surfaces, composite blocks were constructed. Specimens from the “blocks” experimental units were aged as blocks and then cut into sticks, while specimens from the “sticks” experimental units were cut before being aged. The microtensile bond strength test was performed and the failure types were classified. Data were statistically analyzed. The type of adhesive was the only variable that significantly influenced the bond strength among tested groups (p =.0024). Lower values were obtained for the specimens cemented with the 3-step adhesive and thermocycled before being cut (p =.0024), while the highest values were obtained for the 2-step adhesive thermocycled as sticks. Dunnett's test showed that the group differing from the dry subgroups (control) was that with the 3-step adhesive thermocycled as blocks. The predominant failure mode was the cohesive failure of the composite resin. It can be concluded that the different adhesive systems applied to dentin demonstrated similar bond strength, except for the 3 and 2-step adhesives after thermocycling. Moreover, the aging protocols and the experimental unit did not influence the µTSB.
id UNSP_a5d6e49e994e390719d2d279d1a691c1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200990
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unitAdhesivesagingdentin-bonding agentstensile strengthThe objective of this study was to compare bond strengths between composite and dentin using different adhesive systems and to assess the influence of the experimental unit during thermocycling. Ninety recently extracted human molars were selected, and the occlusal third of each crown was removed. The teeth were divided into 15 groups (n = 6), according to the type of adhesive (1, 2, or 3 steps), the aging conditions (dry, distilled water storage, or thermocycling), and the experimental unit used during aging (sticks or blocks). On occlusal surfaces, composite blocks were constructed. Specimens from the “blocks” experimental units were aged as blocks and then cut into sticks, while specimens from the “sticks” experimental units were cut before being aged. The microtensile bond strength test was performed and the failure types were classified. Data were statistically analyzed. The type of adhesive was the only variable that significantly influenced the bond strength among tested groups (p =.0024). Lower values were obtained for the specimens cemented with the 3-step adhesive and thermocycled before being cut (p =.0024), while the highest values were obtained for the 2-step adhesive thermocycled as sticks. Dunnett's test showed that the group differing from the dry subgroups (control) was that with the 3-step adhesive thermocycled as blocks. The predominant failure mode was the cohesive failure of the composite resin. It can be concluded that the different adhesive systems applied to dentin demonstrated similar bond strength, except for the 3 and 2-step adhesives after thermocycling. Moreover, the aging protocols and the experimental unit did not influence the µTSB.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology - ICT São José dos Campos Dental School Univ. Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Department of Restorative Dentistry Division of Prosthodontics Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science Dental Materials Unit Center for Dental and Oral Medicine University of ZurichDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology - ICT São José dos Campos Dental School Univ. Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)University of ZurichLima, Julia Magalhães Costa [UNESP]Anami, Lilian Costa [UNESP]Pereira, Sarina Maciel Braga [UNESP]de Melo, Renata Marques [UNESP]Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]de Miranda, Larissa MendonçaSouza, Karina BarbosaÖzcan, MutluSouza, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção2020-12-12T02:21:20Z2020-12-12T02:21:20Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1816767Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.1568-56160169-4243http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20099010.1080/01694243.2020.18167672-s2.0-85090209038Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T15:48:22Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200990Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:14:50.217318Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit
title Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit
spellingShingle Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit
Lima, Julia Magalhães Costa [UNESP]
Adhesives
aging
dentin-bonding agents
tensile strength
title_short Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit
title_full Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit
title_fullStr Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit
title_full_unstemmed Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit
title_sort Dentin/composite bond strength: effect of aging and experimental unit
author Lima, Julia Magalhães Costa [UNESP]
author_facet Lima, Julia Magalhães Costa [UNESP]
Anami, Lilian Costa [UNESP]
Pereira, Sarina Maciel Braga [UNESP]
de Melo, Renata Marques [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
de Miranda, Larissa Mendonça
Souza, Karina Barbosa
Özcan, Mutlu
Souza, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção
author_role author
author2 Anami, Lilian Costa [UNESP]
Pereira, Sarina Maciel Braga [UNESP]
de Melo, Renata Marques [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
de Miranda, Larissa Mendonça
Souza, Karina Barbosa
Özcan, Mutlu
Souza, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
University of Zurich
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Julia Magalhães Costa [UNESP]
Anami, Lilian Costa [UNESP]
Pereira, Sarina Maciel Braga [UNESP]
de Melo, Renata Marques [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
de Miranda, Larissa Mendonça
Souza, Karina Barbosa
Özcan, Mutlu
Souza, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adhesives
aging
dentin-bonding agents
tensile strength
topic Adhesives
aging
dentin-bonding agents
tensile strength
description The objective of this study was to compare bond strengths between composite and dentin using different adhesive systems and to assess the influence of the experimental unit during thermocycling. Ninety recently extracted human molars were selected, and the occlusal third of each crown was removed. The teeth were divided into 15 groups (n = 6), according to the type of adhesive (1, 2, or 3 steps), the aging conditions (dry, distilled water storage, or thermocycling), and the experimental unit used during aging (sticks or blocks). On occlusal surfaces, composite blocks were constructed. Specimens from the “blocks” experimental units were aged as blocks and then cut into sticks, while specimens from the “sticks” experimental units were cut before being aged. The microtensile bond strength test was performed and the failure types were classified. Data were statistically analyzed. The type of adhesive was the only variable that significantly influenced the bond strength among tested groups (p =.0024). Lower values were obtained for the specimens cemented with the 3-step adhesive and thermocycled before being cut (p =.0024), while the highest values were obtained for the 2-step adhesive thermocycled as sticks. Dunnett's test showed that the group differing from the dry subgroups (control) was that with the 3-step adhesive thermocycled as blocks. The predominant failure mode was the cohesive failure of the composite resin. It can be concluded that the different adhesive systems applied to dentin demonstrated similar bond strength, except for the 3 and 2-step adhesives after thermocycling. Moreover, the aging protocols and the experimental unit did not influence the µTSB.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T02:21:20Z
2020-12-12T02:21:20Z
2020-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1816767
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.
1568-5616
0169-4243
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200990
10.1080/01694243.2020.1816767
2-s2.0-85090209038
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1816767
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200990
identifier_str_mv Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.
1568-5616
0169-4243
10.1080/01694243.2020.1816767
2-s2.0-85090209038
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128779604721664