Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.31637/epsir.20-1.2 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221597 |
Resumo: | Public policies are fundamental to innovation because they establish guidelines to encourage the development of a region and nation. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the differences and similarities between two policies of global development - the Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We focused on the presence or the absence of incentives for open innovation, especially with the adoption of Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding practices. The methodology involved a comparative study between Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We used the Content Analysis method to evaluate both of those policies based on the Categorical Analysis technique. As a result, we found that both policies encourage open innovation practices, but Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding strategies are not explicitly discussed in these policies. |
id |
UNSP_a7cea4081be5a9b05e63d571cbc76f19 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221597 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative studyEstrategias en políticas de innovación: Un estudio comparativo2030 agendaBootcampCrowdfundingHackathonOpen innovationScience, technology and innovationSustainable development goalsPublic policies are fundamental to innovation because they establish guidelines to encourage the development of a region and nation. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the differences and similarities between two policies of global development - the Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We focused on the presence or the absence of incentives for open innovation, especially with the adoption of Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding practices. The methodology involved a comparative study between Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We used the Content Analysis method to evaluate both of those policies based on the Categorical Analysis technique. As a result, we found that both policies encourage open innovation practices, but Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding strategies are not explicitly discussed in these policies.State University of Londrina São Paulo State UniversitySão Paulo UniversitySão Paulo State UniversityState University of Londrina São Paulo State UniversitySão Paulo State UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Silva, Elaine da [UNESP]Hassem, AlinaOttonicar, Selma Letícia Capinzaiki [UNESP]Mallavazi, Victor Silva [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:29:31Z2022-04-28T19:29:31Z2020-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10-21http://dx.doi.org/10.31637/epsir.20-1.2European Public and Social Innovation Review, v. 5, n. 1, p. 10-21, 2020.2529-9824http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22159710.31637/epsir.20-1.22-s2.0-85094568214Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean Public and Social Innovation Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:29:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221597Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:37:48.030190Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study Estrategias en políticas de innovación: Un estudio comparativo |
title |
Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study |
spellingShingle |
Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study Silva, Elaine da [UNESP] 2030 agenda Bootcamp Crowdfunding Hackathon Open innovation Science, technology and innovation Sustainable development goals |
title_short |
Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study |
title_full |
Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study |
title_fullStr |
Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study |
title_sort |
Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study |
author |
Silva, Elaine da [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Silva, Elaine da [UNESP] Hassem, Alina Ottonicar, Selma Letícia Capinzaiki [UNESP] Mallavazi, Victor Silva [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hassem, Alina Ottonicar, Selma Letícia Capinzaiki [UNESP] Mallavazi, Victor Silva [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Elaine da [UNESP] Hassem, Alina Ottonicar, Selma Letícia Capinzaiki [UNESP] Mallavazi, Victor Silva [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
2030 agenda Bootcamp Crowdfunding Hackathon Open innovation Science, technology and innovation Sustainable development goals |
topic |
2030 agenda Bootcamp Crowdfunding Hackathon Open innovation Science, technology and innovation Sustainable development goals |
description |
Public policies are fundamental to innovation because they establish guidelines to encourage the development of a region and nation. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the differences and similarities between two policies of global development - the Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We focused on the presence or the absence of incentives for open innovation, especially with the adoption of Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding practices. The methodology involved a comparative study between Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We used the Content Analysis method to evaluate both of those policies based on the Categorical Analysis technique. As a result, we found that both policies encourage open innovation practices, but Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding strategies are not explicitly discussed in these policies. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-31 2022-04-28T19:29:31Z 2022-04-28T19:29:31Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.31637/epsir.20-1.2 European Public and Social Innovation Review, v. 5, n. 1, p. 10-21, 2020. 2529-9824 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221597 10.31637/epsir.20-1.2 2-s2.0-85094568214 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.31637/epsir.20-1.2 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221597 |
identifier_str_mv |
European Public and Social Innovation Review, v. 5, n. 1, p. 10-21, 2020. 2529-9824 10.31637/epsir.20-1.2 2-s2.0-85094568214 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
European Public and Social Innovation Review |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
10-21 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128836328488960 |