Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Elaine da [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Hassem, Alina, Ottonicar, Selma Letícia Capinzaiki [UNESP], Mallavazi, Victor Silva [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.31637/epsir.20-1.2
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221597
Resumo: Public policies are fundamental to innovation because they establish guidelines to encourage the development of a region and nation. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the differences and similarities between two policies of global development - the Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We focused on the presence or the absence of incentives for open innovation, especially with the adoption of Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding practices. The methodology involved a comparative study between Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We used the Content Analysis method to evaluate both of those policies based on the Categorical Analysis technique. As a result, we found that both policies encourage open innovation practices, but Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding strategies are not explicitly discussed in these policies.
id UNSP_a7cea4081be5a9b05e63d571cbc76f19
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221597
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative studyEstrategias en políticas de innovación: Un estudio comparativo2030 agendaBootcampCrowdfundingHackathonOpen innovationScience, technology and innovationSustainable development goalsPublic policies are fundamental to innovation because they establish guidelines to encourage the development of a region and nation. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the differences and similarities between two policies of global development - the Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We focused on the presence or the absence of incentives for open innovation, especially with the adoption of Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding practices. The methodology involved a comparative study between Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We used the Content Analysis method to evaluate both of those policies based on the Categorical Analysis technique. As a result, we found that both policies encourage open innovation practices, but Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding strategies are not explicitly discussed in these policies.State University of Londrina São Paulo State UniversitySão Paulo UniversitySão Paulo State UniversityState University of Londrina São Paulo State UniversitySão Paulo State UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Silva, Elaine da [UNESP]Hassem, AlinaOttonicar, Selma Letícia Capinzaiki [UNESP]Mallavazi, Victor Silva [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:29:31Z2022-04-28T19:29:31Z2020-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10-21http://dx.doi.org/10.31637/epsir.20-1.2European Public and Social Innovation Review, v. 5, n. 1, p. 10-21, 2020.2529-9824http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22159710.31637/epsir.20-1.22-s2.0-85094568214Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean Public and Social Innovation Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:29:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221597Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:37:48.030190Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study
Estrategias en políticas de innovación: Un estudio comparativo
title Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study
spellingShingle Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study
Silva, Elaine da [UNESP]
2030 agenda
Bootcamp
Crowdfunding
Hackathon
Open innovation
Science, technology and innovation
Sustainable development goals
title_short Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study
title_full Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study
title_fullStr Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study
title_sort Strategies in innovation policies: A comparative study
author Silva, Elaine da [UNESP]
author_facet Silva, Elaine da [UNESP]
Hassem, Alina
Ottonicar, Selma Letícia Capinzaiki [UNESP]
Mallavazi, Victor Silva [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Hassem, Alina
Ottonicar, Selma Letícia Capinzaiki [UNESP]
Mallavazi, Victor Silva [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Elaine da [UNESP]
Hassem, Alina
Ottonicar, Selma Letícia Capinzaiki [UNESP]
Mallavazi, Victor Silva [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv 2030 agenda
Bootcamp
Crowdfunding
Hackathon
Open innovation
Science, technology and innovation
Sustainable development goals
topic 2030 agenda
Bootcamp
Crowdfunding
Hackathon
Open innovation
Science, technology and innovation
Sustainable development goals
description Public policies are fundamental to innovation because they establish guidelines to encourage the development of a region and nation. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the differences and similarities between two policies of global development - the Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We focused on the presence or the absence of incentives for open innovation, especially with the adoption of Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding practices. The methodology involved a comparative study between Goal 9' of Agenda 2030 and the Brazilian National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy 2016-2022. We used the Content Analysis method to evaluate both of those policies based on the Categorical Analysis technique. As a result, we found that both policies encourage open innovation practices, but Hackathon, Bootcamp and Crowdfunding strategies are not explicitly discussed in these policies.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-31
2022-04-28T19:29:31Z
2022-04-28T19:29:31Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.31637/epsir.20-1.2
European Public and Social Innovation Review, v. 5, n. 1, p. 10-21, 2020.
2529-9824
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221597
10.31637/epsir.20-1.2
2-s2.0-85094568214
url http://dx.doi.org/10.31637/epsir.20-1.2
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221597
identifier_str_mv European Public and Social Innovation Review, v. 5, n. 1, p. 10-21, 2020.
2529-9824
10.31637/epsir.20-1.2
2-s2.0-85094568214
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv European Public and Social Innovation Review
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 10-21
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128836328488960