Evaluation of subcutaneous and alveolar implantation surgical sites in the study of the biological properties of root-end filling endodontic materials

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cintra, Luciano Tavares Angelo [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Bernabe, Pedro Felicio Estrada [UNESP], de Moraes, Ivaldo Gomes, Gomes-Filho, Joao Eduardo [UNESP], Okamoto, Tetuo [UNESP], Consolaro, Alberto, Pinheiro, Tiago Novaes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000100013
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15153
Resumo: Objective: The aim of this study was to compare two methodologies used in the evaluation of tissue response to root-end filling materials in rats. Material and Methods: Forty rats were divided into 4 groups: in Groups I and II (control groups), empty polyethylene tubes were implanted in the extraction site and in the subcutaneous tissue, respectively; in Groups III and IV, polyethylene tubes filled with ProRoot MTA were implanted in the extraction site and in the subcutaneous tissue, respectively. The animals were killed 7 and 30 days after tube implantation, and the hemi-maxillas and the capsular subcutaneous tissue, both with the tubes, were removed. Specimens were processed and evaluated histomorphologicaly under light microscopy. The scores obtained were analyzed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the implantation methods (p=0.78033, p=0.72039). It was observed that the 30-day groups presented a more mature healing process due to smaller number of inflammatory cells. Conclusions: The present study showed no differences in tissue responses as far as the implantation site and the studied period were concerned. Alveolar socket implantation methodology represents an interesting method in the study of the biological properties of root-end filling endodontic materials due to the opportunity to evaluate bone tissue response.
id UNSP_a7e0f16a3b8151d9ee8f876171fcdc6f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/15153
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Evaluation of subcutaneous and alveolar implantation surgical sites in the study of the biological properties of root-end filling endodontic materialsRoot-end filling endodontic materialsMineral Trioxide AggregateAnimal modelBiocompatibilityObjective: The aim of this study was to compare two methodologies used in the evaluation of tissue response to root-end filling materials in rats. Material and Methods: Forty rats were divided into 4 groups: in Groups I and II (control groups), empty polyethylene tubes were implanted in the extraction site and in the subcutaneous tissue, respectively; in Groups III and IV, polyethylene tubes filled with ProRoot MTA were implanted in the extraction site and in the subcutaneous tissue, respectively. The animals were killed 7 and 30 days after tube implantation, and the hemi-maxillas and the capsular subcutaneous tissue, both with the tubes, were removed. Specimens were processed and evaluated histomorphologicaly under light microscopy. The scores obtained were analyzed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the implantation methods (p=0.78033, p=0.72039). It was observed that the 30-day groups presented a more mature healing process due to smaller number of inflammatory cells. Conclusions: The present study showed no differences in tissue responses as far as the implantation site and the studied period were concerned. Alveolar socket implantation methodology represents an interesting method in the study of the biological properties of root-end filling endodontic materials due to the opportunity to evaluate bone tissue response.UNINGA Univ, Maringa Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Maringa, Parana, BrazilSão Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Operat Dent, Aracatuba, SP, BrazilUniv São Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Operat Dent Endodont & Dent Mat, Bauru, SP, BrazilUniv São Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Stomatol, Bauru, SP, BrazilSão Paulo State Univ, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Operat Dent, Aracatuba, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Odontologia de BauruUNINGA UnivUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Cintra, Luciano Tavares Angelo [UNESP]Bernabe, Pedro Felicio Estrada [UNESP]de Moraes, Ivaldo GomesGomes-Filho, Joao Eduardo [UNESP]Okamoto, Tetuo [UNESP]Consolaro, AlbertoPinheiro, Tiago Novaes2013-09-30T18:29:45Z2014-05-20T13:43:26Z2013-09-30T18:29:45Z2014-05-20T13:43:26Z2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article75-82application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000100013Journal of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ São Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 18, n. 1, p. 75-82, 2010.1678-7757http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15153S1678-77572010000100013WOS:000276524900012S1678-77572010000100013-en.pdf92357430816673620169955363968097Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Applied Oral Science1.7090,645info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T18:32:01Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/15153Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T18:32:01Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of subcutaneous and alveolar implantation surgical sites in the study of the biological properties of root-end filling endodontic materials
title Evaluation of subcutaneous and alveolar implantation surgical sites in the study of the biological properties of root-end filling endodontic materials
spellingShingle Evaluation of subcutaneous and alveolar implantation surgical sites in the study of the biological properties of root-end filling endodontic materials
Cintra, Luciano Tavares Angelo [UNESP]
Root-end filling endodontic materials
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate
Animal model
Biocompatibility
title_short Evaluation of subcutaneous and alveolar implantation surgical sites in the study of the biological properties of root-end filling endodontic materials
title_full Evaluation of subcutaneous and alveolar implantation surgical sites in the study of the biological properties of root-end filling endodontic materials
title_fullStr Evaluation of subcutaneous and alveolar implantation surgical sites in the study of the biological properties of root-end filling endodontic materials
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of subcutaneous and alveolar implantation surgical sites in the study of the biological properties of root-end filling endodontic materials
title_sort Evaluation of subcutaneous and alveolar implantation surgical sites in the study of the biological properties of root-end filling endodontic materials
author Cintra, Luciano Tavares Angelo [UNESP]
author_facet Cintra, Luciano Tavares Angelo [UNESP]
Bernabe, Pedro Felicio Estrada [UNESP]
de Moraes, Ivaldo Gomes
Gomes-Filho, Joao Eduardo [UNESP]
Okamoto, Tetuo [UNESP]
Consolaro, Alberto
Pinheiro, Tiago Novaes
author_role author
author2 Bernabe, Pedro Felicio Estrada [UNESP]
de Moraes, Ivaldo Gomes
Gomes-Filho, Joao Eduardo [UNESP]
Okamoto, Tetuo [UNESP]
Consolaro, Alberto
Pinheiro, Tiago Novaes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv UNINGA Univ
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cintra, Luciano Tavares Angelo [UNESP]
Bernabe, Pedro Felicio Estrada [UNESP]
de Moraes, Ivaldo Gomes
Gomes-Filho, Joao Eduardo [UNESP]
Okamoto, Tetuo [UNESP]
Consolaro, Alberto
Pinheiro, Tiago Novaes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Root-end filling endodontic materials
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate
Animal model
Biocompatibility
topic Root-end filling endodontic materials
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate
Animal model
Biocompatibility
description Objective: The aim of this study was to compare two methodologies used in the evaluation of tissue response to root-end filling materials in rats. Material and Methods: Forty rats were divided into 4 groups: in Groups I and II (control groups), empty polyethylene tubes were implanted in the extraction site and in the subcutaneous tissue, respectively; in Groups III and IV, polyethylene tubes filled with ProRoot MTA were implanted in the extraction site and in the subcutaneous tissue, respectively. The animals were killed 7 and 30 days after tube implantation, and the hemi-maxillas and the capsular subcutaneous tissue, both with the tubes, were removed. Specimens were processed and evaluated histomorphologicaly under light microscopy. The scores obtained were analyzed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the implantation methods (p=0.78033, p=0.72039). It was observed that the 30-day groups presented a more mature healing process due to smaller number of inflammatory cells. Conclusions: The present study showed no differences in tissue responses as far as the implantation site and the studied period were concerned. Alveolar socket implantation methodology represents an interesting method in the study of the biological properties of root-end filling endodontic materials due to the opportunity to evaluate bone tissue response.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-01-01
2013-09-30T18:29:45Z
2013-09-30T18:29:45Z
2014-05-20T13:43:26Z
2014-05-20T13:43:26Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000100013
Journal of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ São Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 18, n. 1, p. 75-82, 2010.
1678-7757
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15153
S1678-77572010000100013
WOS:000276524900012
S1678-77572010000100013-en.pdf
9235743081667362
0169955363968097
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000100013
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15153
identifier_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ São Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 18, n. 1, p. 75-82, 2010.
1678-7757
S1678-77572010000100013
WOS:000276524900012
S1678-77572010000100013-en.pdf
9235743081667362
0169955363968097
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science
1.709
0,645
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 75-82
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546522991656960