Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206479 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to evaluate the influence of cement type and mechanical cycling on the push-out bond strength (σ) of fiber posts luted to root canals. Eighty bovine single-root teeth were prepared and the roots were included with chemically cured acrylic resin. The specimens were allocated into 8 groups (n = 10) considering the factors ‘cement’ (glass ionomer cement–GIC, resin reinforced glass ionomer cement–RRGIC, conventional dual-cure resin cement–CRC, and self-adhesive resin cement–SARC) and ‘mechanical cycling’ (non-aged and aged–mc). The fiber posts and roots dentin were treated according to the cement type and luted to root canals. Composite-cores were made for the groups submitted to mechanical cycling (1,000,000 cycles, 84 N, 4 Hz). Each root were cut into 4 disk-samples of 1.8 mm (thickness) and submitted to push-out testing. Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey test (5%), and Weibull analysis. ANOVA revealed that cement (p < 0.001) was significant; however, the mechanical cycling had no effect on bond strength (p = 0.895). The CRC (4.36 ± 1.15 MPa), CRCmc (4.13 ± 0.75 MPa), GIC (4.29 ± 2.14 MPa), and GICmc (4.04 ± 1.18 MPa) groups showed higher (σ) than RRGIC (2.36 ± 1.00 MPa). Weibull Characteristic strength of the CRC and CRCmc were significantly higher than RRGICmc, and RRGIC. The mixed type of failure was the most common. Conventional dual-cure resin cement and glass ionomer cement presented higher push-out bond strength to root dentin regardless of mechanical cycling. |
id |
UNSP_a8e37ff5598bf92107de6eb0c03a8940 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206479 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically agedbond strengthcementationFiber postmechanical cyclingroot dentineThis study aimed to evaluate the influence of cement type and mechanical cycling on the push-out bond strength (σ) of fiber posts luted to root canals. Eighty bovine single-root teeth were prepared and the roots were included with chemically cured acrylic resin. The specimens were allocated into 8 groups (n = 10) considering the factors ‘cement’ (glass ionomer cement–GIC, resin reinforced glass ionomer cement–RRGIC, conventional dual-cure resin cement–CRC, and self-adhesive resin cement–SARC) and ‘mechanical cycling’ (non-aged and aged–mc). The fiber posts and roots dentin were treated according to the cement type and luted to root canals. Composite-cores were made for the groups submitted to mechanical cycling (1,000,000 cycles, 84 N, 4 Hz). Each root were cut into 4 disk-samples of 1.8 mm (thickness) and submitted to push-out testing. Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey test (5%), and Weibull analysis. ANOVA revealed that cement (p < 0.001) was significant; however, the mechanical cycling had no effect on bond strength (p = 0.895). The CRC (4.36 ± 1.15 MPa), CRCmc (4.13 ± 0.75 MPa), GIC (4.29 ± 2.14 MPa), and GICmc (4.04 ± 1.18 MPa) groups showed higher (σ) than RRGIC (2.36 ± 1.00 MPa). Weibull Characteristic strength of the CRC and CRCmc were significantly higher than RRGICmc, and RRGIC. The mixed type of failure was the most common. Conventional dual-cure resin cement and glass ionomer cement presented higher push-out bond strength to root dentin regardless of mechanical cycling.Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas (FOP/UNICAMP)Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP/FOSJC)Materials Engineering Academic Unit Technology and Sciences Center Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG)Department of Dental Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB)Division of Prosthodontics Department of Dental Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM)Division of Prosthodontics Department of Dentistry Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP/FOSJC)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG)Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)Lira dos Santos, Elis JanainaCampos, Fernanda [UNESP]Dantas, Alana Moura XavierLira, Maria Luiza Lima AlvesWandsher, Vinícius FelipeSilva, Nathalia Ramos daValandro, Luiz FelipeSouza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção2021-06-25T10:32:44Z2021-06-25T10:32:44Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.1568-56160169-4243http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20647910.1080/01694243.2021.19384732-s2.0-85107850375Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T06:44:46Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206479Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:53:53.272533Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged |
title |
Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged |
spellingShingle |
Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged Lira dos Santos, Elis Janaina bond strength cementation Fiber post mechanical cycling root dentine |
title_short |
Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged |
title_full |
Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged |
title_fullStr |
Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged |
title_sort |
Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged |
author |
Lira dos Santos, Elis Janaina |
author_facet |
Lira dos Santos, Elis Janaina Campos, Fernanda [UNESP] Dantas, Alana Moura Xavier Lira, Maria Luiza Lima Alves Wandsher, Vinícius Felipe Silva, Nathalia Ramos da Valandro, Luiz Felipe Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campos, Fernanda [UNESP] Dantas, Alana Moura Xavier Lira, Maria Luiza Lima Alves Wandsher, Vinícius Felipe Silva, Nathalia Ramos da Valandro, Luiz Felipe Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG) Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lira dos Santos, Elis Janaina Campos, Fernanda [UNESP] Dantas, Alana Moura Xavier Lira, Maria Luiza Lima Alves Wandsher, Vinícius Felipe Silva, Nathalia Ramos da Valandro, Luiz Felipe Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
bond strength cementation Fiber post mechanical cycling root dentine |
topic |
bond strength cementation Fiber post mechanical cycling root dentine |
description |
This study aimed to evaluate the influence of cement type and mechanical cycling on the push-out bond strength (σ) of fiber posts luted to root canals. Eighty bovine single-root teeth were prepared and the roots were included with chemically cured acrylic resin. The specimens were allocated into 8 groups (n = 10) considering the factors ‘cement’ (glass ionomer cement–GIC, resin reinforced glass ionomer cement–RRGIC, conventional dual-cure resin cement–CRC, and self-adhesive resin cement–SARC) and ‘mechanical cycling’ (non-aged and aged–mc). The fiber posts and roots dentin were treated according to the cement type and luted to root canals. Composite-cores were made for the groups submitted to mechanical cycling (1,000,000 cycles, 84 N, 4 Hz). Each root were cut into 4 disk-samples of 1.8 mm (thickness) and submitted to push-out testing. Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey test (5%), and Weibull analysis. ANOVA revealed that cement (p < 0.001) was significant; however, the mechanical cycling had no effect on bond strength (p = 0.895). The CRC (4.36 ± 1.15 MPa), CRCmc (4.13 ± 0.75 MPa), GIC (4.29 ± 2.14 MPa), and GICmc (4.04 ± 1.18 MPa) groups showed higher (σ) than RRGIC (2.36 ± 1.00 MPa). Weibull Characteristic strength of the CRC and CRCmc were significantly higher than RRGICmc, and RRGIC. The mixed type of failure was the most common. Conventional dual-cure resin cement and glass ionomer cement presented higher push-out bond strength to root dentin regardless of mechanical cycling. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T10:32:44Z 2021-06-25T10:32:44Z 2021-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473 Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 1568-5616 0169-4243 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206479 10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473 2-s2.0-85107850375 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206479 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 1568-5616 0169-4243 10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473 2-s2.0-85107850375 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129371138949120 |