Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lira dos Santos, Elis Janaina
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Campos, Fernanda [UNESP], Dantas, Alana Moura Xavier, Lira, Maria Luiza Lima Alves, Wandsher, Vinícius Felipe, Silva, Nathalia Ramos da, Valandro, Luiz Felipe, Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206479
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of cement type and mechanical cycling on the push-out bond strength (σ) of fiber posts luted to root canals. Eighty bovine single-root teeth were prepared and the roots were included with chemically cured acrylic resin. The specimens were allocated into 8 groups (n = 10) considering the factors ‘cement’ (glass ionomer cement–GIC, resin reinforced glass ionomer cement–RRGIC, conventional dual-cure resin cement–CRC, and self-adhesive resin cement–SARC) and ‘mechanical cycling’ (non-aged and aged–mc). The fiber posts and roots dentin were treated according to the cement type and luted to root canals. Composite-cores were made for the groups submitted to mechanical cycling (1,000,000 cycles, 84 N, 4 Hz). Each root were cut into 4 disk-samples of 1.8 mm (thickness) and submitted to push-out testing. Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey test (5%), and Weibull analysis. ANOVA revealed that cement (p < 0.001) was significant; however, the mechanical cycling had no effect on bond strength (p = 0.895). The CRC (4.36 ± 1.15 MPa), CRCmc (4.13 ± 0.75 MPa), GIC (4.29 ± 2.14 MPa), and GICmc (4.04 ± 1.18 MPa) groups showed higher (σ) than RRGIC (2.36 ± 1.00 MPa). Weibull Characteristic strength of the CRC and CRCmc were significantly higher than RRGICmc, and RRGIC. The mixed type of failure was the most common. Conventional dual-cure resin cement and glass ionomer cement presented higher push-out bond strength to root dentin regardless of mechanical cycling.
id UNSP_a8e37ff5598bf92107de6eb0c03a8940
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206479
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically agedbond strengthcementationFiber postmechanical cyclingroot dentineThis study aimed to evaluate the influence of cement type and mechanical cycling on the push-out bond strength (σ) of fiber posts luted to root canals. Eighty bovine single-root teeth were prepared and the roots were included with chemically cured acrylic resin. The specimens were allocated into 8 groups (n = 10) considering the factors ‘cement’ (glass ionomer cement–GIC, resin reinforced glass ionomer cement–RRGIC, conventional dual-cure resin cement–CRC, and self-adhesive resin cement–SARC) and ‘mechanical cycling’ (non-aged and aged–mc). The fiber posts and roots dentin were treated according to the cement type and luted to root canals. Composite-cores were made for the groups submitted to mechanical cycling (1,000,000 cycles, 84 N, 4 Hz). Each root were cut into 4 disk-samples of 1.8 mm (thickness) and submitted to push-out testing. Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey test (5%), and Weibull analysis. ANOVA revealed that cement (p < 0.001) was significant; however, the mechanical cycling had no effect on bond strength (p = 0.895). The CRC (4.36 ± 1.15 MPa), CRCmc (4.13 ± 0.75 MPa), GIC (4.29 ± 2.14 MPa), and GICmc (4.04 ± 1.18 MPa) groups showed higher (σ) than RRGIC (2.36 ± 1.00 MPa). Weibull Characteristic strength of the CRC and CRCmc were significantly higher than RRGICmc, and RRGIC. The mixed type of failure was the most common. Conventional dual-cure resin cement and glass ionomer cement presented higher push-out bond strength to root dentin regardless of mechanical cycling.Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas (FOP/UNICAMP)Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP/FOSJC)Materials Engineering Academic Unit Technology and Sciences Center Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG)Department of Dental Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB)Division of Prosthodontics Department of Dental Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM)Division of Prosthodontics Department of Dentistry Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP/FOSJC)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG)Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)Lira dos Santos, Elis JanainaCampos, Fernanda [UNESP]Dantas, Alana Moura XavierLira, Maria Luiza Lima AlvesWandsher, Vinícius FelipeSilva, Nathalia Ramos daValandro, Luiz FelipeSouza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção2021-06-25T10:32:44Z2021-06-25T10:32:44Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.1568-56160169-4243http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20647910.1080/01694243.2021.19384732-s2.0-85107850375Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T06:44:46Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206479Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:53:53.272533Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged
title Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged
spellingShingle Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged
Lira dos Santos, Elis Janaina
bond strength
cementation
Fiber post
mechanical cycling
root dentine
title_short Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged
title_full Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged
title_fullStr Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged
title_full_unstemmed Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged
title_sort Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged
author Lira dos Santos, Elis Janaina
author_facet Lira dos Santos, Elis Janaina
Campos, Fernanda [UNESP]
Dantas, Alana Moura Xavier
Lira, Maria Luiza Lima Alves
Wandsher, Vinícius Felipe
Silva, Nathalia Ramos da
Valandro, Luiz Felipe
Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção
author_role author
author2 Campos, Fernanda [UNESP]
Dantas, Alana Moura Xavier
Lira, Maria Luiza Lima Alves
Wandsher, Vinícius Felipe
Silva, Nathalia Ramos da
Valandro, Luiz Felipe
Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG)
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lira dos Santos, Elis Janaina
Campos, Fernanda [UNESP]
Dantas, Alana Moura Xavier
Lira, Maria Luiza Lima Alves
Wandsher, Vinícius Felipe
Silva, Nathalia Ramos da
Valandro, Luiz Felipe
Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bond strength
cementation
Fiber post
mechanical cycling
root dentine
topic bond strength
cementation
Fiber post
mechanical cycling
root dentine
description This study aimed to evaluate the influence of cement type and mechanical cycling on the push-out bond strength (σ) of fiber posts luted to root canals. Eighty bovine single-root teeth were prepared and the roots were included with chemically cured acrylic resin. The specimens were allocated into 8 groups (n = 10) considering the factors ‘cement’ (glass ionomer cement–GIC, resin reinforced glass ionomer cement–RRGIC, conventional dual-cure resin cement–CRC, and self-adhesive resin cement–SARC) and ‘mechanical cycling’ (non-aged and aged–mc). The fiber posts and roots dentin were treated according to the cement type and luted to root canals. Composite-cores were made for the groups submitted to mechanical cycling (1,000,000 cycles, 84 N, 4 Hz). Each root were cut into 4 disk-samples of 1.8 mm (thickness) and submitted to push-out testing. Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey test (5%), and Weibull analysis. ANOVA revealed that cement (p < 0.001) was significant; however, the mechanical cycling had no effect on bond strength (p = 0.895). The CRC (4.36 ± 1.15 MPa), CRCmc (4.13 ± 0.75 MPa), GIC (4.29 ± 2.14 MPa), and GICmc (4.04 ± 1.18 MPa) groups showed higher (σ) than RRGIC (2.36 ± 1.00 MPa). Weibull Characteristic strength of the CRC and CRCmc were significantly higher than RRGICmc, and RRGIC. The mixed type of failure was the most common. Conventional dual-cure resin cement and glass ionomer cement presented higher push-out bond strength to root dentin regardless of mechanical cycling.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T10:32:44Z
2021-06-25T10:32:44Z
2021-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.
1568-5616
0169-4243
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206479
10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473
2-s2.0-85107850375
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206479
identifier_str_mv Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology.
1568-5616
0169-4243
10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473
2-s2.0-85107850375
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129371138949120