Effectiveness of reciproc and MTwo for removing filling material during root canal retreatment using a digital radiograph system
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812011021 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190156 |
Resumo: | Objective: To compare the efficacy of Reciproc (reciprocating) and MTwo (rotary) in the filling material removal during endodontic retreatment. Methods: Thirty simulated root canals (plastic blocks) were prepared and filled. The blocks were divided into 3 groups according to the filling removal techniques: Group I-hand files and Gates Glidden burs; Group II-Rotary technique with second series files of Mtwo system; Group III-Reciprocating technique with instrument R40 Reciproc. The blocks were radiographed, the total area of the root canal and the amount of remaining plug material was calculated. The total time required to complete the procedure was recorded and the instruments were evaluated for fracture or deformation. Results: The mean percentage of obturator material remaining in the root canal wall was 15.36% in Group I, 11.56% in Group II and 10.36% in Group III. There was a statistical difference between Group 1 and the other Groups. There was no statistical difference between Groups II and III. Removal of filling material was significantly faster in Group III (437.433 s), followed by Group II (616.535 s) and Group I (1587.651 s). Conclusion: The best results of filling material removal were obtained by groups II and III without statistical difference between them. The reciprocating technique was the fastest among the techniques tested, followed by the rotary technique and manual technique files. |
id |
UNSP_acb1af35f8caf94b6be0e967f66faeca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190156 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effectiveness of reciproc and MTwo for removing filling material during root canal retreatment using a digital radiograph systemNickel-titanium instrumentsReciproc filesReciprocating motionRetreatmentRoot canal filling materialsRotary instrumentsObjective: To compare the efficacy of Reciproc (reciprocating) and MTwo (rotary) in the filling material removal during endodontic retreatment. Methods: Thirty simulated root canals (plastic blocks) were prepared and filled. The blocks were divided into 3 groups according to the filling removal techniques: Group I-hand files and Gates Glidden burs; Group II-Rotary technique with second series files of Mtwo system; Group III-Reciprocating technique with instrument R40 Reciproc. The blocks were radiographed, the total area of the root canal and the amount of remaining plug material was calculated. The total time required to complete the procedure was recorded and the instruments were evaluated for fracture or deformation. Results: The mean percentage of obturator material remaining in the root canal wall was 15.36% in Group I, 11.56% in Group II and 10.36% in Group III. There was a statistical difference between Group 1 and the other Groups. There was no statistical difference between Groups II and III. Removal of filling material was significantly faster in Group III (437.433 s), followed by Group II (616.535 s) and Group I (1587.651 s). Conclusion: The best results of filling material removal were obtained by groups II and III without statistical difference between them. The reciprocating technique was the fastest among the techniques tested, followed by the rotary technique and manual technique files.Faculty of Dentistry Federal University of Alagoas, Av. Lourival Melo Mota, S/N, Tabuleiro do MartinsFaculty of Dentistry Cesmac Universitary CenterFaculdade Sao Leopoldo Mandic Brazilian Association of DentistryDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery UNESP-Universidade Estadual PaulistaDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery UNESP-Universidade Estadual PaulistaFederal University of AlagoasCesmac Universitary CenterBrazilian Association of DentistryUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)de Oliveira, Daniel PintoPeixoto, Tayná Ribeiro OliveiraBueno, Clovis Stephano PereiraGonçalves, Marcelo [UNESP]2019-10-06T17:04:10Z2019-10-06T17:04:10Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1021-1028http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812011021Open Dentistry Journal, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1021-1028, 2018.1874-2106http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19015610.2174/18742106018120110212-s2.0-85062320709Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengOpen Dentistry Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-26T15:21:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190156Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-26T15:21:10Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effectiveness of reciproc and MTwo for removing filling material during root canal retreatment using a digital radiograph system |
title |
Effectiveness of reciproc and MTwo for removing filling material during root canal retreatment using a digital radiograph system |
spellingShingle |
Effectiveness of reciproc and MTwo for removing filling material during root canal retreatment using a digital radiograph system de Oliveira, Daniel Pinto Nickel-titanium instruments Reciproc files Reciprocating motion Retreatment Root canal filling materials Rotary instruments |
title_short |
Effectiveness of reciproc and MTwo for removing filling material during root canal retreatment using a digital radiograph system |
title_full |
Effectiveness of reciproc and MTwo for removing filling material during root canal retreatment using a digital radiograph system |
title_fullStr |
Effectiveness of reciproc and MTwo for removing filling material during root canal retreatment using a digital radiograph system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effectiveness of reciproc and MTwo for removing filling material during root canal retreatment using a digital radiograph system |
title_sort |
Effectiveness of reciproc and MTwo for removing filling material during root canal retreatment using a digital radiograph system |
author |
de Oliveira, Daniel Pinto |
author_facet |
de Oliveira, Daniel Pinto Peixoto, Tayná Ribeiro Oliveira Bueno, Clovis Stephano Pereira Gonçalves, Marcelo [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Peixoto, Tayná Ribeiro Oliveira Bueno, Clovis Stephano Pereira Gonçalves, Marcelo [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Alagoas Cesmac Universitary Center Brazilian Association of Dentistry Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Oliveira, Daniel Pinto Peixoto, Tayná Ribeiro Oliveira Bueno, Clovis Stephano Pereira Gonçalves, Marcelo [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nickel-titanium instruments Reciproc files Reciprocating motion Retreatment Root canal filling materials Rotary instruments |
topic |
Nickel-titanium instruments Reciproc files Reciprocating motion Retreatment Root canal filling materials Rotary instruments |
description |
Objective: To compare the efficacy of Reciproc (reciprocating) and MTwo (rotary) in the filling material removal during endodontic retreatment. Methods: Thirty simulated root canals (plastic blocks) were prepared and filled. The blocks were divided into 3 groups according to the filling removal techniques: Group I-hand files and Gates Glidden burs; Group II-Rotary technique with second series files of Mtwo system; Group III-Reciprocating technique with instrument R40 Reciproc. The blocks were radiographed, the total area of the root canal and the amount of remaining plug material was calculated. The total time required to complete the procedure was recorded and the instruments were evaluated for fracture or deformation. Results: The mean percentage of obturator material remaining in the root canal wall was 15.36% in Group I, 11.56% in Group II and 10.36% in Group III. There was a statistical difference between Group 1 and the other Groups. There was no statistical difference between Groups II and III. Removal of filling material was significantly faster in Group III (437.433 s), followed by Group II (616.535 s) and Group I (1587.651 s). Conclusion: The best results of filling material removal were obtained by groups II and III without statistical difference between them. The reciprocating technique was the fastest among the techniques tested, followed by the rotary technique and manual technique files. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 2019-10-06T17:04:10Z 2019-10-06T17:04:10Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812011021 Open Dentistry Journal, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1021-1028, 2018. 1874-2106 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190156 10.2174/1874210601812011021 2-s2.0-85062320709 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812011021 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190156 |
identifier_str_mv |
Open Dentistry Journal, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1021-1028, 2018. 1874-2106 10.2174/1874210601812011021 2-s2.0-85062320709 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Open Dentistry Journal |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1021-1028 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546404354719744 |