Composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse as a commercial substrate for Eucalyptus urograndis seedling production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Manca, Angelo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: da Silva, Magali Ribeiro [UNESP], Guerrini, Iraê Amaral [UNESP], Fernandes, Dirceu Maximino [UNESP], Villas Bôas, Roberto Lyra [UNESP], da Silva, Laura Cleto [UNESP], da Fonseca, Aline Cássia [UNESP], Ruggiu, Maria Chiara, Cruz, Caio Vilela [UNESP], Lozano Sivisaca, Deicy Carolina [UNESP], de Moura D'Andréa Mateus, Caroline [UNESP], Murgia, Ilenia, Grilli, Eleonora, Ganga, Antonio, Capra, Gian Franco
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122145
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201896
Resumo: Sewage sludge can be used as a source of organic matter and nutrients, whereas sugarcane bagasse can be used as a decompaction material; by composting a mixture of the two, a low-cost substrate for forest nurseries can be obtained. This research investigated the use of composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse (CSB) as a commercial substrate in nurseries to grow seedlings of the hybrid clone Eucalyptus urograndis. Several CSB treatments were evaluated in comparison with a control (no P addition) and a commercial substrate (CS). Before composting, CSB was conditioned with P to increase its final concentration: CSB+1.5, 3.0, and 4.5% triple superphosphate (TP) or reactive phosphate (RP). After 120 d, the Eucalyptus response to all eight substrates was assessed by: i) plant morphological traits (H, height; D, diameter; SB, shoot biomass; RB, root biomass; TB, total dry biomass; GCI, green color intensity; and root system quality) and ii) chemical parameters of shoots and roots. Significant differences among treatments were ascertained using an ANOVA, and variability was interpreted using principal factor analysis (PFA). The treatment with CSB+3% TP (TP3.0) exhibited statistically (p < 0.05) higher performance in regards to morphological parameters (H, D, SB, TB) and the nutrient contents of shoots and roots (N, P, Ca, Na, Mn, Zn, and Cu) than the other treatments and control. The results suggest that B and K could play a fundamental role in both the observed variability and the improved plant performance in the TP3.0 substrate. PFA also showed i) the key role of OM as the primary source/sink of some pivotal macronutrients/heavy metals and ii) the existence of important antagonistic/synergistic effects between elements as a primary driver affecting the concentration/behavior of elements in the shoot/root system. Overall, the research demonstrated that with an addition of only 3.0% TP, the CSB performance was better than the most commonly used and widespread commercial substrate in industrial forest nurseries.
id UNSP_b0cf1555e4bd20381117600d3de4cd6c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201896
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse as a commercial substrate for Eucalyptus urograndis seedling productionBoronForest nurseryPotassiumSeedlings qualityUrban and agricultural residuesWaste reusesSewage sludge can be used as a source of organic matter and nutrients, whereas sugarcane bagasse can be used as a decompaction material; by composting a mixture of the two, a low-cost substrate for forest nurseries can be obtained. This research investigated the use of composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse (CSB) as a commercial substrate in nurseries to grow seedlings of the hybrid clone Eucalyptus urograndis. Several CSB treatments were evaluated in comparison with a control (no P addition) and a commercial substrate (CS). Before composting, CSB was conditioned with P to increase its final concentration: CSB+1.5, 3.0, and 4.5% triple superphosphate (TP) or reactive phosphate (RP). After 120 d, the Eucalyptus response to all eight substrates was assessed by: i) plant morphological traits (H, height; D, diameter; SB, shoot biomass; RB, root biomass; TB, total dry biomass; GCI, green color intensity; and root system quality) and ii) chemical parameters of shoots and roots. Significant differences among treatments were ascertained using an ANOVA, and variability was interpreted using principal factor analysis (PFA). The treatment with CSB+3% TP (TP3.0) exhibited statistically (p < 0.05) higher performance in regards to morphological parameters (H, D, SB, TB) and the nutrient contents of shoots and roots (N, P, Ca, Na, Mn, Zn, and Cu) than the other treatments and control. The results suggest that B and K could play a fundamental role in both the observed variability and the improved plant performance in the TP3.0 substrate. PFA also showed i) the key role of OM as the primary source/sink of some pivotal macronutrients/heavy metals and ii) the existence of important antagonistic/synergistic effects between elements as a primary driver affecting the concentration/behavior of elements in the shoot/root system. Overall, the research demonstrated that with an addition of only 3.0% TP, the CSB performance was better than the most commonly used and widespread commercial substrate in industrial forest nurseries.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)ASCRS Research FoundationDipartimento di Architettura Design e Urbanistica Università Degli Studi di Sassari, Via Piandanna No 4Department of Forest Soil and Environmental Sciences College of Agricultural Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Ambientali Biologiche e Farmaceutiche Università Della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Vivaldi No 43Desertification Research Centre Università Degli Studi di Sassari, Viale Italia No 39Department of Forest Soil and Environmental Sciences College of Agricultural Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)Università Degli Studi di SassariUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Università Della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”Manca, Angeloda Silva, Magali Ribeiro [UNESP]Guerrini, Iraê Amaral [UNESP]Fernandes, Dirceu Maximino [UNESP]Villas Bôas, Roberto Lyra [UNESP]da Silva, Laura Cleto [UNESP]da Fonseca, Aline Cássia [UNESP]Ruggiu, Maria ChiaraCruz, Caio Vilela [UNESP]Lozano Sivisaca, Deicy Carolina [UNESP]de Moura D'Andréa Mateus, Caroline [UNESP]Murgia, IleniaGrilli, EleonoraGanga, AntonioCapra, Gian Franco2020-12-12T02:44:39Z2020-12-12T02:44:39Z2020-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122145Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 269.0959-6526http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20189610.1016/j.jclepro.2020.1221452-s2.0-85086801805Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Cleaner Productioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T19:28:42Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201896Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:57:48.204693Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse as a commercial substrate for Eucalyptus urograndis seedling production
title Composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse as a commercial substrate for Eucalyptus urograndis seedling production
spellingShingle Composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse as a commercial substrate for Eucalyptus urograndis seedling production
Manca, Angelo
Boron
Forest nursery
Potassium
Seedlings quality
Urban and agricultural residues
Waste reuses
title_short Composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse as a commercial substrate for Eucalyptus urograndis seedling production
title_full Composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse as a commercial substrate for Eucalyptus urograndis seedling production
title_fullStr Composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse as a commercial substrate for Eucalyptus urograndis seedling production
title_full_unstemmed Composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse as a commercial substrate for Eucalyptus urograndis seedling production
title_sort Composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse as a commercial substrate for Eucalyptus urograndis seedling production
author Manca, Angelo
author_facet Manca, Angelo
da Silva, Magali Ribeiro [UNESP]
Guerrini, Iraê Amaral [UNESP]
Fernandes, Dirceu Maximino [UNESP]
Villas Bôas, Roberto Lyra [UNESP]
da Silva, Laura Cleto [UNESP]
da Fonseca, Aline Cássia [UNESP]
Ruggiu, Maria Chiara
Cruz, Caio Vilela [UNESP]
Lozano Sivisaca, Deicy Carolina [UNESP]
de Moura D'Andréa Mateus, Caroline [UNESP]
Murgia, Ilenia
Grilli, Eleonora
Ganga, Antonio
Capra, Gian Franco
author_role author
author2 da Silva, Magali Ribeiro [UNESP]
Guerrini, Iraê Amaral [UNESP]
Fernandes, Dirceu Maximino [UNESP]
Villas Bôas, Roberto Lyra [UNESP]
da Silva, Laura Cleto [UNESP]
da Fonseca, Aline Cássia [UNESP]
Ruggiu, Maria Chiara
Cruz, Caio Vilela [UNESP]
Lozano Sivisaca, Deicy Carolina [UNESP]
de Moura D'Andréa Mateus, Caroline [UNESP]
Murgia, Ilenia
Grilli, Eleonora
Ganga, Antonio
Capra, Gian Franco
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Università Degli Studi di Sassari
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Università Della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Manca, Angelo
da Silva, Magali Ribeiro [UNESP]
Guerrini, Iraê Amaral [UNESP]
Fernandes, Dirceu Maximino [UNESP]
Villas Bôas, Roberto Lyra [UNESP]
da Silva, Laura Cleto [UNESP]
da Fonseca, Aline Cássia [UNESP]
Ruggiu, Maria Chiara
Cruz, Caio Vilela [UNESP]
Lozano Sivisaca, Deicy Carolina [UNESP]
de Moura D'Andréa Mateus, Caroline [UNESP]
Murgia, Ilenia
Grilli, Eleonora
Ganga, Antonio
Capra, Gian Franco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Boron
Forest nursery
Potassium
Seedlings quality
Urban and agricultural residues
Waste reuses
topic Boron
Forest nursery
Potassium
Seedlings quality
Urban and agricultural residues
Waste reuses
description Sewage sludge can be used as a source of organic matter and nutrients, whereas sugarcane bagasse can be used as a decompaction material; by composting a mixture of the two, a low-cost substrate for forest nurseries can be obtained. This research investigated the use of composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse (CSB) as a commercial substrate in nurseries to grow seedlings of the hybrid clone Eucalyptus urograndis. Several CSB treatments were evaluated in comparison with a control (no P addition) and a commercial substrate (CS). Before composting, CSB was conditioned with P to increase its final concentration: CSB+1.5, 3.0, and 4.5% triple superphosphate (TP) or reactive phosphate (RP). After 120 d, the Eucalyptus response to all eight substrates was assessed by: i) plant morphological traits (H, height; D, diameter; SB, shoot biomass; RB, root biomass; TB, total dry biomass; GCI, green color intensity; and root system quality) and ii) chemical parameters of shoots and roots. Significant differences among treatments were ascertained using an ANOVA, and variability was interpreted using principal factor analysis (PFA). The treatment with CSB+3% TP (TP3.0) exhibited statistically (p < 0.05) higher performance in regards to morphological parameters (H, D, SB, TB) and the nutrient contents of shoots and roots (N, P, Ca, Na, Mn, Zn, and Cu) than the other treatments and control. The results suggest that B and K could play a fundamental role in both the observed variability and the improved plant performance in the TP3.0 substrate. PFA also showed i) the key role of OM as the primary source/sink of some pivotal macronutrients/heavy metals and ii) the existence of important antagonistic/synergistic effects between elements as a primary driver affecting the concentration/behavior of elements in the shoot/root system. Overall, the research demonstrated that with an addition of only 3.0% TP, the CSB performance was better than the most commonly used and widespread commercial substrate in industrial forest nurseries.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T02:44:39Z
2020-12-12T02:44:39Z
2020-10-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122145
Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 269.
0959-6526
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201896
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122145
2-s2.0-85086801805
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122145
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201896
identifier_str_mv Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 269.
0959-6526
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122145
2-s2.0-85086801805
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Cleaner Production
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128879057960960