Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo de conferência |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164864 |
Resumo: | Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) are the most important fruit fly species in Brazil. Both species causes significant losses in citrus production in the State of Sao Paulo. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different food bait attractants for monitoring fruit flies in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs. The experiment was conducted under block randomized design with seven attractants (BioAnastrepha, IscaMosca, Samarita, Torula (R), Milhocina (R) plus borax, sugar cane molasses and grape juice). The experiments were performed in two seasons, from March until April (season 1) and from November until December 2008 (season 2), in two orange orchards (organic and conventional systems) located in Mogi-Guacu, SP. The number of flies captured by each attractant was evaluated weekly during seven weeks. In total 4,327 adults of Tephritidae were captured: 3,073 specimens of A. fraterculus and 1,258 specimens of C. capitata. Milhocina (R) plus borax and Torula (R) during season 1, and Torula (R) during season 2 were more effective to capture fruit flies. In organic orchard, Torula (R) and BioAnastrepha captured significantly more tephritids during season 2. In general, Torula (R) attracted more females than males. |
id |
UNSP_b2fc02c952dfc082334d228fc0c1442c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/164864 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in BrazilCeratitis capitataAnastrepha fraterculusmonitoringMcPhail trapAnastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) are the most important fruit fly species in Brazil. Both species causes significant losses in citrus production in the State of Sao Paulo. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different food bait attractants for monitoring fruit flies in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs. The experiment was conducted under block randomized design with seven attractants (BioAnastrepha, IscaMosca, Samarita, Torula (R), Milhocina (R) plus borax, sugar cane molasses and grape juice). The experiments were performed in two seasons, from March until April (season 1) and from November until December 2008 (season 2), in two orange orchards (organic and conventional systems) located in Mogi-Guacu, SP. The number of flies captured by each attractant was evaluated weekly during seven weeks. In total 4,327 adults of Tephritidae were captured: 3,073 specimens of A. fraterculus and 1,258 specimens of C. capitata. Milhocina (R) plus borax and Torula (R) during season 1, and Torula (R) during season 2 were more effective to capture fruit flies. In organic orchard, Torula (R) and BioAnastrepha captured significantly more tephritids during season 2. In general, Torula (R) attracted more females than males.Univ Estadual Campinas UNICAMP, Nucleo Estudos & Pesquisas Ambientais NEPAM, Sao Paulo, BrazilCtr Expt, Inst Biol, Lab Entomol Econ, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac ciencias Agr & Vet, Dept Ciencias Exatas, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac ciencias Agr & Vet, Dept Ciencias Exatas, Sao Paulo, BrazilInt Soc Horticultural ScienceUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Alves Rodrigues, Marjorie DelgadoRaga, AdaltonMaldonado Junior, Walter [UNESP]Barbosa, Jose Carlos [UNESP]SabaterMunoz, B.Moreno, P.Pena, L.Navarro, L.2018-11-26T23:37:24Z2018-11-26T23:37:24Z2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject1033-1040Xii International Citrus Congress - International Society Of Citriculture. Leuven 1: Int Soc Horticultural Science, v. 1065, p. 1033-1040, 2015.0567-7572http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164864WOS:000358038600129Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengXii International Citrus Congress - International Society Of Citriculture0,198info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T13:44:13Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/164864Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:13:52.406875Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil |
title |
Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil Alves Rodrigues, Marjorie Delgado Ceratitis capitata Anastrepha fraterculus monitoring McPhail trap |
title_short |
Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil |
title_full |
Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil |
title_sort |
Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil |
author |
Alves Rodrigues, Marjorie Delgado |
author_facet |
Alves Rodrigues, Marjorie Delgado Raga, Adalton Maldonado Junior, Walter [UNESP] Barbosa, Jose Carlos [UNESP] SabaterMunoz, B. Moreno, P. Pena, L. Navarro, L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Raga, Adalton Maldonado Junior, Walter [UNESP] Barbosa, Jose Carlos [UNESP] SabaterMunoz, B. Moreno, P. Pena, L. Navarro, L. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves Rodrigues, Marjorie Delgado Raga, Adalton Maldonado Junior, Walter [UNESP] Barbosa, Jose Carlos [UNESP] SabaterMunoz, B. Moreno, P. Pena, L. Navarro, L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ceratitis capitata Anastrepha fraterculus monitoring McPhail trap |
topic |
Ceratitis capitata Anastrepha fraterculus monitoring McPhail trap |
description |
Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) are the most important fruit fly species in Brazil. Both species causes significant losses in citrus production in the State of Sao Paulo. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different food bait attractants for monitoring fruit flies in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs. The experiment was conducted under block randomized design with seven attractants (BioAnastrepha, IscaMosca, Samarita, Torula (R), Milhocina (R) plus borax, sugar cane molasses and grape juice). The experiments were performed in two seasons, from March until April (season 1) and from November until December 2008 (season 2), in two orange orchards (organic and conventional systems) located in Mogi-Guacu, SP. The number of flies captured by each attractant was evaluated weekly during seven weeks. In total 4,327 adults of Tephritidae were captured: 3,073 specimens of A. fraterculus and 1,258 specimens of C. capitata. Milhocina (R) plus borax and Torula (R) during season 1, and Torula (R) during season 2 were more effective to capture fruit flies. In organic orchard, Torula (R) and BioAnastrepha captured significantly more tephritids during season 2. In general, Torula (R) attracted more females than males. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01 2018-11-26T23:37:24Z 2018-11-26T23:37:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Xii International Citrus Congress - International Society Of Citriculture. Leuven 1: Int Soc Horticultural Science, v. 1065, p. 1033-1040, 2015. 0567-7572 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164864 WOS:000358038600129 |
identifier_str_mv |
Xii International Citrus Congress - International Society Of Citriculture. Leuven 1: Int Soc Horticultural Science, v. 1065, p. 1033-1040, 2015. 0567-7572 WOS:000358038600129 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164864 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Xii International Citrus Congress - International Society Of Citriculture 0,198 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1033-1040 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Int Soc Horticultural Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Int Soc Horticultural Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128776475770880 |