Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves Rodrigues, Marjorie Delgado
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Raga, Adalton, Maldonado Junior, Walter [UNESP], Barbosa, Jose Carlos [UNESP], SabaterMunoz, B., Moreno, P., Pena, L., Navarro, L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164864
Resumo: Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) are the most important fruit fly species in Brazil. Both species causes significant losses in citrus production in the State of Sao Paulo. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different food bait attractants for monitoring fruit flies in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs. The experiment was conducted under block randomized design with seven attractants (BioAnastrepha, IscaMosca, Samarita, Torula (R), Milhocina (R) plus borax, sugar cane molasses and grape juice). The experiments were performed in two seasons, from March until April (season 1) and from November until December 2008 (season 2), in two orange orchards (organic and conventional systems) located in Mogi-Guacu, SP. The number of flies captured by each attractant was evaluated weekly during seven weeks. In total 4,327 adults of Tephritidae were captured: 3,073 specimens of A. fraterculus and 1,258 specimens of C. capitata. Milhocina (R) plus borax and Torula (R) during season 1, and Torula (R) during season 2 were more effective to capture fruit flies. In organic orchard, Torula (R) and BioAnastrepha captured significantly more tephritids during season 2. In general, Torula (R) attracted more females than males.
id UNSP_b2fc02c952dfc082334d228fc0c1442c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/164864
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in BrazilCeratitis capitataAnastrepha fraterculusmonitoringMcPhail trapAnastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) are the most important fruit fly species in Brazil. Both species causes significant losses in citrus production in the State of Sao Paulo. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different food bait attractants for monitoring fruit flies in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs. The experiment was conducted under block randomized design with seven attractants (BioAnastrepha, IscaMosca, Samarita, Torula (R), Milhocina (R) plus borax, sugar cane molasses and grape juice). The experiments were performed in two seasons, from March until April (season 1) and from November until December 2008 (season 2), in two orange orchards (organic and conventional systems) located in Mogi-Guacu, SP. The number of flies captured by each attractant was evaluated weekly during seven weeks. In total 4,327 adults of Tephritidae were captured: 3,073 specimens of A. fraterculus and 1,258 specimens of C. capitata. Milhocina (R) plus borax and Torula (R) during season 1, and Torula (R) during season 2 were more effective to capture fruit flies. In organic orchard, Torula (R) and BioAnastrepha captured significantly more tephritids during season 2. In general, Torula (R) attracted more females than males.Univ Estadual Campinas UNICAMP, Nucleo Estudos & Pesquisas Ambientais NEPAM, Sao Paulo, BrazilCtr Expt, Inst Biol, Lab Entomol Econ, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac ciencias Agr & Vet, Dept Ciencias Exatas, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac ciencias Agr & Vet, Dept Ciencias Exatas, Sao Paulo, BrazilInt Soc Horticultural ScienceUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Alves Rodrigues, Marjorie DelgadoRaga, AdaltonMaldonado Junior, Walter [UNESP]Barbosa, Jose Carlos [UNESP]SabaterMunoz, B.Moreno, P.Pena, L.Navarro, L.2018-11-26T23:37:24Z2018-11-26T23:37:24Z2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject1033-1040Xii International Citrus Congress - International Society Of Citriculture. Leuven 1: Int Soc Horticultural Science, v. 1065, p. 1033-1040, 2015.0567-7572http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164864WOS:000358038600129Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengXii International Citrus Congress - International Society Of Citriculture0,198info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T13:44:13Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/164864Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:13:52.406875Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil
title Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil
spellingShingle Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil
Alves Rodrigues, Marjorie Delgado
Ceratitis capitata
Anastrepha fraterculus
monitoring
McPhail trap
title_short Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil
title_full Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil
title_fullStr Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil
title_sort Comparison of Food Attractants for Monitoring Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Citrus Orchards in Brazil
author Alves Rodrigues, Marjorie Delgado
author_facet Alves Rodrigues, Marjorie Delgado
Raga, Adalton
Maldonado Junior, Walter [UNESP]
Barbosa, Jose Carlos [UNESP]
SabaterMunoz, B.
Moreno, P.
Pena, L.
Navarro, L.
author_role author
author2 Raga, Adalton
Maldonado Junior, Walter [UNESP]
Barbosa, Jose Carlos [UNESP]
SabaterMunoz, B.
Moreno, P.
Pena, L.
Navarro, L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves Rodrigues, Marjorie Delgado
Raga, Adalton
Maldonado Junior, Walter [UNESP]
Barbosa, Jose Carlos [UNESP]
SabaterMunoz, B.
Moreno, P.
Pena, L.
Navarro, L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ceratitis capitata
Anastrepha fraterculus
monitoring
McPhail trap
topic Ceratitis capitata
Anastrepha fraterculus
monitoring
McPhail trap
description Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) are the most important fruit fly species in Brazil. Both species causes significant losses in citrus production in the State of Sao Paulo. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different food bait attractants for monitoring fruit flies in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs. The experiment was conducted under block randomized design with seven attractants (BioAnastrepha, IscaMosca, Samarita, Torula (R), Milhocina (R) plus borax, sugar cane molasses and grape juice). The experiments were performed in two seasons, from March until April (season 1) and from November until December 2008 (season 2), in two orange orchards (organic and conventional systems) located in Mogi-Guacu, SP. The number of flies captured by each attractant was evaluated weekly during seven weeks. In total 4,327 adults of Tephritidae were captured: 3,073 specimens of A. fraterculus and 1,258 specimens of C. capitata. Milhocina (R) plus borax and Torula (R) during season 1, and Torula (R) during season 2 were more effective to capture fruit flies. In organic orchard, Torula (R) and BioAnastrepha captured significantly more tephritids during season 2. In general, Torula (R) attracted more females than males.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01
2018-11-26T23:37:24Z
2018-11-26T23:37:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Xii International Citrus Congress - International Society Of Citriculture. Leuven 1: Int Soc Horticultural Science, v. 1065, p. 1033-1040, 2015.
0567-7572
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164864
WOS:000358038600129
identifier_str_mv Xii International Citrus Congress - International Society Of Citriculture. Leuven 1: Int Soc Horticultural Science, v. 1065, p. 1033-1040, 2015.
0567-7572
WOS:000358038600129
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/164864
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Xii International Citrus Congress - International Society Of Citriculture
0,198
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1033-1040
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Int Soc Horticultural Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Int Soc Horticultural Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128776475770880