Accuracy of genotype imputation and genomic predictions in a two-generation farmed Atlantic salmon population using high-density and low-density SNP panels
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.03.004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170787 |
Resumo: | The objectives of this study were: (i) to assess genotype imputation accuracy in different scenarios using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) data from a population comprising two generations of farmed Atlantic salmon and (ii) to assess the accuracy of genomic predictions for a quantitative trait (body weight) using the imputed genotypes. The pedigree consisted of 53 parents and 1069 offspring genotyped using a high-density SNP panel (50 K). Two groups were created: Group A: 90% of the offspring were included into training and 10% into validation sets; Group B: 10% of the offspring were included into training and 90% into validation sets. Different scenarios of available genotypic information from relatives were tested for the two groups previously described. Imputation was performed using three in silico low-density panels (0.5, 3 and 6 K) with all markers except the markers present on the low-density panel masked in the validation sets. The accuracy of genomic selection was tested using the scenarios that resulted in the best and the worst imputation accuracy for the three low density panels and were compared to accuracy obtained from pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and genomic predictions using the 50 K SNP panel. In general, imputation accuracy ranged from 0.74 to 0.98 depending on scenario. For the best scenario with the highest number of animals in reference population (Group A), the accuracy of imputation ranged from 0.95 to 0.98 depending on the low-density panel used. For the best scenario with the lowest number of animals in reference population (Group B), the accuracy of imputation ranged from 0.94 to 0.98 depending on the low-density panel used. In general, the number of SNPs in the low-density panels had a greater influence on the accuracy of imputation than the size of the reference set. The accuracies of genomic predictions using imputed genotypes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73, outperformed PBLUP (0.66) and were identical or very similar to the use of all true genotype data (0.73). The high imputation and genomic prediction accuracy suggest that the imputation of genotypes from low density (0.5 to 3 K) to high density (50 K) could be a cost-effective strategy for the feasibility of the practical implementation of genomic selection in Atlantic salmon. |
id |
UNSP_b76c4a4abcb1bb5506d5f2cd2bf5a2b7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170787 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Accuracy of genotype imputation and genomic predictions in a two-generation farmed Atlantic salmon population using high-density and low-density SNP panelsCost-effectivenessGenome-wide association studiesGenomic selectionSalmo salarSingle nucleotide polymorphismThe objectives of this study were: (i) to assess genotype imputation accuracy in different scenarios using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) data from a population comprising two generations of farmed Atlantic salmon and (ii) to assess the accuracy of genomic predictions for a quantitative trait (body weight) using the imputed genotypes. The pedigree consisted of 53 parents and 1069 offspring genotyped using a high-density SNP panel (50 K). Two groups were created: Group A: 90% of the offspring were included into training and 10% into validation sets; Group B: 10% of the offspring were included into training and 90% into validation sets. Different scenarios of available genotypic information from relatives were tested for the two groups previously described. Imputation was performed using three in silico low-density panels (0.5, 3 and 6 K) with all markers except the markers present on the low-density panel masked in the validation sets. The accuracy of genomic selection was tested using the scenarios that resulted in the best and the worst imputation accuracy for the three low density panels and were compared to accuracy obtained from pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and genomic predictions using the 50 K SNP panel. In general, imputation accuracy ranged from 0.74 to 0.98 depending on scenario. For the best scenario with the highest number of animals in reference population (Group A), the accuracy of imputation ranged from 0.95 to 0.98 depending on the low-density panel used. For the best scenario with the lowest number of animals in reference population (Group B), the accuracy of imputation ranged from 0.94 to 0.98 depending on the low-density panel used. In general, the number of SNPs in the low-density panels had a greater influence on the accuracy of imputation than the size of the reference set. The accuracies of genomic predictions using imputed genotypes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73, outperformed PBLUP (0.66) and were identical or very similar to the use of all true genotype data (0.73). The high imputation and genomic prediction accuracy suggest that the imputation of genotypes from low density (0.5 to 3 K) to high density (50 K) could be a cost-effective strategy for the feasibility of the practical implementation of genomic selection in Atlantic salmon.Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias Universidad de Chile, Av. Santa Rosa 11735School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato CastellaneAquainnovo, Cardonal S/NThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies University of EdinburghNúcleo Milenio INVASALSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato CastellaneUniversidad de ChileUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)AquainnovoUniversity of EdinburghNúcleo Milenio INVASALYoshida, Grazyella M. [UNESP]Carvalheiro, Roberto [UNESP]Lhorente, Jean P.Correa, KatharinaFigueroa, RenéHouston, Ross D.Yáñez, José M.2018-12-11T16:52:25Z2018-12-11T16:52:25Z2018-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article147-154application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.03.004Aquaculture, v. 491, p. 147-154.0044-8486http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17078710.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.03.0042-s2.0-850440995502-s2.0-85044099550.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAquaculture1,152info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-23T06:10:00Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170787Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:45:39.568997Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Accuracy of genotype imputation and genomic predictions in a two-generation farmed Atlantic salmon population using high-density and low-density SNP panels |
title |
Accuracy of genotype imputation and genomic predictions in a two-generation farmed Atlantic salmon population using high-density and low-density SNP panels |
spellingShingle |
Accuracy of genotype imputation and genomic predictions in a two-generation farmed Atlantic salmon population using high-density and low-density SNP panels Yoshida, Grazyella M. [UNESP] Cost-effectiveness Genome-wide association studies Genomic selection Salmo salar Single nucleotide polymorphism |
title_short |
Accuracy of genotype imputation and genomic predictions in a two-generation farmed Atlantic salmon population using high-density and low-density SNP panels |
title_full |
Accuracy of genotype imputation and genomic predictions in a two-generation farmed Atlantic salmon population using high-density and low-density SNP panels |
title_fullStr |
Accuracy of genotype imputation and genomic predictions in a two-generation farmed Atlantic salmon population using high-density and low-density SNP panels |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accuracy of genotype imputation and genomic predictions in a two-generation farmed Atlantic salmon population using high-density and low-density SNP panels |
title_sort |
Accuracy of genotype imputation and genomic predictions in a two-generation farmed Atlantic salmon population using high-density and low-density SNP panels |
author |
Yoshida, Grazyella M. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Yoshida, Grazyella M. [UNESP] Carvalheiro, Roberto [UNESP] Lhorente, Jean P. Correa, Katharina Figueroa, René Houston, Ross D. Yáñez, José M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carvalheiro, Roberto [UNESP] Lhorente, Jean P. Correa, Katharina Figueroa, René Houston, Ross D. Yáñez, José M. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Chile Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Aquainnovo University of Edinburgh Núcleo Milenio INVASAL |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Yoshida, Grazyella M. [UNESP] Carvalheiro, Roberto [UNESP] Lhorente, Jean P. Correa, Katharina Figueroa, René Houston, Ross D. Yáñez, José M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cost-effectiveness Genome-wide association studies Genomic selection Salmo salar Single nucleotide polymorphism |
topic |
Cost-effectiveness Genome-wide association studies Genomic selection Salmo salar Single nucleotide polymorphism |
description |
The objectives of this study were: (i) to assess genotype imputation accuracy in different scenarios using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) data from a population comprising two generations of farmed Atlantic salmon and (ii) to assess the accuracy of genomic predictions for a quantitative trait (body weight) using the imputed genotypes. The pedigree consisted of 53 parents and 1069 offspring genotyped using a high-density SNP panel (50 K). Two groups were created: Group A: 90% of the offspring were included into training and 10% into validation sets; Group B: 10% of the offspring were included into training and 90% into validation sets. Different scenarios of available genotypic information from relatives were tested for the two groups previously described. Imputation was performed using three in silico low-density panels (0.5, 3 and 6 K) with all markers except the markers present on the low-density panel masked in the validation sets. The accuracy of genomic selection was tested using the scenarios that resulted in the best and the worst imputation accuracy for the three low density panels and were compared to accuracy obtained from pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and genomic predictions using the 50 K SNP panel. In general, imputation accuracy ranged from 0.74 to 0.98 depending on scenario. For the best scenario with the highest number of animals in reference population (Group A), the accuracy of imputation ranged from 0.95 to 0.98 depending on the low-density panel used. For the best scenario with the lowest number of animals in reference population (Group B), the accuracy of imputation ranged from 0.94 to 0.98 depending on the low-density panel used. In general, the number of SNPs in the low-density panels had a greater influence on the accuracy of imputation than the size of the reference set. The accuracies of genomic predictions using imputed genotypes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73, outperformed PBLUP (0.66) and were identical or very similar to the use of all true genotype data (0.73). The high imputation and genomic prediction accuracy suggest that the imputation of genotypes from low density (0.5 to 3 K) to high density (50 K) could be a cost-effective strategy for the feasibility of the practical implementation of genomic selection in Atlantic salmon. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-11T16:52:25Z 2018-12-11T16:52:25Z 2018-04-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.03.004 Aquaculture, v. 491, p. 147-154. 0044-8486 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170787 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.03.004 2-s2.0-85044099550 2-s2.0-85044099550.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.03.004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170787 |
identifier_str_mv |
Aquaculture, v. 491, p. 147-154. 0044-8486 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.03.004 2-s2.0-85044099550 2-s2.0-85044099550.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Aquaculture 1,152 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
147-154 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128558327922688 |