Effect of different substrates on composting of poultry litter
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000700028 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/30874 |
Resumo: | The objective was to evaluate the differences between distinct types of litter material and their combinations in the dynamics of degradation on the organic matter fractions and the quality of the final compound. The treatments were established according to material used as substrate for broiler litter: treatment 1 - rice husks; 2 - sugar cane bagasse; 3 - wood shavings; 4 - wood shavings + sugar cane bagasse; 5 - rice husks + sugar cane bagasse; and 6 - Napier grass. The following variables were monitored: temperature, levels of total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), mass and volume of the pile, fibrous fraction, and levels and reductions of N, P and K during the process. Piles formed with Napier grass and sugar cane bagasse presented the highest average temperatures during composting. The greater average reductions in TS and VS were attained in piles with sugar cane bagasse (68.12 and 73.07%, for TS and VS, respectively). The reductions of greatest volume occurred in piles with sugar cane bagasse (52.08%), followed by Napier grass (50.56%). Poultry litters composed of rice husks and wood shavings presented 13.21 and 10.23% of lignin, respectively, which contributed to the lower degradation of fibrous fraction and degradability. Substrates with lower lignin content were those with greatest organic matter degradation rate and had reduced losses of N levels during the process. Composting performance is affected by the initial substrate used to compose the poultry litter. |
id |
UNSP_b96f70f337db561a1572f67363d1ee87 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/30874 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effect of different substrates on composting of poultry litterbroiler productioncelluloselignintemperaturetotal solidsThe objective was to evaluate the differences between distinct types of litter material and their combinations in the dynamics of degradation on the organic matter fractions and the quality of the final compound. The treatments were established according to material used as substrate for broiler litter: treatment 1 - rice husks; 2 - sugar cane bagasse; 3 - wood shavings; 4 - wood shavings + sugar cane bagasse; 5 - rice husks + sugar cane bagasse; and 6 - Napier grass. The following variables were monitored: temperature, levels of total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), mass and volume of the pile, fibrous fraction, and levels and reductions of N, P and K during the process. Piles formed with Napier grass and sugar cane bagasse presented the highest average temperatures during composting. The greater average reductions in TS and VS were attained in piles with sugar cane bagasse (68.12 and 73.07%, for TS and VS, respectively). The reductions of greatest volume occurred in piles with sugar cane bagasse (52.08%), followed by Napier grass (50.56%). Poultry litters composed of rice husks and wood shavings presented 13.21 and 10.23% of lignin, respectively, which contributed to the lower degradation of fibrous fraction and degradability. Substrates with lower lignin content were those with greatest organic matter degradation rate and had reduced losses of N levels during the process. Composting performance is affected by the initial substrate used to compose the poultry litter.UFGD Faculdade de Ciências AgráriasUFGDUFGD FCA Programa de Pós-Graduação em ZootecniaUNESP Programa de Pós-Graduação em ZootecniaUNESP Programa de Pós-Graduação em ZootecniaSociedade Brasileira de ZootecniaUniversidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Orrico, Ana Carolina AmorimCenturion, Stanley RibeiroFarias, Romildo Marques deOrrico Junior, Marco Antonio Previdelli [UNESP]Garcia, Rodrigo Garófallo2014-05-20T15:18:24Z2014-05-20T15:18:24Z2012-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1764-1768application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000700028Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 41, n. 7, p. 1764-1768, 2012.1516-3598http://hdl.handle.net/11449/3087410.1590/S1516-35982012000700028S1516-35982012000700028WOS:000311559100028S1516-35982012000700028.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia0,337info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-26T06:17:14Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/30874Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:20:13.270882Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of different substrates on composting of poultry litter |
title |
Effect of different substrates on composting of poultry litter |
spellingShingle |
Effect of different substrates on composting of poultry litter Orrico, Ana Carolina Amorim broiler production cellulose lignin temperature total solids |
title_short |
Effect of different substrates on composting of poultry litter |
title_full |
Effect of different substrates on composting of poultry litter |
title_fullStr |
Effect of different substrates on composting of poultry litter |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of different substrates on composting of poultry litter |
title_sort |
Effect of different substrates on composting of poultry litter |
author |
Orrico, Ana Carolina Amorim |
author_facet |
Orrico, Ana Carolina Amorim Centurion, Stanley Ribeiro Farias, Romildo Marques de Orrico Junior, Marco Antonio Previdelli [UNESP] Garcia, Rodrigo Garófallo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Centurion, Stanley Ribeiro Farias, Romildo Marques de Orrico Junior, Marco Antonio Previdelli [UNESP] Garcia, Rodrigo Garófallo |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Orrico, Ana Carolina Amorim Centurion, Stanley Ribeiro Farias, Romildo Marques de Orrico Junior, Marco Antonio Previdelli [UNESP] Garcia, Rodrigo Garófallo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
broiler production cellulose lignin temperature total solids |
topic |
broiler production cellulose lignin temperature total solids |
description |
The objective was to evaluate the differences between distinct types of litter material and their combinations in the dynamics of degradation on the organic matter fractions and the quality of the final compound. The treatments were established according to material used as substrate for broiler litter: treatment 1 - rice husks; 2 - sugar cane bagasse; 3 - wood shavings; 4 - wood shavings + sugar cane bagasse; 5 - rice husks + sugar cane bagasse; and 6 - Napier grass. The following variables were monitored: temperature, levels of total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), mass and volume of the pile, fibrous fraction, and levels and reductions of N, P and K during the process. Piles formed with Napier grass and sugar cane bagasse presented the highest average temperatures during composting. The greater average reductions in TS and VS were attained in piles with sugar cane bagasse (68.12 and 73.07%, for TS and VS, respectively). The reductions of greatest volume occurred in piles with sugar cane bagasse (52.08%), followed by Napier grass (50.56%). Poultry litters composed of rice husks and wood shavings presented 13.21 and 10.23% of lignin, respectively, which contributed to the lower degradation of fibrous fraction and degradability. Substrates with lower lignin content were those with greatest organic matter degradation rate and had reduced losses of N levels during the process. Composting performance is affected by the initial substrate used to compose the poultry litter. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-07-01 2014-05-20T15:18:24Z 2014-05-20T15:18:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000700028 Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 41, n. 7, p. 1764-1768, 2012. 1516-3598 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/30874 10.1590/S1516-35982012000700028 S1516-35982012000700028 WOS:000311559100028 S1516-35982012000700028.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000700028 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/30874 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 41, n. 7, p. 1764-1768, 2012. 1516-3598 10.1590/S1516-35982012000700028 S1516-35982012000700028 WOS:000311559100028 S1516-35982012000700028.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 0,337 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1764-1768 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129310909792256 |