Philosophical problem of relations according to Peirce: alliances towards an ontology of relations regarding two aspects of Synechism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitio/article/view/8172 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/127062 |
Resumo: | This paper aims at providing the example of Peirce s philosophy as an alternative to the philosophy of being. Peirce s ontology could not be ranked as a discourse about the reality of being (Aristotle); nor could it be understood as a scientific metaphysics ruled by transcendental conditions (Kant). Peirce evades from both traditions, as long as he builds his ontology from a semiotics-based reality whose mode of being is defined in terms of relations (monadic, dyadic and triadic relations). So I assume through my argument that Peirce s ontology forges an essential alliance to the so called ontology of relations. I summarize the allies and principles of such ontology, and consequently I argue for the Peirce s part on it taking into account two elements of his Synechism: the primacy of relations over individuals in continuous multiplicities and the mode of being of relations according to triadic relations in the category of Thirdness. |
id |
UNSP_ba1b63290bb1c934570c84754216ac2d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/127062 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Philosophical problem of relations according to Peirce: alliances towards an ontology of relations regarding two aspects of SynechismProblema filosófico da relação de acordo com peirce: alianças em direção a uma ontologia das relações tendo em vista dois aspectos do sinequismoOntologiaSinequismoRelaçãoOntologySynechismRelationThis paper aims at providing the example of Peirce s philosophy as an alternative to the philosophy of being. Peirce s ontology could not be ranked as a discourse about the reality of being (Aristotle); nor could it be understood as a scientific metaphysics ruled by transcendental conditions (Kant). Peirce evades from both traditions, as long as he builds his ontology from a semiotics-based reality whose mode of being is defined in terms of relations (monadic, dyadic and triadic relations). So I assume through my argument that Peirce s ontology forges an essential alliance to the so called ontology of relations. I summarize the allies and principles of such ontology, and consequently I argue for the Peirce s part on it taking into account two elements of his Synechism: the primacy of relations over individuals in continuous multiplicities and the mode of being of relations according to triadic relations in the category of Thirdness.Este artigo tem como finalidade apresentar a filosofia de Peirce como uma alternativa para a filosofia do ser. A ontologia de Peirce não poderia ser classificada como um discurso sobre a realidade do ser (e.g. Aristóteles); nem poderia ser entendida como uma metafísica científica regrada por condições transcendentais (e.g. Kant). Peirce se esquiva a ambas as tradições, na medida em que constrói sua ontologia em uma realidade baseada na semiótica cujo modo de ser é definido em termos de relações (monádicas, diádicas e triádicas). Então, eu sustento o argumento de que a ontologia de Peirce perfaz uma aliança essencial para a assim chamada ontologia das relações (BAINS, 2006). Eu resumo os aliados e princípios de tal ontologia, eu defendo que a contribuição de Peirce para a mesma pode ser observada em pelo menos dois elementos de seu Sinequismo: a primazia das relações sobre os indivíduos em multiplicidades contínuas e o modo de ser das relações de acordo com relações triádicas na categoria de Terceiridade.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de História, Faculdade de Ciências e Letras de Assis, Assis, Av. Dom Antônio 2001, Campus Universitário, CEP 19806173, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de História, Faculdade de Ciências e Letras de Assis, Assis, Av. Dom Antônio 2001, Campus Universitário, CEP 19806173, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Cardoso Júnior, Hélio Rebello [UNESP]Spinelli, Thien [UNESP]2015-08-21T17:53:49Z2015-08-21T17:53:49Z2011info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article96-105application/pdfhttp://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitio/article/view/8172Cognitio-Estudos, v. 8, n. 2, p. 96-105, 2011.1809-8428http://hdl.handle.net/11449/127062ISSN1809-8428-2011-08-02-96-105.pdf7428964121614007Currículo Lattesreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCognitio-Estudosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-13T19:29:26Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/127062Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:45:26.654329Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Philosophical problem of relations according to Peirce: alliances towards an ontology of relations regarding two aspects of Synechism Problema filosófico da relação de acordo com peirce: alianças em direção a uma ontologia das relações tendo em vista dois aspectos do sinequismo |
title |
Philosophical problem of relations according to Peirce: alliances towards an ontology of relations regarding two aspects of Synechism |
spellingShingle |
Philosophical problem of relations according to Peirce: alliances towards an ontology of relations regarding two aspects of Synechism Cardoso Júnior, Hélio Rebello [UNESP] Ontologia Sinequismo Relação Ontology Synechism Relation |
title_short |
Philosophical problem of relations according to Peirce: alliances towards an ontology of relations regarding two aspects of Synechism |
title_full |
Philosophical problem of relations according to Peirce: alliances towards an ontology of relations regarding two aspects of Synechism |
title_fullStr |
Philosophical problem of relations according to Peirce: alliances towards an ontology of relations regarding two aspects of Synechism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Philosophical problem of relations according to Peirce: alliances towards an ontology of relations regarding two aspects of Synechism |
title_sort |
Philosophical problem of relations according to Peirce: alliances towards an ontology of relations regarding two aspects of Synechism |
author |
Cardoso Júnior, Hélio Rebello [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Cardoso Júnior, Hélio Rebello [UNESP] Spinelli, Thien [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Spinelli, Thien [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cardoso Júnior, Hélio Rebello [UNESP] Spinelli, Thien [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ontologia Sinequismo Relação Ontology Synechism Relation |
topic |
Ontologia Sinequismo Relação Ontology Synechism Relation |
description |
This paper aims at providing the example of Peirce s philosophy as an alternative to the philosophy of being. Peirce s ontology could not be ranked as a discourse about the reality of being (Aristotle); nor could it be understood as a scientific metaphysics ruled by transcendental conditions (Kant). Peirce evades from both traditions, as long as he builds his ontology from a semiotics-based reality whose mode of being is defined in terms of relations (monadic, dyadic and triadic relations). So I assume through my argument that Peirce s ontology forges an essential alliance to the so called ontology of relations. I summarize the allies and principles of such ontology, and consequently I argue for the Peirce s part on it taking into account two elements of his Synechism: the primacy of relations over individuals in continuous multiplicities and the mode of being of relations according to triadic relations in the category of Thirdness. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011 2015-08-21T17:53:49Z 2015-08-21T17:53:49Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitio/article/view/8172 Cognitio-Estudos, v. 8, n. 2, p. 96-105, 2011. 1809-8428 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/127062 ISSN1809-8428-2011-08-02-96-105.pdf 7428964121614007 |
url |
http://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitio/article/view/8172 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/127062 |
identifier_str_mv |
Cognitio-Estudos, v. 8, n. 2, p. 96-105, 2011. 1809-8428 ISSN1809-8428-2011-08-02-96-105.pdf 7428964121614007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio-Estudos |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
96-105 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Currículo Lattes reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129459474137088 |