Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramos, Tatiane Caroline de Souza [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Boas, Mariéllen Longo Vilas [UNESP], Nunes, Camilla Magnoni Moretto [UNESP], Ferreira, Camila Lopes [UNESP], Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes, Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP], Jardini, Maria Aparecida Neves [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0583
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234305
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the efficacy of two adjunct therapies (antibiotic and probiotic) for periodontal treatment based on clinical and immunological parameters in patients with Stage II and III Grade B periodontitis. METHODOLOGY: 45 patients were randomly allocated into three groups: control group (CG); antibiotic group (GAtb), in which 500 mg amoxicillin + 400 mg metronidazole were used; and probiotic group (GProb), for which Lactobacillus reuteri was used. Patients received medications after undergoing periodontal debridement. Clinical and immunological parameters were assessed at baseline, 30 days, and 90 days. RESULTS: All therapies reduced bleeding on probing (BoP) in the evaluated periods, and the GAtb had a greater reduction at 90 days (p=0.03). The GProb group showed better results for plaque index (PI) and gingival recession (GR) compared to the GAtb at 90 days (p=0.0014; p=0.006). The area of inflammation (PISA Index) significantly decreased in all therapies in the evaluated periods. Therapies had no significant differences regarding moderate pockets. The GAtb had a greater reduction in probing depth (PD) for deep pockets (p=0.03) at 90 days and in the number of deep pocket sites at 30 days (p=0.04). The occurrence of adverse effects was commonly reported in the GAtb as a percentage per patient. The GAtb had a significant reduction in the concentration of interleukins IL-1β and IL-8 and an increase in IL-10 and TNF-α. The CG had a reduction in IL-6 and IL-1 β, whereas in the GProb there was no difference. CONCLUSION: After three months, none of the adjuvant therapies provided any additional benefit for subgingival instrumentation.
id UNSP_ba9af0ebf421d1ee65d78b77ac1a7265
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/234305
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical studyOBJECTIVE: This study assessed the efficacy of two adjunct therapies (antibiotic and probiotic) for periodontal treatment based on clinical and immunological parameters in patients with Stage II and III Grade B periodontitis. METHODOLOGY: 45 patients were randomly allocated into three groups: control group (CG); antibiotic group (GAtb), in which 500 mg amoxicillin + 400 mg metronidazole were used; and probiotic group (GProb), for which Lactobacillus reuteri was used. Patients received medications after undergoing periodontal debridement. Clinical and immunological parameters were assessed at baseline, 30 days, and 90 days. RESULTS: All therapies reduced bleeding on probing (BoP) in the evaluated periods, and the GAtb had a greater reduction at 90 days (p=0.03). The GProb group showed better results for plaque index (PI) and gingival recession (GR) compared to the GAtb at 90 days (p=0.0014; p=0.006). The area of inflammation (PISA Index) significantly decreased in all therapies in the evaluated periods. Therapies had no significant differences regarding moderate pockets. The GAtb had a greater reduction in probing depth (PD) for deep pockets (p=0.03) at 90 days and in the number of deep pocket sites at 30 days (p=0.04). The occurrence of adverse effects was commonly reported in the GAtb as a percentage per patient. The GAtb had a significant reduction in the concentration of interleukins IL-1β and IL-8 and an increase in IL-10 and TNF-α. The CG had a reduction in IL-6 and IL-1 β, whereas in the GProb there was no difference. CONCLUSION: After three months, none of the adjuvant therapies provided any additional benefit for subgingival instrumentation.Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Odontologia Programa de Biopatologia Bucal Área de PeriodontiaUniversidade de São Paulo (USP) Faculdade de Odontologia Divisão de Periodontia Departamento de EstomatologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Instituto de Ciências e Tecnologia Departamento de Diagnóstico e Cirurgia Área de PeriodontiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Odontologia Programa de Biopatologia Bucal Área de PeriodontiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Instituto de Ciências e Tecnologia Departamento de Diagnóstico e Cirurgia Área de PeriodontiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Ramos, Tatiane Caroline de Souza [UNESP]Boas, Mariéllen Longo Vilas [UNESP]Nunes, Camilla Magnoni Moretto [UNESP]Ferreira, Camila Lopes [UNESP]Pannuti, Cláudio MendesSantamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP]Jardini, Maria Aparecida Neves [UNESP]2022-05-01T15:46:18Z2022-05-01T15:46:18Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlee20210583http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0583Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, v. 30, p. e20210583-.1678-7765http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23430510.1590/1678-7757-2021-05832-s2.0-85126907410Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of applied oral science : revista FOBinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-01T15:46:18Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/234305Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-05-01T15:46:18Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical study
title Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical study
spellingShingle Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical study
Ramos, Tatiane Caroline de Souza [UNESP]
title_short Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical study
title_full Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical study
title_fullStr Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical study
title_sort Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical study
author Ramos, Tatiane Caroline de Souza [UNESP]
author_facet Ramos, Tatiane Caroline de Souza [UNESP]
Boas, Mariéllen Longo Vilas [UNESP]
Nunes, Camilla Magnoni Moretto [UNESP]
Ferreira, Camila Lopes [UNESP]
Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes
Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP]
Jardini, Maria Aparecida Neves [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Boas, Mariéllen Longo Vilas [UNESP]
Nunes, Camilla Magnoni Moretto [UNESP]
Ferreira, Camila Lopes [UNESP]
Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes
Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP]
Jardini, Maria Aparecida Neves [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramos, Tatiane Caroline de Souza [UNESP]
Boas, Mariéllen Longo Vilas [UNESP]
Nunes, Camilla Magnoni Moretto [UNESP]
Ferreira, Camila Lopes [UNESP]
Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes
Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP]
Jardini, Maria Aparecida Neves [UNESP]
description OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the efficacy of two adjunct therapies (antibiotic and probiotic) for periodontal treatment based on clinical and immunological parameters in patients with Stage II and III Grade B periodontitis. METHODOLOGY: 45 patients were randomly allocated into three groups: control group (CG); antibiotic group (GAtb), in which 500 mg amoxicillin + 400 mg metronidazole were used; and probiotic group (GProb), for which Lactobacillus reuteri was used. Patients received medications after undergoing periodontal debridement. Clinical and immunological parameters were assessed at baseline, 30 days, and 90 days. RESULTS: All therapies reduced bleeding on probing (BoP) in the evaluated periods, and the GAtb had a greater reduction at 90 days (p=0.03). The GProb group showed better results for plaque index (PI) and gingival recession (GR) compared to the GAtb at 90 days (p=0.0014; p=0.006). The area of inflammation (PISA Index) significantly decreased in all therapies in the evaluated periods. Therapies had no significant differences regarding moderate pockets. The GAtb had a greater reduction in probing depth (PD) for deep pockets (p=0.03) at 90 days and in the number of deep pocket sites at 30 days (p=0.04). The occurrence of adverse effects was commonly reported in the GAtb as a percentage per patient. The GAtb had a significant reduction in the concentration of interleukins IL-1β and IL-8 and an increase in IL-10 and TNF-α. The CG had a reduction in IL-6 and IL-1 β, whereas in the GProb there was no difference. CONCLUSION: After three months, none of the adjuvant therapies provided any additional benefit for subgingival instrumentation.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-01T15:46:18Z
2022-05-01T15:46:18Z
2022-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0583
Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, v. 30, p. e20210583-.
1678-7765
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234305
10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0583
2-s2.0-85126907410
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0583
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234305
identifier_str_mv Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, v. 30, p. e20210583-.
1678-7765
10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0583
2-s2.0-85126907410
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv e20210583
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964487351009280