Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, R. A. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Oliveira Afonso, A. A. de, Francescony, W., Silva, A. M. da [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1873-x
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185633
Resumo: The poor management of aquatic ecosystems often results in environmental degradation, which requires actions for its recovery. A field protocol was elaborated to guide users (restorationists) to assess degraded areas and provide site- and situation-specific interventionist actions. The protocol was developed following the plant or animal taxonomy framework by Linnaeus, considering that the first character has two mutually exclusive possibilities. It was elaborated in three parts: (1) a technical glossary, (2) a hierarchical key, and (3) a set of intervention actions that are indicated according to the case. Complementarily, ten degraded sites (lentic or lotic ecosystem), all located in continental regions of the Brazilian territory, were evaluated using this key. The protocol was thought to be applied to continental and superficial water bodies. It starts separating the lotic and lentic ecosystems, and after each part goes for specific ways, all of them finishing in one or more interventionist action(s). The set of actions presented is composed of fourteen scenarios, seven of them to be implemented on-site, five to be implemented off-site, and two to be implemented on- and/or off-site. The intervention actions range from simply monitoring, to revegetation of the riparian zone, to activities that target the reoxygenation of hypolimnion. The study cases exemplify the use of the key and provide insight into the required adjustments for the implementation of intervention actions. The protocol and guidelines presented here will allow in a systematic manner, assess and compare the outcomes and efficiency of river restoration projects, locally, regionally and internationally.
id UNSP_baed4bf03eff59242eb50e39e59f0a14
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185633
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocolAquatic ecosystems reclamationEcological restorationEcosystems repairRiver ecotechnologyThe poor management of aquatic ecosystems often results in environmental degradation, which requires actions for its recovery. A field protocol was elaborated to guide users (restorationists) to assess degraded areas and provide site- and situation-specific interventionist actions. The protocol was developed following the plant or animal taxonomy framework by Linnaeus, considering that the first character has two mutually exclusive possibilities. It was elaborated in three parts: (1) a technical glossary, (2) a hierarchical key, and (3) a set of intervention actions that are indicated according to the case. Complementarily, ten degraded sites (lentic or lotic ecosystem), all located in continental regions of the Brazilian territory, were evaluated using this key. The protocol was thought to be applied to continental and superficial water bodies. It starts separating the lotic and lentic ecosystems, and after each part goes for specific ways, all of them finishing in one or more interventionist action(s). The set of actions presented is composed of fourteen scenarios, seven of them to be implemented on-site, five to be implemented off-site, and two to be implemented on- and/or off-site. The intervention actions range from simply monitoring, to revegetation of the riparian zone, to activities that target the reoxygenation of hypolimnion. The study cases exemplify the use of the key and provide insight into the required adjustments for the implementation of intervention actions. The protocol and guidelines presented here will allow in a systematic manner, assess and compare the outcomes and efficiency of river restoration projects, locally, regionally and internationally.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Sao Paulo State Univ, Inst Sci & Technol Sorocaba, Dept Environm Engn, Campus Sorocaba,11 Tres Marco Ave, BR-18087180 Sorocaba, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Co Environm Technol CETESB, 820 Americo de Carvalho Ave, BR-18045000 Sorocaba, SP, BrazilInt Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Lima, PeruSao Paulo State Univ, Inst Sci & Technol Sorocaba, Dept Environm Engn, Campus Sorocaba,11 Tres Marco Ave, BR-18087180 Sorocaba, SP, BrazilSpringerUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Sao Paulo State Co Environm Technol CETESBInt Ctr Trop Agr CIATSilva, R. A. [UNESP]Oliveira Afonso, A. A. deFrancescony, W.Silva, A. M. da [UNESP]2019-10-04T12:37:11Z2019-10-04T12:37:11Z2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2083-2090http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1873-xInternational Journal Of Environmental Science And Technology. New York: Springer, v. 16, n. 4, p. 2083-2090, 2019.1735-1472http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18563310.1007/s13762-018-1873-xWOS:000465479000022Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal Of Environmental Science And Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T21:54:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185633Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-06T00:00:23.655982Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol
title Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol
spellingShingle Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol
Silva, R. A. [UNESP]
Aquatic ecosystems reclamation
Ecological restoration
Ecosystems repair
River ecotechnology
title_short Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol
title_full Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol
title_fullStr Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol
title_full_unstemmed Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol
title_sort Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol
author Silva, R. A. [UNESP]
author_facet Silva, R. A. [UNESP]
Oliveira Afonso, A. A. de
Francescony, W.
Silva, A. M. da [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Oliveira Afonso, A. A. de
Francescony, W.
Silva, A. M. da [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Sao Paulo State Co Environm Technol CETESB
Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, R. A. [UNESP]
Oliveira Afonso, A. A. de
Francescony, W.
Silva, A. M. da [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aquatic ecosystems reclamation
Ecological restoration
Ecosystems repair
River ecotechnology
topic Aquatic ecosystems reclamation
Ecological restoration
Ecosystems repair
River ecotechnology
description The poor management of aquatic ecosystems often results in environmental degradation, which requires actions for its recovery. A field protocol was elaborated to guide users (restorationists) to assess degraded areas and provide site- and situation-specific interventionist actions. The protocol was developed following the plant or animal taxonomy framework by Linnaeus, considering that the first character has two mutually exclusive possibilities. It was elaborated in three parts: (1) a technical glossary, (2) a hierarchical key, and (3) a set of intervention actions that are indicated according to the case. Complementarily, ten degraded sites (lentic or lotic ecosystem), all located in continental regions of the Brazilian territory, were evaluated using this key. The protocol was thought to be applied to continental and superficial water bodies. It starts separating the lotic and lentic ecosystems, and after each part goes for specific ways, all of them finishing in one or more interventionist action(s). The set of actions presented is composed of fourteen scenarios, seven of them to be implemented on-site, five to be implemented off-site, and two to be implemented on- and/or off-site. The intervention actions range from simply monitoring, to revegetation of the riparian zone, to activities that target the reoxygenation of hypolimnion. The study cases exemplify the use of the key and provide insight into the required adjustments for the implementation of intervention actions. The protocol and guidelines presented here will allow in a systematic manner, assess and compare the outcomes and efficiency of river restoration projects, locally, regionally and internationally.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-04T12:37:11Z
2019-10-04T12:37:11Z
2019-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1873-x
International Journal Of Environmental Science And Technology. New York: Springer, v. 16, n. 4, p. 2083-2090, 2019.
1735-1472
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185633
10.1007/s13762-018-1873-x
WOS:000465479000022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1873-x
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185633
identifier_str_mv International Journal Of Environmental Science And Technology. New York: Springer, v. 16, n. 4, p. 2083-2090, 2019.
1735-1472
10.1007/s13762-018-1873-x
WOS:000465479000022
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Journal Of Environmental Science And Technology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 2083-2090
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129571465199616