Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1873-x http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185633 |
Resumo: | The poor management of aquatic ecosystems often results in environmental degradation, which requires actions for its recovery. A field protocol was elaborated to guide users (restorationists) to assess degraded areas and provide site- and situation-specific interventionist actions. The protocol was developed following the plant or animal taxonomy framework by Linnaeus, considering that the first character has two mutually exclusive possibilities. It was elaborated in three parts: (1) a technical glossary, (2) a hierarchical key, and (3) a set of intervention actions that are indicated according to the case. Complementarily, ten degraded sites (lentic or lotic ecosystem), all located in continental regions of the Brazilian territory, were evaluated using this key. The protocol was thought to be applied to continental and superficial water bodies. It starts separating the lotic and lentic ecosystems, and after each part goes for specific ways, all of them finishing in one or more interventionist action(s). The set of actions presented is composed of fourteen scenarios, seven of them to be implemented on-site, five to be implemented off-site, and two to be implemented on- and/or off-site. The intervention actions range from simply monitoring, to revegetation of the riparian zone, to activities that target the reoxygenation of hypolimnion. The study cases exemplify the use of the key and provide insight into the required adjustments for the implementation of intervention actions. The protocol and guidelines presented here will allow in a systematic manner, assess and compare the outcomes and efficiency of river restoration projects, locally, regionally and internationally. |
id |
UNSP_baed4bf03eff59242eb50e39e59f0a14 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185633 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocolAquatic ecosystems reclamationEcological restorationEcosystems repairRiver ecotechnologyThe poor management of aquatic ecosystems often results in environmental degradation, which requires actions for its recovery. A field protocol was elaborated to guide users (restorationists) to assess degraded areas and provide site- and situation-specific interventionist actions. The protocol was developed following the plant or animal taxonomy framework by Linnaeus, considering that the first character has two mutually exclusive possibilities. It was elaborated in three parts: (1) a technical glossary, (2) a hierarchical key, and (3) a set of intervention actions that are indicated according to the case. Complementarily, ten degraded sites (lentic or lotic ecosystem), all located in continental regions of the Brazilian territory, were evaluated using this key. The protocol was thought to be applied to continental and superficial water bodies. It starts separating the lotic and lentic ecosystems, and after each part goes for specific ways, all of them finishing in one or more interventionist action(s). The set of actions presented is composed of fourteen scenarios, seven of them to be implemented on-site, five to be implemented off-site, and two to be implemented on- and/or off-site. The intervention actions range from simply monitoring, to revegetation of the riparian zone, to activities that target the reoxygenation of hypolimnion. The study cases exemplify the use of the key and provide insight into the required adjustments for the implementation of intervention actions. The protocol and guidelines presented here will allow in a systematic manner, assess and compare the outcomes and efficiency of river restoration projects, locally, regionally and internationally.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Sao Paulo State Univ, Inst Sci & Technol Sorocaba, Dept Environm Engn, Campus Sorocaba,11 Tres Marco Ave, BR-18087180 Sorocaba, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Co Environm Technol CETESB, 820 Americo de Carvalho Ave, BR-18045000 Sorocaba, SP, BrazilInt Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Lima, PeruSao Paulo State Univ, Inst Sci & Technol Sorocaba, Dept Environm Engn, Campus Sorocaba,11 Tres Marco Ave, BR-18087180 Sorocaba, SP, BrazilSpringerUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Sao Paulo State Co Environm Technol CETESBInt Ctr Trop Agr CIATSilva, R. A. [UNESP]Oliveira Afonso, A. A. deFrancescony, W.Silva, A. M. da [UNESP]2019-10-04T12:37:11Z2019-10-04T12:37:11Z2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2083-2090http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1873-xInternational Journal Of Environmental Science And Technology. New York: Springer, v. 16, n. 4, p. 2083-2090, 2019.1735-1472http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18563310.1007/s13762-018-1873-xWOS:000465479000022Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal Of Environmental Science And Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T21:54:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185633Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-06T00:00:23.655982Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol |
title |
Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol |
spellingShingle |
Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol Silva, R. A. [UNESP] Aquatic ecosystems reclamation Ecological restoration Ecosystems repair River ecotechnology |
title_short |
Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol |
title_full |
Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol |
title_fullStr |
Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol |
title_full_unstemmed |
Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol |
title_sort |
Technical assessment and decision making for the environmental recovery of waterways and their banks: a science-based protocol |
author |
Silva, R. A. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Silva, R. A. [UNESP] Oliveira Afonso, A. A. de Francescony, W. Silva, A. M. da [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira Afonso, A. A. de Francescony, W. Silva, A. M. da [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Sao Paulo State Co Environm Technol CETESB Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, R. A. [UNESP] Oliveira Afonso, A. A. de Francescony, W. Silva, A. M. da [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aquatic ecosystems reclamation Ecological restoration Ecosystems repair River ecotechnology |
topic |
Aquatic ecosystems reclamation Ecological restoration Ecosystems repair River ecotechnology |
description |
The poor management of aquatic ecosystems often results in environmental degradation, which requires actions for its recovery. A field protocol was elaborated to guide users (restorationists) to assess degraded areas and provide site- and situation-specific interventionist actions. The protocol was developed following the plant or animal taxonomy framework by Linnaeus, considering that the first character has two mutually exclusive possibilities. It was elaborated in three parts: (1) a technical glossary, (2) a hierarchical key, and (3) a set of intervention actions that are indicated according to the case. Complementarily, ten degraded sites (lentic or lotic ecosystem), all located in continental regions of the Brazilian territory, were evaluated using this key. The protocol was thought to be applied to continental and superficial water bodies. It starts separating the lotic and lentic ecosystems, and after each part goes for specific ways, all of them finishing in one or more interventionist action(s). The set of actions presented is composed of fourteen scenarios, seven of them to be implemented on-site, five to be implemented off-site, and two to be implemented on- and/or off-site. The intervention actions range from simply monitoring, to revegetation of the riparian zone, to activities that target the reoxygenation of hypolimnion. The study cases exemplify the use of the key and provide insight into the required adjustments for the implementation of intervention actions. The protocol and guidelines presented here will allow in a systematic manner, assess and compare the outcomes and efficiency of river restoration projects, locally, regionally and internationally. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-04T12:37:11Z 2019-10-04T12:37:11Z 2019-04-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1873-x International Journal Of Environmental Science And Technology. New York: Springer, v. 16, n. 4, p. 2083-2090, 2019. 1735-1472 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185633 10.1007/s13762-018-1873-x WOS:000465479000022 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1873-x http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185633 |
identifier_str_mv |
International Journal Of Environmental Science And Technology. New York: Springer, v. 16, n. 4, p. 2083-2090, 2019. 1735-1472 10.1007/s13762-018-1873-x WOS:000465479000022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal Of Environmental Science And Technology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
2083-2090 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129571465199616 |