Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2004 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.1590/S1516-635X2004000300008 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2004000300008 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/4138 |
Resumo: | This study evaluated the effect of different probiotics and prebiotics on the performance of broilers. One-day-old male broiler chicks from the Cobb strain (n=1,260) were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial arrangement, considering 3 probiotics and 3 prebiotics sources. Nine treatments with 4 repetitions and 35 birds per parcel were used. The results showed that there was no influence of treatment on feed intake at the different rearing phases. Better weight gain (p<0.05) was seen when diet was supplemented with the phosphorylated mannanoligosaccharide-based prebiotic (MOS) compared to diets without prebiotics. Feed conversion of birds fed diets with probiotics and prebiotics was better than feed conversion of birds not receiving such additives. Such better results were seen in the initial period (1 to 21 days), but not in the following period (1 to 35 days) or in the total period (1 to 42 days). Better rearing viability was seen when MOS was used together with organic acidifier when compared to the diets without prebiotic. Viability was worst when no prebiotics or probiotics were used. It was concluded that beneficial effects were seen in performance of birds at 21 days when the growth promoters were used, but not at 42 days of age. Nevertheless, there was better growth viability at 42 days of age when growth promoters were added. |
id |
UNSP_baf404d4220b0f6f988741d1d0fe83d6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/4138 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promotersBroiler chickensPerformanceprebioticsprobioticsThis study evaluated the effect of different probiotics and prebiotics on the performance of broilers. One-day-old male broiler chicks from the Cobb strain (n=1,260) were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial arrangement, considering 3 probiotics and 3 prebiotics sources. Nine treatments with 4 repetitions and 35 birds per parcel were used. The results showed that there was no influence of treatment on feed intake at the different rearing phases. Better weight gain (p<0.05) was seen when diet was supplemented with the phosphorylated mannanoligosaccharide-based prebiotic (MOS) compared to diets without prebiotics. Feed conversion of birds fed diets with probiotics and prebiotics was better than feed conversion of birds not receiving such additives. Such better results were seen in the initial period (1 to 21 days), but not in the following period (1 to 35 days) or in the total period (1 to 42 days). Better rearing viability was seen when MOS was used together with organic acidifier when compared to the diets without prebiotic. Viability was worst when no prebiotics or probiotics were used. It was concluded that beneficial effects were seen in performance of birds at 21 days when the growth promoters were used, but not at 42 days of age. Nevertheless, there was better growth viability at 42 days of age when growth promoters were added.Unesp Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de TecnologiaUnesp Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de TecnologiaFundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia AvícolasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Pelicano, ERL [UNESP]Souza, PA de [UNESP]Souza, HBA de [UNESP]Leonel, FR [UNESP]Zeola, NMBL [UNESP]Boiago, MM [UNESP]2014-05-20T13:17:49Z2014-05-20T13:17:49Z2004-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article177-182application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2004000300008Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 6, n. 3, p. 177-182, 2004.1516-635Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/413810.1590/S1516-635X2004000300008S1516-635X2004000300008S1516-635X2004000300008.pdf3756802878031727SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola0.463info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T15:32:35Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/4138Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:04:44.300361Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters |
title |
Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters |
spellingShingle |
Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters Pelicano, ERL [UNESP] Broiler chickens Performance prebiotics probiotics Pelicano, ERL [UNESP] Broiler chickens Performance prebiotics probiotics |
title_short |
Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters |
title_full |
Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters |
title_fullStr |
Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters |
title_full_unstemmed |
Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters |
title_sort |
Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters |
author |
Pelicano, ERL [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Pelicano, ERL [UNESP] Pelicano, ERL [UNESP] Souza, PA de [UNESP] Souza, HBA de [UNESP] Leonel, FR [UNESP] Zeola, NMBL [UNESP] Boiago, MM [UNESP] Souza, PA de [UNESP] Souza, HBA de [UNESP] Leonel, FR [UNESP] Zeola, NMBL [UNESP] Boiago, MM [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, PA de [UNESP] Souza, HBA de [UNESP] Leonel, FR [UNESP] Zeola, NMBL [UNESP] Boiago, MM [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pelicano, ERL [UNESP] Souza, PA de [UNESP] Souza, HBA de [UNESP] Leonel, FR [UNESP] Zeola, NMBL [UNESP] Boiago, MM [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Broiler chickens Performance prebiotics probiotics |
topic |
Broiler chickens Performance prebiotics probiotics |
description |
This study evaluated the effect of different probiotics and prebiotics on the performance of broilers. One-day-old male broiler chicks from the Cobb strain (n=1,260) were randomly distributed in a 3 x 3 factorial arrangement, considering 3 probiotics and 3 prebiotics sources. Nine treatments with 4 repetitions and 35 birds per parcel were used. The results showed that there was no influence of treatment on feed intake at the different rearing phases. Better weight gain (p<0.05) was seen when diet was supplemented with the phosphorylated mannanoligosaccharide-based prebiotic (MOS) compared to diets without prebiotics. Feed conversion of birds fed diets with probiotics and prebiotics was better than feed conversion of birds not receiving such additives. Such better results were seen in the initial period (1 to 21 days), but not in the following period (1 to 35 days) or in the total period (1 to 42 days). Better rearing viability was seen when MOS was used together with organic acidifier when compared to the diets without prebiotic. Viability was worst when no prebiotics or probiotics were used. It was concluded that beneficial effects were seen in performance of birds at 21 days when the growth promoters were used, but not at 42 days of age. Nevertheless, there was better growth viability at 42 days of age when growth promoters were added. |
publishDate |
2004 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2004-09-01 2014-05-20T13:17:49Z 2014-05-20T13:17:49Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2004000300008 Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 6, n. 3, p. 177-182, 2004. 1516-635X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/4138 10.1590/S1516-635X2004000300008 S1516-635X2004000300008 S1516-635X2004000300008.pdf 3756802878031727 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2004000300008 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/4138 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 6, n. 3, p. 177-182, 2004. 1516-635X 10.1590/S1516-635X2004000300008 S1516-635X2004000300008 S1516-635X2004000300008.pdf 3756802878031727 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 0.463 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
177-182 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822182589306241024 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1516-635X2004000300008 |