Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Crespilho, André Maciel
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Bosco, Karinne Ávila, Dell’aqua, Camila de Paula Freitas [UNESP], Segabinazzi, Lorenzo Garrido [UNESP], Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP], Brás, Karoline Maria Gil, Gomes, Gustavo Mendes, Peixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232842
Resumo: Protocols for cooling or freezing goat semen usually recommend centrifugation for seminal plasma removal. However, little is known about the effect of this process on goat sperm viability and functionality. The present study evaluated the effects of centrifugation force on the plasma membrane, acrosomes, and DNA integrity of goat semen. Four ejaculates from each of the four different Anglo Nubian male goats were used. Semen samples were obtained using artificial vagina, and immediately after collection, ejaculates were diluted using Ringer’s sodium lactate solution and split into three groups: Control (CG, without centrifugation), G1 (centrifugation 600 x g/10 min), G2 (centrifugation 1200 x g/10 min). After centrifugation, seminal plasma was removed, the sperm pellets were resuspended using Tris-egg yolk extender (80 x 106 spermatozoa/mL) and the sperm morphology was analyzed. Samples were cooled at 5°C for 5, 24, 36, and 48 h and then sperm plasma membrane and acrosome integrity (PMAI, %) and sperm DNA fragmentation index (SDF, %) were evaluated at each time-point, using a flow cytometer. Additionally, sperm movement was determined using computer semen analysis (CASA) after 5, 24, and 48 h of refrigeration period. The semen centrifugation did not induce additional sperm morphology defect or reduction in sperm kinetics in the experimental groups. Differences were not observed (p > 0.05) in PMAI and SDF among different groups, in any of each time-point of the cooling process. In conclusion, centrifugation, even at high speeds, did not affect goat sperm integrity and functionality when submitted to refrigeration process.
id UNSP_bcc3a537164fadb020f05bb92566b858
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232842
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?A força de centrifugação pode comprometer a integridade de membrana plasmática, acrossomal e DNA de espermatozoides caprinos?CentrifugationGoatIntegritySemenViabilityProtocols for cooling or freezing goat semen usually recommend centrifugation for seminal plasma removal. However, little is known about the effect of this process on goat sperm viability and functionality. The present study evaluated the effects of centrifugation force on the plasma membrane, acrosomes, and DNA integrity of goat semen. Four ejaculates from each of the four different Anglo Nubian male goats were used. Semen samples were obtained using artificial vagina, and immediately after collection, ejaculates were diluted using Ringer’s sodium lactate solution and split into three groups: Control (CG, without centrifugation), G1 (centrifugation 600 x g/10 min), G2 (centrifugation 1200 x g/10 min). After centrifugation, seminal plasma was removed, the sperm pellets were resuspended using Tris-egg yolk extender (80 x 106 spermatozoa/mL) and the sperm morphology was analyzed. Samples were cooled at 5°C for 5, 24, 36, and 48 h and then sperm plasma membrane and acrosome integrity (PMAI, %) and sperm DNA fragmentation index (SDF, %) were evaluated at each time-point, using a flow cytometer. Additionally, sperm movement was determined using computer semen analysis (CASA) after 5, 24, and 48 h of refrigeration period. The semen centrifugation did not induce additional sperm morphology defect or reduction in sperm kinetics in the experimental groups. Differences were not observed (p > 0.05) in PMAI and SDF among different groups, in any of each time-point of the cooling process. In conclusion, centrifugation, even at high speeds, did not affect goat sperm integrity and functionality when submitted to refrigeration process.Universidade Santo AmaroUniversidade Severino SombraUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e ZootecniaVetsemen®-Análise de sêmen para Inseminação ArtificialUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e ZootecniaUniversidade Santo AmaroUniversidade Severino SombraUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Vetsemen®-Análise de sêmen para Inseminação ArtificialCrespilho, André MacielBosco, Karinne ÁvilaDell’aqua, Camila de Paula Freitas [UNESP]Segabinazzi, Lorenzo Garrido [UNESP]Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP]Brás, Karoline Maria GilGomes, Gustavo MendesPeixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha2022-04-30T14:24:48Z2022-04-30T14:24:48Z2018-10-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, v. 55, n. 3, 2018.1678-44561413-9596http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23284210.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.1458732-s2.0-85059283138Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-09T14:01:21Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232842Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-09T14:01:21Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
A força de centrifugação pode comprometer a integridade de membrana plasmática, acrossomal e DNA de espermatozoides caprinos?
title Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
spellingShingle Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
Crespilho, André Maciel
Centrifugation
Goat
Integrity
Semen
Viability
title_short Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
title_full Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
title_fullStr Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
title_full_unstemmed Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
title_sort Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
author Crespilho, André Maciel
author_facet Crespilho, André Maciel
Bosco, Karinne Ávila
Dell’aqua, Camila de Paula Freitas [UNESP]
Segabinazzi, Lorenzo Garrido [UNESP]
Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP]
Brás, Karoline Maria Gil
Gomes, Gustavo Mendes
Peixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha
author_role author
author2 Bosco, Karinne Ávila
Dell’aqua, Camila de Paula Freitas [UNESP]
Segabinazzi, Lorenzo Garrido [UNESP]
Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP]
Brás, Karoline Maria Gil
Gomes, Gustavo Mendes
Peixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Santo Amaro
Universidade Severino Sombra
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Vetsemen®-Análise de sêmen para Inseminação Artificial
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Crespilho, André Maciel
Bosco, Karinne Ávila
Dell’aqua, Camila de Paula Freitas [UNESP]
Segabinazzi, Lorenzo Garrido [UNESP]
Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP]
Brás, Karoline Maria Gil
Gomes, Gustavo Mendes
Peixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Centrifugation
Goat
Integrity
Semen
Viability
topic Centrifugation
Goat
Integrity
Semen
Viability
description Protocols for cooling or freezing goat semen usually recommend centrifugation for seminal plasma removal. However, little is known about the effect of this process on goat sperm viability and functionality. The present study evaluated the effects of centrifugation force on the plasma membrane, acrosomes, and DNA integrity of goat semen. Four ejaculates from each of the four different Anglo Nubian male goats were used. Semen samples were obtained using artificial vagina, and immediately after collection, ejaculates were diluted using Ringer’s sodium lactate solution and split into three groups: Control (CG, without centrifugation), G1 (centrifugation 600 x g/10 min), G2 (centrifugation 1200 x g/10 min). After centrifugation, seminal plasma was removed, the sperm pellets were resuspended using Tris-egg yolk extender (80 x 106 spermatozoa/mL) and the sperm morphology was analyzed. Samples were cooled at 5°C for 5, 24, 36, and 48 h and then sperm plasma membrane and acrosome integrity (PMAI, %) and sperm DNA fragmentation index (SDF, %) were evaluated at each time-point, using a flow cytometer. Additionally, sperm movement was determined using computer semen analysis (CASA) after 5, 24, and 48 h of refrigeration period. The semen centrifugation did not induce additional sperm morphology defect or reduction in sperm kinetics in the experimental groups. Differences were not observed (p > 0.05) in PMAI and SDF among different groups, in any of each time-point of the cooling process. In conclusion, centrifugation, even at high speeds, did not affect goat sperm integrity and functionality when submitted to refrigeration process.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-25
2022-04-30T14:24:48Z
2022-04-30T14:24:48Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, v. 55, n. 3, 2018.
1678-4456
1413-9596
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232842
10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873
2-s2.0-85059283138
url http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232842
identifier_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, v. 55, n. 3, 2018.
1678-4456
1413-9596
10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873
2-s2.0-85059283138
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546579020218368