Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232842 |
Resumo: | Protocols for cooling or freezing goat semen usually recommend centrifugation for seminal plasma removal. However, little is known about the effect of this process on goat sperm viability and functionality. The present study evaluated the effects of centrifugation force on the plasma membrane, acrosomes, and DNA integrity of goat semen. Four ejaculates from each of the four different Anglo Nubian male goats were used. Semen samples were obtained using artificial vagina, and immediately after collection, ejaculates were diluted using Ringer’s sodium lactate solution and split into three groups: Control (CG, without centrifugation), G1 (centrifugation 600 x g/10 min), G2 (centrifugation 1200 x g/10 min). After centrifugation, seminal plasma was removed, the sperm pellets were resuspended using Tris-egg yolk extender (80 x 106 spermatozoa/mL) and the sperm morphology was analyzed. Samples were cooled at 5°C for 5, 24, 36, and 48 h and then sperm plasma membrane and acrosome integrity (PMAI, %) and sperm DNA fragmentation index (SDF, %) were evaluated at each time-point, using a flow cytometer. Additionally, sperm movement was determined using computer semen analysis (CASA) after 5, 24, and 48 h of refrigeration period. The semen centrifugation did not induce additional sperm morphology defect or reduction in sperm kinetics in the experimental groups. Differences were not observed (p > 0.05) in PMAI and SDF among different groups, in any of each time-point of the cooling process. In conclusion, centrifugation, even at high speeds, did not affect goat sperm integrity and functionality when submitted to refrigeration process. |
id |
UNSP_bcc3a537164fadb020f05bb92566b858 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232842 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa?A força de centrifugação pode comprometer a integridade de membrana plasmática, acrossomal e DNA de espermatozoides caprinos?CentrifugationGoatIntegritySemenViabilityProtocols for cooling or freezing goat semen usually recommend centrifugation for seminal plasma removal. However, little is known about the effect of this process on goat sperm viability and functionality. The present study evaluated the effects of centrifugation force on the plasma membrane, acrosomes, and DNA integrity of goat semen. Four ejaculates from each of the four different Anglo Nubian male goats were used. Semen samples were obtained using artificial vagina, and immediately after collection, ejaculates were diluted using Ringer’s sodium lactate solution and split into three groups: Control (CG, without centrifugation), G1 (centrifugation 600 x g/10 min), G2 (centrifugation 1200 x g/10 min). After centrifugation, seminal plasma was removed, the sperm pellets were resuspended using Tris-egg yolk extender (80 x 106 spermatozoa/mL) and the sperm morphology was analyzed. Samples were cooled at 5°C for 5, 24, 36, and 48 h and then sperm plasma membrane and acrosome integrity (PMAI, %) and sperm DNA fragmentation index (SDF, %) were evaluated at each time-point, using a flow cytometer. Additionally, sperm movement was determined using computer semen analysis (CASA) after 5, 24, and 48 h of refrigeration period. The semen centrifugation did not induce additional sperm morphology defect or reduction in sperm kinetics in the experimental groups. Differences were not observed (p > 0.05) in PMAI and SDF among different groups, in any of each time-point of the cooling process. In conclusion, centrifugation, even at high speeds, did not affect goat sperm integrity and functionality when submitted to refrigeration process.Universidade Santo AmaroUniversidade Severino SombraUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e ZootecniaVetsemen®-Análise de sêmen para Inseminação ArtificialUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e ZootecniaUniversidade Santo AmaroUniversidade Severino SombraUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Vetsemen®-Análise de sêmen para Inseminação ArtificialCrespilho, André MacielBosco, Karinne ÁvilaDell’aqua, Camila de Paula Freitas [UNESP]Segabinazzi, Lorenzo Garrido [UNESP]Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP]Brás, Karoline Maria GilGomes, Gustavo MendesPeixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha2022-04-30T14:24:48Z2022-04-30T14:24:48Z2018-10-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, v. 55, n. 3, 2018.1678-44561413-9596http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23284210.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.1458732-s2.0-85059283138Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-09T14:01:21Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232842Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-09T14:01:21Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa? A força de centrifugação pode comprometer a integridade de membrana plasmática, acrossomal e DNA de espermatozoides caprinos? |
title |
Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa? |
spellingShingle |
Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa? Crespilho, André Maciel Centrifugation Goat Integrity Semen Viability |
title_short |
Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa? |
title_full |
Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa? |
title_fullStr |
Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa? |
title_sort |
Can centrifugation force compromise the plasmatic membrane, acrosome and DNA integrity of goat spermatozoa? |
author |
Crespilho, André Maciel |
author_facet |
Crespilho, André Maciel Bosco, Karinne Ávila Dell’aqua, Camila de Paula Freitas [UNESP] Segabinazzi, Lorenzo Garrido [UNESP] Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP] Brás, Karoline Maria Gil Gomes, Gustavo Mendes Peixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bosco, Karinne Ávila Dell’aqua, Camila de Paula Freitas [UNESP] Segabinazzi, Lorenzo Garrido [UNESP] Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP] Brás, Karoline Maria Gil Gomes, Gustavo Mendes Peixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Santo Amaro Universidade Severino Sombra Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Vetsemen®-Análise de sêmen para Inseminação Artificial |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Crespilho, André Maciel Bosco, Karinne Ávila Dell’aqua, Camila de Paula Freitas [UNESP] Segabinazzi, Lorenzo Garrido [UNESP] Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP] Brás, Karoline Maria Gil Gomes, Gustavo Mendes Peixoto Junior, Kleber da Cunha |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Centrifugation Goat Integrity Semen Viability |
topic |
Centrifugation Goat Integrity Semen Viability |
description |
Protocols for cooling or freezing goat semen usually recommend centrifugation for seminal plasma removal. However, little is known about the effect of this process on goat sperm viability and functionality. The present study evaluated the effects of centrifugation force on the plasma membrane, acrosomes, and DNA integrity of goat semen. Four ejaculates from each of the four different Anglo Nubian male goats were used. Semen samples were obtained using artificial vagina, and immediately after collection, ejaculates were diluted using Ringer’s sodium lactate solution and split into three groups: Control (CG, without centrifugation), G1 (centrifugation 600 x g/10 min), G2 (centrifugation 1200 x g/10 min). After centrifugation, seminal plasma was removed, the sperm pellets were resuspended using Tris-egg yolk extender (80 x 106 spermatozoa/mL) and the sperm morphology was analyzed. Samples were cooled at 5°C for 5, 24, 36, and 48 h and then sperm plasma membrane and acrosome integrity (PMAI, %) and sperm DNA fragmentation index (SDF, %) were evaluated at each time-point, using a flow cytometer. Additionally, sperm movement was determined using computer semen analysis (CASA) after 5, 24, and 48 h of refrigeration period. The semen centrifugation did not induce additional sperm morphology defect or reduction in sperm kinetics in the experimental groups. Differences were not observed (p > 0.05) in PMAI and SDF among different groups, in any of each time-point of the cooling process. In conclusion, centrifugation, even at high speeds, did not affect goat sperm integrity and functionality when submitted to refrigeration process. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-25 2022-04-30T14:24:48Z 2022-04-30T14:24:48Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873 Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, v. 55, n. 3, 2018. 1678-4456 1413-9596 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232842 10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873 2-s2.0-85059283138 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232842 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, v. 55, n. 3, 2018. 1678-4456 1413-9596 10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.145873 2-s2.0-85059283138 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546579020218368 |