“Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Watanabe, Kassia
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Bánkuti, Sandra Schiavi, Lourenzani, Ana Elisa [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169904
Resumo: “Pingado” is a Brazilian beverage similar to cappuccino, macchiato. For a good “pingado”, coffee and milk should be of good quality. The formal institutions ensure the minimum attributes of quality for coffee and for milk in Brazil. However, in order to reach consumer desirable quality attributes for a differentiated “pingado” the transactions between farmers and agroindustry in quality-driven systems is likely to be conducted with hybrid forms. Thus, “Pingado Dilemma” involves the interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming. This paper aims at analyzing the contract farming and the role of public and private institutions in transactions between farmers and agroindustry in Brazilian high-quality dairy and coffee chains. The research design used in this study is a case study based on multiple cases. The results indicate that while in dairy chain the private institutions reinforce public requirements (formal institutions), for the coffee sector, the role of private institutions is to establish and guarantee a new level of quality and differentiation. Interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming.
id UNSP_c0a250122784dc00c9a5d63da1e930b6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169904
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling “Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?CoffeeContract farmingInstitutionsMilk“Pingado” is a Brazilian beverage similar to cappuccino, macchiato. For a good “pingado”, coffee and milk should be of good quality. The formal institutions ensure the minimum attributes of quality for coffee and for milk in Brazil. However, in order to reach consumer desirable quality attributes for a differentiated “pingado” the transactions between farmers and agroindustry in quality-driven systems is likely to be conducted with hybrid forms. Thus, “Pingado Dilemma” involves the interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming. This paper aims at analyzing the contract farming and the role of public and private institutions in transactions between farmers and agroindustry in Brazilian high-quality dairy and coffee chains. The research design used in this study is a case study based on multiple cases. The results indicate that while in dairy chain the private institutions reinforce public requirements (formal institutions), for the coffee sector, the role of private institutions is to establish and guarantee a new level of quality and differentiation. Interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Federal University of Reconcavo da Bahia Center of Biological Environmental and Agrarian Science, Rua Rui Barbosa, 710 - CentroState University of Maringa Department of Administration, Av. Colombo, 5790, Jd. UniversitárioSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Sciences and EngineeringSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Sciences and EngineeringCNPq: 409099/2013-9Environmental and Agrarian ScienceState University of MaringaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Watanabe, KassiaBánkuti, Sandra SchiaviLourenzani, Ana Elisa [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:48:07Z2018-12-11T16:48:07Z2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article126-137application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001Journal of Rural Studies, v. 54, p. 126-137.0743-0167http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16990410.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.0012-s2.0-850220757332-s2.0-85022075733.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Rural Studies1,113info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-18T06:23:42Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169904Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-01-18T06:23:42Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?
title “Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?
spellingShingle “Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?
Watanabe, Kassia
Coffee
Contract farming
Institutions
Milk
title_short “Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?
title_full “Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?
title_fullStr “Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?
title_full_unstemmed “Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?
title_sort “Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?
author Watanabe, Kassia
author_facet Watanabe, Kassia
Bánkuti, Sandra Schiavi
Lourenzani, Ana Elisa [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Bánkuti, Sandra Schiavi
Lourenzani, Ana Elisa [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Environmental and Agrarian Science
State University of Maringa
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Watanabe, Kassia
Bánkuti, Sandra Schiavi
Lourenzani, Ana Elisa [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Coffee
Contract farming
Institutions
Milk
topic Coffee
Contract farming
Institutions
Milk
description “Pingado” is a Brazilian beverage similar to cappuccino, macchiato. For a good “pingado”, coffee and milk should be of good quality. The formal institutions ensure the minimum attributes of quality for coffee and for milk in Brazil. However, in order to reach consumer desirable quality attributes for a differentiated “pingado” the transactions between farmers and agroindustry in quality-driven systems is likely to be conducted with hybrid forms. Thus, “Pingado Dilemma” involves the interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming. This paper aims at analyzing the contract farming and the role of public and private institutions in transactions between farmers and agroindustry in Brazilian high-quality dairy and coffee chains. The research design used in this study is a case study based on multiple cases. The results indicate that while in dairy chain the private institutions reinforce public requirements (formal institutions), for the coffee sector, the role of private institutions is to establish and guarantee a new level of quality and differentiation. Interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
2018-12-11T16:48:07Z
2018-12-11T16:48:07Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001
Journal of Rural Studies, v. 54, p. 126-137.
0743-0167
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169904
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001
2-s2.0-85022075733
2-s2.0-85022075733.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169904
identifier_str_mv Journal of Rural Studies, v. 54, p. 126-137.
0743-0167
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001
2-s2.0-85022075733
2-s2.0-85022075733.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Rural Studies
1,113
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 126-137
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803047362286845952