“Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169904 |
Resumo: | “Pingado” is a Brazilian beverage similar to cappuccino, macchiato. For a good “pingado”, coffee and milk should be of good quality. The formal institutions ensure the minimum attributes of quality for coffee and for milk in Brazil. However, in order to reach consumer desirable quality attributes for a differentiated “pingado” the transactions between farmers and agroindustry in quality-driven systems is likely to be conducted with hybrid forms. Thus, “Pingado Dilemma” involves the interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming. This paper aims at analyzing the contract farming and the role of public and private institutions in transactions between farmers and agroindustry in Brazilian high-quality dairy and coffee chains. The research design used in this study is a case study based on multiple cases. The results indicate that while in dairy chain the private institutions reinforce public requirements (formal institutions), for the coffee sector, the role of private institutions is to establish and guarantee a new level of quality and differentiation. Interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming. |
id |
UNSP_c0a250122784dc00c9a5d63da1e930b6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169904 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
“Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?CoffeeContract farmingInstitutionsMilk“Pingado” is a Brazilian beverage similar to cappuccino, macchiato. For a good “pingado”, coffee and milk should be of good quality. The formal institutions ensure the minimum attributes of quality for coffee and for milk in Brazil. However, in order to reach consumer desirable quality attributes for a differentiated “pingado” the transactions between farmers and agroindustry in quality-driven systems is likely to be conducted with hybrid forms. Thus, “Pingado Dilemma” involves the interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming. This paper aims at analyzing the contract farming and the role of public and private institutions in transactions between farmers and agroindustry in Brazilian high-quality dairy and coffee chains. The research design used in this study is a case study based on multiple cases. The results indicate that while in dairy chain the private institutions reinforce public requirements (formal institutions), for the coffee sector, the role of private institutions is to establish and guarantee a new level of quality and differentiation. Interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Federal University of Reconcavo da Bahia Center of Biological Environmental and Agrarian Science, Rua Rui Barbosa, 710 - CentroState University of Maringa Department of Administration, Av. Colombo, 5790, Jd. UniversitárioSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Sciences and EngineeringSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Sciences and EngineeringCNPq: 409099/2013-9Environmental and Agrarian ScienceState University of MaringaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Watanabe, KassiaBánkuti, Sandra SchiaviLourenzani, Ana Elisa [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:48:07Z2018-12-11T16:48:07Z2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article126-137application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001Journal of Rural Studies, v. 54, p. 126-137.0743-0167http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16990410.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.0012-s2.0-850220757332-s2.0-85022075733.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Rural Studies1,113info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-18T06:23:42Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169904Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:19:05.585231Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough? |
title |
“Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough? |
spellingShingle |
“Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough? Watanabe, Kassia Coffee Contract farming Institutions Milk |
title_short |
“Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough? |
title_full |
“Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough? |
title_fullStr |
“Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough? |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough? |
title_sort |
“Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough? |
author |
Watanabe, Kassia |
author_facet |
Watanabe, Kassia Bánkuti, Sandra Schiavi Lourenzani, Ana Elisa [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bánkuti, Sandra Schiavi Lourenzani, Ana Elisa [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Environmental and Agrarian Science State University of Maringa Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Watanabe, Kassia Bánkuti, Sandra Schiavi Lourenzani, Ana Elisa [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Coffee Contract farming Institutions Milk |
topic |
Coffee Contract farming Institutions Milk |
description |
“Pingado” is a Brazilian beverage similar to cappuccino, macchiato. For a good “pingado”, coffee and milk should be of good quality. The formal institutions ensure the minimum attributes of quality for coffee and for milk in Brazil. However, in order to reach consumer desirable quality attributes for a differentiated “pingado” the transactions between farmers and agroindustry in quality-driven systems is likely to be conducted with hybrid forms. Thus, “Pingado Dilemma” involves the interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming. This paper aims at analyzing the contract farming and the role of public and private institutions in transactions between farmers and agroindustry in Brazilian high-quality dairy and coffee chains. The research design used in this study is a case study based on multiple cases. The results indicate that while in dairy chain the private institutions reinforce public requirements (formal institutions), for the coffee sector, the role of private institutions is to establish and guarantee a new level of quality and differentiation. Interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-01 2018-12-11T16:48:07Z 2018-12-11T16:48:07Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001 Journal of Rural Studies, v. 54, p. 126-137. 0743-0167 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169904 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001 2-s2.0-85022075733 2-s2.0-85022075733.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169904 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Rural Studies, v. 54, p. 126-137. 0743-0167 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001 2-s2.0-85022075733 2-s2.0-85022075733.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Rural Studies 1,113 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
126-137 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129506832023552 |