Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Siqueira, Tadeu [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Saito, Victor S., Bini, Luis M., Melo, Adriano S., Petsch, Danielle K., Landeiro, Victor L., Tolonen, Kimmo T., Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, Jenny, Soininen, Janne, Heino, Jani
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3014
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198867
Resumo: Ecological drift can override the effects of deterministic niche selection on small populations and drive the assembly of some ecological communities. We tested this hypothesis with a unique data set sampled identically in 200 streams in two regions (tropical Brazil and boreal Finland) that differ in macroinvertebrate community size by fivefold. Null models allowed us to estimate the magnitude to which β-diversity deviates from the expectation under a random assembly process while taking differences in richness and relative abundance into account, i.e., β-deviation. We found that both abundance- and incidence-based β-diversity was negatively related to community size only in Brazil. Also, β-diversity of small tropical communities was closer to stochastic expectations compared with β-diversity of large communities. We suggest that ecological drift may drive variation in some small communities by changing the expected outcome of niche selection, increasing the chances of species with low abundance and narrow distribution to occur in some communities. Habitat destruction, overexploitation, pollution, and reductions in connectivity have been reducing the size of biological communities. These environmental pressures might make smaller communities more vulnerable to novel conditions and render community dynamics more unpredictable. Incorporation of community size into ecological models should provide conceptual and applied insights into a better understanding of the processes driving biodiversity.
id UNSP_c589f2d9fa3aac0d4fb87370e5a7d4b4
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198867
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversityaquatic insectscommunity assemblydemographic stochasticitydispersalmetacommunitiesnull modelsβ-diversity deviationEcological drift can override the effects of deterministic niche selection on small populations and drive the assembly of some ecological communities. We tested this hypothesis with a unique data set sampled identically in 200 streams in two regions (tropical Brazil and boreal Finland) that differ in macroinvertebrate community size by fivefold. Null models allowed us to estimate the magnitude to which β-diversity deviates from the expectation under a random assembly process while taking differences in richness and relative abundance into account, i.e., β-deviation. We found that both abundance- and incidence-based β-diversity was negatively related to community size only in Brazil. Also, β-diversity of small tropical communities was closer to stochastic expectations compared with β-diversity of large communities. We suggest that ecological drift may drive variation in some small communities by changing the expected outcome of niche selection, increasing the chances of species with low abundance and narrow distribution to occur in some communities. Habitat destruction, overexploitation, pollution, and reductions in connectivity have been reducing the size of biological communities. These environmental pressures might make smaller communities more vulnerable to novel conditions and render community dynamics more unpredictable. Incorporation of community size into ecological models should provide conceptual and applied insights into a better understanding of the processes driving biodiversity.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Academy of FinlandConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Avenida 24 A 1515Departamento de Ciências Ambientais Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), Rodovia Washington Luis, km 235Departamento de Ecologia ICB Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança s/n, Câmpus SamambaiaDepartamento de Ecologia IB Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves 9500Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Av. Colombo 5790Departamento de Botânica e Ecologia IB Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Bairro Boa EsperançaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35Department of Geosciences and Geography University of Helsinki, PO Box 64WWF Finland, Lintulahdenkatu 10Finnish Environment Institute Freshwater Centre, Paavo Havaksen Tie 3Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Avenida 24 A 1515CAPES: 001FAPESP: 13/50424-1FAPESP: 19/04033-7Academy of Finland: 273557Academy of Finland: 273560CNPq: 304314/2014-5CNPq: 307587/2017-7CNPq: 465610/2014-5Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)Universidade Federal de Mato GrossoUniversity of JyväskyläUniversity of HelsinkiWWF FinlandFreshwater CentreSiqueira, Tadeu [UNESP]Saito, Victor S.Bini, Luis M.Melo, Adriano S.Petsch, Danielle K.Landeiro, Victor L.Tolonen, Kimmo T.Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, JennySoininen, JanneHeino, Jani2020-12-12T01:24:05Z2020-12-12T01:24:05Z2020-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3014Ecology, v. 101, n. 6, 2020.1939-91700012-9658http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19886710.1002/ecy.30142-s2.0-85085097906Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEcologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T20:42:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198867Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-22T20:42:54Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversity
title Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversity
spellingShingle Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversity
Siqueira, Tadeu [UNESP]
aquatic insects
community assembly
demographic stochasticity
dispersal
metacommunities
null models
β-diversity deviation
title_short Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversity
title_full Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversity
title_fullStr Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversity
title_full_unstemmed Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversity
title_sort Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversity
author Siqueira, Tadeu [UNESP]
author_facet Siqueira, Tadeu [UNESP]
Saito, Victor S.
Bini, Luis M.
Melo, Adriano S.
Petsch, Danielle K.
Landeiro, Victor L.
Tolonen, Kimmo T.
Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, Jenny
Soininen, Janne
Heino, Jani
author_role author
author2 Saito, Victor S.
Bini, Luis M.
Melo, Adriano S.
Petsch, Danielle K.
Landeiro, Victor L.
Tolonen, Kimmo T.
Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, Jenny
Soininen, Janne
Heino, Jani
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
University of Jyväskylä
University of Helsinki
WWF Finland
Freshwater Centre
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Siqueira, Tadeu [UNESP]
Saito, Victor S.
Bini, Luis M.
Melo, Adriano S.
Petsch, Danielle K.
Landeiro, Victor L.
Tolonen, Kimmo T.
Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, Jenny
Soininen, Janne
Heino, Jani
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv aquatic insects
community assembly
demographic stochasticity
dispersal
metacommunities
null models
β-diversity deviation
topic aquatic insects
community assembly
demographic stochasticity
dispersal
metacommunities
null models
β-diversity deviation
description Ecological drift can override the effects of deterministic niche selection on small populations and drive the assembly of some ecological communities. We tested this hypothesis with a unique data set sampled identically in 200 streams in two regions (tropical Brazil and boreal Finland) that differ in macroinvertebrate community size by fivefold. Null models allowed us to estimate the magnitude to which β-diversity deviates from the expectation under a random assembly process while taking differences in richness and relative abundance into account, i.e., β-deviation. We found that both abundance- and incidence-based β-diversity was negatively related to community size only in Brazil. Also, β-diversity of small tropical communities was closer to stochastic expectations compared with β-diversity of large communities. We suggest that ecological drift may drive variation in some small communities by changing the expected outcome of niche selection, increasing the chances of species with low abundance and narrow distribution to occur in some communities. Habitat destruction, overexploitation, pollution, and reductions in connectivity have been reducing the size of biological communities. These environmental pressures might make smaller communities more vulnerable to novel conditions and render community dynamics more unpredictable. Incorporation of community size into ecological models should provide conceptual and applied insights into a better understanding of the processes driving biodiversity.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T01:24:05Z
2020-12-12T01:24:05Z
2020-06-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3014
Ecology, v. 101, n. 6, 2020.
1939-9170
0012-9658
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198867
10.1002/ecy.3014
2-s2.0-85085097906
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3014
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198867
identifier_str_mv Ecology, v. 101, n. 6, 2020.
1939-9170
0012-9658
10.1002/ecy.3014
2-s2.0-85085097906
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Ecology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964706793848832