Performance assessment of primary health care facilities in Brazil: Concordance between web-based questionnaire and in-person interviews with health personnel

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nunes, Luceime Olivia
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Castanheira, Elen Rose Lodeiro [UNESP], Sanine, Patricia Rodrigues [UNESP], Akerman, Marco, Nemes, Maria Ines Baptistella
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281085
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/248300
Resumo: This study is a concordance analysis comparing answers to two external assessment tools for Primary Health Care (PHC) facilities that use two different data collection methodologies: (a) external assessment through structured interviews and direct observation of facilities conducted by the National Program for Improvement of Access and Quality of Primary Care (AE-PMAQ-AB), and (b) a computerized web-based self-administered questionnaire for Assessment of the Quality of Primary Health Care Services (QualiAB). The two surveys were answered by 1,898 facilities located in 437 municipalities in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, between 2017 and 2018. Both surveys aimed to assess the management and organization of PHC facilities. A total of 158 equivalent questions were identified. The answers were grouped by thematic similarity into nine domains: Territory characteristics; Local management and external support; Structure; Health promotion, disease prevention, and therapeutic procedures; Attention to unscheduled patients; Women’s health; Children’s health; Attention to chronic conditions; and Oral health. The results show a high level of concordance between the answers, with 81% of the 158 compared questions showing concordance higher than 0.700. We showed that the information obtained by the web-based survey QualiAB was comparable to that of the structured interview-based AE-PMAQ-AB, which is considered the gold standard. This is important because web-based surveys are more practical and convenient, and do not require trained interviewers. Online assessment surveys can allow immediate access to answers, reports and guidelines for each evaluated facility, as provided by the QualiAB system. In this way, the answers to this type of survey can be directly employed by users, allowing the assessment to fulfill all phases of an assessment process.
id UNSP_c62dfe15d363c7e95cf4ccc0c9f73058
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/248300
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Performance assessment of primary health care facilities in Brazil: Concordance between web-based questionnaire and in-person interviews with health personnelThis study is a concordance analysis comparing answers to two external assessment tools for Primary Health Care (PHC) facilities that use two different data collection methodologies: (a) external assessment through structured interviews and direct observation of facilities conducted by the National Program for Improvement of Access and Quality of Primary Care (AE-PMAQ-AB), and (b) a computerized web-based self-administered questionnaire for Assessment of the Quality of Primary Health Care Services (QualiAB). The two surveys were answered by 1,898 facilities located in 437 municipalities in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, between 2017 and 2018. Both surveys aimed to assess the management and organization of PHC facilities. A total of 158 equivalent questions were identified. The answers were grouped by thematic similarity into nine domains: Territory characteristics; Local management and external support; Structure; Health promotion, disease prevention, and therapeutic procedures; Attention to unscheduled patients; Women’s health; Children’s health; Attention to chronic conditions; and Oral health. The results show a high level of concordance between the answers, with 81% of the 158 compared questions showing concordance higher than 0.700. We showed that the information obtained by the web-based survey QualiAB was comparable to that of the structured interview-based AE-PMAQ-AB, which is considered the gold standard. This is important because web-based surveys are more practical and convenient, and do not require trained interviewers. Online assessment surveys can allow immediate access to answers, reports and guidelines for each evaluated facility, as provided by the QualiAB system. In this way, the answers to this type of survey can be directly employed by users, allowing the assessment to fulfill all phases of an assessment process.Departament of Preventive Medicine School of Medicine University of São PauloDepartament of Public Health Medical School - Botucatu São Paulo State UniversityGraduate Program in Public Health Medical School - Botucatu São Paulo State UniversityDepartment of Politics Management and Health School of Public Health University of São PauloDepartament of Public Health Medical School - Botucatu São Paulo State UniversityGraduate Program in Public Health Medical School - Botucatu São Paulo State UniversityUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Nunes, Luceime OliviaCastanheira, Elen Rose Lodeiro [UNESP]Sanine, Patricia Rodrigues [UNESP]Akerman, MarcoNemes, Maria Ines Baptistella2023-07-29T13:40:05Z2023-07-29T13:40:05Z2023-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281085PLoS ONE, v. 18, n. 2 February, 2023.1932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24830010.1371/journal.pone.02810852-s2.0-85147319340Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPLoS ONEinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-29T13:40:05Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/248300Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-07-29T13:40:05Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance assessment of primary health care facilities in Brazil: Concordance between web-based questionnaire and in-person interviews with health personnel
title Performance assessment of primary health care facilities in Brazil: Concordance between web-based questionnaire and in-person interviews with health personnel
spellingShingle Performance assessment of primary health care facilities in Brazil: Concordance between web-based questionnaire and in-person interviews with health personnel
Nunes, Luceime Olivia
title_short Performance assessment of primary health care facilities in Brazil: Concordance between web-based questionnaire and in-person interviews with health personnel
title_full Performance assessment of primary health care facilities in Brazil: Concordance between web-based questionnaire and in-person interviews with health personnel
title_fullStr Performance assessment of primary health care facilities in Brazil: Concordance between web-based questionnaire and in-person interviews with health personnel
title_full_unstemmed Performance assessment of primary health care facilities in Brazil: Concordance between web-based questionnaire and in-person interviews with health personnel
title_sort Performance assessment of primary health care facilities in Brazil: Concordance between web-based questionnaire and in-person interviews with health personnel
author Nunes, Luceime Olivia
author_facet Nunes, Luceime Olivia
Castanheira, Elen Rose Lodeiro [UNESP]
Sanine, Patricia Rodrigues [UNESP]
Akerman, Marco
Nemes, Maria Ines Baptistella
author_role author
author2 Castanheira, Elen Rose Lodeiro [UNESP]
Sanine, Patricia Rodrigues [UNESP]
Akerman, Marco
Nemes, Maria Ines Baptistella
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nunes, Luceime Olivia
Castanheira, Elen Rose Lodeiro [UNESP]
Sanine, Patricia Rodrigues [UNESP]
Akerman, Marco
Nemes, Maria Ines Baptistella
description This study is a concordance analysis comparing answers to two external assessment tools for Primary Health Care (PHC) facilities that use two different data collection methodologies: (a) external assessment through structured interviews and direct observation of facilities conducted by the National Program for Improvement of Access and Quality of Primary Care (AE-PMAQ-AB), and (b) a computerized web-based self-administered questionnaire for Assessment of the Quality of Primary Health Care Services (QualiAB). The two surveys were answered by 1,898 facilities located in 437 municipalities in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, between 2017 and 2018. Both surveys aimed to assess the management and organization of PHC facilities. A total of 158 equivalent questions were identified. The answers were grouped by thematic similarity into nine domains: Territory characteristics; Local management and external support; Structure; Health promotion, disease prevention, and therapeutic procedures; Attention to unscheduled patients; Women’s health; Children’s health; Attention to chronic conditions; and Oral health. The results show a high level of concordance between the answers, with 81% of the 158 compared questions showing concordance higher than 0.700. We showed that the information obtained by the web-based survey QualiAB was comparable to that of the structured interview-based AE-PMAQ-AB, which is considered the gold standard. This is important because web-based surveys are more practical and convenient, and do not require trained interviewers. Online assessment surveys can allow immediate access to answers, reports and guidelines for each evaluated facility, as provided by the QualiAB system. In this way, the answers to this type of survey can be directly employed by users, allowing the assessment to fulfill all phases of an assessment process.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-29T13:40:05Z
2023-07-29T13:40:05Z
2023-02-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281085
PLoS ONE, v. 18, n. 2 February, 2023.
1932-6203
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/248300
10.1371/journal.pone.0281085
2-s2.0-85147319340
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281085
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/248300
identifier_str_mv PLoS ONE, v. 18, n. 2 February, 2023.
1932-6203
10.1371/journal.pone.0281085
2-s2.0-85147319340
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv PLoS ONE
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046497312309248