Effect of two erosive protocols using acidic beverages on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to bovine enamel
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.064-072.oar http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183881 |
Resumo: | AbstractObjective:To assess the short-term effect of two in vitro erosive challenge protocols on the bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets on bovine enamel.Methods: Sixty bovine incisors were selected and randomly divided into six groups: AS7 (artificial saliva - 7 days, Control Group); CC7 (Coca-Cola™ - 7 days); LJ7 (lime juice - 7 days); AS30 (artificial saliva - 30 days, Control Group); CC30 (Coca-Cola™ - 30 days); LJ30 (lime juice - 30 days). Microhardness testing was performed prior to the erosive challenge to verify the standardization of samples. Immersion was performed 4x/day for five minutes, for either 7 or 30 days. After immersions were concluded, the brackets were bonded and shear bond strength was assessed after 48 hours. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was also assessed. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc and Student’s t test for paired samples, and the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test (α = 5%).Results: The mean and standard deviation of microhardness testing of total samples were 281.89 ± 44.51 KHN. There was no statistically significant difference in shear bond strength for the time factor (7 or 30 days; F5.54= 0.105; p = 0.901). However, there was a statistically significant difference for the solution factor (F5.54= 6.671; p = 0.003). These differences occurred among solutions of Saliva x Coca-Cola™ (p = 0.003) and Coca-Cola™ x Lime Juice (p= 0.029). The assessment of the Adhesive Remnant Index showed no significant difference between groups.Conclusions: The immersion time used in the erosion protocols did not affect the bond strength of brackets to teeth. Coca-Cola™ induced significantly higher shear bond strength values than lime juice and artificial saliva. However, the short term effects of 7/30 days in this in vitro study may not be extrapolated for in vivo ones. Clinical studies should be conducted, substantiating the laboratory results. |
id |
UNSP_c6f8e729a79b907267dbc40c9cb57d41 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/183881 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effect of two erosive protocols using acidic beverages on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to bovine enamelErosionOrthodonticsOrthodontic bracketsShear strength.ErosãoOrtodontiaBraquetes ortodônticosResistência ao cisalhamento.AbstractObjective:To assess the short-term effect of two in vitro erosive challenge protocols on the bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets on bovine enamel.Methods: Sixty bovine incisors were selected and randomly divided into six groups: AS7 (artificial saliva - 7 days, Control Group); CC7 (Coca-Cola™ - 7 days); LJ7 (lime juice - 7 days); AS30 (artificial saliva - 30 days, Control Group); CC30 (Coca-Cola™ - 30 days); LJ30 (lime juice - 30 days). Microhardness testing was performed prior to the erosive challenge to verify the standardization of samples. Immersion was performed 4x/day for five minutes, for either 7 or 30 days. After immersions were concluded, the brackets were bonded and shear bond strength was assessed after 48 hours. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was also assessed. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc and Student’s t test for paired samples, and the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test (α = 5%).Results: The mean and standard deviation of microhardness testing of total samples were 281.89 ± 44.51 KHN. There was no statistically significant difference in shear bond strength for the time factor (7 or 30 days; F5.54= 0.105; p = 0.901). However, there was a statistically significant difference for the solution factor (F5.54= 6.671; p = 0.003). These differences occurred among solutions of Saliva x Coca-Cola™ (p = 0.003) and Coca-Cola™ x Lime Juice (p= 0.029). The assessment of the Adhesive Remnant Index showed no significant difference between groups.Conclusions: The immersion time used in the erosion protocols did not affect the bond strength of brackets to teeth. Coca-Cola™ induced significantly higher shear bond strength values than lime juice and artificial saliva. However, the short term effects of 7/30 days in this in vitro study may not be extrapolated for in vivo ones. Clinical studies should be conducted, substantiating the laboratory results.ResumoObjetivo:avaliar o efeito de curto prazo de dois protocolos de desafio erosivo, in vitro, na resistência adesiva de braquetes ortodônticos metálicos em esmalte bovino.Métodos: Sessenta incisivos bovinos foram selecionados e divididos aleatoriamente em seis grupos: SA7 (saliva artificial - 7 dias, Grupo Controle); CC7 (Coca-Cola® - 7 dias); SL7 (suco de limão - 7 dias); SA30 (saliva artificial - 30 dias, Grupo Controle); CC30 (Coca-Cola® - 30 dias); SL30 (suco de limão - 30 dias). Foi realizado o teste de microdureza antes do desafio erosivo, para verificar a padronização das amostras. A imersão foi realizada quatro vezes ao dia, por cinco minutos, durante 7 ou 30 dias. Finalizadas as imersões, os braquetes foram colados e, após 48 horas, foi avaliada a resistência ao cisalhamento. O Índice de Adesivo Remanescente (IAR) também foi avaliado. Para análise dos dados, foram utilizados os testes ANOVA dois fatores, seguido do post-hoc de Tukey e teste t de Student para amostras pareadas, e o teste não-paramétrico de Kruskal-Wallis (α?#8197;= 5%).Resultados: a média e o desvio-padrão do teste de microdureza das amostras totais foi igual a 281,89 ± 44,51 KHN. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa na resistência ao cisalhamento para o fator tempo (7 ou 30 dias; F5,54= 0,105; p= 0,901). Contudo, houve diferença estatisticamente significativa para o fator solução (F5,54=6,671; p= 0,003). Essas diferenças ocorreram entre as soluções de Saliva x Coca-Cola® (p= 0,003) e Coca-Cola® x suco de limão (p= 0,029). Ao avaliar o Índice de Adesivo Remanescente, não foi possível verificar diferença significativa entre os grupos.Conclusões: o tempo de imersão utilizado nos protocolos de erosão não afetou a resistência de união dos braquetes aos dentes. A Coca-Cola® induziu valores de resistência ao cisalhamento significativamente mais altos do que o suco de limão e a saliva artificial. No entanto, os efeitos em curto prazo de 7 e 30 dias, nesse estudo in vitro, não podem ser extrapolados para os estudos in vivo. Estudos clínicos devem ser conduzidos, fundamentando os resultados laboratoriais.Universidade Federal de Sergipe Programa de Pós-graduação em OdontologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia RestauradoraUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia Departamento de Materiais Dentários e PróteseUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Odontologia Departamento de Biomateriais e Biologia OralUniversidade Federal de Sergipe Departamento de OdontologiaUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia Faculdade de OdontologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia RestauradoraUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia Departamento de Materiais Dentários e PróteseDental Press InternationalUniversidade Federal de Sergipe Programa de Pós-graduação em OdontologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Federal de Sergipe Departamento de OdontologiaUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia Faculdade de OdontologiaSantos, Catielma NascimentoMatos, Felipe De SouzaRode, Sigmar De MelloCesar, Paulo FranciscoNahsan, Flávia Pardo SalataParanhos, Luiz Renato2019-10-03T17:32:06Z2019-10-03T17:32:06Z2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article64-72application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.064-072.oarDental Press Journal of Orthodontics. Dental Press International, v. 23, n. 6, p. 64-72, 2018.2176-9451http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18388110.1590/2177-6709.23.6.064-072.oarS2176-94512018000600064S2176-94512018000600064.pdf30009456124403740000-0001-5834-105XSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-11-18T18:51:02Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/183881Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-11-18T18:51:02Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of two erosive protocols using acidic beverages on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to bovine enamel |
title |
Effect of two erosive protocols using acidic beverages on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to bovine enamel |
spellingShingle |
Effect of two erosive protocols using acidic beverages on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to bovine enamel Santos, Catielma Nascimento Erosion Orthodontics Orthodontic brackets Shear strength. Erosão Ortodontia Braquetes ortodônticos Resistência ao cisalhamento. |
title_short |
Effect of two erosive protocols using acidic beverages on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to bovine enamel |
title_full |
Effect of two erosive protocols using acidic beverages on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to bovine enamel |
title_fullStr |
Effect of two erosive protocols using acidic beverages on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to bovine enamel |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of two erosive protocols using acidic beverages on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to bovine enamel |
title_sort |
Effect of two erosive protocols using acidic beverages on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to bovine enamel |
author |
Santos, Catielma Nascimento |
author_facet |
Santos, Catielma Nascimento Matos, Felipe De Souza Rode, Sigmar De Mello Cesar, Paulo Francisco Nahsan, Flávia Pardo Salata Paranhos, Luiz Renato |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Matos, Felipe De Souza Rode, Sigmar De Mello Cesar, Paulo Francisco Nahsan, Flávia Pardo Salata Paranhos, Luiz Renato |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe Programa de Pós-graduação em Odontologia Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Federal de Sergipe Departamento de Odontologia Universidade Federal de Uberlândia Faculdade de Odontologia |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Catielma Nascimento Matos, Felipe De Souza Rode, Sigmar De Mello Cesar, Paulo Francisco Nahsan, Flávia Pardo Salata Paranhos, Luiz Renato |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Erosion Orthodontics Orthodontic brackets Shear strength. Erosão Ortodontia Braquetes ortodônticos Resistência ao cisalhamento. |
topic |
Erosion Orthodontics Orthodontic brackets Shear strength. Erosão Ortodontia Braquetes ortodônticos Resistência ao cisalhamento. |
description |
AbstractObjective:To assess the short-term effect of two in vitro erosive challenge protocols on the bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets on bovine enamel.Methods: Sixty bovine incisors were selected and randomly divided into six groups: AS7 (artificial saliva - 7 days, Control Group); CC7 (Coca-Cola™ - 7 days); LJ7 (lime juice - 7 days); AS30 (artificial saliva - 30 days, Control Group); CC30 (Coca-Cola™ - 30 days); LJ30 (lime juice - 30 days). Microhardness testing was performed prior to the erosive challenge to verify the standardization of samples. Immersion was performed 4x/day for five minutes, for either 7 or 30 days. After immersions were concluded, the brackets were bonded and shear bond strength was assessed after 48 hours. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was also assessed. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc and Student’s t test for paired samples, and the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test (α = 5%).Results: The mean and standard deviation of microhardness testing of total samples were 281.89 ± 44.51 KHN. There was no statistically significant difference in shear bond strength for the time factor (7 or 30 days; F5.54= 0.105; p = 0.901). However, there was a statistically significant difference for the solution factor (F5.54= 6.671; p = 0.003). These differences occurred among solutions of Saliva x Coca-Cola™ (p = 0.003) and Coca-Cola™ x Lime Juice (p= 0.029). The assessment of the Adhesive Remnant Index showed no significant difference between groups.Conclusions: The immersion time used in the erosion protocols did not affect the bond strength of brackets to teeth. Coca-Cola™ induced significantly higher shear bond strength values than lime juice and artificial saliva. However, the short term effects of 7/30 days in this in vitro study may not be extrapolated for in vivo ones. Clinical studies should be conducted, substantiating the laboratory results. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-01 2019-10-03T17:32:06Z 2019-10-03T17:32:06Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.064-072.oar Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. Dental Press International, v. 23, n. 6, p. 64-72, 2018. 2176-9451 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183881 10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.064-072.oar S2176-94512018000600064 S2176-94512018000600064.pdf 3000945612440374 0000-0001-5834-105X |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.064-072.oar http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183881 |
identifier_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. Dental Press International, v. 23, n. 6, p. 64-72, 2018. 2176-9451 10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.064-072.oar S2176-94512018000600064 S2176-94512018000600064.pdf 3000945612440374 0000-0001-5834-105X |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
64-72 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1826303670187196416 |