Repair bond strength of a resin composite to alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Goia, Tamiye Simone [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira [UNESP], Valandro, Luiz Felipe [UNESP], Özcan, Mutlu, Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231796
Resumo: This study compared the microtensile bond strength of a repair resin to an alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic (Vitadur-α, Vita) after 3 surface conditioning methods: Group 1, etching with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid for 1 minute plus rinsing and drying, followed by application of silane for 5 minutes; group 2, airborne particle abrasion with 110-mm aluminum oxide using a chairside air-abrasion device followed by silane application for 5 minutes; group 3, chairside tribochemical silica coating with 30-μm SiOx followed by silane application for 5 minutes (N = 30). Group 1 presented the highest mean bond strength (19.7 ± 3.8 MPa), which was significantly higher than those of groups 2 (10 ± 2.6 MPa) and 3 (10.4 ± 4 MPa) (P < .01). Scanning electron microscope analysis of the failure modes demonstrated predominantly mixed types of failures, with adhesive and/or cohesive failures in all experimental groups.
id UNSP_c86007dfcdbf13976900e23179ee4a91
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231796
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Repair bond strength of a resin composite to alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramicThis study compared the microtensile bond strength of a repair resin to an alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic (Vitadur-α, Vita) after 3 surface conditioning methods: Group 1, etching with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid for 1 minute plus rinsing and drying, followed by application of silane for 5 minutes; group 2, airborne particle abrasion with 110-mm aluminum oxide using a chairside air-abrasion device followed by silane application for 5 minutes; group 3, chairside tribochemical silica coating with 30-μm SiOx followed by silane application for 5 minutes (N = 30). Group 1 presented the highest mean bond strength (19.7 ± 3.8 MPa), which was significantly higher than those of groups 2 (10 ± 2.6 MPa) and 3 (10.4 ± 4 MPa) (P < .01). Scanning electron microscope analysis of the failure modes demonstrated predominantly mixed types of failures, with adhesive and/or cohesive failures in all experimental groups.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Federal University of Santa MariaSão Jose dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, São Jose dos CamposDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Santa MariaDepartment of Dentistry and Dental Hygiene Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Groningen, GroningenDepartment of Dentistry and Dental Hygiene Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV GroningenSão Jose dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, São Jose dos CamposFederal University of Santa MariaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of GroningenGoia, Tamiye Simone [UNESP]Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira [UNESP]Valandro, Luiz Felipe [UNESP]Özcan, MutluBottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]2022-04-29T08:47:27Z2022-04-29T08:47:27Z2006-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article400-402International Journal of Prosthodontics, v. 19, n. 4, p. 400-402, 2006.0893-2174http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2317962-s2.0-33746896602Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Prosthodonticsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-29T08:47:27Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/231796Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:55:40.569374Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Repair bond strength of a resin composite to alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic
title Repair bond strength of a resin composite to alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic
spellingShingle Repair bond strength of a resin composite to alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic
Goia, Tamiye Simone [UNESP]
title_short Repair bond strength of a resin composite to alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic
title_full Repair bond strength of a resin composite to alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic
title_fullStr Repair bond strength of a resin composite to alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic
title_full_unstemmed Repair bond strength of a resin composite to alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic
title_sort Repair bond strength of a resin composite to alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic
author Goia, Tamiye Simone [UNESP]
author_facet Goia, Tamiye Simone [UNESP]
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira [UNESP]
Valandro, Luiz Felipe [UNESP]
Özcan, Mutlu
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira [UNESP]
Valandro, Luiz Felipe [UNESP]
Özcan, Mutlu
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Maria
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
University of Groningen
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Goia, Tamiye Simone [UNESP]
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira [UNESP]
Valandro, Luiz Felipe [UNESP]
Özcan, Mutlu
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
description This study compared the microtensile bond strength of a repair resin to an alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic (Vitadur-α, Vita) after 3 surface conditioning methods: Group 1, etching with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid for 1 minute plus rinsing and drying, followed by application of silane for 5 minutes; group 2, airborne particle abrasion with 110-mm aluminum oxide using a chairside air-abrasion device followed by silane application for 5 minutes; group 3, chairside tribochemical silica coating with 30-μm SiOx followed by silane application for 5 minutes (N = 30). Group 1 presented the highest mean bond strength (19.7 ± 3.8 MPa), which was significantly higher than those of groups 2 (10 ± 2.6 MPa) and 3 (10.4 ± 4 MPa) (P < .01). Scanning electron microscope analysis of the failure modes demonstrated predominantly mixed types of failures, with adhesive and/or cohesive failures in all experimental groups.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-07-01
2022-04-29T08:47:27Z
2022-04-29T08:47:27Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv International Journal of Prosthodontics, v. 19, n. 4, p. 400-402, 2006.
0893-2174
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231796
2-s2.0-33746896602
identifier_str_mv International Journal of Prosthodontics, v. 19, n. 4, p. 400-402, 2006.
0893-2174
2-s2.0-33746896602
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/231796
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Prosthodontics
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 400-402
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129565145432064