Comparison of teicoplanin disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822011000400003 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18110 |
Resumo: | The CLSI M100-S19 document has recommended the disuse of vancomycin disks for staphylococci and informed that studies on the action of teicoplanin in disk-diffusion testing should be performed. We describe the comparison of two methods, disk diffusion and broth microdilution, for determining teicoplanin susceptibility in clinical isolates of staphylococci. Overall results showed an aggregation rate of 96.8%; Staphylococcus aureus showed total agreement while S. epidermidis showed 93.8% of agreement. According to these local results, disk diffusion can still be employed to teicoplanin susceptibility determination for staphylococci in our institution. |
id |
UNSP_c93cb5cc7e9f2915600a76c965ab22ae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/18110 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparison of teicoplanin disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidisTeicoplaninsusceptibility testsS. aureusS. epidermidisThe CLSI M100-S19 document has recommended the disuse of vancomycin disks for staphylococci and informed that studies on the action of teicoplanin in disk-diffusion testing should be performed. We describe the comparison of two methods, disk diffusion and broth microdilution, for determining teicoplanin susceptibility in clinical isolates of staphylococci. Overall results showed an aggregation rate of 96.8%; Staphylococcus aureus showed total agreement while S. epidermidis showed 93.8% of agreement. According to these local results, disk diffusion can still be employed to teicoplanin susceptibility determination for staphylococci in our institution.Universidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual PaulistaSociedade Brasileira de MicrobiologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Camargo, Carlos Henrique [UNESP]Mondelli, Alessandro Lia [UNESP]Villas Bôas, Paulo José Fortes [UNESP]2014-05-20T13:50:42Z2014-05-20T13:50:42Z2011-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1265-1268application/pdfhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822011000400003Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia, v. 42, n. 4, p. 1265-1268, 2011.1517-8382http://hdl.handle.net/11449/1811010.1590/S1517-83822011000400003S1517-83822011000400003WOS:000300430600003S1517-83822011000400003.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Journal of Microbiology1.8100,630info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-14T17:21:50Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/18110Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-14T17:21:50Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of teicoplanin disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis |
title |
Comparison of teicoplanin disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of teicoplanin disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis Camargo, Carlos Henrique [UNESP] Teicoplanin susceptibility tests S. aureus S. epidermidis |
title_short |
Comparison of teicoplanin disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis |
title_full |
Comparison of teicoplanin disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of teicoplanin disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of teicoplanin disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis |
title_sort |
Comparison of teicoplanin disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis |
author |
Camargo, Carlos Henrique [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Camargo, Carlos Henrique [UNESP] Mondelli, Alessandro Lia [UNESP] Villas Bôas, Paulo José Fortes [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mondelli, Alessandro Lia [UNESP] Villas Bôas, Paulo José Fortes [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Camargo, Carlos Henrique [UNESP] Mondelli, Alessandro Lia [UNESP] Villas Bôas, Paulo José Fortes [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Teicoplanin susceptibility tests S. aureus S. epidermidis |
topic |
Teicoplanin susceptibility tests S. aureus S. epidermidis |
description |
The CLSI M100-S19 document has recommended the disuse of vancomycin disks for staphylococci and informed that studies on the action of teicoplanin in disk-diffusion testing should be performed. We describe the comparison of two methods, disk diffusion and broth microdilution, for determining teicoplanin susceptibility in clinical isolates of staphylococci. Overall results showed an aggregation rate of 96.8%; Staphylococcus aureus showed total agreement while S. epidermidis showed 93.8% of agreement. According to these local results, disk diffusion can still be employed to teicoplanin susceptibility determination for staphylococci in our institution. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-12-01 2014-05-20T13:50:42Z 2014-05-20T13:50:42Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822011000400003 Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia, v. 42, n. 4, p. 1265-1268, 2011. 1517-8382 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18110 10.1590/S1517-83822011000400003 S1517-83822011000400003 WOS:000300430600003 S1517-83822011000400003.pdf |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822011000400003 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18110 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia, v. 42, n. 4, p. 1265-1268, 2011. 1517-8382 10.1590/S1517-83822011000400003 S1517-83822011000400003 WOS:000300430600003 S1517-83822011000400003.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 1.810 0,630 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1265-1268 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128102183731200 |