The intravenous glucose tolerance and postprandial glucose tests may present different responses in the evaluation of obese dogs.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brunetto, Márcio Antonio [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Sá, Fabiano César, Nogueira, Sandra Prudente, Gomes, Márcia de Oliveira Sampaio, Pinarel, Amanda Gullo, Jeremias, Juliana Toloi, de Paula, Francisco José Albuquerque, Carciofi, Aulus Cavalieri
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219763
Resumo: The present study compared the intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) and the glucose postprandial response (GPPR) test for the evaluation of glucose metabolism in obese dogs. A total of ten owned obese dogs (body condition score (BCS) of 9; fat mass, 45.7 (sem 1.51) %) were used. These dogs had their weight reduced by 20 % (BCS, 8; fat mass, 33.5 (SEM 1.92) %; P < 0.001), designated as weight-reduced (WR) group. A control group of ten Beagle dogs was also included (BCS, 4.5; fat mass, 18.3 (SEM 1.38) %; P < 0.01). Glucose tolerance was measured by two methods: IVGTT (infusion of 0.5 g of glucose/kg body weight) and GPPR (consumption of cooked rice to achieve 6 g of starch/kg body weight). When using the IVGTT, the area under the curve (AUC) for glucose and maximum glycaemia were higher for obese dogs compared with controls (P < 0.05), with intermediate results for the WR group (P>0.05). Basal insulin, insulin response peak, insulinogenic index and the AUC for insulin increment from 0 to 15 min and from 60 to 120 min were higher for the obese group (P < 0.05), while the WR group and control dogs showed similar results (P>0.05). When using the GPPR test, the AUC for insulin increment from 0 to 120 min was higher for the obese group compared with the control group (P < 0.05) and intermediate for the WR group (P>0.05). However, the AUC for insulin increment from 120 to 360 min was similar between the obese and WR groups (P>0.05), while it was lower for the control group (P < 0.05). The IVGTT showed that the loss of 20 % body weight resulted in an improvement of glucose control with reduced insulin secretion, and these same WR dogs showed higher insulin secretion with values similar to those of obese dogs when the GPPR test was used.
id UNSP_c9dc6345196b836af9f15f60311b8aa1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219763
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling The intravenous glucose tolerance and postprandial glucose tests may present different responses in the evaluation of obese dogs.The present study compared the intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) and the glucose postprandial response (GPPR) test for the evaluation of glucose metabolism in obese dogs. A total of ten owned obese dogs (body condition score (BCS) of 9; fat mass, 45.7 (sem 1.51) %) were used. These dogs had their weight reduced by 20 % (BCS, 8; fat mass, 33.5 (SEM 1.92) %; P < 0.001), designated as weight-reduced (WR) group. A control group of ten Beagle dogs was also included (BCS, 4.5; fat mass, 18.3 (SEM 1.38) %; P < 0.01). Glucose tolerance was measured by two methods: IVGTT (infusion of 0.5 g of glucose/kg body weight) and GPPR (consumption of cooked rice to achieve 6 g of starch/kg body weight). When using the IVGTT, the area under the curve (AUC) for glucose and maximum glycaemia were higher for obese dogs compared with controls (P < 0.05), with intermediate results for the WR group (P>0.05). Basal insulin, insulin response peak, insulinogenic index and the AUC for insulin increment from 0 to 15 min and from 60 to 120 min were higher for the obese group (P < 0.05), while the WR group and control dogs showed similar results (P>0.05). When using the GPPR test, the AUC for insulin increment from 0 to 120 min was higher for the obese group compared with the control group (P < 0.05) and intermediate for the WR group (P>0.05). However, the AUC for insulin increment from 120 to 360 min was similar between the obese and WR groups (P>0.05), while it was lower for the control group (P < 0.05). The IVGTT showed that the loss of 20 % body weight resulted in an improvement of glucose control with reduced insulin secretion, and these same WR dogs showed higher insulin secretion with values similar to those of obese dogs when the GPPR test was used.Veterinary Medicine and Surgery Department College of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University - UNESP Via de Acesso Professor Paulo Donato CastellaneVeterinary Medicine and Surgery Department College of Agrarian and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University - UNESP Via de Acesso Professor Paulo Donato CastellaneUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Brunetto, Márcio Antonio [UNESP]Sá, Fabiano CésarNogueira, Sandra PrudenteGomes, Márcia de Oliveira SampaioPinarel, Amanda GulloJeremias, Juliana Toloide Paula, Francisco José AlbuquerqueCarciofi, Aulus Cavalieri2022-04-28T18:57:21Z2022-04-28T18:57:21Z2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleThe British journal of nutrition, v. 106 Suppl 1.1475-2662http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2197632-s2.0-84856366747Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengThe British journal of nutritioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T18:57:21Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219763Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:19:35.548437Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The intravenous glucose tolerance and postprandial glucose tests may present different responses in the evaluation of obese dogs.
title The intravenous glucose tolerance and postprandial glucose tests may present different responses in the evaluation of obese dogs.
spellingShingle The intravenous glucose tolerance and postprandial glucose tests may present different responses in the evaluation of obese dogs.
Brunetto, Márcio Antonio [UNESP]
title_short The intravenous glucose tolerance and postprandial glucose tests may present different responses in the evaluation of obese dogs.
title_full The intravenous glucose tolerance and postprandial glucose tests may present different responses in the evaluation of obese dogs.
title_fullStr The intravenous glucose tolerance and postprandial glucose tests may present different responses in the evaluation of obese dogs.
title_full_unstemmed The intravenous glucose tolerance and postprandial glucose tests may present different responses in the evaluation of obese dogs.
title_sort The intravenous glucose tolerance and postprandial glucose tests may present different responses in the evaluation of obese dogs.
author Brunetto, Márcio Antonio [UNESP]
author_facet Brunetto, Márcio Antonio [UNESP]
Sá, Fabiano César
Nogueira, Sandra Prudente
Gomes, Márcia de Oliveira Sampaio
Pinarel, Amanda Gullo
Jeremias, Juliana Toloi
de Paula, Francisco José Albuquerque
Carciofi, Aulus Cavalieri
author_role author
author2 Sá, Fabiano César
Nogueira, Sandra Prudente
Gomes, Márcia de Oliveira Sampaio
Pinarel, Amanda Gullo
Jeremias, Juliana Toloi
de Paula, Francisco José Albuquerque
Carciofi, Aulus Cavalieri
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brunetto, Márcio Antonio [UNESP]
Sá, Fabiano César
Nogueira, Sandra Prudente
Gomes, Márcia de Oliveira Sampaio
Pinarel, Amanda Gullo
Jeremias, Juliana Toloi
de Paula, Francisco José Albuquerque
Carciofi, Aulus Cavalieri
description The present study compared the intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) and the glucose postprandial response (GPPR) test for the evaluation of glucose metabolism in obese dogs. A total of ten owned obese dogs (body condition score (BCS) of 9; fat mass, 45.7 (sem 1.51) %) were used. These dogs had their weight reduced by 20 % (BCS, 8; fat mass, 33.5 (SEM 1.92) %; P < 0.001), designated as weight-reduced (WR) group. A control group of ten Beagle dogs was also included (BCS, 4.5; fat mass, 18.3 (SEM 1.38) %; P < 0.01). Glucose tolerance was measured by two methods: IVGTT (infusion of 0.5 g of glucose/kg body weight) and GPPR (consumption of cooked rice to achieve 6 g of starch/kg body weight). When using the IVGTT, the area under the curve (AUC) for glucose and maximum glycaemia were higher for obese dogs compared with controls (P < 0.05), with intermediate results for the WR group (P>0.05). Basal insulin, insulin response peak, insulinogenic index and the AUC for insulin increment from 0 to 15 min and from 60 to 120 min were higher for the obese group (P < 0.05), while the WR group and control dogs showed similar results (P>0.05). When using the GPPR test, the AUC for insulin increment from 0 to 120 min was higher for the obese group compared with the control group (P < 0.05) and intermediate for the WR group (P>0.05). However, the AUC for insulin increment from 120 to 360 min was similar between the obese and WR groups (P>0.05), while it was lower for the control group (P < 0.05). The IVGTT showed that the loss of 20 % body weight resulted in an improvement of glucose control with reduced insulin secretion, and these same WR dogs showed higher insulin secretion with values similar to those of obese dogs when the GPPR test was used.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
2022-04-28T18:57:21Z
2022-04-28T18:57:21Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv The British journal of nutrition, v. 106 Suppl 1.
1475-2662
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219763
2-s2.0-84856366747
identifier_str_mv The British journal of nutrition, v. 106 Suppl 1.
1475-2662
2-s2.0-84856366747
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219763
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv The British journal of nutrition
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128790558146560