Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172471 |
Resumo: | Photoelastic analysis was used to evaluate the biomechanical behaviour of implant-supported, double-screwed crowns with different connection systems and cantilever lengths. Three models were made in PL-2 photoelastic resin and divided into six groups, on the basis of the implant connection system (external hexagon [EH] or Morse taper [MT]), type of abutment (Mini Pilar [Neodent, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil] or UCLA) and number of crowns in the cantilever (one or two). The implant-prosthesis unit was placed in a circular polariscope. Occlusal surfaces of the crowns were subjected to 100-N loads in the axial and oblique (45°) directions in a universal testing machine (EMIC). Generated stresses were recorded and analysed qualitatively in a graphics program (Adobe Photoshop). Under axial loading, all of the groups had similar numbers of fringes, which were increased when the crowns were subjected to oblique loading. The highest number of fringes was found during oblique loading in the EH + Mini Pilar group. In conclusion, although the type of implant connection system did not have a direct influence on the stress distribution for axial loading, the cantilever length did have a direct influence on stress distribution. Models with two crowns in the cantilever showed more stress, with a greater concentration of force on the cervical part of the implant. |
id |
UNSP_ca2b23b4f6d1ec90e8b958332aad18c6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172471 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticitybiomechanicsdental implantDigital photoelasticityimage analysisPhotoelastic analysis was used to evaluate the biomechanical behaviour of implant-supported, double-screwed crowns with different connection systems and cantilever lengths. Three models were made in PL-2 photoelastic resin and divided into six groups, on the basis of the implant connection system (external hexagon [EH] or Morse taper [MT]), type of abutment (Mini Pilar [Neodent, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil] or UCLA) and number of crowns in the cantilever (one or two). The implant-prosthesis unit was placed in a circular polariscope. Occlusal surfaces of the crowns were subjected to 100-N loads in the axial and oblique (45°) directions in a universal testing machine (EMIC). Generated stresses were recorded and analysed qualitatively in a graphics program (Adobe Photoshop). Under axial loading, all of the groups had similar numbers of fringes, which were increased when the crowns were subjected to oblique loading. The highest number of fringes was found during oblique loading in the EH + Mini Pilar group. In conclusion, although the type of implant connection system did not have a direct influence on the stress distribution for axial loading, the cantilever length did have a direct influence on stress distribution. Models with two crowns in the cantilever showed more stress, with a greater concentration of force on the cervical part of the implant.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracątuba Dental School UNESPDepartment of Mechanical Projects Federal University of UberlândiaDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracątuba Dental School UNESPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]Shibayama, Ricardo [UNESP]Filho, Humberto Gennari [UNESP]De Medeiros, Rodrigo Antonio [UNESP]Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP]Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]De Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral2018-12-11T17:00:32Z2018-12-11T17:00:32Z2016-02-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article35-42http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, v. 40, n. 2, p. 35-42, 2016.1464-522X0309-1902http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17247110.3109/03091902.2015.11274402-s2.0-849556766259719883814872582Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Medical Engineering and Technology0,389info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T14:51:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172471Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T14:51:49Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity |
title |
Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity |
spellingShingle |
Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP] biomechanics dental implant Digital photoelasticity image analysis |
title_short |
Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity |
title_full |
Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity |
title_fullStr |
Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity |
title_sort |
Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity |
author |
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP] Shibayama, Ricardo [UNESP] Filho, Humberto Gennari [UNESP] De Medeiros, Rodrigo Antonio [UNESP] Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP] Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP] De Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Shibayama, Ricardo [UNESP] Filho, Humberto Gennari [UNESP] De Medeiros, Rodrigo Antonio [UNESP] Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP] Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP] De Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP] Shibayama, Ricardo [UNESP] Filho, Humberto Gennari [UNESP] De Medeiros, Rodrigo Antonio [UNESP] Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP] Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP] De Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
biomechanics dental implant Digital photoelasticity image analysis |
topic |
biomechanics dental implant Digital photoelasticity image analysis |
description |
Photoelastic analysis was used to evaluate the biomechanical behaviour of implant-supported, double-screwed crowns with different connection systems and cantilever lengths. Three models were made in PL-2 photoelastic resin and divided into six groups, on the basis of the implant connection system (external hexagon [EH] or Morse taper [MT]), type of abutment (Mini Pilar [Neodent, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil] or UCLA) and number of crowns in the cantilever (one or two). The implant-prosthesis unit was placed in a circular polariscope. Occlusal surfaces of the crowns were subjected to 100-N loads in the axial and oblique (45°) directions in a universal testing machine (EMIC). Generated stresses were recorded and analysed qualitatively in a graphics program (Adobe Photoshop). Under axial loading, all of the groups had similar numbers of fringes, which were increased when the crowns were subjected to oblique loading. The highest number of fringes was found during oblique loading in the EH + Mini Pilar group. In conclusion, although the type of implant connection system did not have a direct influence on the stress distribution for axial loading, the cantilever length did have a direct influence on stress distribution. Models with two crowns in the cantilever showed more stress, with a greater concentration of force on the cervical part of the implant. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-02-17 2018-12-11T17:00:32Z 2018-12-11T17:00:32Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440 Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, v. 40, n. 2, p. 35-42, 2016. 1464-522X 0309-1902 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172471 10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440 2-s2.0-84955676625 9719883814872582 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172471 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, v. 40, n. 2, p. 35-42, 2016. 1464-522X 0309-1902 10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440 2-s2.0-84955676625 9719883814872582 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology 0,389 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
35-42 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546474121723904 |