Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Shibayama, Ricardo [UNESP], Filho, Humberto Gennari [UNESP], De Medeiros, Rodrigo Antonio [UNESP], Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP], Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP], De Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172471
Resumo: Photoelastic analysis was used to evaluate the biomechanical behaviour of implant-supported, double-screwed crowns with different connection systems and cantilever lengths. Three models were made in PL-2 photoelastic resin and divided into six groups, on the basis of the implant connection system (external hexagon [EH] or Morse taper [MT]), type of abutment (Mini Pilar [Neodent, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil] or UCLA) and number of crowns in the cantilever (one or two). The implant-prosthesis unit was placed in a circular polariscope. Occlusal surfaces of the crowns were subjected to 100-N loads in the axial and oblique (45°) directions in a universal testing machine (EMIC). Generated stresses were recorded and analysed qualitatively in a graphics program (Adobe Photoshop). Under axial loading, all of the groups had similar numbers of fringes, which were increased when the crowns were subjected to oblique loading. The highest number of fringes was found during oblique loading in the EH + Mini Pilar group. In conclusion, although the type of implant connection system did not have a direct influence on the stress distribution for axial loading, the cantilever length did have a direct influence on stress distribution. Models with two crowns in the cantilever showed more stress, with a greater concentration of force on the cervical part of the implant.
id UNSP_ca2b23b4f6d1ec90e8b958332aad18c6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172471
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticitybiomechanicsdental implantDigital photoelasticityimage analysisPhotoelastic analysis was used to evaluate the biomechanical behaviour of implant-supported, double-screwed crowns with different connection systems and cantilever lengths. Three models were made in PL-2 photoelastic resin and divided into six groups, on the basis of the implant connection system (external hexagon [EH] or Morse taper [MT]), type of abutment (Mini Pilar [Neodent, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil] or UCLA) and number of crowns in the cantilever (one or two). The implant-prosthesis unit was placed in a circular polariscope. Occlusal surfaces of the crowns were subjected to 100-N loads in the axial and oblique (45°) directions in a universal testing machine (EMIC). Generated stresses were recorded and analysed qualitatively in a graphics program (Adobe Photoshop). Under axial loading, all of the groups had similar numbers of fringes, which were increased when the crowns were subjected to oblique loading. The highest number of fringes was found during oblique loading in the EH + Mini Pilar group. In conclusion, although the type of implant connection system did not have a direct influence on the stress distribution for axial loading, the cantilever length did have a direct influence on stress distribution. Models with two crowns in the cantilever showed more stress, with a greater concentration of force on the cervical part of the implant.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracątuba Dental School UNESPDepartment of Mechanical Projects Federal University of UberlândiaDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracątuba Dental School UNESPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]Shibayama, Ricardo [UNESP]Filho, Humberto Gennari [UNESP]De Medeiros, Rodrigo Antonio [UNESP]Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP]Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]De Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral2018-12-11T17:00:32Z2018-12-11T17:00:32Z2016-02-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article35-42http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, v. 40, n. 2, p. 35-42, 2016.1464-522X0309-1902http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17247110.3109/03091902.2015.11274402-s2.0-849556766259719883814872582Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Medical Engineering and Technology0,389info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T14:51:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172471Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T14:51:49Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity
title Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity
spellingShingle Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
biomechanics
dental implant
Digital photoelasticity
image analysis
title_short Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity
title_full Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity
title_fullStr Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity
title_full_unstemmed Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity
title_sort Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity
author Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
author_facet Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
Shibayama, Ricardo [UNESP]
Filho, Humberto Gennari [UNESP]
De Medeiros, Rodrigo Antonio [UNESP]
Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP]
Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
De Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral
author_role author
author2 Shibayama, Ricardo [UNESP]
Filho, Humberto Gennari [UNESP]
De Medeiros, Rodrigo Antonio [UNESP]
Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP]
Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
De Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
Shibayama, Ricardo [UNESP]
Filho, Humberto Gennari [UNESP]
De Medeiros, Rodrigo Antonio [UNESP]
Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP]
Dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
De Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv biomechanics
dental implant
Digital photoelasticity
image analysis
topic biomechanics
dental implant
Digital photoelasticity
image analysis
description Photoelastic analysis was used to evaluate the biomechanical behaviour of implant-supported, double-screwed crowns with different connection systems and cantilever lengths. Three models were made in PL-2 photoelastic resin and divided into six groups, on the basis of the implant connection system (external hexagon [EH] or Morse taper [MT]), type of abutment (Mini Pilar [Neodent, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil] or UCLA) and number of crowns in the cantilever (one or two). The implant-prosthesis unit was placed in a circular polariscope. Occlusal surfaces of the crowns were subjected to 100-N loads in the axial and oblique (45°) directions in a universal testing machine (EMIC). Generated stresses were recorded and analysed qualitatively in a graphics program (Adobe Photoshop). Under axial loading, all of the groups had similar numbers of fringes, which were increased when the crowns were subjected to oblique loading. The highest number of fringes was found during oblique loading in the EH + Mini Pilar group. In conclusion, although the type of implant connection system did not have a direct influence on the stress distribution for axial loading, the cantilever length did have a direct influence on stress distribution. Models with two crowns in the cantilever showed more stress, with a greater concentration of force on the cervical part of the implant.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-17
2018-12-11T17:00:32Z
2018-12-11T17:00:32Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, v. 40, n. 2, p. 35-42, 2016.
1464-522X
0309-1902
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172471
10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440
2-s2.0-84955676625
9719883814872582
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172471
identifier_str_mv Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, v. 40, n. 2, p. 35-42, 2016.
1464-522X
0309-1902
10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440
2-s2.0-84955676625
9719883814872582
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology
0,389
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 35-42
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546474121723904