Spray deposition at two growth stages of cattail

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, João R.V.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Da Silva, Antonio C. [UNESP], Pereira, Maria R.R., Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n1p194-205/2016
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177946
Resumo: Surfactant use in spray solutions has a major advantage of reducing droplet surface tension and increasing deposition. We aimed to evaluate droplet deposition on cattail plants (Typha subulata) using food coloring (Brilliant Blue - FD & C-1) as marker added to spray solution at two different growth stages: vegetative (4 leaves) and flowering (5 leaves). The treatments were arranged in a completely randomized design with four replications and five plants per plot (16.2-L tanks). Treatments consisted of adding into spray solutions Brilliant Blue alone (control), Brilliant Blue + 0.5% v/v Aterbane and Brilliant Blue + 0.01% v/v Silwet. Spraying was performed by a pressurized CO2 sprayer at 220 kPa using two Teejet XR 8002 nozzles at a spray volume of 200 L ha-1. We observed that surfactant addition provided uniform deposition of spray solution on T. subulata plants at both growth stages compared to treatments without surfactant. However, this product has not increased spray deposits on cattail leaves at both stages.
id UNSP_caaef1676d9229066a9e3aada1ca472c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/177946
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Spray deposition at two growth stages of cattailAterbaneDropletSilwetSurfactantTypha subulataSurfactant use in spray solutions has a major advantage of reducing droplet surface tension and increasing deposition. We aimed to evaluate droplet deposition on cattail plants (Typha subulata) using food coloring (Brilliant Blue - FD & C-1) as marker added to spray solution at two different growth stages: vegetative (4 leaves) and flowering (5 leaves). The treatments were arranged in a completely randomized design with four replications and five plants per plot (16.2-L tanks). Treatments consisted of adding into spray solutions Brilliant Blue alone (control), Brilliant Blue + 0.5% v/v Aterbane and Brilliant Blue + 0.01% v/v Silwet. Spraying was performed by a pressurized CO2 sprayer at 220 kPa using two Teejet XR 8002 nozzles at a spray volume of 200 L ha-1. We observed that surfactant addition provided uniform deposition of spray solution on T. subulata plants at both growth stages compared to treatments without surfactant. However, this product has not increased spray deposits on cattail leaves at both stages.Syngenta SeedsDepartamento de Produção Vegetal UNESPDepartamento de Silvicultura FATECDepartamento de Produção Vegetal UNESPSyngenta SeedsUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)FATECSilva, João R.V.Da Silva, Antonio C. [UNESP]Pereira, Maria R.R.Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:27:49Z2018-12-11T17:27:49Z2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article194-205application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n1p194-205/2016Engenharia Agricola, v. 36, n. 1, p. 194-205, 2016.1808-43890100-6916http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17794610.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n1p194-205/2016S0100-691620160001001942-s2.0-84963516703S0100-69162016000100194.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEngenharia Agricola0,305info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:53:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/177946Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-04-30T15:53:30Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Spray deposition at two growth stages of cattail
title Spray deposition at two growth stages of cattail
spellingShingle Spray deposition at two growth stages of cattail
Silva, João R.V.
Aterbane
Droplet
Silwet
Surfactant
Typha subulata
title_short Spray deposition at two growth stages of cattail
title_full Spray deposition at two growth stages of cattail
title_fullStr Spray deposition at two growth stages of cattail
title_full_unstemmed Spray deposition at two growth stages of cattail
title_sort Spray deposition at two growth stages of cattail
author Silva, João R.V.
author_facet Silva, João R.V.
Da Silva, Antonio C. [UNESP]
Pereira, Maria R.R.
Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Da Silva, Antonio C. [UNESP]
Pereira, Maria R.R.
Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Syngenta Seeds
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
FATEC
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, João R.V.
Da Silva, Antonio C. [UNESP]
Pereira, Maria R.R.
Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aterbane
Droplet
Silwet
Surfactant
Typha subulata
topic Aterbane
Droplet
Silwet
Surfactant
Typha subulata
description Surfactant use in spray solutions has a major advantage of reducing droplet surface tension and increasing deposition. We aimed to evaluate droplet deposition on cattail plants (Typha subulata) using food coloring (Brilliant Blue - FD & C-1) as marker added to spray solution at two different growth stages: vegetative (4 leaves) and flowering (5 leaves). The treatments were arranged in a completely randomized design with four replications and five plants per plot (16.2-L tanks). Treatments consisted of adding into spray solutions Brilliant Blue alone (control), Brilliant Blue + 0.5% v/v Aterbane and Brilliant Blue + 0.01% v/v Silwet. Spraying was performed by a pressurized CO2 sprayer at 220 kPa using two Teejet XR 8002 nozzles at a spray volume of 200 L ha-1. We observed that surfactant addition provided uniform deposition of spray solution on T. subulata plants at both growth stages compared to treatments without surfactant. However, this product has not increased spray deposits on cattail leaves at both stages.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01
2018-12-11T17:27:49Z
2018-12-11T17:27:49Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n1p194-205/2016
Engenharia Agricola, v. 36, n. 1, p. 194-205, 2016.
1808-4389
0100-6916
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177946
10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n1p194-205/2016
S0100-69162016000100194
2-s2.0-84963516703
S0100-69162016000100194.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n1p194-205/2016
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177946
identifier_str_mv Engenharia Agricola, v. 36, n. 1, p. 194-205, 2016.
1808-4389
0100-6916
10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n1p194-205/2016
S0100-69162016000100194
2-s2.0-84963516703
S0100-69162016000100194.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agricola
0,305
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 194-205
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1826303472074489856