Capsicum-Colletotrichum interaction: Identification of resistance sources and quantification of secondary metabolites in unripe and ripe fruits in response to anthracnose infection
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.011 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184296 |
Resumo: | Anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichium species complex, is one of the main fungal diseases in pepper (Capsicum spp.) crops, resulting in extensive fruit losses during pre- and post-harvesting. Plants have structural and biochemical defense mechanisms produced before and/or after the pathogen attack. Biochemical defense involve the production of compounds that accumulate at the site of infection and are toxic to the pathogen. However, the accumulation and biosynthesis of these compounds during Capsicum-Colletotrichum interaction, especially during fruit development stages remain poorly understood. In order to identify potential resistant genotypes and to improve our knowledge about the metabolites produced by pepper fruits against fungus infection, we inoculated unripe and ripe fruits of 59 accessions of Capsicum spp. with C. gloeosporioides and analyzed the disease severity during 8 days after inoculation. In this study, we observed a wide variability of fungus resistance response in unripe and ripe fruits of Capsicum spp. accessions, and ripe fruits presented greater resistance to anthracnose than unripe. Six accessions (GBUEL06, GBUEL28, GBUEL73, GBUEL87, GBUEL104 and GBUEL106) were considered as resistant for both fruits development stages and have potential to be used in future breeding programs. In addition, we selected two C. annuum accessions GBUEL103 (susceptible) and GBUEL104 (resistant), to describe the histological aspects of C. gloeosporioides infection in pepper fruits, followed by the quantification of secondary metabolites produced during this plant-pathogen interaction, using light microscopy and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC), respectively. The quantification of secondary metabolites produced in pepper fruits during fungus infection showed different values according genotype characteristic (susceptible or resistant), fruit development stages (unripe and ripe) and time (1st and 8th day post-inoculation). Interestingly, high concentrations of caffeic and chlorogenic acid were quantified in unripe and ripe fruits characterized as resistant genotype, showing that these biochemical compounds are putatively involved in fruit defense mechanism in response to anthracnose disease. |
id |
UNSP_cca49224e85fed749a276ca75642544f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184296 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Capsicum-Colletotrichum interaction: Identification of resistance sources and quantification of secondary metabolites in unripe and ripe fruits in response to anthracnose infectionPeppersColletotrichum gloeosporioidesFruit ripeningDefense mechanismsPhenolic compoundsAnthracnose, caused by Colletotrichium species complex, is one of the main fungal diseases in pepper (Capsicum spp.) crops, resulting in extensive fruit losses during pre- and post-harvesting. Plants have structural and biochemical defense mechanisms produced before and/or after the pathogen attack. Biochemical defense involve the production of compounds that accumulate at the site of infection and are toxic to the pathogen. However, the accumulation and biosynthesis of these compounds during Capsicum-Colletotrichum interaction, especially during fruit development stages remain poorly understood. In order to identify potential resistant genotypes and to improve our knowledge about the metabolites produced by pepper fruits against fungus infection, we inoculated unripe and ripe fruits of 59 accessions of Capsicum spp. with C. gloeosporioides and analyzed the disease severity during 8 days after inoculation. In this study, we observed a wide variability of fungus resistance response in unripe and ripe fruits of Capsicum spp. accessions, and ripe fruits presented greater resistance to anthracnose than unripe. Six accessions (GBUEL06, GBUEL28, GBUEL73, GBUEL87, GBUEL104 and GBUEL106) were considered as resistant for both fruits development stages and have potential to be used in future breeding programs. In addition, we selected two C. annuum accessions GBUEL103 (susceptible) and GBUEL104 (resistant), to describe the histological aspects of C. gloeosporioides infection in pepper fruits, followed by the quantification of secondary metabolites produced during this plant-pathogen interaction, using light microscopy and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC), respectively. The quantification of secondary metabolites produced in pepper fruits during fungus infection showed different values according genotype characteristic (susceptible or resistant), fruit development stages (unripe and ripe) and time (1st and 8th day post-inoculation). Interestingly, high concentrations of caffeic and chlorogenic acid were quantified in unripe and ripe fruits characterized as resistant genotype, showing that these biochemical compounds are putatively involved in fruit defense mechanism in response to anthracnose disease.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Univ Estadual Londrina, Dept Agron, Ecophysiol & Agr Biotechnol Lab, Londrina, Parana, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Plants Genome & Transcriptome Lab, Biosci Inst, Rio Claro, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Londrina, Dept Chem, Dev Instrumentat & Analyt Automat Lab, Londrina, Para, BrazilUniv Estadual Norte Fluminense, Genet & Plant Breeding Lab, Campos Dos Goytacazes, RJ, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Plants Genome & Transcriptome Lab, Biosci Inst, Rio Claro, SP, BrazilElsevier B.V.Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Univ Estadual Norte FluminenseBaba, Viviane YumiConstantino, Leonel ViniciusIvamoto, Suzana Tiemi [UNESP]Paladini Moreira, Aline FabianaMadeira, Tiago BervelieriNixdorf, Suzana LucyRodrigues, RosanaAzeredo Goncalves, Leandro Simoes2019-10-04T11:56:29Z2019-10-04T11:56:29Z2019-02-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article469-477http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.011Scientia Horticulturae. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 246, p. 469-477, 2019.0304-4238http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18429610.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.011WOS:000456762700055Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengScientia Horticulturaeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T16:30:48Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184296Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:39:48.913407Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Capsicum-Colletotrichum interaction: Identification of resistance sources and quantification of secondary metabolites in unripe and ripe fruits in response to anthracnose infection |
title |
Capsicum-Colletotrichum interaction: Identification of resistance sources and quantification of secondary metabolites in unripe and ripe fruits in response to anthracnose infection |
spellingShingle |
Capsicum-Colletotrichum interaction: Identification of resistance sources and quantification of secondary metabolites in unripe and ripe fruits in response to anthracnose infection Baba, Viviane Yumi Peppers Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Fruit ripening Defense mechanisms Phenolic compounds |
title_short |
Capsicum-Colletotrichum interaction: Identification of resistance sources and quantification of secondary metabolites in unripe and ripe fruits in response to anthracnose infection |
title_full |
Capsicum-Colletotrichum interaction: Identification of resistance sources and quantification of secondary metabolites in unripe and ripe fruits in response to anthracnose infection |
title_fullStr |
Capsicum-Colletotrichum interaction: Identification of resistance sources and quantification of secondary metabolites in unripe and ripe fruits in response to anthracnose infection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Capsicum-Colletotrichum interaction: Identification of resistance sources and quantification of secondary metabolites in unripe and ripe fruits in response to anthracnose infection |
title_sort |
Capsicum-Colletotrichum interaction: Identification of resistance sources and quantification of secondary metabolites in unripe and ripe fruits in response to anthracnose infection |
author |
Baba, Viviane Yumi |
author_facet |
Baba, Viviane Yumi Constantino, Leonel Vinicius Ivamoto, Suzana Tiemi [UNESP] Paladini Moreira, Aline Fabiana Madeira, Tiago Bervelieri Nixdorf, Suzana Lucy Rodrigues, Rosana Azeredo Goncalves, Leandro Simoes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Constantino, Leonel Vinicius Ivamoto, Suzana Tiemi [UNESP] Paladini Moreira, Aline Fabiana Madeira, Tiago Bervelieri Nixdorf, Suzana Lucy Rodrigues, Rosana Azeredo Goncalves, Leandro Simoes |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Univ Estadual Norte Fluminense |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Baba, Viviane Yumi Constantino, Leonel Vinicius Ivamoto, Suzana Tiemi [UNESP] Paladini Moreira, Aline Fabiana Madeira, Tiago Bervelieri Nixdorf, Suzana Lucy Rodrigues, Rosana Azeredo Goncalves, Leandro Simoes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Peppers Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Fruit ripening Defense mechanisms Phenolic compounds |
topic |
Peppers Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Fruit ripening Defense mechanisms Phenolic compounds |
description |
Anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichium species complex, is one of the main fungal diseases in pepper (Capsicum spp.) crops, resulting in extensive fruit losses during pre- and post-harvesting. Plants have structural and biochemical defense mechanisms produced before and/or after the pathogen attack. Biochemical defense involve the production of compounds that accumulate at the site of infection and are toxic to the pathogen. However, the accumulation and biosynthesis of these compounds during Capsicum-Colletotrichum interaction, especially during fruit development stages remain poorly understood. In order to identify potential resistant genotypes and to improve our knowledge about the metabolites produced by pepper fruits against fungus infection, we inoculated unripe and ripe fruits of 59 accessions of Capsicum spp. with C. gloeosporioides and analyzed the disease severity during 8 days after inoculation. In this study, we observed a wide variability of fungus resistance response in unripe and ripe fruits of Capsicum spp. accessions, and ripe fruits presented greater resistance to anthracnose than unripe. Six accessions (GBUEL06, GBUEL28, GBUEL73, GBUEL87, GBUEL104 and GBUEL106) were considered as resistant for both fruits development stages and have potential to be used in future breeding programs. In addition, we selected two C. annuum accessions GBUEL103 (susceptible) and GBUEL104 (resistant), to describe the histological aspects of C. gloeosporioides infection in pepper fruits, followed by the quantification of secondary metabolites produced during this plant-pathogen interaction, using light microscopy and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC), respectively. The quantification of secondary metabolites produced in pepper fruits during fungus infection showed different values according genotype characteristic (susceptible or resistant), fruit development stages (unripe and ripe) and time (1st and 8th day post-inoculation). Interestingly, high concentrations of caffeic and chlorogenic acid were quantified in unripe and ripe fruits characterized as resistant genotype, showing that these biochemical compounds are putatively involved in fruit defense mechanism in response to anthracnose disease. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-04T11:56:29Z 2019-10-04T11:56:29Z 2019-02-27 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.011 Scientia Horticulturae. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 246, p. 469-477, 2019. 0304-4238 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184296 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.011 WOS:000456762700055 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.011 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184296 |
identifier_str_mv |
Scientia Horticulturae. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 246, p. 469-477, 2019. 0304-4238 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.011 WOS:000456762700055 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Horticulturae |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
469-477 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129540490264576 |